Rule · NBK · 12 Nov 2019
Second-tier banks must comply with the resolution by 1 July 2020. Their boards of directors must ensure a risk management system, approve a strategy for at least three years and an annual budget, approve a risk appetite strategy setting aggregated and per-risk levels, and establish three lines of defence, conflict-of-interest and confidential reporting procedures, and policies including ML/FT, internal control, business continuity and IT risk.
| "NATIONAL BANK OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN" REPUBLICAN STATE INSTITUTION | REPUBLICAN STATE INSTITUTION "NATIONAL BANK OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN" | |
| BOARD RESOLUTION | RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD | |
| 12 November 2019, Almaty city | No. 188, Almaty city |
| On approval of the Rules for forming the risk management and internal control system for second-tier banks |
In accordance with the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan of 31 August 1995 "On banks and banking activity in the Republic of Kazakhstan", the Board of the National Bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan RESOLVES:
To approve the attached Rules for forming the risk management and internal control system for second-tier banks.
To recognize as no longer in force the normative legal acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan, as well as structural elements of certain normative legal acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan, according to the list in the annex to this resolution.
The Department of Methodology and Regulation of Financial Organizations shall, in the manner established by the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, ensure:
1) together with the Legal Department, state registration of this resolution with the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan;
2) placement of this resolution on the official internet resource of the National Bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan after its official publication;
3) within ten working days after state registration of this resolution, submission to the Legal Department of information on the implementation of the measures provided for by subparagraph 2) of this paragraph and paragraph 4 of this resolution.
The Department of External Communications – Press Service of the National Bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan shall ensure, within ten calendar days after state registration of this resolution, that a copy of it is sent for official publication to periodical print publications.
Control over the execution of this resolution shall be assigned to the Deputy Chairman of the National Bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan, O.A. Smolyakov.
This resolution enters into force upon the expiry of ten calendar days after the day of its first official publication.
Second-tier banks shall, by 1 July 2020, bring their activities into compliance with the requirements of this resolution.
| Chairman of the National Bank | E. Dosayev |
Approved
by resolution of the Board
of the National Bank
of the Republic of Kazakhstan
dated "12" November 2019 No. 188
Rules
for forming the risk management and internal control system for second-tier banks
Chapter 1. General provisions
The corporate governance system allows organizing the distribution of powers and responsibilities, as well as building the process of making corporate decisions;
The risk management system is a set of components established by the Rules which provides a mechanism for interaction of internal procedures, processes, policies, structural units of the bank developed and regulated by the bank for the purpose of timely identification, measurement, control and monitoring of the bank's risks, as well as their minimization to ensure its financial stability and stable functioning.
the first line – at the level of the bank's structural units;
the second line – at the level of risk management units and those performing control functions;
the third line – at the level of the internal audit unit in terms of assessing the effectiveness of the functioning of the risk management system;
Chapter 2. Business model
The bank conducts a regular analysis of the business model in order to assess the impact of strategic risks and risks inherent in the bank's activities on it.
Banking activities are carried out within the framework of the chosen business model, taking into account the volume of assets, the nature and level of complexity of activities, organizational structure, and risk profile.
The budget corresponds to the bank's strategy. At the same time, the assumptions used are realistic and take into account available and accessible resources, current and potential economic conditions and possible risks.
One of the components of effective budget planning is the tariff policy, which minimally includes the following components:
internal order and procedures for conducting market analysis of demand and prices for banking services;
internal order and procedures for forming the structure of interest rates and tariffs;
acceptable lower and upper limits of interest rates and tariffs for the bank, as well as requirements for the internal order of their approval, taking into account the requirements of civil, banking legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, on payments and payment systems, on compulsory deposit insurance, their application and periodic review;
criteria for choosing the method of determining prices for banking services, as well as requirements for methodologies based on assessing the nature and level of complexity of the bank's activities and the risks inherent in the bank;
participants in the pricing process and the order of interaction between them, including information exchange;
internal order and procedures for timely informing the bank's clients about the conditions for providing banking services, as well as informing about changes.
The bank conducts a monthly analysis of the budget for compliance of forecast indicators with actual values, the causes of identified deviations, followed by the development of corrective measures if necessary, and makes justified adjustments with their subsequent documentation.
In order to keep the bank's strategy and budget up to date, the bank annually analyzes the target markets in which it operates, assesses the competitive environment, the sufficiency of resources and the ability to generate short-term and long-term profitability.
Strategic and budget planning is carried out within the framework of the adopted and approved risk appetite levels.
Chapter 3. Risk appetite strategy
The applied risk appetite levels meet the following requirements:
have a clear definition;
are relevant;
are measurable;
are calculated on a periodic basis;
information on the actual values of risk appetite levels and their fulfillment is provided to the board of directors and the bank's risk management committee;
are developed taking into account a forward-looking approach.
The quantitative methods used in establishing risk appetite levels ensure a high degree of reliability in assessing the level of risks.
When determining risk appetite, the bank assesses the acceptability of the established risk appetite in the current period of time and how acceptable it will be in the future through stress testing (scenario analysis and sensitivity analysis).
If material risks are identified, the description of which is absent in the risk profile, the bank assesses the risk level, refines the relevant procedures to include such risks in the risk profile, determines the risk appetite level and develops measures to prevent and (or) minimize the identified risk.
The aggregated level (levels) of risk appetite is (are) established and reviewed (reviewed) on a periodic basis. Risk appetite levels for certain types of risk are reviewed during the year when the market situation changes and (or) the requirements of the authorized body change, but within the framework of the aggregated risk appetite level.
Chapter 4. Corporate governance
Within the framework of the corporate governance code, a procedure for managing conflicts of interest and mechanisms for its implementation, as well as control over execution, are developed. The procedure contains the following components:
mechanism of the procedure for minimizing conflicts of interest in the bank's activities;
approval process that a member of the board of directors undergoes before starting to perform the functions of an official in another organization in order to prevent a conflict of interest;
obligation of members of the board of directors to immediately provide information on any issue that has created a conflict of interest or is a potential cause of its occurrence;
obligation of members of the board of directors to abstain from voting on issues in which a member of the board of directors has a conflict of interest;
mechanism of the board of directors' response to violations of the provisions of the procedure.
