2025-07-22 | CFTC Staff Letter 25-23Added · Updated
The CFTC Divisions of Market Oversight and Clearing and Risk will not recommend enforcement action against Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (CME) or its participants for failing to comply with specific swap data reporting and recordkeeping requirements under Commission Regulations 38.8(b), 38.10, 38.951, 39.20(b)(2), and Parts 43 and 45 for binary options contracts traded and cleared on CME. This relief applies to standardized, centrally traded binary options subject to premium style margining, provided CME clears them solely through its designated clearing organization, publishes trade timestamps, contract, quantity, and price in USD, and provides transactional information as required by Regulation 16.02. CME must continue to comply with all other swap data reporting and recordkeeping obligations, maintain required records for inspection by the Commission, the Department of Justice, or authorized prudential regulators, and ensure all contracts are fully margined.
CFTC published 4 documents in the last 30 days — get each new one by email the day it lands.
CFTC LETTER NO. 25-23 NO-ACTION JULY 22, 2025
1
Division of Market Oversight
Division of Clearing and Risk
Re: Request for No-Action Position for Commission Regulations 38.8(b), 38.10, 38.951 (In Part), and 39.20(b)(2), and Parts 43 and 45, for Contracts Traded on or Pursuant to the Rules of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. Introduction The Division of Market Oversight (“DMO”) and the Division of Clearing and Risk (“DCR” and, together with DMO, the “Divisions”) of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”) are issuing this letter in response to a request from Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (“CME”). CME requested a no-action position, on their own behalf and on behalf of their participants (the “Request”), 1 with respect to the swap data reporting and recordkeeping requirements of sections 38.8(b), 38.10, and 38.951 (only to the extent it requires compliance with Part 45 of the Commission’s regulations), 39.20(b)(2), along with Parts 43 and 45 of the Commission’s regulations (collectively, the “Relevant Regulations”). CME requests a no-action position with respect to binary options contracts with the features described in this letter traded and cleared pursuant to CME’s rules. CME is a designated contract market (“DCM”) and a registered derivatives clearing organization (“DCO”). Background CME stated in the Request that it intends to list for trading certain “binary options”2 that “provide for a payment that is dependent on the occurrence, nonoccurrence, or the extent of the occurrence of an event or contingency associated with a potential financial, economic, or commercial consequence.” 3 CME represents that the CME Contracts are “DCM-listed binary options with characteristics similar to other exchange-listed products (i.e., standardized, fungible and centrally traded), with few of the indicia of traditional swaps.”4 CME also represents that the CME Contracts are “subject to premium style margining, which means that a person establishing a long position will pay the full premium amount for each contract,” such that “the maximum risk 1 Letter from J. McKinlay to the Division of Market Oversight and Division of Clearing and Risk re: Request for NoAction Relief for Commission Regulations 38.8(b), 38.10, 38.951 (In Part), and 39.20(b)(2), and Parts 43 and 45, for Contracts Traded on or Pursuant to the Rules of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (May 2, 2025). 2 Request at 1. 3 Id. at 1-2. 4 Id. at 4. U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION Three Lafayette Centre 1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 Telephone: (202) 418-5000 www.cftc.gov
2 on a long position in a CME Contract will be the amount of money the market participant pays as the premium for that binary option swap” and “the maximum per contract risk for a short position is $100 minus the premium received for selling the binary option swap.”5 CME states that “[g]iven the risk profile and margining of the CME Contracts, they will have no bearing on systemic risk or potential transmission of risk or contagion among systemically important financial institutions.”6 In the Request, CME also states that the CME Contracts “provide for a payment that is dependent on the occurrence, nonoccurrence, or the extent of the occurrence of an event or contingency associated with a potential financial, economic, or commercial consequence, and, therefore, are swaps.” 7 CEA section 4c(b), in relevant part, prohibits any person from offering, entering into, or confirming the execution of a transaction involving any commodity regulated under the CEA that “is of the character of, or is commonly known to the trade as, an ‘option’ . . .” contrary to any Commission rule prohibiting the transaction or allowing it pursuant to specified terms and conditions. 8 When promulgating Commission regulation 32.2, the Commission stated that “the swap definition . . . includes options . . . (whether or not traded on a DCM).” 9 Commission regulation 32.2 states, in relevant part, that commodity option transactions must be conducted in compliance with the CEA and the Commission’s regulations related to swaps. 10
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”) 11 amended the CEA by adding a definition of “swap.”12 The Dodd-Frank Act required the Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission to further define jointly the term “swap.” In jointly adopting such further definition, the Commissions stated that “the statutory swap definition explicitly provides that commodity options are swaps[.]”13 Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, the Commission promulgated various regulations applicable to swaps, including the Relevant Regulations. The Relevant Regulations apply swap reporting and recordkeeping obligations to DCMs, DCOs, and other market participants. No-Action Position Requested CME requested that the Divisions not recommend the Commission take enforcement action against CME or their participants for failure to report the CME Contracts to an SDR or to fulfill 5 Id. 6 Id. 7 Id. at 2. 8 7 U.S.C. § 6c(b). 9 Commodity Options, 77 Fed. Reg. 25320, 25321, n.6 (Apr. 27, 2012). 10 17 C.F.R. § 32.2. 11 Public Law 111–203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010). 12 7 U.S.C. § 1a(47). 13 Further Definition of “Swap,” “Security-Based Swap,” and “Security-Based Swap Agreement;” Mixed Swaps; Security-Based Swap Agreement Recordkeeping, 77 Fed. Reg. 48207, 48236 (Aug. 13, 2012). See also In re:
Blockratize, Inc. d/b/a Polymarket.com, CFTC Dkt. No. 22-09, at 2, 7 (Jan. 3, 2022) (“binary options . . . constitute swaps under the CFTC’s jurisdiction, and therefore can only be offered on a registered exchange in accordance with the Act and Regulations”).
