2018-09-05
Added · Updated
The Tunisian Financial Analysis Commission issued this guide to require stockbrokers and portfolio management companies acting on behalf of third parties to implement comprehensive anti-money laundering, terrorism financing, and proliferation financing measures. It mandates strict client identification, beneficial owner verification, record retention, and suspicious transaction reporting through robust internal controls. The guide establishes precise thresholds for occasional transactions, defines designated entities subject to targeted financial sanctions, and outlines specific procedures for verifying clients against official lists.
CMF published 1 document in the last 30 days — get each new one by email the day it lands.
GUIDE
Guide on Combating Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing and Proliferation of Weapons for Stockbrokers and Portfolio Management Companies Acting on Behalf of Third Parties April 2018
PREAMBLE
Legal References of the Guide
What is the objective of this guide?
The present guide aims to raise awareness among professionals about the problem posed by money laundering and terrorism financing, and to guide them in implementing practical measures to combat these two forms of financial crime, in accordance with the legislative and regulatory provisions governing the matter. The guide also presents practical measures regarding the fight against proliferation and the financing of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
Which institutions are concerned by this guide?
Legal definition of money laundering (Article 92 of Organic Law No. 2015-26):
Any intentional act aimed at any means of falsely justifying the illicit origin of movable or immovable property or revenues derived directly or indirectly from any crime or offense punishable by imprisonment of three years or more, as well as any offense sanctioned under the customs code.
Any intentional act aimed at placing, depositing, concealing, disguising, administering, integrating or conserving the proceeds derived directly or indirectly from the aforementioned offenses, as well as attempt, complicity, incitement, facilitation, or providing assistance in committing them.
The money laundering offense is independent of the principal offense regarding its constitution. It is proven by the existence of presumptions and sufficient evidence regarding the illegal origin of the property subject to money laundering.
The provisions of the preceding paragraphs apply even if the offense from which the laundered money originates was not committed on Tunisian territory.
Legal definition of terrorism financing (Article 98 of Organic Law No. 2015-26):
What is money laundering in practice?
Money laundering is the act of concealing the origin of illicit funds by granting them a legal basis, so that these funds ultimately appear to have been acquired legally and are not subject to laws penalizing revenues from delinquent or criminal activities. The money laundering techniques generally occur in three stages:
PROVISIONS OF THE GUIDE
Preliminary Chapter - Definitions
For the purposes of this manual, the following terms are understood as:
1° The concerned institutions:
Chapter 1. Basic Principles of Combating Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing
The general obligation to guard against money laundering and terrorism financing by exercising constant vigilance over operations and transactions concluded for the benefit of clients is broken down into various more detailed obligations imposed on the concerned institutions, namely:
Chapter 2. Identification of clients, agents and beneficial owners and verification of their identities:
Section 1. Documents used for identification:
Date of incorporation, trade name or denomination, legal form and corporate object,
Registration number in the commercial register and tax identifier,
Registered office address including postal code, telephone and fax numbers, and email address. When main activities are not exercised at the registered office, the effective operating address should be indicated,
Capital distribution,
Identity of its directors and persons authorized to commit the entity on its behalf, with the obligation to collect the aforementioned natural person data regarding them,
Identities and addresses of principal shareholders whose participation in the company's capital amounts to at least 40%, and persons who control it when it is a company, or if it is an entity other than a company, the identity of the founders and persons exercising effective control or who are beneficial owners, with the obligation to collect the aforementioned natural person data regarding them,
Objective of the business relationship and its nature.
The aforementioned data are verified in particular based on the articles of association, an extract from the commercial register, a deed of incorporation, and any equivalent official document or other document emanating from reliable and independent sources, when the legal entity is registered abroad.
Section 2. Copies of official documents:
Section 3. Case of agents:
Section 4. Case of beneficial owners:
The concerned institutions must identify and take all reasonable measures to verify the identity of the person or persons for whom the transaction or operation is performed, particularly in case of doubt regarding whether the clients act on their own account or with certainty that they do not act on their own account.