Within the framework of the corporate governance code, procedures are developed through which the bank's employees confidentially report violations related to the bank's activities;
compliance with the scale and nature of the bank's activities, its structure, risk profile, business model of the bank;
protection of shareholders' rights, provided for in accordance with civil, banking legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on joint-stock companies and support for the implementation of these rights;
ensuring timely and reliable disclosure of information in accordance with banking legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on state regulation, control and supervision of the financial market and financial organizations, legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, on currency regulation and currency control, on payments and payment systems, on the securities market, on countering the legalization (laundering) of proceeds from crime and the financing of terrorism, on joint-stock companies;
to perform their duties, members of the board of directors have access to complete, up-to-date and timely information;
the bank's organizational structure;
the bank's development strategy;
the bank's profitability management policy;
stress testing procedures and scenarios;
contingency financing plan;
business continuity management policy;
internal procedure for paying remuneration to the bank's executive employees and bank employees directly subordinate to the bank's board of directors;
HR policy;
remuneration policy;
accounting policy;
tariff policy;
credit policy;
problem assets policy;
the document regulating the main approaches and principles of the internal capital adequacy assessment process (hereinafter – ICAAP);
the document regulating the main approaches and principles of the internal liquidity adequacy assessment process (hereinafter – ILAAP);
policy (policies) for managing information technology risks and information security of the bank;
internal control policy;
credit risk management policy;
market risk management policy;
operational risk management policy;
compliance risk management policy;
policy for managing the risk of legalization (laundering) of proceeds from crime and financing of terrorism (hereinafter – ML/FT);
collateral policy;
liquidity management policy;
internal audit policy, internal auditor's code of ethics, regulation on the internal audit subdivision, internal audit procedures, annual internal audit plan;
policy (procedures) for engaging an external auditor;
the first line of defence is provided by the bank's structural subdivisions responsible for the timely identification and assessment of risks, communicating information about them to the subdivisions of the second line of defence, as well as risk management. The first line of defence performs operations within the approved risk appetite levels of the bank and functions within the framework of the adopted risk management policies;
the second line of defence is provided by independent subdivisions for risk management, compliance control and other subdivisions performing control functions (including, within their competence, subdivisions performing security functions, financial control, human resources, legal risk management, operational risk management). The risk management subdivision(s) conducts a comprehensive analysis of risks in the bank's activities, forms the necessary reports to the bank's board of directors and the risk management committee, promotes critical assessment and identification of risks by members of the management board and business subdivisions.
The compliance control subdivision organizes procedures for compliance with the requirements of the civil, tax, banking legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on state regulation, control and supervision of the financial market and financial organizations, the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on currency regulation and currency control, on payments and payment systems, on pension provision, on the securities market, on accounting and financial reporting, on credit bureaus and the formation of credit histories, on collection activities, on mandatory deposit insurance, on countering the legalization (laundering) of proceeds from crime and the financing of terrorism, on joint-stock companies, the legislation of foreign states affecting the bank's activities, as well as the bank's internal documents regulating the procedure for the bank's provision of services and conduct of operations in the financial market, and provides complete and reliable information to the board of directors on the presence of compliance risks;
the third line of defence is provided by an independent internal audit subdivision responsible for assessing the quality and effectiveness of the risk management and internal control system, the first and second lines of defence;
monitoring the implementation by the bank's management board of the strategy and policies approved by the board of directors, decisions of the general meeting of shareholders;
approving internal documents regulating the activities of the bank's management board in accordance with the Rules;
ensuring the implementation of the internal control system;
holding regular meetings with members of the bank's management board;
conducting analysis and critical assessment of information submitted by the management board;
establishing the necessary performance standards and remuneration system for members of the management board that correspond to the long-term goals defined by the bank's strategy and are aimed at financial stability;
1. interaction with and control over the work of the head of risk management;
2. periodic (at least once a year) assessment of the activities of each member of the bank's board of directors;
3. ensuring that records of decisions taken are kept (minutes of meetings, brief information on the issues considered, recommendations, if any, as well as special opinions of members of the bank's board of directors). Such documents and (or) materials are provided to the authorized body upon request in accordance with the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on state regulation, control and supervision of the financial market and financial organizations;
4. ensuring a developed information technology infrastructure for the collection and analysis of complete, reliable, timely information for risk management purposes. Awareness of the existence of information technology infrastructure limitations in determining risk appetite levels;
5. making a decision on granting a loan the amount of which exceeds 5 (five) percent of the bank's own capital based on analysis and assessment of the expediency of granting the loan;
6. making a decision on granting an unsecured consumer loan the amount of which exceeds 20,000,000 (twenty million) tenge based on analysis and assessment of the expediency of granting the bank loan. This paragraph does not apply to cases of granting an unsecured consumer loan when refinancing mortgage loans.
1. The composition of the bank's board of directors and the qualification requirements for its members meet the following requirements:
2. the composition of the bank's board of directors and its powers are sufficient to exercise effective control;
3. the bank's board of directors consists of persons possessing the necessary qualifications, impeccable business reputation and experience, collectively sufficient for the general management of the bank, in accordance with the chosen business model, scale of activity, type and complexity of operations;
4. members of the bank's board of directors are focused on interaction, cooperation and critical discussion in the decision-making process;
5. members of the bank's board of directors conscientiously perform their duties and make decisions, minimize conflicts of interest.
6. In order to improve efficiency and conduct more detailed work on certain areas of the bank's activities and based on the chosen business model, scale of activity, types and complexity of operations, risk profile, the bank's board of directors creates special committees under the bank's board of directors.
Each committee carries out its activities within the framework of a document defining its powers, competence, as well as principles of work, internal procedure for submitting reports to the bank's board of directors, tasks facing committee members and restrictions on the terms of work of members of the bank's board of directors in the committee. The bank's board of directors provides for periodic rotation of members (except experts) of such committees in order to avoid concentration of powers and promote the advancement of new views.
Committees keep records of decisions taken (minutes of meetings, brief information on the issues considered, recommendations, if any, as well as special opinions of committee members). The chairman of a committee under the board of directors is a member of the board of directors who is not the head or a member of the executive body.
Consideration of the listed issues is carried out by one or several committees of the bank's board of directors, except for audit issues considered by a separate committee of the board of directors.
criteria and conditions for selecting an external auditor;
system of payment for financial statement audit services, as well as for the provision of consulting services to the bank on audit issues;
8) consideration of the results of assessing the effectiveness of internal audit activities.
on the results of stress testing and other tools for assessing and identifying the interconnectedness of banking risks among themselves;
on assessing the impact of risks on the bank's financial condition, including assessing changes in the bank's income and expenses, assessing the size and sufficiency of own capital, identifying the main factors and causes that caused changes and affect the main performance indicators;
The risk management committee regularly receives from the risk management subdivision(s) and other responsible subdivisions data and reports on the current level of the bank's risks, violations of risk appetite levels and mechanisms for reducing the level of risks.
