Consultation · SECP · 11 Dec 2024
The policy proposes six pillars for NBMFCs, including a mandate that NBMFCs achieve 70% of all new women clients within five years, with incremental lending targets for those below the threshold. It proposes at least 25% independent female board members, gender sensitization training for boards and C-suite, a 40% women employee target, gender-disaggregated reporting via the SUSTAIN portal, green financing guidelines in FY 25-26, and phased client capacity-building and awareness campaigns on financial and digital literacy. It is a draft out for consultation, with an intended approval in 2024.
SECP
Contents
Introduction 3
Women’s Equality in Finance Policy 4
The Problem 4
Market Evidence 4
Outreach to Women Clients 4
Box 1: Potential Market Opportunity with Women 4
Gender-Inclusive Culture and Values 6
WEFP Framework 7
Pillar 1: Women Centric Products & Services 8
Pillar 2: Women Centric Non-Financial Services 9
Pillar 3: Inclusive Human Resources 10
Pillar 4: A2F for Women Customers 11
Pillar 5: Gender Disaggregated Data 13
Pillar 6: Digitization 14
Annexure A 16
Annexure B – WEF Policy Formulation Process 19
Annexure C – Institutional and Market Assessment 20
Annexure D – Situational Analysis 27
Figures
Figure 1 | NBMFC Challenges and Barriers to Gender Inclusivity 6
Figure 2 | Women Equality in Finance Policy Framework - Suggested Pillars 7
Figure 3 | WEFP Development Process and Progress 19
Tables
Table 1 | Gender Analysis of Borrowers at MFBs & NBMF (Jan 2018 – Dec 2023) 5
Pakistan’s economic growth has not benefited men and women equally, and women remain underrepresented in the economy. In addition, while Pakistan’s financial inclusion has been improving, the share of women account holders in formal financial institutions is a disappointing 13%[1] as compared to men which stands at 34%[2] by the end of FY2021. The microcredit segment in particular represents a large opportunity, with the gender gap[3] increasing from 16% in 2013 to 31% in 2024[4] and this has been forecast to deteriorate further to 40%+ by 2030 (see next section for a detailed commentary).
The Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP), as a regulator of the non-bank microfinance sector has embarked on a journey of developing a Women Equality in Finance Policy (WEFP), starting in early 2023. The effort is being supported by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) under the Women Inclusive Finance (WIF)[5] program for Pakistan to support women’s access to finance.
Women Equality in Finance Policy (WEFP) is expected to complement the gender initiatives of the financial ecosystem, such as Banking on Equality (BOE) policy of the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) under the ambit of the National Financial Inclusion Strategy (NFIS), and the Women Entrepreneurship Policy (WEP) currently being developed by Small and Medium Enterprise Development Authority (SMEDA) under the overarching Small and Medium Enterprise Policy (SME Policy).
Women Equality in Finance Policy (WEFP) is predominantly focused on the Non-Bank Microfinance Companies (NBMFCs) and addresses a growing gender finance gap in the Pakistan market. It suggests solutions for women empowerment by recognizing the needs and challenges faced by women entrepreneurs. In addition, the Policy aims to increase and upgrade the inclusion of women as employees at all hierarchical levels, within the NBMFC sector, for improved decision making and governance of the microfinance market.
The process of policy formulation was initiated in January 2023 consisting of a series of surveys, market analysis, and assessment of prevailing regulatory guidelines and practices. (See Annexure C for WEFP Development Process details). A consultative session “Women in Finance Thought Leaders Workshop” was later jointly organized by SECP and ADB in January 2024. The workshop brought together key representatives of the NBMFC sector, enabling environment entities, and regional experts to find solutions to bridge the gender finance gap (see participants’ list in Appendix D). The workshop participants prioritized a roadmap of policy initiatives that could potentially form part of the new Women Equality in Finance Policy (WEFP) – intended to be approved in 2024.
The following discourse details the discussions and recommendations for policy formulation with the intent to elicit final views from the readers. Once the industry accords with its consent, the next step would entail setting targets under each pillar and sub-themes (see WEFP Framework for details).
[1] Global Findex data 2021
[2] ibid
[3] Defined as the share of microloans distributed to male versus female borrowers.
[4] Estimations based on data provided by Pakistan Microfinance Network for June 2024
[5] The Women Inclusive Finance (WIF) is $155.5 million sector development program comprising a $100 million policy-based loan that supports legal and regulatory reforms to help women better access finance; a $50 million financial intermediation loan to enable participating financial institutions to lend to women entrepreneurs, and women-led micro, small and medium enterprises; and a $5.5 million grant to finance related activities.