In this regard, the concerned institutions must take into account the following guiding principles:
The beneficial owner is a natural person. They are not necessarily the declared beneficiary of the operation or transaction. It is important to clearly distinguish these two concepts.
The beneficial owner is not necessarily the client, whether the latter is a natural person, legal entity or legal structure.
The beneficial owner and the beneficiary may, in some cases, be the same person, for example when the beneficial owner of a client issuing an electronic transfer is also its recipient.
A business relationship, operation or transaction with an occasional client may conceal one or more beneficial owners.
Certain business relationships or operations with occasional clients reveal that the beneficiary and the beneficial owner are not distinct.
In all cases, the following are considered beneficial owners:
The natural person or persons who ultimately own/control the client, whether the latter is a natural person, legal entity or legal structure.
The natural person, in law or in fact, on whose behalf the operation(s) is/are performed.
The natural person or persons who ultimately exercise effective control, in fact or by law, over a legal entity or legal structure.
The following are considered beneficial owners when the client is a company:
The natural person or persons who directly or indirectly hold 40% of the company's capital shares or voting rights, and failing that, capital shares or voting rights conferring effective control over the company.
The natural person or persons who exercise, by any other means, in fact or by law, a power of control over the management, administration or direction bodies, or over the general assembly or the functioning of the company.
The following are considered beneficial owners when the client is a legal entity other than a company (e.g., association, foundation or economic interest group):
The natural person or persons who, by virtue of a legal act designating them for this purpose, are destined to become holders of at least 25% of the assets of the legal entity.
The natural person or persons, in fact, holding at least 25% of the assets of the legal entity.
In general, the concerned institutions must identify the beneficial owner(s) among the natural person or persons who would exercise by any other means, in fact or by law, a power of control over the management, administration or direction bodies, or over the general assembly or the functioning of the legal entity.
The following are considered beneficial owners in the case of earmarked patrimony subject to foreign law, such as trusts and fiducies and other similar structures:
The natural person or persons who, by virtue of a legal act designating them for this purpose, are destined to become holders of at least 25% of the assets transferred to an earmarked patrimony subject to foreign law.
The natural person or persons, in fact, holding at least 25% of the assets of an earmarked patrimony subject to foreign law.
The natural person or persons who belong to a group in whose interest an earmarked patrimony subject to foreign law was constituted, when the beneficial natural persons have not yet been designated.
In general, the concerned institutions must identify the beneficial owner(s) among the natural person or persons who would exercise by any other means, in fact or by law, a power of control over the earmarked patrimony subject to foreign law. Banks, financial institutions, lawyers, insurance companies, investment firms and accountants must, when acting in the capacity of fiduciary or trustee, declare their status as fiduciary or trustee to the concerned institution upon establishing the business relationship or executing an operation/transaction. For the proper execution of the above provisions, the aforementioned terms are understood as follows:
Earmarked patrimony: patrimony earmarked for the creation of a trust or other legal structures.
Trust/Fiducie and similar legal structures: the operation by which one or more settlors transfer present or future assets, rights or securities, or a set of assets, rights or securities, to one or more trustees who, holding them separate from their own patrimony, act for a determined purpose for the benefit of one or more beneficiaries.
Also included in the category of earmarked patrimony subject to foreign law are all other similar legal structures functioning on the same model, such as "el wakf" or "el habouss".
Section 5. Identification measures specific to combating terrorism financing:
The concerned institutions must take necessary measures to verify, when establishing the business relationship or executing an occasional transaction/operation and subsequently on a periodic basis, that the client or beneficial owner does not appear on the list of persons or organizations whose link to terrorist crimes is established by competent international bodies or by the national commission against terrorism provided for in Article 66 of Organic Law No. 2015-26 of August 7, 2015 on combating terrorism and repressing money laundering. They must also proceed to freeze the assets belonging to the persons or organizations referred to in the first paragraph of this article and make the corresponding declaration, in accordance with the provisions of Article 103 of Law No. 2015-26 of August 7, 2015 on combating terrorism and repressing money laundering.
Section 6. Identification measures specific to combating proliferation and financing the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction:
The concerned institutions do
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
Read the rest free
Source: Conseil du Marche Financier — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works