Individual decision · CFTC · 2 Aug 2017 · CFTC Staff Letter 17-47
The Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight grants no-action relief to entities B and C, allowing them to avoid registering as commodity pool operators for specified pools by delegating CPO responsibilities to entity A. This relief applies provided that B and C delegate all CPO rights and obligations to A, maintain no involvement in solicitation or property management, and execute legally binding documents establishing joint and several liability with A. The Division will not recommend enforcement action against B or C for failure to register under Section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act, contingent upon the continued accuracy of the representations made regarding their operations and A's registered status.
Division of Swap Dealer and Eileen T. Flaherty Intermediary Oversight Director U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION Three Lafayette Centre 1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 Telephone: (202) 418-6700 Facsimile: (202) 418-5528 eflaherty@cftc.gov CFTC Letter No. 17-47 No-Action Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight RE: Request for No-Action Relief from the Requirement to Register as a Commodity Pool Operator under Section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act Dear :
This is in response to your letters dated May 22, 2017, to the Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight (“Division”) of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”). In the letters, you request on behalf of “A”, “B”, and “C”, that “B” and “C” receive relief from the requirement to register with the Commission as commodity pool operators (“CPO”) under section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA” or “Act”) 1 in connection with their roles as managers of certain commodity pools listed in Appendix A (the “Pools”). 2
Instead, you state that “B” and “C” will delegate certain of their responsibilities as CPOs of the Pools to “A” pursuant to the applicable requirements of CFTC Staff Letter No. 14-126 (“Letter 14-126”), 3 except for criterion 6 therein. Background On May 12, 2014, the Division issued CFTC Staff Letter No. 14-69 (“Letter 14-69”), which was in response to numerous requests asking that the Division provide no-action relief for failure to register as a CPO under section 4m(1) of the Act, if another person would serve as the registered CPO of the commodity pool at issue in lieu of the requesting CPO. Letter 14-69 developed a standardized, streamlined approach pursuant to which the Division addressed these types of relief requests, and set forth certain requirements that were based on prior staff no-action letters.
1
7 U.S.C. 6m(1). The Act is found at 7 U.S.C. 1 et seq. (2016). It, and the Commission’s regulations, may be accessed through the Commission’s website, http://www.cftc.gov. 2 “B” and “C” are affiliates and both serve as managers on the board of managers for the commodity pools listed in
Appendix A. Request, p. 1.
3
CFTC Staff Letter No. 14-126 (Oct. 15, 2014). This and the other Commission staff letters referenced herein are also available on the Commission’s website, http://www.cftc.gov.
RE: “A”, “B”, and “C” Delegation
2
On October 15, 2014, the Division issued Letter 14-126, which was a further refinement of the relief addressed in Letter 14-69. Like Letter 14-69, Letter 14-126 provided no-action relief for failure to register as a CPO under CEA Section 4m(1), if another person would serve as the registered CPO of the commodity pool at issue in lieu of the requesting CPO. The circumstances and conditions for relief under Letter 14-126 were, in purpose and effect, the same as those set forth in Letter 14-69, with the exception of certain added clarifications. One of those conditions was that, if the Delegating CPO 4 and the Designated CPO 5 are each a non-natural person, then one such CPO controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the other CPO. The relief provided by letter 14-126 was self-executing, and no notice or claim needed to be filed, in order to, in part, ease the administrative burdens of Letter 14-69 on the Division. In issuing Letter 14-126, the Division noted that there may be other CPO delegation situations involving circumstances in which CPO registration no-action relief may be warranted that are not addressed by Letter 14-126, and indicated that it intends to continue to evaluate requests submitted pursuant to Commission Regulation 140.99 6 for CPO registration no-action relief from persons who fall outside the scope of Letter 14-126. 7 Requested Relief Based on the representations made in your letter and other email and telephone correspondence (the “Correspondence”), we understand the facts to be as follows. “A”, the Designated CPO, is organized as a Delaware corporation and is subject to U.S. federal and state regulation. “A” is registered with the Commission as a CPO and has been a member of the National Futures Association in such capacity, since October 6, 1994. “A” is an advisory affiliate of “D”, which serves as the investment manager of each of the Pools, and has been registered with the Commission as a commodity trading advisor (“CTA”) and an NFA Member in that capacity since July 1987, when including its predecessor firms. 8 Both “B” and “C”, the Delegating CPOs, are organized as limited companies under the laws of Luxembourg. The Pools are société à responsabilité limitée governed by the laws of Luxembourg. Both “B” and “C” are affiliates of the Pools’ administrator, “E”. Additionally, you state that the Pools have a natural person manager on the board of managers, who, in reliance on CFTC Staff Letter 14-126, has not registered as a CPO and has also delegated his/her CPO rights and obligations to “A”. You state that permitting all managers of the Pools to delegate their CPO rights and obligations to a single entity “A” would promote consistency in
4
This term is defined in Letter 14-126.
