Guidance · RBNZ · 29 Apr 2024
Issued by New Zealand AML/CFT supervisors in April 2024, this guideline mandates that reporting entities conduct customer due diligence on limited partnerships under the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009. It requires entities to identify and verify beneficial owners, assess risks associated with nominee general partners, and obtain specific legal and ownership structure information effective from June 2024. The document further outlines conditions for enhanced due diligence and verification procedures for persons acting on behalf of these partnerships.
1
AML/CFT
Anti-money laundering and countering financing of terrorism Customer Due Diligence: Limited Partnerships Guideline This guideline should be read together with the Beneficial Ownership and Enhanced Customer Due Diligence guidelines. April 2024
2
Introduction
3
10.The CDD process you follow (standard or enhanced) for limited partnerships is determined by the level of risk posed by your customer. Characteristics of limited partnerships
11. A limited partnership is a separate legal person and has two types of partners: limited
and general partners. Limited and general partners have different functions and legal liability.
12. Being a limited partner in a limited partnership is somewhat like being a shareholder
in a company in that limited partners are only liable to the extent of their financial contribution to the partnership. They also have restrictions on involvement in management and the activities that they can undertake within the partnership. In New Zealand, a limited partner must not take part in the management of the limited partnership. If a limited partner does so, they are liable to the same extent as a general partner at the time the debt or liability was incurred.3 13.In New Zealand, a general partner is responsible for the management of the limited partnership and may, but does not have to, make a capital contribution to the limited partnership. 14.The relationship between the general partners and limited partners can vary and will depend upon the terms of the governing document between them.
15. An important consideration about the ML/TF risks relating to New Zealand limited
partnerships is that a limited partner’s details are not publicly available on the Limited Partnerships Register (unlike companies for example where there are publicly available records of directors and shareholders). Only the general partners’ details are publicly available on the Limited Partnerships Register. This characteristic of limited partnerships increases their inherent ML/TF risk profile. Customers Standard CDD 16.When standard CDD applies, you need to obtain the following identity information about a limited partnership:
4
18.You also need to obtain information on the nature and purpose of the proposed business relationship between you and the limited partnership, and sufficient information to determine whether the limited partnership should be subject to enhanced CDD. 6 Any beneficial owner of a limited partnership 19.If you want to do business with a customer that is a limited partnership, you must identify and verify the identity of its beneficial owner(s). 20.A beneficial owner is the individual(s) (i.e. a natural person(s)) who ultimately owns or controls the limited partnership. It is crucial to know who the beneficial owner(s) is so that you can make appropriate decisions about the level of ML/TF risk presented by the limited partnership. Refer to the Beneficial Ownership Guideline for further information. 21.You must identify all beneficial owners. For each beneficial owner of a limited partnership, you must obtain the individual’s full name, date of birth, address, and their relationship to the limited partnership (for example, general partner or limited partner). You must then take reasonable steps, according to the level of ML/TF risk, to verify this information, so that you are satisfied who the beneficial owner is. You must also take reasonable steps to determine if the beneficial owner of the limited partnership is a politically exposed person.7 22.To identify the beneficial owner(s), you should establish and understand the limited partnership’s ownership and control structure. This includes identifying and examining any nominee general partner arrangements that are in place (see paragraphs [24] to [27] below). The individual’s ownership or control may be indirect, for example through several layers of ownership. Where the general or limited partner or any other party holding a similar role is a legal person or arrangement, the beneficial owner(s) of that legal person or arrangement should be identified. 23.Where there are complex ownership structures with no reasonable explanation, you should consider the possibility that the structure is used to hide the beneficial owner(s), whether enhanced CDD should be conducted, and whether a suspicious activity report should be submitted. Nominee general partners 24.The involvement (or otherwise) of a nominee general partner in a limited partnership is an important consideration when assessing the level of ML/TF risk. 25.A nominee general partner is a person who must follow, or is accustomed to follow, the instructions or directions of another person who is not a general partner when 6 Section 17 of the Act. Refer also to the Enhanced Customer Due Diligence Guideline for more information. 7 Section 26 of the Act.
