2019-09-01
Added · Updated
Issued by Nigeria’s Special Control Unit against Money Laundering (SCUML), this guidance mandates accounting firms to adopt a risk-based approach for anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing compliance. Firms must systematically identify, assess, and mitigate money laundering risks by evaluating customer, geographic, product, and industry factors using a structured scoring model. The directive further requires accounting practices to embed robust internal control systems, designate compliance officers, and file suspicious transaction reports in accordance with Nigerian AML/CFT legislation.
EFCC published 3 documents in the last 30 days — get each new one by email the day it lands.
GUIDANCE NOTE ON AML/CFT RISK BASED APPROACH FOR ACCOUNTING PROFESSION ISSUED BY THE SPECIAL CONTROL UNIT AGAINST MONEY LAUNDERING 2019
Table of Contents
2. Risk-Based Approach for Accounting Profession .......................................................................4
2.1 Purpose and objective.....................................................................................................................6
2.3 Accounting Profession pipe-line diagram..................................................................................6
2.4.1 Vulnerability of Accounting Profession.....................................................................................7
3.0 Understanding of the RBA...............................................................................................................8
3.1 Components of the risk-based approach and risk profiling................................................10
3.2 Risk Factors.........................................................................................................................................10
3.3 Risk Factors For The Accounting Profession........................................................................11
3.4 Modified risk Variables...................................................................................................................13
3.5 RISK SCORING ..................................................................................................................................14
ANNEXURES...............................................................................................................................................18
Annexure 1: Customer Risk Assessment......................................................................................18
Annexure 2: Customer on boarding lifecycle...........................................................................19
1.Background
The Special Control Unit against Money Laundering (SCUML) has commenced implementation of the outcome of the Nigeria National Money Laundering/Terrorist Financing (ML/TF Risk Assessment)(NRA) concluded in 2016. The Assessment was conducted as a response to Recommendation 1 of the Financial Action Task Force 40 Recommendations. The Recommendation urges countries to identify, assess and understand their ML/TF risks and apply mitigating measures commensurate to identified risks. Following the conclusion of the Nigerian National Risk Assessment (NRA) exercise, the country developed a National Strategy from the findings of the NRA as contained in the National AML/CFT strategy 2018-2020. Accordingly, individual reporting entities or DNFIs are required to conduct an assessment of their own Money Laundering /Terrorist financing risk (ML/TF)in line with the risks identified in the NRA using customers, countries or geographic areas, products and services, transactions or delivery channels.1 Such as when on-boarding new customers, and throughout the relationship with each customer, Designated Non financial institutions are required to perform anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) risk assessments to determine a customer’s overall money laundering risk. In order to achieve the above objective of combating ML/TF, it is essential to have a clear understanding of the threats/vulnerabilities to the dealers in precious metals and stones in particular and the Designated Non-Financial Institution sector in general. Consequently, SCUML has developed an AML/CFT risk assessment template and information collection tool herewith attached for your guidance. Please note that SCUML is available to guide your understanding and utilization of the developed template and tool where required.
2.0 Risk-Based Approach for Accounting Profession
Introduction
In today’s emerging risks and challenges, Designated Non Financial Businesses and Professions (DNFBPs) which is referred to as Designated Non- financial institutions (DNFIs) in S.25 of the Money Laundering Prohibition Act, 2011 as amended are seriously exposed to vulnerabilities of money laundering, terrorist financing and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and consequently risk being sanctioned. It is therefore necessary to adopt preventive measures that will ensure effective application of mitigation measures .According to the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) 2019 RBA Guidance for accountants,2 was reviewed in order to bring it in line with the new FATF requirements and to reflect the experience gained by public authorities and the private sector over the years in applying the RBA. The revised version applies to professional accountants in public practice (hereinafter also referred to as “accountants” or “accountancy. Risk Based Approach (RBA)“Risk Based Approach in AML/CFT means the identification, Understanding and Assessment of ML/TF risks to which they are exposed and take AML/CFT measures commensurate to those risks in order to mitigate them effectively. This approach should be an essential foundation to efficient allocation of resources across the anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) regime and the implementation of risk based measures throughout the FATF Recommendations. Based on the foregoing, Nigeria conducted her maiden National Risk Assessment (NRA) on Money Laundering/Terrorist Financing in 2016, the assessment covered the period between 2010- June 2016. The report findings revealed that the risk posed by Accounting firm rated is medium-high in Nigeria.3In line with Regulation 10(7) of Federal Ministry of Industry, Trade and Investment (Designation of Non-Financial Institutions and Other Related Matters) Regulations, 2013, it is required that Accounting Profession conduct their risk assessment and come up with measures to mitigate the risks thereof.