Women’s Equality in Finance
Policy
The NBMFC sector in Pakistan is critical for access to finance for women, providing loans to around 2.5 million women with a Gross Outstanding Portfolio (GLP) of PKR 89.2 million in June 2024, making them the main source of formal access to credit in the country for women. However, a longitudinal analysis of the microfinance sector in Pakistan (from 2018 to 2024) shows that the number of women borrowers at NBMFCs is on a downward trend, shrinking by over 5% comparing 2008 outreach to 2024 outreach[8]. Moreover, for the sector as a whole the rate of growth of women borrowers is much slower than the growth in the male borrowers. The overall number of microfinance women borrowers has grown only 41% from 3.5 million (2008) to 4.9 million (2024) compared to 97% growth in male borrowers from 2.9 million (2008) to 5.9 million (2024). 4 The Problem “Women’s access to finance in Pakistan is severely constrained, evidenced by higher levels of financial exclusion of women, a widening gender finance gap[6] and a lower average loan outstanding. While NMBFIs remain the main providers for women’s access to finance[7], the downward trend in serving the microfinance customer base, especially women, is clear indication of a consistent need to operationalize changes at NBMFC level to serve women more and better” Market Evidence Based on proxy calculations of the women’s market size (see Box 1, below)[9], rough estimates indicate that NBMFCs and MFBs combined are only serving less than 25% of the potential microfinance women market. Women are increasingly left behind with a large gender finance gap currently standing at 34% (K-FIS 2022). Pakistan has among the lowest rates of women's entrepreneurship in the world at 4% of female working age adults. Over 80% of NBMFC active client portfolio consists of women. See Market Evidence for more details. Several factors could have contributed to this trend, one of which is the liquidity issue experienced as after the Covid-19 pandemic and other external shocks (which was signalled by the NBMFC industry during the SECP-ADB January 2024 workshop conducted in Lahore). Several factors could have contributed to this trend, one of which is the liquidity issue experienced as after the Covid-19 pandemic and other external shocks (which was signalled by the NBMFC industry during the SECP-ADB January 2024 workshop conducted in Lahore). 6 7 8 9 A potential women market of 18.4 million women can be approximated, using an available estimation of the potential microcredit market in Pakistan. Box 1: Potential Market Opportunity with Women Outreach to Women Clients
Table 1 Gender Analysis of Outreach & Gross Loan Portfolio of NBMFCs & MFBs (June
2018 – June 2024) – Source Pakistan Microfinance Network
| Number of Borrowers (in Millions) | Gross Loan Portfolio (in PKR M) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 2024 | Change | 2018 | 2024 | Change | ||
| NBMFCs | Male | 0.83 | 0.56 | -37.1% | 20.73 | 35.89 | 73.1% |
| Female | 2.65 | 2.51 | -5.2% | 56.1 | 89.22 | 59.0% | |
| Total | 3.53 | 3.06 | -13.2% | 76.83 | 125.1 | 62.8% | |
| MFBs | Male | 2.08 | 5.29 | 154.7% | 132.32 | 335.22 | 153.3% |
| Female | 0.85 | 2.43 | 184.9% | 30.22 | 105.53 | 249.2% | |
| Total | 2.93 | 7.72 | 163.5% | 162.53 | 440.75 | 171.2% | |
| Sector | Male | 2.91 | 5.85 | 97.4% | 153.05 | 371.11 | 142.5% |
| Female | 3.5 | 4.94 | 41.1% | 86.32 | 194.75 | 125.6% | |
| Total | 6.46 | 10.78 | 66.9% | 239.36 | 565.85 | 136.4% | |
| Female % in Sector | 54% | 46% | - | 36% | 34% | - | |
| NBMFC Female % of Total Female | 76% | 51% | - | - | - | - |
The data given above shows that:
The average loan outstanding by NBMFCs in 2024 for women is much lower at PKR 35,571 as compared to PKR 64.537 for men. The same comparison for 2018, showed more gender parity in average loan outstanding for women and men at PKR 21,937 for women compared to PKR 23,459 for men. This shows that even within the NBMFC sector, average loan outstanding for women is 55% that of men in 2024.
Between 2018 and 2024, the overall share of lending to women in the microfinance sector (MFBs and NBMFCs combined) has also declined both in terms of numbers (from 54% to 46%) and loan volume (from 36% to 34%).
Source: Calculations based on Pakistan Microfinance Network Data
Moreover, the microfinance sector faces challenges of limited focus on gender inclusive culture and values, evident through a low level of female employment at all levels – especially for leadership roles. Organizational roles demanding high customer engagement such as sales, credit, complaint are dominated by male staff members. The sector experiences insufficient gender sensitive trainings and awareness, coupled with a pervasive missed opportunity to serve the women and women entrepreneurs’ segments in Pakistan. For NBMFCs no specific female employment participation targets are advised. Currently, women represent 23% of employees and 21% of senior management.
A survey exercise conducted by SECP and ADB in 2023 with NBMFCs in 2023-2024 (see Annexure C for details) indicated that:
Even though NBMFCs acknowledge that women exhibit better financial behavior than men, few NBMFCs offer products customized to women´s conditions.
NBMFC credit decisions rely heavily on Credit Bureau data and not alternative data.
Most NBMFC lending is secured by personal guarantees (individual or group).
Non-financial services´ offering for women customers on business, financial and digital literacy is often lacking or superficial.
Take up of digital solutions by women customers is low due to limited access to technology and information on available platforms.
Climate finance is nascent and mostly focused on renewables at a small scale.
Multiple factors contribute to this downward trend, including:
Gaps in the regulatory enabling environment.
Supply- side capacity challenges
Limited knowledge of, and value-proposition offerings for the demand side
REGULATORY FACTORS
Capacity at senior management level of the smaller MFIs regulated by SECP is seen as a limitation on their growth.
Lack of gender focus or targets.
There are very few specialized women focused lending products offered by the industry.
Absence of women centric marketing and communications.
Assessment of adequacy of lending models with women and social impact thereof are not conducted.
SUPPLY SIDE
DEMAND SIDE
Insufficient linkage to the Pakistan
NFIS and no specific target setting for the women’s market.
Significant gaps in gender disaggregated data and reporting from MFIs making it difficult to advocate policy.
Lack of adequate focus upon clear regime for consumer protection and responsible finance for women.
Insufficient support for adequate funding and de-risking mechanisms.
Low levels of financial and digital literacy not adequately supported or addressed.
Limited connectivity and digital access.
A high share of lending to women is applied for or used by a make family member (proxy figure 67%).
Limited mobility and support from community and families for women to become economically active.
Figure 1 | NBMFC Challenges and barriers to gender inclusivity
One of the key findings from WEF policy development undertakings (see Annexure B for details) has been the overlapping themes and discussions in three major domains (identified and summarized in Figure 1)
NBMFC Regulatory and Legal Enablers
Supply side Financing Offerings and
Constraints
Demand side Challenges and
Requirements
An opportunity to finding concrete, quantifiable solutions under each of these domains was provided by ‘Women in Finance Thought Leaders Workshop’ (January 2024). The discussions to close the gender finance gap expanded upon women inclusion as business owners, employees, and customers. The two-day deliberations culminated in a prioritized roadmap of initiatives which form the basis of WEFP Framework. (See Annexure D for details).