The amount of remuneration directly depends on the ratio of risk to result. Methods of paying remuneration against future income, the term and probability of receipt of which are uncertain, are carefully weighed on the basis of adopted qualitative and quantitative indicators. The remuneration system provides for the possibility of changing the amount of non-fixed remuneration taking into account all risks, including violations of risk appetite limits, internal procedures or requirements of the authorized body.
information technology development;
development and provision of banking services;
risk management;
budget planning.
the availability of personnel possessing the necessary experience, qualifications and impeccable business reputation, capable of managing the processes and risks associated with the bank's activities;
maintaining a sufficient amount of resources for the effective performance of functions and duties;
minimizing conflicts of interest in the performance of their duties;
minimizing the risk of concentration of powers in one employee;
internal procedure for remuneration of employees, including the procedure for payment of remuneration, as well as other types of material incentives;
conducting an assessment of the performance of the bank's employees;
the management board's achievement of the goals set in the bank's strategy, indicating, if any, the reasons preventing their achievement;
the compliance of the bank's activities with the strategy and policies approved by the bank's board of directors;
the results of the bank's activities and its financial position, including the stability (volatility) of the bank's profitability;
the non-compliance of the bank's decisions with the procedures, processes and policies approved by the bank's board of directors;
exceeding the approved risk appetite levels and the reasons for their violation;
information on the timeliness, completeness and quality of the management board's elimination of violations and deficiencies identified by compliance control, risk management, internal control, internal audit units, and external audit and the authorized body, as well as the implementation of their recommendations;
information on the state of internal control, in terms of timely identification of incorrect, incomplete or unauthorized operations, deficiencies in activities to ensure the safety of assets, errors in the formation of financial and regulatory reporting, violations of the bank's internal documents, requirements of the civil, tax, banking legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on state regulation, control and supervision of the financial market and financial organizations, the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on currency regulation and currency control, on payments and payment systems, on pension provision, on the securities market, on accounting and financial reporting, on credit bureaus and the formation of credit histories, on collection activities, on compulsory deposit insurance, on countering the legalization (laundering) of proceeds from crime and the financing of terrorism, on joint-stock companies, as well as the exclusion of conflicts of interest and internal abuses and fraud, including in relation to persons connected with the bank by special relations;
procedures for record-keeping on complaints (applications) of clients, including the receipt, initial processing, registration of appeals received by the bank, and responses to client appeals;
the bank's structural unit responsible for record-keeping on client appeals;
procedures for communicating (transferring) received appeals to the responsible structural units or employees who will be tasked with processing and preparing a response to the client's appeal;
the timeframes for timely processing of client appeals and preparation of responses to client appeals;
the internal procedure for interaction of the bank's structural units when considering client appeals and preparing responses to client appeals;
the internal procedure and procedures for maintaining a classifier of received client appeals of the bank;
The bank's management board is responsible for the proper performance of duties delegated to collegial bodies or employees of the bank within the framework of the approved organizational structure of the bank.
Interaction between the head of risk management and the board of directors and (or) the risk management committee is carried out on a regular basis. Information on the decision taken to dismiss the head of risk management is communicated to the authorized body. At the request of the authorized body, the bank's board of directors provides the rationale for the reasons for such a decision.
The bank identifies all material risks inherent in the bank's activities (including risks on balance sheet and off-balance sheet operations, by groups, portfolios and certain types of activities of business units). In order to effectively manage material risks, the bank's board of directors, the risk management committee and the head of risk management carry out regular assessment of the risks inherent in the bank's activities, as well as maintaining the relevance of the bank's risk profile. The risk assessment procedure includes continuous analysis of current risks, as well as identification of new and potential risks. When assessing risks, the bank takes into account the degree of concentration of material risks.
When identifying and measuring risks, both quantitative and qualitative parameters are taken into account. The bank also takes into account risks that are difficult to assess, for example, reputational and legal risks.
In addition to identifying and measuring risk exposure, the risk management unit assesses possible ways to mitigate risks and indicates the need to reduce the risk level. In cases where a decision is made to accept a risk exceeding the established risk appetite levels, the head of risk management submits a report on such exception to the board of directors with a proper analysis of the reasons for the excess and subsequently monitors the reduction of the accepted risk level within the framework of the risk management system and the established level for it.
The head of risk management informs the bank's board of directors of the existence of material discrepancies between the opinion of the risk management unit and the decision of the bank's management board regarding the level of risks accepted by the bank.
Regular communication on risk-related issues, including risk management policies and procedures, within the bank is a key factor of a high risk management culture. The risk management culture promotes a full exchange of information on risks and encourages open discussion and critical assessment of issues related to risk-taking by employees, the management board and the bank's board of directors.
Significant information on risk-related issues requiring immediate decision-making or urgent measures is promptly communicated to the bank's board of directors, the risk management committee and, if necessary, the bank's management board, responsible officials and heads of control units, for taking preventive measures.
The bank excludes the creation of closed groups within individual units that impede the effective exchange of information on risks and lead to decisions by the bank's authorized bodies without taking into account the opinion (expertise) of the bank's involved units. To overcome problems related to information exchange, the board of directors, management board and control units of the bank ensure the effectiveness of the internal communication system and, if necessary, make appropriate changes.
Within the framework of internal control, checks are carried out of the bank's processes for carrying out activities for compliance with internal policies and procedures, as well as the requirements of the civil, tax, banking legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on state regulation, control and supervision of the financial market and financial organizations, the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on currency regulation and currency control, on payments and payment systems, on pension provision, on the securities market, on accounting and financial reporting, on credit bureaus and the formation of credit histories, on collection activities, on compulsory deposit insurance, on countering the legalization (laundering) of proceeds from crime and the financing of terrorism, on joint-stock companies. The bank has reliable internal and external information for the purposes of risk management, making strategic business decisions and determining the sufficiency of its own capital and liquidity. The bank's board of directors and the relevant committees of the bank's board of directors make decisions related to risk-taking on the basis of qualitative, up-to-date and reliable data.
Risk measurement and modeling methods are used in addition to qualitative analysis and risk monitoring. The head of risk management informs the bank's board of directors and the risk management committee about the methods used and potential shortcomings of risk management models and analytical approaches in the bank.
