Guidance On Accepting Accounts From Foreign Governments, Foreign Embassies And Foreign Political Figures

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Financial Crimes Enforcement Network National Credit Union Administration Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Office of Thrift Supervision June 15, 2004 Interagency Advisory GUIDANCE ON ACCEPTING ACCOUNTS FROM FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS, FOREIGN EMBASSIES AND FOREIGN POLITICAL FIGURES In light of recent actions involving Riggs Bank N.A., the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office of Thrift Supervision and the National Credit Union Administration (“the Agencies”) and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network have received inquiries as to whether financial institutions should do business with embassies and establish account services for foreign governments, foreign embassies and foreign political figures. The purpose of this advisory is to provide guidance to institutions on this subject.

• As it would with any new account, an institution should evaluate whether or not to accept
  a new account for a foreign government, embassy or political figure. That decision should be made by the institution’s management, under standards and guidelines established by the board of directors, and should be based on the institution’s own business objectives, its assessment of the risks associated with particular accounts or lines of business, and its capacity to manage those risks.
• The Agencies will not, absent extraordinary circumstances, direct or encourage any
  institution to open, close or refuse a particular account or relationship.
• Providing financial services to foreign governments and embassies and to foreign
  political figures can, depending on the nature of the customer and the services provided, involve varying degrees of risk. Such services can range from account relationships that enable an embassy to handle the payment of operational expenses, e.g., payroll, rent and utilities, to ancillary services or accounts provided to embassy staff or foreign government officials, each potentially posing different levels of risk. Institutions are expected to assess the risks involved in any such relationships, and to take steps to ensure both that such risks are appropriately managed and that the institution can do so in full compliance with its obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act, as amended by the USA PATRIOT Act, and the regulations promulgated thereunder.
• Where an institution elects to establish financial relationships with foreign governments,
  embassies or political figures, the Agencies, consistent with their usual practice of risk￾based supervision, will make their own assessment of the risks involved in such business.

As is the case with all accounts, the institution should expect appropriate scrutiny by examiners that is commensurate with the level of risk presented by the account relationship. As in any case where higher risks are presented, the institution should expect an increased level of review by examiners to ensure that the institution has in place controls and compliance oversight systems adequate to monitor and manage such risks, as well as personnel trained in the management of such risks and in the requirements of applicable laws and regulations.

• Institutions that have or are considering taking on relationships with foreign
  governments, embassies or political figures should ensure that such customers are aware of the requirements of U.S. laws and regulations to which the institution is subject, and should, to the maximum extent feasible, seek to structure such relationships in order to conform them to conventional U.S. domestic banking relationships so as to reduce the risks that might be presented by such relationships.
• Any institutions that have questions about this guidance are encouraged to contact their
  primary federal regulator.
  2