While every effort has been made to preserve the comprehensive outcomes of the workshop, it is important to note that not all recommendations made by the participants fall under the domain of SECP, and/or are directly relevant to enabling access to finance for women. Additionally, some recommendations may require an extended time frame (more than 5 years) to implement, making them difficult or costly to consider. Hence, the inclusion of recommendations in the final policy document considers the following factors:
Level of effort (cost) required or readiness (of the NBMFCs) for adoption/adaption
Existence, amendment, or absence of regulation, guidelines for implementation
Creation of new partnership models or operational structures
Six major pillars (or domains) are proposed for the Women Equality in Finance Policy (WEFP). See Figure 2 for a schematic summary. The details are as under:
Figure 2 | Women Equality in Finance Policy Framework - Suggested Pillars
The survey and the workshop have highlighted the non-uniformity of capabilities and capacities of NBMFCs to promote women’s inclusive finance across the sector. Based on the varied spectrum of understanding of women needs and priorities, the adoption of gender inclusive practices vary widely across the NBMFCs for women customers. While compliance with regulatory requirements[10] is ensured, gender specialization as a business approach is thus far not realized. This points towards the need for a more active role of the regulator to guide the sector towards gender inclusivity and growth.
| Sub-themes | Policy Reforms | Considerations for Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 Increased women portfolio with institution wise incremental female lending targets assigned. | SECP mandates that NBMFC achieve target of 70% of all new women clients in 5 years. | The rule to be targeted to all NBMFCs. For NBMFCs that are below the threshold incremental lending targets to serve at least 70% women in their new portfolios by Year 5. |
| 1.2 Gender lens application in products and services offered by NBMFCs (existing and/or new) | SECP promotes a standard definition of ‘gender product and service’ to be developed and provided to industry under the broader concept of women financial inclusion. | Technical assistance is required by SECP to develop the standard definition and the toolkit to recognize and promote women centric products. To encourage adoption of the scheme |
| 1.3 Advancing women centric products and services | Design a Training/Capacity curricula for development of women centric products and services through a standardized (life-cycle) and livelihoods approach. | SECP will use the coordination forum to define/conceptualize women centric products and work with PMN/ to hold an annual competition to award best women centric products. |
| 1.4 Gender ranking in products and services (existing and/or new) | Provides gender Financial Inclusion tools for assessing existing product(s) and service(s) for women centricity, including a ranking mechanism. | SECP, through the Coordination Forum, to create a repository of the type of women centric products used in South Asia and other developing countries on its website and organize webinars of experts from other countries to educate & encourage NBMFCs |
[10] Apart from directives in NBMFC Licensing regime, SECP has issued guidelines for Gender Mainstreaming (circular 24), and Gender Diversity (circular 7 and 9) 10
| 1.5 Gender market segmentation | Regulator leads market segmentation exercise that purposely follows a women centric approach (e.g., looking at women typical sectoral profiles etc.). | SECP might conduct the exercise itself and/or rely on stakeholders (such as Karandaaz or data-analytic entities such as Tasdeeq) for market segmentation |
|---|---|---|
| 1.6 Climate Resilience (Agri/livestock value chain) | SECP issues green financing guidelines for NBMFCs to lend to (women) customers which also includes climate risk mitigation and adaptation. For better outreach, SECP incentivizes and showcases successful women centric crop and/or livestock insurance products through multiple forums. | Guidelines to be issued by SECP in FY 25-26 |
Research has shown that providing nonfinancial services (NFS) alongside finance can help financial institutions to tap into the enormous potential of women-led enterprises[11]. Very few NBMFCs follow the ‘life-cycle’ approach towards women and their businesses. While arguments can be made regarding the cost constraints for the provision of such services, international best practices show community and client outreach and mobilization programs to be more successful when combined with non-financial value-added services.
This pillar focuses on building the capacity of NBMFC staff on consumer protection and gender sensitization to better serve the women segment. Moreover, proposed non-financial services such as digital and/or financial literacy, business development skills, and trainings on agency and empowerment will not just build the capacity of women clients but also help the NBMFCs reduce portfolio risk, grow their portfolio, increase client loyalty, and improve opportunities for cross-sell.
| Sub-themes | Policy Reforms | Considerations for Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| 2.1 Staff training on consumer protection and gender sensitization | SECP develops and launches modules on gender sensitive consumer protection, and gender sensitization for NBMFC staff. Client facing key messages on digital/financial literacy, women’s empowerment, and women’s agency to be added to this module also. | SECP to consult the industry on timelines and targets for implementation. SECP may work with institutions such as IFMP for rolling out the TOT. |
| SECP (as well as NBMFCs) to launch awareness campaigns for financial & digital literacy and women centric financial products | The NBMFC could be mandated to adopt or launch the same for their customers. |
[11] IFC & FMO. 2020. Non-Financial Services: The Key to Unlocking the Growth Potential of Women-led Small and Medium Enterprises for Banks. Washington. D.C. 11
| 2.2 Business Development Trainings and Support | Leveraging the Coordination forum to develop an understanding of women entrepreneurs’ business needs and determine minimum support modalities for clients. | Based on the deliberations of the forum, SECP will provide guideline to standardize minimum support modalities. NBMFCs may develop or add further value-added services (such as trainings, information provision in business registration, linkage with platform, digital app etc) to position themselves as lender of choice by women. |
|---|---|---|
| 2.3 Client Capacity Building Trainings | Capacity building of clients to be undertaken by NBMFCs. This would include the financial/digital literacy modules and Empowerment /Agency modules which would include key messages to be delivered to clients by NBMFCs in interactions with them. | SECP introduces targets in a phased manner with established timelines. |
As mentioned in pillar 2, the capacity and capabilities of women inclusion vary across the sector. With evidence of impact of gender diversity and inclusion on profitability and other variables , it is important to push the envelope further. With prioritization of ESG by the regulator, linking NBMFCs’ inclusion and governance indicators is the logical next step, further to SECP Circulars 7, 9 and 24.
Another important consideration for improvement in human resources is for funding purposes. Commercial banks have expressed reservations to the loose focus on governance structures, policies and procedures such as ‘succession planning’. This has translated into the NBMFC sector perceived as medium to high risk.
With regards to employees, NBMFCs appear to struggle with establishing a healthy pipeline of high-quality potential women candidates who fulfill the minimum job criteria. Given the cultural constraints women face of education, confidence, a non-traditional approach might be best suited. Examples include skill-based job requirements (rather than minimum educational level), gender inclusive interview panels and communication, inclusive culture offerings, etc.
Inclusive HR practices entail a holistic approach which requires engagement with gender sensitization and gender planning at all levels; starting with the Board and C-suite.