Chapter 5. Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process
credit risk;
market risk;
operational risk;
as well as other risks to which the bank is exposed;
Within the framework of the ICAAP, the bank's board of directors is responsible for compliance with the approved risk appetite strategy developed in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Rules.
maintaining a sufficient level of provisions;
exercising control over the credit risk assessment process, which is ensured by the following:
taking necessary measures to ensure the completeness and reliability of information for the purpose of making decisions;
compliance with the requirements of the civil, tax, and banking legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on accounting and financial reporting, on credit bureaus and the formation of credit histories, internal policies and procedures for credit risk management;
taking measures to ensure complete and reliable management, regulatory, and financial reporting;
the existence of a procedure for assessing loans that is independent of business units;
approval of an adequate system for classifying assets by credit risk level, based on the use of all available information in the loan assessment process;
the existence of interaction procedures between participants in the credit risk management process that are regulated in detail and in full;
building an effective internal control system, including assessment of the conformity of the level of provisions with expected losses within the framework of the approved provisioning methodology and the internal capital adequacy assessment process;
the main directions of the bank's credit activity;
participants in the credit process and their areas of responsibility;
the internal procedure for making credit decisions, including the procedure for reviewing and approving loans, including with respect to lending to persons related to the bank by special relationships, and lending limits for the purpose of limiting credit risk concentration;
the procedure for analyzing the borrower's creditworthiness.
If the aggregate amount of loans granted and contingent obligations assumed to an individual exceeds 0.01 (zero point zero one) percent of the bank's equity, the size of which is above 100 (one hundred) billion tenge, or exceeds 0.02 (zero point zero two) percent of the bank's equity, the size of which is up to 100 (one hundred) billion tenge, the bank performs a creditworthiness analysis on the basis of the following information and taking into account the following factors (but not limited to them):
the borrower's possession of a permanent and sufficient income;
the possession of real estate and other property;
the existence of loan indebtedness, including to other creditors;
debt burden;
payment discipline (credit history) on loans;
the borrower's rating in the bank's scoring systems (if any);
the existence of other indebtedness;
the existence of other sources of repayment of indebtedness to the bank;
balances and transactions on bank accounts;
information on education and employment (field of activity);
socio-demographic characteristics;
information on the intended use of money;
additional information on the borrower's income.
If the aggregate amount of loans granted and contingent obligations assumed to an individual does not exceed 0.01 (zero point zero one) percent of the bank's equity, the size of which is above 100 (one hundred) billion tenge, or exceeds 0.02 (zero point zero two) percent of the bank's equity, the size of which is up to 100 (one hundred) billion tenge, the bank performs a creditworthiness analysis on the basis of the following information and taking into account the following factors (but not limited to them):
the borrower's possession of a permanent and sufficient income;
the existence of loan indebtedness, including to other creditors;
debt burden;
payment discipline (credit history) on loans;
the borrower's rating in the bank's scoring systems (if any);
the existence of other sources of repayment of indebtedness to the bank;
balances and transactions on bank accounts;
information on education and employment;
socio-demographic characteristics;
information on the intended use of money (if any).
If the aggregate amount of loans granted and contingent obligations to a legal entity exceeds 0.1 (zero point one) percent of the bank's equity, the size of which is above 100 (one hundred) billion tenge, or exceeds 0.2 (zero point one) of the bank's equity, the size of which is up to 100 (one hundred) billion tenge, the bank performs a creditworthiness analysis on the basis of the following information and taking into account the following factors (but not limited to them):
analysis of financial statements and main financial ratios of borrower legal entities (profitability, ratio of own and borrowed funds, cash inflow plan) and income level;
the existence of loan indebtedness, including to other creditors;
payment discipline (credit history) on loans;
the level of liquid assets;
debt burden;
the existence of other sources of repayment of indebtedness to the bank;
projected free cash flows;
assessment of the borrower's external environment (state of the economy, industry, development prospects, diversification of production and sales markets, and characteristics of the borrower's operating activity, such as the borrower's market share in the relevant market, positioning of the borrower's product, geography of operations, cyclicality of the business, changes in consumer preferences, changes in technology, barriers to entry into the economic sector, and other factors affecting the company's ability to generate income and maintain prices);
assessment of the quality of management (experience, competence, business reputation);
assessment of the borrower's owners;
the existence of facts of involvement in court proceedings;
inclusion in the list of unreliable taxpayers.
If the aggregate amount of loans granted and contingent obligations to a legal entity does not exceed 0.1 (zero point one) percent of the bank's equity, the size of which is above 100 (one hundred) billion tenge, or exceeds 0.2 (zero point one) of the bank's equity, the size of which is up to 100 (one hundred) billion tenge, the bank performs a creditworthiness analysis on the basis of the following information and taking into account the following factors (but not limited to them):
the borrower's possession of a permanent and sufficient income;
the existence of loan indebtedness, including to other creditors;
payment discipline (credit history) on loans;
debt burden;
the existence of other sources of repayment of indebtedness to the bank;
the development prospects of the relevant industry.
Depending on the lending industry and the type of borrower, the set of quantitative and qualitative indicators changes.
With respect to individuals and legal entities, the credit policy determines the cases (issuance of bank guarantees, letters of credit, bank guarantees issued under a bank counter-guarantee, as well as loans secured by highly liquid assets) in which the borrower's creditworthiness analysis is not applied. For banks that are subsidiary organizations of non-resident banks of the Republic of Kazakhstan having a long-term foreign currency credit rating of not lower than "A-" on the international scale of Standard & Poor's agency or a rating of an equivalent level from one of the other rating agencies, it is permitted to use a creditworthiness analysis at the level of the borrower's parent organization or the organization that includes the borrower in consolidated financial statements, conducted by the parent bank or a person affiliated with the bank, provided that the analysis was carried out no later than 12 months from the date of the borrower's application;
the internal procedure for making credit decisions with respect to loan restructuring in connection with the borrower's financial difficulties, which is based on the principles of justification, expediency, and independence when making a decision to carry out restructuring and includes a description of the cases and conditions for loan restructuring. At the same time, the bank defines the following cases of changing the terms of a bank loan agreement in connection with the borrower's financial difficulties as restructuring:
change in the loan payment schedule, including the subsequent granting or extension of a grace period for loan payments for repayment of principal and (or) remuneration;
subsequent extension of the loan term;
deferral of one or more loan payments in aggregate for a period of more than 30 (thirty) calendar days;
forgiveness of part of the principal and (or) remuneration on the loan;
capitalization of payments on remuneration overdue in aggregate for more than 30 (thirty) calendar days;
change (conversion) of the loan currency from one currency to another with capitalization of overdue indebtedness on remuneration and (or) fixing the exchange rate on loans in foreign currency;
granting a new loan to pay overdue indebtedness on a loan at the bank, including at other financial organizations;
increase in the credit limit in the case of indebtedness on the loan overdue in aggregate for more than 30 (thirty) calendar days;
reduction of the remuneration rate on the loan, except for a change in the size of the base indicator on a loan with a floating remuneration rate;
reduction of indebtedness on the loan as a result of repayment of the amount of indebtedness at the expense of the borrower's collateral property transferred to the financial organization.