5
Id.
6
17 CFR 140.99.
7
Letter 14-126, p. 2. The Division indicated the same following the issuance of Letter 14-69 as well. 8 “D” is also registered as an investment adviser with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and is considered a large advisory firm, with regulatory assets under management (“AUM”) for “D” and its advisory affiliates of approximately US $, as of March 31, 2017.
RE: “A”, “B”, and “C” Delegation
3 the delegation of the CPO function with respect to those pools and avoid potential confusion for current and prospective investors, while fostering efficient operations of the Pools. In addition, you state that “A”, “B”, and “C” satisfy all of the applicable criteria in Letter 14-126, except for criterion 6 therein, which states that, “[i]f the Delegating CPO and the Designated CPO are each a non-natural person, then one such CPO controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the other CPO.” In particular, you represent the following:
Pursuant to a legally binding document, “B” and “C” have delegated to “A” all of their CPO rights and obligations with respect to the Pools. “B” and “C”, including any of their employees or other persons acting on their behalf, do not participate, and have never participated, in the solicitation of participants for the Pools. “B” and “C”, including any of their employees or other persons acting on their behalf, do not manage, and have never managed, any property of the Pools beyond that which is required for the fulfillment of its role as a fiduciary to the Pools. “B” and “C” are not a subject to statutory disqualification under section 8a(2) or 8a(3) of the Act. There is a business purpose for “A” being a separate entity from “B” and “C” that is not solely to avoid registration by “B” or “C” under the Act and the Commission’s regulations. The books and records of “B” and “C” with respect to the Pools are maintained by “A” in the United States in accordance with Commission Regulation 1.31. 9 Both “B” and “C” have executed legally binding documents with “A”, whereby each undertakes to be jointly and severally liable for any violation of the Act or the Commission’s regulations by the other in connection with the operation of the Pools. Relief Granted Based upon the representations made in the Correspondence, the Division will not recommend that the Commission commence any enforcement action against “B” or “C” for failure to register as a CPO under CEA Section 4m(1) in connection with its role with respect to
9
17 CFR 1.31.
RE: “A”, “B”, and “C” Delegation
4 the Pools. This position is subject to all of the representations you have made in connection with your relief request. Although “A”, “B”, and “C” are not under common control and neither “A” nor “B” or “C” controls the other, they will remain jointly and severally liable for any violations of the Act or Commission regulations. Further, the entity to which “B” and “C” have delegated, “A” has itself been registered as a CPO for more than 20 years, is affiliated with a dually registered CTA-investment adviser with nearly $ AUM, and will maintain all books and records in the United States. The relief issued by this letter does not excuse persons relying on it from compliance with any other applicable requirements contained in the Act or in the Commission regulations issued thereunder. Further, this letter, the relief contained herein, is based upon the representations made to the Division. Any different, changed, or omitted material facts or circumstances might render this letter void. The Division retains the authority to condition further, modify, suspend, terminate, or otherwise restrict the terms of the relief provided herein in its discretion. Finally, this letter and the position taken herein represent the views of this Division only, and do not necessarily represent the views of the Commission or of any other office or division of the Commission. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Amanda Olear, Associate Director, at 202-418-5283 or aolear@cftc.gov, or Elizabeth Groover, Special Counsel, at 202- 418-5985 or egroover@cftc.gov.
Very truly yours,
Eileen T. Flaherty
Director
Division of Swap Dealer and
Intermediary Oversight
RE: “A”, “B”, and “C” Delegation
5
Appendix A
Commodity Pools Delegated by “B” and
“C” to “A”
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
The documents this one cites, and the documents that cite it.
“except for criterion 6 therein. CFTC Staff Letter No. 14-126 (Oct. 15, 2014).”
More like this from CFTC
CFTC published 1 document in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.
Source: Commodity Futures Trading Commission — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added · updated