[12] Companies most gender diverse on executive teams are 21% more likely to outperform on profitability and 27% more likely to demonstrate superior value creation (i.e., economic profit margin). Source: McKinsey & Company. 2023. Diversity matters even more: The case for holistic impact. Firms run by female CEOs have lower leverage, less volatile earnings, and a higher chance of survival than otherwise similar firms run by male CEOs. Source: Faccio, Mara, Maria-Teresa Marchica, and Roberto Mura. 2016. CEO gender, corporate risk-taking, and the efficiency of capital allocation. Journal of Corporate Finance 39 (August): 193–209. Companies that do not focus on gender diversity will find themselves at a disadvantage in the search for talent, as gender diversity translates to improved ability to attract and retain talent. Source: McKinsey&Company. 2015. The Power of Parity: How Advancing Women’s Equality can Add $12 trillion to Global Growth. McKinsey Global Institute More women on bank boards is positively linked with bank stability and higher profitability. Source: Sahay, R. and Čihák, M. 2018. Women in Finance: A Case for Closing Gaps. IMF Discussion Notes. 12
| Sub-themes | Policy Reforms | Considerations for Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| 3.1 Gender sensitized trainings for boards and C-suite. | SECP mandates NBMFCs to become more gender sensitive in their governance through gender sensitization trainings for Board members and C-Suite. | SECP consults industry and sets timelines and targets. A TOT modality may be developed and promoted by SECP to ensure a capacitated Board and Management. As per ADB recommendation and best practice for effectiveness of the gender sensitization, - 100% BoD trained by year - Integration of gender sensitization module in onboarding information kit to new BoD members. |
| 3.2 Gender Inclusive Board of directors | SECP mandates appointment of at least 25% independent female members in NBMFCs’ BoD (as per SECP´s instructions under the NBMFC Regulations). | |
| 3.3 Gender segregated reporting and tracking as per GDD Dashboard metrics | SECP will mandate gender inclusive standards in reporting for NBMFCs. | See Annexure A for suggested GDD Dashboard Metrics. NBMFCs would be required to report against the dashboard indicators, and upload onto a NBMFC Gender Tab created in the SUSTAIN portal. The portal is in last stages of development, and shall be launched later this year. |
| 3.4 Gradual progressive target of 40% Women employee assigned. | To encourage women centricity in NBMFC operations at institutional level, SECP launches an incremental mandate of women’s participation in NBMFCs’ workforce. Readily available HR tools (NPS methodology), techniques (policies, practices) and hiring/retention strategies to support the sector will be made available at Sustain Portal | SECP to create NBMFCs level incremental targets and timelines for achievement for the whole sector overall over 5 years (e.g. by NBMFC type, size, segments served etc.). Given industry comments, SECP has revised the target to 30% for five years. |
Access to finance emerged as one of the most significant challenges faced by NBMFCs, as the available local sources of funding remain limited. Lack of innovation in conventional funding instruments has translated into high costs for the NBMFCs with restrictive terms and conditions attached. Incentive schemes for women entrepreneurs (MSMEs) by authorities (credit guarantees, reduced interest rates, sector specific funding lines etc.) are not attractive for the wholesale lenders to subscribe to, resulting in limited uptake and mobilization by the commercial market.
While the regulatory authorities have been exploring innovative funding avenues (e.g., capital markets), the uptake by NBMFCs is to date very low. Additionally, the majority of NBMFCs remain unaware of alternative funding channels such as international green funds, global venture capitals or SPVs. At the national level, Pakistan Microfinance Investment Company (PMIC) has the mandate to fill the gaps in the funding market landscape. However, its business model does not allow for significant lending rates below commercial terms, thereby reducing the value creation affect to the NBMFC sector.
Women customers also face challenges in accessing financing. As supported by survey data, despite women representing a lower credit risk with better repayment behavior, their access to NBMFC finance is arrested overall not only with regards to the nature of loans solicited, but also the amount, and quality of products offered. Portfolio indicators to measure business health, impact and wider benefits of expanding lending with women are not tracked which could otherwise attract foreign investors. Proactive efforts to attract women clients by NBMFCs remain sporadic in nature.
A concerted effort is required to improve and increase the women portfolio in absolute and relative terms. The challenges being faced by the NBMFCs need to be addressed through funding, policy and research. Further, a special fund needs to be established which could allow for experimentation, innovation and capacity building of institutions themselves which serve women clients.
| Sub-themes | Policy Reforms | Considerations for Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| 4.1 Gender Inclusive Consumer Protection Regulatory Framework | SECP appraises and amends its consumer protection regulatory framework for enhanced transparency and disclosure practices whilst incorporating a gender lens | Gender inclusive Consumer protection practices to be standardized for NBMFCs. The consolidated framework to be unveiled in Year 1, Compliance by NBMFCs to start from Year 2 on prioritized pillars. Complete compliance by Year 5. |
| 4.2 NBMFC Policy Dialogue & Research Forum | SECP creates a knowledge, policy and research sub-committee under the SECP Microfinance coordination forum for exchange on best practices in gender inclusive lending and performance-based lending targeted at women. | SECP may conduct the research itself, or disseminate important research conducted by reputable institutions which might benefit the NBMFC sector at large. |
| 4.3 Sandbox for innovation & Experimentation | SECP prioritizes proposals/ideas sent by NBMFCs to the regulatory sandbox of the SECP for innovation and experimentation. | |
| 4.4 Creating an enabling environment for NBMFCs to access credit lines | SECP initiates discussions with the Ministry of Finance to explore the possibility of becoming an agent/manager of funds for the Government of Pakistan. | This can help remove guarantee requirements on NBMFCs to access lines of credit made available for the microfinance sector to the GoP by multi-lateral institutions and other foreign donors. |
| 4.5 SECP creates incentives for NBMFCs to convert to for-profit entities or hybrid structures | SECP creates incentives through structured engagement with the sector and information dissemination on benefits to the entity of transforming into for-profit. Moreover, SECP will explore the following incentives for for-profit entities: - Use of SIP ratings as an additional/alternate ranking system for impact investors - Enable experimentation around deposit mobilization arrangements | |
| 4.6 Enabling Direct international investment for NBMFCs | SECP to engage PMN to undertake a market sizing for global impact funds working for inclusive finance and/or microfinance. SECP to house the roster created via the market sizing exercise to enable access of NBMFCs to up-to-date information on foreign funds including qualification requirements and due diligence processes. SECP to independently or through partnerships arrange forums/conferences where NBMFCs can engage with investors. |
International best practice dictates gender disaggregated data as the starting point for any formal intervention concerning women. Importance is placed not only on collecting and recording of data, but its public availability for analytical purposes as it guides commercial decisions and policy enactment [13].