The bank makes a decision on restructuring loans for borrowers having financial difficulties taking into account the existence of prospects for loan repayment after restructuring.
The decision to carry out loan restructuring (for borrowers and (or) a group of interrelated borrowers having financial difficulties, whose total indebtedness, including contingent obligations, exceeds 1 (one) percent of the bank's equity, the size of which is above 100 (one hundred) billion tenge, or 2 (two) percent of the bank's equity, the size of which is up to 100 (one hundred) billion tenge) is made by the bank's management board or an authorized collegial body of the bank, which includes the chairman of the bank's management board. Information on decisions made is sent on a quarterly basis to members of the bank's board of directors;
acceptable credit risk management methods, taking into account (but not limited to) the following factors:
one's own knowledge and experience in using the method;
economic efficiency;
the type of borrower and (or) counterparties, their financial condition;
the complexity and degree of risk inherent in a particular type of lending;
the conditions for granting loans to individuals and legal entities (including persons related to the bank by special relationships and bank employees) for each type of lending, including requirements for potential borrowers and (or) counterparties;
requirements for information of the borrower and (or) counterparty, including financial and other information necessary for making a decision on granting a loan;
the internal procedure for corporate lending, providing for analysis of the lending sector, the borrower's credit history, as well as a rating system based on quantitative and qualitative factors enabling a detailed assessment of loan quality;
the methodology of credit scoring or analysis of the borrower's solvency and creditworthiness, based on quantitative and qualitative characteristics, and the internal procedure for its use;
establishment of the minimum acceptable rating level (if any) at which a loan is granted;
the internal procedure and procedures for approval, authorization, analysis, and monitoring of deviations from the credit policy, standards, procedures, and limits;
establishment of lending limits and (or) remuneration rates on loans taking into account analysis of borrowers, including taking into account, if any, ratings and (or) scoring assessment of borrowers. Lending limits, including on unsecured loans, are established by currencies, industries, categories of borrowers (counterparties) (financial organizations, corporate, retail lending), products, groups of related parties, and per borrower;
the internal procedure for reviewing and approving applications for loans, making decisions on granting (refusing to grant), including with respect to lending to persons related to the bank by special relationships;
the internal procedure with respect to collateral, defining:
types of collateral and criteria for their acceptability;
requirements for the collateral structure;
limits by types of collateral;
the share of highly liquid collateral in the overall structure of security, the coefficient characterizing the ratio of the loan amount to the collateral value;
procedures ensuring the legal validity of collateral;
prompt assessment of the sufficiency of collateral, taking into account changes in the borrower's production activity indicators, the value and preservation of the collateral, including its exposure to other circumstances materially affecting its valuation;
procedures for the sale of collateral, including maximum sale periods;
the objectivity (adequacy) of the collateral valuation by appraisers.
When making a decision to grant a loan secured by immovable property, the bank considers the results of the appraisal. In the case where the market value determined as of the date of the last appraisal by the appraiser amounts to more than 100,000 (one hundred thousand) monthly calculation indices, the bank ensures (at least once a year) an appraisal of the collateral by an appraiser.
Assessment of decisions made for compliance with the established internal procedure is carried out in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 11 of the Rules. In the event of detection of deviations from the established internal procedure, the interested units bring information on the detected deviations to the bank's board of directors. In order to exclude material deviations in the bank's activity, the board of directors establishes restrictions on the volume (loan amount) and (or) on the number of deviations and exercises control over compliance with the established restrictions;
The bank's board of directors determines the units responsible for the development of the rating model and (or) scoring system, their implementation, application, and control over their functioning. The rating model and (or) scoring system contain a description of each credit risk level and the conditions for their assignment. In the process of assigning a borrower's credit rating and (or) scoring score, the bank takes into account the financial condition of the borrower(s) and other available information on the borrower.
When assigning a borrower's credit rating and (or) scoring score, the bank is guided by current available information on factors affecting the borrower's future creditworthiness and solvency.
The credit rating assigned to legal entities is subject to periodic monitoring for relevance. The frequency of review increases in the case of negative information carrying the risk of deterioration of the borrower's financial condition and (or) impossibility of repaying obligations to the bank and other available information;
Within the framework of the asset classification system by credit risk level, the bank implements and uses comprehensive procedures and information systems (in their absence, software) for monitoring the quality of the credit portfolio. The procedures and information systems include criteria that identify and detect problem loans and ensure proper control.
The asset classification system by credit risk level ensures the provision of information to the board of directors, committees under the board of directors, the management board, and other bank units participating in the credit risk management process and allows assessing the bank's credit risk level both for the balance sheet as a whole and in the context of each asset.
The asset classification system by credit risk level is based on a detailed analysis of all assets (except receivables from non-core activities in an amount not exceeding 2 (two) percent of the bank's equity) inherent in credit risk.
The detailed analysis of assets includes assessment of:
the probability of default on the obligations of the borrower and (or) counterparty (PD);
the amount of losses in the event of default of the borrower and (or) counterparty (LGD);
the amount of obligations exposed to default (EAD);
the term during which the risk position is maintained;
the value of collateral and the possibility of its sale;
the business environment and economic conditions.
Classification of assets (except receivables from non-core activities in an amount not exceeding 2 (two) percent of the bank's equity) inherent in credit risk is carried out on the basis of at least 5 (five) categories and ensures:
reliable assessment of capital adequacy within the framework of ICAAP;
the necessary level of provisions to cover expected losses.
Assets for which there is overdue indebtedness on principal and (or) accrued remuneration for a period of more than 90 (ninety) calendar days are classified into the worst categories, unless there are strong and justified grounds for classification into a higher category.
Assets for which there is overdue indebtedness on principal and (or) accrued remuneration for a period of less than 90 (ninety) calendar days are classified into the worst category if there are other factors of the borrower's insolvency determined by internal documents;
The bank's board of directors approves the problem asset management policy, which contains:
the definition of problem assets;
methods of problem asset management (restructuring, sale, write-off, seizure of collateral, bankruptcy, and others);
limits with respect to problem assets (by portfolios) and deadlines for implementing the approved problem asset management methods to bring them into compliance with the established limits when they are breached;
quantitative and qualitative parameters for early response to the risk of an increase in the volume of problem assets;
a list of interested units and the internal procedure for their interaction when working with problem assets;
the internal procedure for providing management reporting to the board of directors on the level of problem assets;
procedures for assessing the problem asset management methods used by the bank;
In order to ensure the sufficiency of provisions formed to cover expected losses, the bank annually (or more often if necessary) conducts an analysis of the provisioning methodology by:
determining the conformity of provisions calculated according to the requirements of the provisioning methodology with actual amounts of losses;
analyzing current market conditions and changes in macroeconomic indicators;
validating the provisioning methodology.