For the purpose of guidance, find below a risk based approach manual to guide the accounting Profession operations of the sector.
2.1 Purpose/Objective of the Guidance Note
The development of guideline is in line with the FATF Recommendation 25 to assist DFNIs in applying national measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing. The objectives of the guidance note include:
o Understanding the vulnerability of the sector to ML/TF o Understanding of what risk-based approach involves o Principles involve in applying risk-based approach o Showcase good practice in the design and implementation of an effective risk-based approach
2.1 Vulnerability of Accounting Profession
o Financial and tax advice o Company and trust formation o Buying and selling of properties o Performing financial transactions o Gaining introductions to financial Institutions
2.3 Understanding of the RBA
Risk is defined as the possibility of some adverse event occurring and the likely consequences of this event. Risk is expressed as;
ML threat refers to
The proceeds of crimes in a country which includes
documented. FATF Recommendation 1 is considered the groundwork towards the implementation of the risk-based approach: See figure 1 below:
Figure 1: Risk based approach implementation Groundwork4
2.5 Risk Factors
Accordingly, the main components that drive a risk assessment by the Designated Non financial institution are as recommended by the Wolfsberg riskbased approach guidance has provided an insight on the approach by identifying these components that can assist in measuring the risk5. “Money laundering risks may be measured using various categories, which may be modified by risk variables. The most commonly used risk criteria are as follows:
Figure 2: Risk Based Approach: Risk Factors
2.6 Risk Factors For The Accounting Profession
The risk factors have been modified as seen below for the Accounting Profession for the purpose of conducting a risk based assessment in the sector. The list is non exhaustive. Customer Risk
Geography/Country Risk
High-risk countries to ML/TF have been identified by many regulatory and advisory bodies such as the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), World Bank, Transparency International, United Nations, Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC) etc based on certain characteristics as stated below which can assist in understanding the level of risk such as the level of stability and corruption, terrorist and criminal activity.
3.2 RISK SCORING
After the identification of the risk variables, the next stage is to develop a risk assessment by calculating the risk, based on the level of impact and threat considering the weight age and risk scoring in order to classify the risk properly. Attributing the risk rating should be in a numerical format. The DNFI can choose ranges from 1 to 5 with 1 being the lowest and 5 being the highest 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 5 4 3 2 1 Very High High Medium Medium Low Low Risk Scoring 5 4 3 2 1 Risk Level Very High High Medium Medium Low Low Due Diligence Level EDD Simplified due diligence CDD Approval AML Committee CCO HOD Relationship Manager/Staff The first step in implementing RBA is identifying the risk factors and setting up risk scoring. The process can be simple or sophisticated depending on the size, nature of business and its complexity. The method should allow the integration of RBA with the Designated Non financial institution’s customer on-boarding process. Accounting Professions should do risk assessments of their business and developing appropriate risk mitigation policies.
Having regard to the size of the firm, the framework of internal control should:
ANNEXURES
Annexure 1: Customer Risk Assessment
Risk Factors Risk Description Rating Range Description Risk Rating Customer type Public Sector Private Sector Business man Nature of the customer
Annexure 2: Customer on boarding lifecycle Customer Customer Type of Customer and Watch List screening(PEP, Natural or Legal Person) Country Country of residence and origin and risk factors of the country(sanctioned, highly corrupt, high risk)
Industry
Nature of business that the customer is involved the risk level
Product and Services
Type of products the firm is offering and type of products/services required by a customer. Appro ach based Risk KYC Process High Risk Customer Low Risk Customer Medium Risk Customer Risk Rating
1 FATF Recommendation 2012-Interpretatiove Note to Recommendation 1 2 FATF Guidance 2016 for Risk Based Approach Accounting Profession. 3 National Risk Assessment of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing in Nigeria 2016. 4 FATF Recommendations, Recommendation No.1, 2012. 5 Wolfsberg Statement, Guidance on a Risk Based Approach for Managing Money Laundering Risks, 2006.
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
Source: Economic and Financial Crimes Commission — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
More like this from EFCC
EFCC published 3 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.