Fragmentation of data and information within the eco-system
Limited reliance on, and investment in digitization
Lack of partnership models for leveraging deep insights
| Sub-themes | Policy Reforms | Considerations for Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| 5.1 Collection, Monitoring, Evaluation | - Mandatory reporting of gender disaggregated data (GDD) indicators by NBMFCs on a pre-defined frequency basis. - GDD indicators to be reported on the ESG portal | See Annexure A for proposed initial list of gender disaggregated Dashboard Indicators. SECP shall provide the requisite training for reporting on the ESG portal “Sustain” to all NBMFCs’ nominated staff. |
| 5.2 Gender Audits | - Mandatory internal gender audits by the NBMFCs to be undertaken once every 3 years - SECP supervisory function to include key gender indictors based on the already issued circulars, along with some indicators of the Dashboard. | SECP to develop a a. Gender audit toolkit for NBMFCs along with guidelines/instructional documents b. Supervisory audit tool and a scorecard. Both tools to be developed with support from donor agencies and international best practice. |
| 5.3 Publicly available Industry Gender Annual Report | SECP publishes an annual report on the state of gender inclusion by the NBMFCs. The report to draw from the reporting of NBMFCs on ESG portal, as well as supervisory audit reports. | PMN could potentially add new data points stemming from SECP dashboard in annual MicroWatch reports to ensure harmonization with SECP efforts. |
Pakistan’s non-bank microfinance suffers from extremely high-cost structures in sharp contrast to comparable countries with similar cultural context. Reasons highlighted during the workshop are: Discussions point to a chicken-and-egg situation whereby NBMFCs claim lack of investment in cost reducing structures to funding constraints, while funding entities are reluctant to extend credit because of in-efficient business models. Fear of losing clients by the NBMFCs heightens the propensity to hoard client information which could otherwise be utilized to create new products, new markets. The regulator could potentially play a role here to act as a mediator between market players, incentivizing partnerships which could reduce the fragmentation of information to create new and efficient models of business.
| Sub-themes | Policy Reforms | Considerations for Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| 6.1 Targeted awareness creation on leveraging digital platforms for cost efficiencies | SECP through the Coordination Forum promotes digitization practices for cost economization (efficiency benchmarking, use cases, international/regional best practices). | The Forum to shortlist key indicators on NBMFC operational efficiency to benchmark Pakistani NBMFCs to regional best performing entities. SECP may require NBMFCs to start reporting on these indicators in Year 2 and Year 3. |
| 6.2 Alternative credit scoring model’s adoption | SECP, by leveraging coordination forum, to identify and shortlist best performing credit scoring models in the market. | |
| 6.3 Data sharing MOUs with PTA, SBP | Regulator facilitated or incentivized models of fee-based partnerships ensuring non cannibalization of client base. | Regulatory level MOUs to ensure the legitimacy of partnerships. Further, SECP and other regulatory bodies to define the partnership modalities to safeguard interests of partners. |
[Note:] While both Pillar 5 (Gender Disaggregated) and Pillar 6 (Digitization) rely on data, distinction can be drawn on the utility and aim of both pillars. While the former is predominantly for reporting purposes to draw consumer insights and trends from, the latter intends to explore realization of cost efficiencies through reliance on digitization, and digitalization.
Use SECP definition of BoD
Total staff on payroll
Total active staff on payroll with contracts providing all institutional benefits Total active staff on payroll with contracts providing only remuneration Senior Management includes all executive management Middle Management includes all subordinates to executive management All staff excluding Senior Management and Middle Management Staff responsible for client acquisition and recoveries Includes all staff that are in the administration department and all staff supporting the working of the organization including kitchen helpers, cleaners, peons, bank runners etc. All staff promoted with title change and/or grade change Total staff added to payroll in the last FY Refer to definition of permanent and contractual staff Refer to definition of permanent and contractual staff The median salary is the middle value in a list of salaries where half of the workers earn more and half earn less The median salary is the middle value in a list of salaries where half of the workers earn more and half earn less The median salary is the middle value in a list of salaries where half of the workers earn more and half earn less Cumulative number of unique clients served by a microfinance institution during that three-year period. The KPI is intended to reflect the institution's reach and ability to extend its services over time Total number of clients that on-boarded themselves digitally and received loans Full branches launched by the company in last FY Total branches at current FY close – (minus) Total branches in last FY close
[14] 14
[15] 15
[16] 16
[17] 17
[18] 18
[19] 19
[20] 20
[21] 21
[22] 22
[23] 23
[24] 24
[25] 25
[26] 26
[27] 27
[28] 28
[29] 29
[30] 30
[31] 31
[32] 32
[33] 33
Women-centric financial/ non-financial products are intentionally designed for women and are aimed at closing gender gaps in access to and usage of financial services. They (a) are designed to target women customers and businesses in specific sub-demographics (eg women agro-processers), (b) consciously integrate women’s perspective in the problem definition phase (ie seek to understand what is the problem and why from women’s perspective), (c) analyze sex-disaggregated data for understanding female customer behaviour (ie engagement, usage of products/ services), (d) conduct interviews with women clients and front line staff and observe them to complement the diagnosis, (e) identify practical barriers (eg women’s limited mobility) and behavioural barriers (eg women’s lack of trust of banks), (f) based thereupon design commercially-viable solutions for women, and (g) pilot test the solutions and request feedback from women for final improvements. Women centric marketing means putting women at the front and center of campaigns (in messages and imagery), and as recipients of campaigns. This can be done by first conducting women-centric segmentation to identify specific sub-demographic is being targeted. Women centric campaigns achieve one or more of the following: a) mention women, b) showcase a female face, c) portray women in economic functions where they typically participate (eg as business owners in different activities) or where the campaign seeks to integrate women, d) highlight how a specific product/ service/ advantage can benefit women in their specific conditions (eg as small animal farmers).
