1997-07-01 | CFTC Staff Letter 97-60Added · Updated
The Division of Trading and Markets will not recommend enforcement action against entity N for failing to register as a commodity pool operator for Funds I and II, provided entity O serves as the CPO and N exercises no discretion or control over fund investments or solicitations. The Division also will not recommend enforcement against entity O for admitting five previously relieved non-qualified eligible participants and one new investor, X, into Funds I, II, and III, subject to written consent and immediate access to trading records for each investor. These positions apply solely to the specified operations of Funds I, II, and III and do not excuse compliance with other Act provisions, including antifraud rules and reporting requirements.
CFTC published 6 documents in the last 30 days — get each new one by email the day it lands.
97-60
CFTC Letter No. 97-60
July 1, 1997
Division of Trading & Markets
Re: Request for Relief from CPO Registration Requirement of Section 4m(1) of the Act; Request for Relief from the QEP Criteria of Rule 4.7(a) Dear :
This is in response to your letter dated May 22, 1997 to the Division of Trading and Markets ("Division") of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("Commission"), as supplemented by your facsimile dated June 18, 1997 and by telephone conversations with Division staff. By your correspondence, you request that the Division not recommend that the Commission take any enforcement action against: (1) "N" for failure to comply with the commodity pool operator ("CPO") registration requirements of Section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act ("Act")1 in connection with serving as the sole general partner of Fund I and Fund II, both of which are organized and operated in the United States ("U.S.") and for which relief has been claimed pursuant to Rule 4.7(a)2; and (2) "O", a registered commodity pool operator, for failure to comply with the "qualified eligible participant" ("QEP") criteria of Rule 4.7(a) in connection with serving as the CPO of Fund I, Fund II, and Fund III, which is not organized and operated in the U.S. Based upon the representations made in your correspondence, we understand the relevant facts to be as follows. "O" will serve as the commodity trading advisor ("CTA") to Funds I and II, each of which is a Delaware limited partnership, and you request that it also be deemed to be the CPO of these funds. "O" also will serve as the CTA to Fund III, a Cayman Islands company, which will be operated as a Rule 4.7(a) exempt pool.3 "P" and "Q" (the "Directors"), each of whom is a U.S. resident, will serve as members of the board of directors of Fund III.4 These Directors comprise a minority of the members of the board of directors of Fund III.5 "P" and "Q" are listed as principals of "O". In addition, "P" is registered as an associated person ("AP") of "O". Funds I, II and III invest in a variety of securities and other financial instruments issued by U.S. and foreign issuers and they may trade commodity interests. The current minimum investment for Funds I, II and III is $1,000,000, 5,000,000, and $1,000,000, respectively, subject to the discretion of each Fund's general partner or board of directors.6 Since "N" will be serving as the general partner of Funds I and II, it would, absent relief, be required to be registered as a CPO in connection with its operation of each such fund.7 You file:///S|/Website%20Management/LegacyDataCopyasof2010-04-21/tm/letters/97letters/tm97-60.htm (1 of 5) [5/6/2010 7:36:32 PM]
Read the rest free, and get an email when CFTC publishes again
Source: Commodity Futures Trading Commission — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
More like this from CFTC
CFTC published 6 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.