When forming provisions for collective loans, the bank analyzes historical data covering the necessary period of time and most correctly reflecting the bank's credit losses. At the same time, historical data are supplemented by analysis of the current market and economic situation.
If the provisioning methodology indicates the absence of signs of increased credit risk on loans for which provisions are formed on an individual basis, such loans are subject to assessment of the credit risk level on a collective basis;
In order to ensure the adequacy of credit risk assessment using models, the bank regulates the processes of their validation, back-testing, and permissible levels of deviation from the planned risk level. In the event of deviation from the planned risk level, the bank develops a corrective action plan.
Validation is carried out through one or more of the following methods:
checking the discriminatory power of the model;
assessing the predictive accuracy of the model;
analyzing rating migration;
comparative analysis of ratings.
Validation is carried out at least once every 4 (four) years. The frequency of validation depends on the current market situation, strategy, volume of assets, and level of complexity of the bank's operations, and increases in the event of significant changes in the economy or in the bank's internal lending processes. The validation results are provided to the risk management committee;
In situations where the use of expert judgments is necessary, the bank ensures:
a regulated process for the use of expert judgments, indicating the limits for the use of such judgments;
a sufficient level of competence of employees conducting the expert judgment;
a uniform approach in the application of expert judgments. Under identical conditions, expert judgments do not have significant deviations;
expert judgment is carried out on the basis of justified and documented assumptions, with the application of due prudence.
The bank's application of expert judgments taking into account historical data is supplemented by analysis of the current market and economic situation, in particular (as applicable):
changes in lending processes, standards, and practices of decision-making, repayments, and write-offs;
changes in external and internal economic factors and the business environment, taking into account dynamics;
changes in the level of non-performing and restructured loans;
the emergence of new market segments and products;
changes in credit risk concentration;
The bank carries out credit administration in accordance with procedures that include, but are not limited to, the following:
verification of the conformity of the submitted credit documents with the terms of granting loans;
verification of the conformity of loan agreements with the decisions made;
formation and maintenance of the credit file.
Formation of the credit file (part of the credit file) in electronic form is permitted. The credit file contains (including, but not limited to):
borrower identification documents:
this group includes documents proving the identity of an individual, documents related to the formation of a legal entity (with disclosure of ultimate individual owners owning directly or indirectly ten or more percent of shares or participation interests, except in cases established by paragraph 3 of Article 8-1 of the Law on Banks), confirmation of its legal personality, as well as documents confirming the powers of persons acting on behalf of the borrower and authorized to sign credit and collateral documentation on behalf of the borrower.
Documentation relating to the determination of intended use (except for overdrafts, consumer loans without confirmation of intended use with an aggregate amount of less than 0.2 (zero point two) percent of the bank's equity, and loans for the purpose of replenishing working capital with an aggregate amount of less than 0.2 (zero point two) percent of the bank's equity, syndicated loans with the participation of non-resident banks of the Republic of Kazakhstan):
This group includes documents and information on the transaction for the purpose of which financing is requested (including the initial financing purposes in the case of restructuring and (or) refinancing), including for large borrowers:
documents confirming the purpose of the loan, including for legal entities – supply contracts, purchase and sale contracts, foreign trade contracts;
for a legal entity whose amount of loans and contingent liabilities exceeds, for banks whose own capital exceeds 100 (one hundred) billion tenge – 0.1 (zero point one tenth) percent of the bank's own capital, for banks whose own capital does not exceed 100 (one hundred) billion tenge – 0.2 (zero point two tenths) percent of the bank's own capital – a feasibility study for the loan characterizing the payback periods and profitability level of the financed transaction, or the borrower's business plan which reflects information on the description of activities indicating the purposes of the loan, sales markets and the borrower's marketing strategy, risk assessment and management, a financial plan detailed by year (financial indicators of the business plan implementation by year, sources and volume of financing of the business plan and loan repayment), an estimate of income (expenses) (for loans related to investment purposes, start-up projects or loans whose main source of repayment is planned to be proceeds from the sale of goods and (or) services acquired through credit funds).
For the purposes of this paragraph:
a working capital replenishment loan means a loan granted to finance current production processes;
a consumer loan means a loan granted to an individual or an individual entrepreneur without forming a legal entity and meeting the following criteria:
the granting of the loan is not related to the purpose of financing entrepreneurial activity and it is assumed that the loan will not be used by the borrower for carrying out entrepreneurial activity;
the loan is planned to be directed to the acquisition of durable goods (residential real estate, automobiles, household appliances, furniture and other) and (or) payment for various services (educational, tourist, medical, repair and construction and other) and (or) other purchases and purposes (refinancing of a loan in another bank (if the previously obtained loan is related to consumer purposes), mobile phones, food products and other);
the loan recipient has a permanent source of income (wages, pension, benefits, dividends from securities, income from leasing real estate and other income) objectively allowing it to service obligations to the bank under the loan received, confirmed in the manner determined by the bank's internal documents.
Documents necessary for analyzing the client's financial condition and the quality of collateral:
this group of documents includes all documents on the basis of which the analysis of the borrower's financial condition is carried out and which reflect the main economic indicators of the borrower's activity, as well as documents confirming the existence, quality and size of the collateral accepted.
Documentation necessary for conducting credit monitoring. This group includes documentation formed by the bank's divisions in the course of administering the loan or necessary to confirm periodic credit monitoring, as well as procedures for updating information about borrowers (counterparties) for the purposes of credit risk management;
The bank develops management reporting forms which include, but are not limited to, the following information:
on the credit portfolio and its quality, presented, including in the dynamics of its changes;
on the size (level) of exposure to credit risk, including an assessment of the approach of aggregate exposure to the limits established in the bank for various types of loans (pre-limit approach);
on exposure to credit risk in relation to a group of related borrowers and the dynamics of its change;
on the concentration of credit risk of the largest borrowers (counterparties) and borrowers (counterparties) related to the bank by special relationships, including with the bank's shareholders, and the dynamics of its change;
on internal ratings of borrowers (counterparties) and the dynamics of their change, on monitoring the quality of loans by borrower (counterparty) ratings and its frequency;
on the size of provisions and assessment of the adequacy level of provisions;
on restructured, refinanced and problem loans;
on monitoring and control over compliance with limits;
on deviations from policy and limits.