[36] E.g. using PACRA’s social impact tool 36
[35] 35
[34] 34
| 3.3 | Number of Loans with Tenure of 12 months: Total loans disbursed in reporting period with loan completion tenures of 12 months | Quarterly | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.4 | Number of Loans with Tenure more than 12 months but less than 18 months: Total loans disbursed in reporting period with loan completion tenures more than 12 months but less than 18 months | Quarterly | ||
| 3.5 | Number of Loans with Tenure more than 18 months but less than 24 months: Total loans disbursed in reporting period with loan completion tenures more than 18 months but less than 24 months | Quarterly | ||
| 3.6 | Number of Loans with Tenure more than 24 months: Total loans disbursed in reporting period with loan completion tenures more than 24 months | Quarterly | ||
| 4 | Gross Loan Portfolio – Total: All outstanding principal for all outstanding client loans, including current, delinquent and restructured loans, but not loans that have been written off. It does not include interest receivable in PKR Million | Monthly | ||
| 4.1 | Gross Loan Portfolio – Branch: GLP of loans disbursed through institution-initiated onboarding | Monthly | ||
| 4.2 | Gross Loan Portfolio - Digital : GLP of loans disbursed through client-initiated digital onboarding via website and/or app | Monthly | ||
| 5 | Average Disbursement Size : Total number of loan amount disbursed divided by total loans disbursed | Monthly | ||
| 6 | Average Loan Size : Total GLP divided by total number of loans | Monthly | ||
| 7 | PAR > 30 days (%): The PAR30 days indicates that loans are effectively at risk compared to PAR1-30 days. The PAR30 ratio is calculated by dividing the outstanding balance of all loans with arrears over 30 days by the outstanding gross loan portfolio | Monthly | ||
| 8 | # (Insurance) Policy Holders : Total number of insurance policy holders in client base in reporting period | Quarterly | ||
| 8.1 | Number of Credit for Life Insurance Policy Holders: Total number of Credit for Life insurance policy holders in client base in reporting period | Quarterly | ||
| 8.2 | Number of Health Insurance Policy Holders: Total number of Health insurance policy holders in client base in reporting period | Quarterly | ||
| 8.3 | Number of Crop/Livestock Insurance Policy Holders: Total number of Crop/Insurance policy holders in client base in reporting period | Quarterly | ||
| 9 | Total number of claims submitted : No. of claims submitted in reporting period | Quarterly | ||
| 9.1 | No. of credit insurance claims for life insurance raised: No. of credit for life claims submitted in reporting period | Quarterly | ||
| 9.2 | No. of claims for health insurance raised: No. of health claims submitted in reporting period | Quarterly | ||
| 9.3 | No. of claims for crop/livestock insurance policy raised: No. of crop/livestock claims submitted in reporting period | Quarterly |
In collaboration with ADB , a stepwise list of activities was devised, prioritizing a consultative approach towards policy formulation (see figure 4 below). The policy initiation process was broadly guided by
Assessment of existing supervisory framework as analyzed against international best practices
NBMFC gender data analysis, and
Industry level stakeholder dialogue to assess for contextual adoption
Figure 3 | WEFP Development Process and Progress
The policy formulation process was initiated in Jan 2023, in the form of assessing existing gender policy initiatives, and regulatory directives, introduced by SECP. Comparable structures were also studied such as the Banking on Equality Policy of State Bank of Pakistan (SBP), and SME Policy of Small and Medium Enterprise Development Authority (SMEDA). A stakeholder mapping exercise culminated in dialogues, interviews and meetings with industry experts, sectoral leaders and collaborative partners.
A survey (please see Annexure C-I) was designed and rolled out to all NBMFCs to gather information on the sector’s inclusion of women at workforce and leadership levels, the policy structures supporting women’s participation in delivery of financial services, and the gender approach to lending (including product design marketing strategies, gender disaggregation of data, green lending, digitalization of finance). This was followed by key informant interviews carried out with key NBMFCs operating in Pakistan.
[37] ADB collaboration refers to the provision of technical assistance in the form of international and national experts for design, draft and formulation of policy, including deciding on a plan of action for best possible results.
(a). Women Inclusive Finance Program – Survey Questionnaire
| Date of Survey |
|---|
Details of individual taking the assessment
| Name of the Respondent | |
|---|---|
| Designation |
Introduction of Organization/Company
| Financial Institution (NBFC, MFI, leasing company, fintech company) | |
|---|---|
| Address of HQ | |
| Type of entity – not for profit/social entity/for profit | |
| Funding structure (local, international, other) | |
| Major Geographical Footprint (e.g., x% of portfolio falls in district abc) |
Organogram
1. If your organization/company is collecting data on inclusion of women at all hierarchical levels, please complete.
| Job Category | Total (#) | Female Personnel (number + %) | Male Personnel (number + %) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Structure | |||
| Board of Directors | |||
| Investors | |||
| Workforce Breakdown | |||
| Senior Management (Heads of Departments, Heads of Branches, etc.) | |||
| Management (Unit/Team Managers) | |||
| Credit/Loan Officers | |||
| Admin and Support Staff | |||
| Other (please specify: ________________________) |
Policies and Provisions
2. Does your organization/company offer any of the following to its female and male staff?
Mark all that apply and explain how they are applied
| Leave (sick, childbirth, parental, etc.) | |
|---|---|
| Flexible work arrangements (remote, flexi times, etc.) | |
| Childcare (in house or subsidized, etc.) | |
| Travel to work (subsidized, facilitated, etc.) | |
| Other (please specify): |
3. Does your organization/company have a specific gender policy or strong gender components under other institutional policies (e.g., Code of Business)?
a. Yes
b. No
c. Being prepared
4. If your answer to question 3 was yes, please indicate what the gender policy or gender component includes (mark all that apply):
Mark all that apply and explain how they are applied
| Principles and talent management measures aimed at increasing recruitment, retention, and promotion of women (e.g., gender sensitive language or explicit language encouraging women to apply for positions; women-focused leadership training; rotation opportunities; internal communications that showcase women as talent assets) | |
|---|---|
| Measures to promote an increase women's representation in higher management/board positions | |
| Tools to address gender/other based discrimination, anti-sexual harassment | |
| A procedure about reporting grievances, including sexual harassment | |
| On-the-job training/internship/sponsorship program to support female staff's access to quality jobs | |
| Establishment of a women's network, peer support groups, etc. | |
| Other (please specify): |
5. Does your organization/company have a training program for its employees which has a gender sensitization/awareness component/module (e.g., including unconscious bias, gender roles and stereotypes, anti-harassment, and anti-discrimination topics, etc.)?