5 carrying out their role.8 This other/instructing person is sometimes called a ‘silent partner’. This relationship can be informal (such as acting on the verbal instructions of a family member or a business associate), or formal (such as setting up a nominee agreement with a professional intermediary such as a lawyer, accountant, or trust and company service provider). 26.Nominee general partner arrangements are sometimes used to protect or disguise a limited partnership’s beneficial owner(s). For example, a nominee general partner could make all their decisions on the instructions of an underlying third party, who in practice is the natural person with effective ownership or control of the limited partnership. In this circumstance, the underlying third party would be considered a beneficial owner of the limited partnership. 27.While there are legitimate reasons for the use of nominee general partners, limited partnerships which have these arrangements also present a higher ML/TF risk. Nominee general partner arrangements can be misused to facilitate money laundering and other types of criminal offending. For example, criminals or terrorists can use nominees to obscure their involvement in a transaction or activity. Additional standard CDD requirements for limited partnerships 28.Effective 1 June 2024, Regulation 11 of the AML/CFT (Requirements and Compliance) Regulations 2011 introduces additional requirements when conducting standard CDD for a limited partnership. 9 29.This regulation formalises the information you are required to obtain and verify as
part of standard CDD.
10
This is intended to assist you to understand the limited partnership’s legal structure(s), to accurately identify its beneficial owner(s) (refer paragraph [19] to [23] above) and in turn, assist to determine the level of risk associated with the limited partnership. 30.Under Regulation 11, you must obtain, and according to the level of risk verify, information relating to:
6 ownership and control structure. The powers that bind and regulate can also assist you to identify the beneficial owners and the basis on which they are a beneficial owner, whether through ownership and/or effective control (refer to paragraph [36] below). 32.The supervisors also consider that this regulation will assist you to meet the requirement in the Act to obtain sufficient information to determine whether the limited partnership should be subject to enhanced CDD (refer paragraph [18] above). 33.In practice, complying with the regulation can (and should) be aligned with your existing procedures, policies and controls (PPCs) in place to identify and verify the existence of a nominee general partner12 and in turn, the identity of the beneficial owner(s). 34.It may be necessary to include some additional questions as part of your onboarding process to comply with Regulation 11. However, for limited partnership types you are familiar with and onboard regularly (e.g. New Zealand limited partnerships), this does not need to be extensive (unless the level of risk requires it). 35.Obtaining required information – The first step is to ask for the information from the limited partnership. This could include asking direct questions (verbally or in writing) or by using yes/no tick box questions (for example on an application form). You should record the limited partnership’s responses in writing, including retaining any written correspondence you receive. You must obtain information on the following:
7
8
When is enhanced CDD required?
42.When your customer is a limited partnership you must conduct enhanced CDD in specific circumstances:
9
46.You must obtain the person’s full name, date of birth and address (if an individual), full name, entity identifier or registration number, address or registered office (if not an individual), and the person’s relationship to the limited partnership. In some circumstances, this person may also be a beneficial owner of the limited partnership (for example, the general partner(s)). In other circumstances, this may be an additional person that you must conduct CDD on. When entities are appointed, you also need to identify the individual(s) representing the entity. Identification and verification of all such individuals must be to the extent required by the Act. 47.When a limited partnership is a customer with whom you have an existing business relationship, you must identify the identity of any new person acting on behalf of the limited partnership. This applies when you have previously conducted CDD on the limited partnership. You must obtain the full name and date of birth of the new person acting on behalf of the limited partnership, and their relationship to the limited partnership. 23 48.You must take reasonable steps, according to the level of ML/TF risk, to verify the information you have obtained, so that you are satisfied who the person is and that they have authority to act. 49.Refer to the Acting on behalf of a customer factsheet and Beneficial ownership guideline for further information. AML/CFT programme 50.Your procedures, policies, and controls for CDD must be documented in your AML/CFT programme. This should include how your business will determine the applicable level of CDD required, and what you will do if you are unable to conduct CDD. 23 Section 18(3) of the Act. Note also Part 19 of the AML/CFT Class Exemptions Notice 2018. This provides an exemption from the requirement to conduct CDD (under s18(3) of the Act) on a person acting on behalf of a customer by electronic means, subject to certain conditions and a written agreement between the reporting entity and the customer.
10
Version History
April 2024 Initial version (specific to limited partnerships) Disclaimer: This guideline has been produced by the AML/CFT supervisors under section 132(2)(c) of the Act. It is intended to assist reporting entities to understand their customer due diligence obligations under the Act for their customers who are limited partnerships. This guideline does not constitute legal advice. Where AML/CFT Guidelines are referenced, they can be accessed at the following websites:
Department of Internal Affairs http://bit.ly/2gQ3Iev Reserve Bank of New Zealand http://bit.ly/2n6RYdp Financial Markets Authority https://bit.ly/3fjcKlD
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
RegAlert holds no document that amends or replaces this one. This is not a check that it is in force: confirm with the regulator.
“This guideline is based on the requirements of the Act and has been produced by the AML/CFT supervisors under section 132(2) of the Act.”
More like this from RBNZ
We email you every new RBNZ publication the day it's published.
Source: Reserve Bank of New Zealand — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added · updated