The market risk management system is integrated into the bank's internal risk management processes, and its results constitute an integral part of the process of monitoring and controlling the level and profile of its market risk, as well as the decision-making process in carrying out the bank's current activities. The results of the market risk assessment are taken into account in the process of developing the bank's development strategy.
Market risk management is carried out on the basis of managing the position of assets and liabilities, forming the value of financial instruments with ensuring a positive interest margin and expected return, managing the open currency position, constant monitoring of market risks and control of established risk appetite levels for the relevant operations.
The market risk management system includes management of securities portfolios and control over open positions by currencies, interest rates and derivative financial instruments.
The trading book is the part of the bank's financial portfolio in which financial instruments are presented that are acquired and sold to maintain trading operations, generate income in the form of the difference between the purchase and sale price, and hedge the bank's operations against various types of risk. Trading book positions are regularly revalued. All other operations relate to the banking book;
The investment activity strategy complies with the following main principles:
the content corresponds to the bank's overall strategy in terms of goals, directions and implementation timelines;
the existence of a relationship between the tactical and strategic processes of managing the bank's investment activity;
maximum profit generation, ensuring growth of a quality investment portfolio, maintaining a sufficient level of liquid assets in the overall structure of the bank's assets;
formation of the structure of assets and liabilities taking into account compliance with the requirements, methods and procedures for managing market risk;
The bank develops a market risk management process which includes, but is not limited to, the following:
the participants in the market risk management process, their powers and responsibilities with a clear definition of the reporting structure, as well as the internal order of information exchange;
the list of foreign currencies and financial instruments with which operations are permitted, indicating the purposes of their use, as well as internal requirements and criteria for financial instruments, including as to volume, composition and conditions;
the internal order and procedures for identifying, measuring, monitoring and controlling the level of market risk.
The procedures for identifying, measuring, monitoring and controlling market risk:
cover all types of assets, liabilities and off-balance-sheet positions;
cover all types of market risk and their sources;
allow, on a regular basis, assessment and monitoring of changes in factors affecting the level of market risk, including rates, prices and other market conditions;
allow timely identification of market risk and taking measures in response to adverse changes in market conditions.
In order to assess the accepted level of market risk, the bank uses models corresponding to the development strategy, volume of assets and level of complexity of the bank's operations.
In relation to financial instruments denominated in foreign currency and sensitive to changes in interest rates, the aggregate volume of which exceeds 5 (five) percent of the volume of assets (liabilities), the bank measures interest rate risk separately for each of the foreign currencies. The assumptions adopted within the interest rate risk assessment methodology are documented in the relevant internal documents of the bank.
The bank, on a periodic basis, conducts sensitivity analysis for each type of market risk inherent in the bank's activity. Sensitivity analysis shows the impact on the bank's profit (losses) and own capital of possible changes in risk variable factors.
The bank, on a periodic basis, carries out back-testing of market risk assessment models. The bank conducts back-testing to verify the reliability and effectiveness of market risk assessment models and, where necessary, improves them. The results of back-testing with proposals, where necessary, for improving market risk management procedures are sent to the risk management committee and the bank's board of directors.
The bank conducts regular monitoring of the level of market risk in order to prevent the possibility of exceeding the established risk appetite levels. The frequency of market risk monitoring is determined by the bank based on the degree of its materiality for the relevant area of the bank's activity.
Information obtained in the process of market risk monitoring about a significant change in the level of risk is promptly brought to the attention of the board of directors and the bank's risk management committee for making the necessary decisions.
In order to minimize market risk the bank establishes:
risk appetite levels for currency, price and interest rate risks in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Rules;
constant control over compliance with the established risk appetite levels;
procedures for immediately informing the board of directors, the risk management committee, the bank's management board and other interested structural divisions about the achievement of limit values and (or) violations of the established risk appetite levels;
measures to reduce market risk taken upon achievement of the risk appetite levels;
changes in the structure of financial instruments, their quantitative and value indicators;
development and introduction of new technologies and conditions for carrying out banking operations and other transactions, other financial innovations and technologies;
entry into new markets;
The bank develops and implements a hedging strategy for each type of market risk, which contains:
hedged items;
a description of the hedging instruments used (use of exchange-traded and over-the-counter market instruments taking into account assessment of counterparty reliability and the terms of the hedging instruments);
the internal order for determining the necessary level of liquidity to cover hedging instruments;
a description of the procedure and methods for assessing hedging effectiveness.
Hedging is considered effective if the change in the fair value or cash flow of the hedged item is fully offset by the change in the fair value or cash flow of the hedging instrument. Hedging is carried out in relation to a specific identifiable risk, and not the bank's general risks;
The bank conducts stress testing of market risks on a periodic basis in order to identify the level of potential market risks inherent in the bank's activity and assess the bank's ability to withstand changes.
The frequency of stress testing, procedures and methods of conducting it are established in the relevant internal documents of the bank. The frequency of stress testing is determined based on the level of the bank's exposure to market risk, the volatility of capital markets and other external factors. The frequency of stress testing increases in cases of significant changes in external factors.
The following scenarios are used in conducting stress testing:
historical;
providing for changes in exchange rates of foreign currencies and (or) precious metals on the bank's open positions;
providing for changes in the market value of financial instruments;
providing for changes in the general level of interest rates, scenarios of growth or decline in the yield of financial instruments sensitive to changes in interest rates;
providing for changes in yield;
providing for changes in the ratios between interest rates on resources attracted and placed by the bank;
providing for changes in the degree of volatility of market interest rates;
providing for sharp deteriorations in key market, financial and (or) other factors and conditions of the bank's activity.
The bank uses a stress testing methodology and scenarios corresponding to its business structure and risk profile.
The results of stress testing are presented to the bank's board of directors, risk management committee and management board and other interested structural divisions of the bank on a periodic basis. If the results of stress testing indicate the bank's vulnerability to individual risk factors, the bank applies measures to reduce the level of accepted risk;
The bank ensures the existence of an effective management information system intended to provide the bank's board of directors, risk management committee and other interested structural divisions of the bank with information about the bank's exposure to market risk.