a. Yes. Please explain the component or module's contents.
b. No
c. In the process of developing a program
6. Please mark with an X your answer to the following questions:
| Question | Men | Women | No difference | Not sure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Who is more confident in their ability to run a business – women or men? | ||||
| Who is better able to manage a business independently – women or men? | ||||
| Who is more likely to have a wide network of business contacts – women or men? | ||||
| Who is generally better at finding customers – women or men? | ||||
| Who is usually better at negotiating in business, with buyers and suppliers – women or men? | ||||
| Who is usually better at informal negotiations (with authorities, for example) – women or men? | ||||
| Who is more likely to have higher financial literacy – a businesswoman or a businessman? | ||||
| Who is more likely to use different banking products from the FI – women or men? | ||||
| Who makes a better client – a businesswoman or a businessman? | ||||
| Who needs more assistance when applying for a business loan – women or men? | ||||
| Whose business tends to be less risky for the bank to lend to – a woman or a man? | ||||
| Who is more likely to use digital solutions, such as money transfers, mobile payments, or mobile banking – in their business – women or men? |
7. Currently, what kind of financial products work well with women in the MSME segment? Mark with an X all that apply
| Money transfers and/or remittances (for business and private transfers) | |
|---|---|
| Group-based loans | |
| Individual Business loans | |
| Individual Consumer loans | |
| Micro-insurance (via partnerships) | |
| POS machines | |
| Pawn shop or fast-track loans | |
| Branch service | |
| Agent banking service | |
| Branchless finance (internet or mobile based) | |
| Mobile payments, transactions | |
| Other (please specify): |
8. Looking at your current portfolio, what kind of loans do women typically request? Please rank the top 5 loans from most to least requested from the list below.
| Business loans for business operation: operating funds or cash flow | |
|---|---|
| Business lease / loans for business growth: new machinery, more employees | |
| Business loans for business operation – Uncollateralized | |
| Business lease / loans for business growth – Uncollateralized | |
| Group loans for diverse purposes | |
| Housing loans | |
| Loans for household needs and/or repairs | |
| Education loans | |
| Loans for health care (personal health, family health) | |
| Business start-up loans | |
| Consumer loans | |
| Lease / loans for car/vehicle purchase | |
| Loans for life events (weddings, funerals) | |
| Other (please specify): |
9. What aspects are important to women when requesting a loan? Mark with an X all that apply and explain where possible.
| Loan / lease amount (e.g., larger amounts) | |
|---|---|
| Loan / lease duration or tenor (e.g., longer tenors) | |
| Frequency of payment (e.g., more frequent) | |
| Grace period (e.g., payment of interest every month but principal is paid after 3 or 6 months) | |
| Non-lengthy/complex documentation requirements and procedures | |
| Innovative offerings | |
| Products tailored to specific sub-segments or sectors | |
| Competitive interest rates | |
| Collateral or guarantee requirements realistic to women's opportunity | |
| Turnaround time for loan / lease decisions | |
| Digital/technology solutions (mobile banking, mobile repayment, other solutions) | |
| Provision of business or financial management support | |
| Low upfront costs | |
| Bundled products offering | |
| Products that are designed for women in different life cycle needs | |
| Trusting the financial institution or knowing the loan / lease officer | |
| Other (please specify): |
10. What are the most common reasons why women's requests for credit are rejected?
Please rank the top reasons from 1 to 5 from the list below.
| Problems with identification documents, ID status | |
|---|---|
| Economic sector or activity where women operate businesses. Examples | |
| Level of business experience or business too young | |
| Level of indebtedness | |
| Tax status of business | |
| Tax debt | |
| Financial statements of the business (balance sheet, profit and loss statement, cash flow) | |
| Level of formalization of the business (i.e., legal form of the business, business certification, formal/informal staff status) | |
| Competitive advantage of products/services | |
| Bad assessment of market opportunity for business | |
| Insufficient loan repayment capacity (based on cash flow) | |
| Bad credit history | |
| Loan purpose | |
| Availability of collateral or other guarantees (i.e., immovable, and movable assets) | |
| Other (please specify): |
11. In your organization/company's experience, what type of immovable and movable assets are more difficult for women entrepreneurs to offer as collateral for loans?
Please rank 1 to 5 the most difficult collateral options from the list below.
| Land or buildings owned by the business (legally registered entity) | |
|---|---|
| Equipment and machinery owned by the business (legally registered entity) | |
| Other movable assets belonging to the business (legally registered entity) | |
| Specify: | |
| Accounts receivable and inventories | |
| Personal assets of business owner | |
| Cattle, jewellery/gold, other personal items | |
| Personal guarantor | |
| Guarantee fund | |
| Other form of collateral related to economic activity (example: cattle, harvest) | |
| Other (please specify): |
12. Do you see an opportunity in the market for developing a new business area focused on women entrepreneurs/women-owned/led MSMEs, or for deepening your strategy and outreach with this segment?
a. Yes
b. No
Please explain.
13. If NBFCs would want to expand their market share with women, please mark how this could best done from the options below:
| Please rank the strategies from 1 to 5 (in descending order) from the list below. | |
|---|---|
| Increase their funding sources | |
| Improve their governance structures | |
| Invest in technology for data analysis and deeper insights | |
| Advocate for regulatory amendments | |
| Introduce alternative credit assessment models | |
| Invest in identifying the non-financial service (NFS) needs of female customers and in the NFS package offered to them | |
| Identify alternative data points for credit risk assessment of women customers | |
| Create a customer value proposition that aligns with women's identified needs | |
| Other (please specify: |
14. Does your organization/company include sex-disaggregated information in loan applications? Please mark all that apply.
a. Yes, for individuals
b. Yes, for business borrowers – in this case, does your organization include questions about MSME ownership and /or management? Please explain.
c. No.