3 any of the other requirements of the Relevant Regulations. CME states that it requests a no-action position that is comparable to the no-action positions concerning reporting of similar contracts provided in CFTC Letters Nos. 17-31, 17-32, 21-11, 24-09, 24-12, and 25-02. 14 CME makes the following representations:
4 transactions.
16 The Divisions will not recommend that the Commission initiate an enforcement action against CME or its participants for failure to comply with Commission regulations 38.8(b), 38.10, 38.951 (only to the extent that regulation 38.951 requires compliance with Part 45 of the Commission’s regulations), 39.20(b)(2), as well as the applicable provisions of Parts 43 and 45 of the Commission’s regulations, or the requirements of the relevant CEA provisions pursuant to which the Relevant Regulations were promulgated, with respect to the CME Contracts, subject to the following conditions: 17
5
This letter expresses a staff position only with respect to enforcement of the Relevant Regulations. This letter does not state any legal conclusion regarding the characteristics or legality of the CME Contracts or the conduct of any person covered by the no-action position. 19 This letter and the no-action position taken herein represent the views of the Divisions only, and do not necessarily represent the positions or views of the Commission or of any other Commission division or office. This letter and the no-action position taken herein are not binding on the Commission. 20 Except as explicitly provided in this letter, the no-action position taken herein does not excuse persons from compliance with any applicable requirements of the CEA or Commission regulations. Further, this letter, and the no-action position contained herein, are based upon the representations made to the Divisions. Any different, changed, or omitted material facts or circumstances may render this letter void. As with all no-action letters, the Divisions retain the authority to, in their discretion, further condition, modify, suspend, terminate or otherwise restrict the terms of the no-action position provided herein. If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Paul Chaffin, Division of Market Oversight, at (202) 418-5185 or pchaffin@cftc.gov; Alicia Viguri, Division of Market Oversight, at (202) 418-5219 or aviguri@cftc.gov; Owen Kopon, Division of Market Oversight, at (202) 418-5360 or okopon@cftc.gov; or Elizabeth Arumilli, Division of Clearing and Risk, at (312) 596- 0632 or earumilli@cftc.gov. Sincerely, ____________________ Rahul Varma Acting Director Division of Market Oversight ____________________ Richard Haynes Acting Director Division of Clearing and Risk 19 For the avoidance of doubt, this letter is not intended to address whether any of the CME Contracts are consistent with any statutory or regulatory requirement, including with respect to the requirements of CEA section 5c(c)(5)(C) or Commission regulation 40.11. 17 C.F.R. § 40.11. 20 See 17 C.F.R. § 140.99(a)(2) (“A no-action letter binds only the issuing Division… and not the Commission or other Commission staff.”).
Sign in to read the rest — it's free
Source: Commodity Futures Trading Commission — original document
Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
2025-08-28
Staff Advisory: Registration Framework for Foreign Boards of Trade Providing Direct Access to Members or Other Participants Located in the United States
2025-08-07
CFTC Staff Letter 25-26: No-Action Position for Binary Options and Variable Payout Contracts on Railbird Exchange Cleared by QC Clearing
2025-07-31
CFTC Staff Letter 25-25: No-Action Position on Swap Data Error Correction Notifications
2025-07-30
CFTC Staff Letter 25-24: No-Action Position on SEF Minimum Trading Functionality for Permitted Transactions
2025-07-18
CFTC Staff Letter 25-21 (No-Action): Extension of No-Action Positions for Position Aggregation Requirements
2025-07-18
CFTC Staff Letter 25-22: Withdrawal of Staff Advisory 23-06 on Prime Brokerage and DCOR Registration
2025-07-14
CFTC Letter 25-20: Amendment of Letter 14-130 for Victoria University and PMRC
2025-07-09
CFTC Staff Letter 25-19: Advisory on Referrals for Potential Criminal Enforcement
More like this from CFTC
CFTC published 4 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.