Individual decision · CFTC · 3 Feb 1993 · CFTC Staff Letter 93-08
The Division of Trading and Markets will not recommend enforcement action against a registered commodity pool operator if it allows three non-qualified eligible participant directors to invest in its exempt funds. This relief applies provided the directors are listed as principals, are accredited investors, and have consented to be treated as qualified eligible participants. The operator remains subject to all other applicable Commodity Exchange Act provisions and Commission regulations.
I .
, I
DIVISION OF
TRADING AND MARKETS
Dear
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 2033 K Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 (202) 254-8955 (202) 254-8010 Facsimile February 3, 1993 Re: A-- Request for Relief Under Rule 4.7 This is in response to your letter dated January 13, 1993, as supplemented by telephone conversations with Division staff, in which, on behalf of A, a registered commodity pool operator {"CPO"), you request relief under Rule 4.7{a)~/ as set forth herein, in connection with A's operation of the Funds. Based upon the representations made in your letter, as supplemented, we understand the pertinent facts to be as follows. A is the CPO of the Funds. The Funds are "exempt pools" as defined in Rule 4.7{a) (1) (i) and all their participants are qualified eligible participants ("QEPs") as defined in Rule 4.7(a) {1) {ii). Band C and D, three of A's directors, are not QEPs but wish to invest in the Funds. You represent that each of the three directors is listed as a principal of A, is an accredited investor as defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, 17 C.F.R. 230.501 {1992), and has consented to being treated as a QEP. In addition, you represent that: (1) B was employed for eight years as Vice President, corporate lending officer and head of a merger and acquisitions group for a major U.S. bank. B joined A and its affiliates in 1989 and is managing director of E; (2) C is an attorney with extensive experience in banking and swap trading. C has be~:::n with A and its affiliates since June of 1992; (3) D has been employed in the securities industry since 1985, most recently in positions as vice president with responsibility for convertible securities sales and vice president with responsibility for institutional sales of global equity derivatives. D has been with A and its affiliates since January of 1992; and (4) c and D are registered with the National Association of Securities Dealers as registered representatives of an affiliate of A and intend to become registered as associated persons of A. ~/ Upon the filing of a notice of claim for exemption, Rule 4.7(a), recently adopted by the Commission at 57 Fed. Reg. 34853 {August 7, 1992), provides relief from certain Part 4 requirements to, among others, registered CPOs in connection with specified pools sold only to "qualified eligible participants" as defined in the rule.
~7sed on the foregoing and in accordance with prior prac- tice,- the Division will not recommend that the Commission take any enforcement action against A if the Funds continue to operate as Rule 4.7 exempt funds after Band C and D make an investment in the Funds. This letter is based on the representations that have been made to us. Any different, changed or omitted facts or circumstances might require us to reach a different conclusion. In this connection, we request that you notify us immediately in the event the operations or activities of A or the Funds change in any way from those represented to us. This letter is applicable to A solely in connection with its operation of the Funds. Further, this letter does not excuse A from compliance with any other applicable requirements contained in the Commodity Exchange Act (•Act•) or in the Commission's regulations thereunder. For example, A remains subject to the antifraud provisions of Section 4Q of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 6Q (1988), as amended by the Futures Trading Practices Act of 1992, to the reporting re~1irements for traders set forth in Parts 15, 18 and 19 of the Commission's regulations, 17 C.F.R. Parts 15, 18 and 19 (1992), and to all other applicable provisions of Part 4. This letter represents the views of this Division only and does not necessarily represent the views of the Commission or of any other office or division of the Commission. If you have any questions concerning this correspondence, please contact me or France M.T. Maca, an attorney on my staff, at (202) 254-8955. FMTM/bgb cc: Daniel A. Driscoll National Futures Association Very truly yours, Susan C. Ervin Chief Counsel ~I Seg Division·of Trading and Markets Interpretative Letter No. 93-2 (Current Transfer Binder], Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) 1 25,532, (December 10, 1992).
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
The documents this one cites, and the documents that cite it.
“A remains subject to the antifraud provisions of Section 4Q of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 6Q (1988)”
More like this from CFTC
CFTC published 1 document in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.
Source: Commodity Futures Trading Commission — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added · updated