15. Does your organization/company use a definition for women owned or led businesses? Please include it here for reference.
16. If your organization/company collects sex-disaggregated client data in its data management systems, has it conducted any gender portfolio analysis to assess gender portfolio trends (e.g., funds availed to women) and understand their financial behavior compared to men (e.g., repayment, active # products, etc.)?
17. Has your organization/company conducted market assessments to define women and men's borrowers' distinct needs in the last 3 years?
a. Yes
b. No.
Please explain why.
18. If the answer to question 17 was yes, please indicate how the information was gathered:
Mark with an X all that apply
| Through customer satisfaction surveys | |
|---|---|
| Via consumer rights associations | |
| With regular feedback from industry leaders | |
| Through regulator's feedback | |
| By analysing public opinion trends in print/electronic media/social media | |
| Other (please specify): |
19. Has your organization/company designed and launched products and services tailored to women in the last 3 years?
a. Yes
b. No
20. If the answer to question 19 was yes, please provide the list of products and services in order of most to least demanded. Please explain what makes the products specifically tailored to women.
| Main Loan Products for Women | Product 1 | Product 2 | Product 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Name of the product | Name | Name | Name |
| Target market | |||
| Tenor / Years (Min/Max) | |||
| Amount (PKR) (Min/Max) | |||
| Interest Rate (fixed or variable) | |||
| Fees | |||
| Collateral & Guarantees | |||
| Instalment Frequency (instalment or revolving?) |
21. How does your organization support women to learn about special financial products and services available to them?
Mark with an X all that apply
| By creating a women-friendly customer experience – female loan/lease officers | |
|---|---|
| Through agent banking – including with a female face | |
| By increasing online or mobile phone-based points of contact (SMS, streaming) | |
| Via print/electronic media/social media | |
| Through walk-in customer opportunities | |
| Other (please specify): |
22. Are any special financial product considerations or provisions offered to women, youth, seniors, and/or other vulnerable or low-income groups (please mark all that apply)?
a. specialized incentive schemes (e.g., dedicated products and services)
b. longer cooling off or grace periods
c. fee waivers
d. Other, please explain: ________________________
23. Does your organization use a credit assessment model for appraising clients' financial capability and creditworthiness?
a. Yes. Please explain.
b. No
24. Has your organization/company developed an alternative credit assessment model specifically adjusted to women's risk and financial capability profile?
a. Yes. Please explain.
b. No
25. Does the Staff of your organization/company who deal directly with consumers receive adequate training, suitable for the complexity of the products or services offered to women customers?
a. Yes
b. No
26. If the answer to question 25 was yes, is mandatory gender sensitivity provided to staff on a regular basis?
a. Yes. Please explain what it entails.
b. No
27. Does your organization/company use outreach and marketing campaigns specifically tailored to the women's segment? These could include, for example, streaming sent via SMS, innovative campaigns that appeal to women's different profiles, female agent banking, female loan officers or desks, etc.
a. Yes. Please explain what it entails and what channels it uses.
b. No
28. Non-financial services (NFS) are business development services offered by financial institutions to MSMEs. Examples are trainings, networking events, and other tools and resources that can help MSMEs manage and grow their business. Does your organization/company offer NFS to MSME clients overall? If so, please mark on the table below the kind of NFS offered to MSME clients, what services are or could be most popular among women-owned or led MSMEs.
| Mark with an X all that apply | What is in Offer | What NFS are most popular or would be most useful with WMSMEs |
|---|---|---|
| Business Advisory Services (by Relationship Managers or other front-line staff) | ||
| Vocational Education / Technical Training: - financial literacy - digital literacy - business planning - market research - advertising and marketing - imports/exports - business management - negotiation and selling skills - leadership | ||
| Networking events/opportunities | ||
| Access to markets, such as trade fairs, exposure trips to new markets, access to online marketplace platforms | ||
| Business administration software (accounting, cash flow, invoicing management solutions) | ||
| Online tools and resources, such as templates, checklists, articles, and other relevant information | ||
| Support services such as childcare during provision of other services | ||
| IT System support | ||
| Legal support | ||
| Tax and revenue support | ||
| Other (please specify): |
29. Does your organization/company have a well-defined financial literacy/education program (either in house or in partnership with another entity – government or non-government related– for its development and implementation)?
a. Yes
b. No
30. If the answer to question 29 was yes, please indicate if the program is being implemented with:
a. Embedded gender methodologies (e.g., with gender sensitive learning instruments or through channels that work best with women)
b. An exclusive gender component (e.g., with a module specifically dedicated to women's way of doing business)
c. Gender disaggregated data on success or effectiveness of the program/s
31. Does your organization/company employ digital technologies ('fintechs') for operations?
a. Yes
b. No
32. If the answer to question 31 was no, please explain why.
33. If the answer to question 31 was yes, what does your organization/company use digital technologies for?
| Mark with an X all that apply | |
|---|---|
| For customer data recording during acquisition | |
| For end-to-end loan processing (identification, initiation, acquisition, instalment, retirement) | |
| For channelling lending, payments, and other services (e.g., 'insuretech') via digital means | |
| For penetrating new markets via extension of online services | |
| For customer segmentation | |
| For using data analytics to understand portfolios and draw deep customer insights | |
| For identification of processes which could be improved | |
| Other (please specify): |
34. Does your organization/company use or consider deploying fintech to deepen or establish relationships with clients via digital means, especially with women as a distinct segment to serve?
a. Yes
b. No
Please explain why.
S o u r c e: A D B ´ s Q u e s tio n n air e wit h 1 7 N B M F C s, F e b r u a r y - M a r c h 2 0 2 3 a n d in - d e p t h in t e r vie w s wit h 1 2 N B M F C s, M a r c h 2 0 2 3. 38
Insufficient gender sensitization training for NBMFCs employees.
Have not developed and enacted internal gender policies to incentivize women’s participation institutionally and to serve women as a specific segment.
Do not have gender targets for female participation (%) in overall staffing, higher decision-making positions, and key customer facing roles.
Many NBMFC lack inclusive workforce and governance structures, with women representing 23% of employees and 21% of senior management.
Source | ADB´s Questionnaire with 17 NBMFCs, February- March 2023
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
More like this from SECP
SECP published 4 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.
Source: Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added