Management information contains, but is not limited to, the following:
information on the current state of interest rates, exchange rates, market quotations and their dynamics;
information on significant open positions by currency and financial instruments;
information on the level of interest rate risk on aggregated positions in financial instruments sensitive to changes in interest rates;
information on compliance of positions in financial instruments sensitive to changes in interest rates with established limits;
on early warning indicators of market risk;
expert assessments of changes in interest rates, exchange rates and price indices in the future;
results of market risk measurement;
The bank determines the participants in the operational risk management process on the basis of 3 (three) lines of defence.
The first line of defence is provided by the bank's structural divisions themselves. This means that the heads of structural divisions are responsible for identifying, measuring, monitoring and controlling the operational risk inherent in their activities, including that related to personnel, products, processes and systems. Based on the current market situation, strategy, volume of assets and level of complexity of the bank's operations, in order to ensure the effective functioning of the operational risk management system in the first line of defence, operational risk coordinators are appointed in the bank's structural divisions and the internal order of their interaction with the operational risk management and internal audit divisions is determined.
The second line of defence is provided by an independent operational risk management division.
The third line of defence is provided by the internal audit division through an independent assessment of the effectiveness of the bank's operational risk management system;
the goals and objectives of operational risk management;
the main principles of operational risk management;
the classification of operational risk event types;
the level of the bank's operational risk appetite;
determination of the participants in the operational risk management process on the basis of 3 (three) lines of defence, their powers, responsibilities with a clear definition of the reporting structure;
determination of the internal order and procedures for identifying, measuring, monitoring and controlling operational risk, including:
determination of key operational risk indicators;
determination of procedures and mechanisms for managing operational risk;
the internal order of information exchange between the participants in the operational risk management process along the 3 (three) lines of defence, including the types, forms and timeframes for submitting information;
procedures for approving, authorizing, analyzing and monitoring deviations from policy, procedures and limits;
the internal order and procedures for approving new products, activities, processes and systems and (or) making significant changes to existing products, activities, processes and systems;
requirements for making changes to internal documents and procedures in cases of detecting deficiencies in operational risk management and (or) the occurrence of conditions affecting the level of the bank's exposure to operational risk;
Audit results are an additional source of information in the bank's operational risk management process;
Collection and analysis of internal data on operational risk events (maintaining a database of operational risk events) is a process allowing assessment of exposure to operational risk and the effectiveness of internal control on the basis of information on operational losses.
Analysis of loss cases gives an idea of the causes of large losses and information on whether control system failures are episodic or systemic;
The composition of external data on operational risk events includes (if available) aggregate operational losses, timeframes, data on loss coverage, as well as relevant episodic information on loss cases in other banks;
An instrument through which the bank identifies and assesses the operational risks inherent in the bank's processes and assesses their impact on the processes and the effectiveness of the existing procedures for controlling the identified operational risks;
Description (regulation) of business processes – a process within which structural units constituting the first line of defense determine the main stages of business processes, types of activity, organizational functions, facilitating the identification of operational risks, interdependencies between risks, deficiencies in control and risk management;
Key operational risk indicators represent values (magnitudes) and (or) statistical data giving an idea of the operational risk profile to which the bank is exposed. Key operational risk indicators are used to monitor changes in the level of operational risk in the bank, which, in turn, ensures the identification of deficiencies in processes, organization, failures and potential losses;
Scenario analysis of operational risk is a process of comparing external loss events with the bank's internal processes and obtaining an expert opinion from heads of structural units and the risk management unit on deficiencies in the control system or risks not previously identified in order to identify potential cases of operational risk and assess possible consequences.
The risk management committee ensures the existence of a process for regular monitoring of the level of operational risk.
Management reporting contains complete, reliable, timely information. The frequency of reporting reflects the degree of the bank's exposure to risks, as well as the pace and nature of changes in its activities.
The processes of forming management reporting on operational risk are periodically reviewed for the purpose of continuous improvement of operational risk management and further development of the principles, procedures and processes of operational risk management.
The stress testing process includes the following:
stress testing allows the bank to analyze the impact of stress scenarios on the level of capital adequacy, assess the level of risk occurrence when the internal and external environment changes;
the degree and frequency of stress testing corresponds to the chosen business model, scale of activity, types and complexity of operations, as well as the bank's role in the financial system. The bank has the ability to increase the frequency of stress testing in deteriorating market conditions or at the request of senior management;
the bank's board of directors actively participates in the stress testing process in terms of approving stress testing procedures, scenarios (including considering conservative scenarios also during periods of economic growth), evaluating results and, as a result, taking measures to minimize the capital risk identified during stress testing.
When conducting stress testing, the bank uses, but is not limited to, the following stress testing scenarios:
general economic scenario, which is based on assessing the impact of a decline in the country's economic conditions, including a decline in economic growth in general and in individual sectors of the economy;
a scenario specific to the bank's business, which is based on assessing the impact of local stress factors, including those related to the specifics of the bank's lending activity and the structure of its loan portfolio.
The bank develops stress testing scenarios based on conservative but potentially realizable negative changes in external and internal indicators affecting the reduction of the capital adequacy level.
The bank's board of directors approves the stress testing scenarios and adopted assumptions, as well as the stress testing results. The validity of the choice of scenarios and corresponding assumptions of the bank is documented and reviewed together with the stress test results.
When determining stress scenarios and sensitivity, the bank uses a wide range of information, including historical and hypothetical stress situations.
In addition to the possibility of applying stress scenarios used by the regulator, the bank strives to use the most applicable stress situations that correspond to its individual characteristics.
The bank's board of directors regularly reviews stress testing scenarios for significant changes. If necessary, changes to stress testing scenarios are subject to an interim assessment.
When developing stress testing scenarios and assumptions, the bank is guided by the following:
scenarios include all significant risks to which the bank is potentially exposed;
during stress testing, the bank considers the interrelationship of various types of risks;
the bank adheres to a conservative approach when determining stress testing assumptions. Based on the type and severity of the scenario, the bank considers the appropriateness of a number of assumptions in relation to its activities;
the bank considers short-term and prolonged, as well as idiosyncratic and market scenarios, regardless of how high the level of capital adequacy is at the current moment, including:
lack of availability of capital markets;
decline in energy prices;
weakening of the national currency exchange rate;
real estate market crisis;
changes in interest rates;
agricultural sector crisis;
growth of inflationary expectations;
increase in unemployment and decline in household incomes;
decline in the market value of assets.
The stress test results and projected risks, as well as subsequent actions to minimize negative impact, are communicated and discussed with the bank's board of directors and the units participating in the liquidity risk management process. The bank's board of directors integrates the results of the stress testing process into the bank's strategic and budget planning process. Stress testing results are used in setting internal limits.
The bank's board of directors takes into account stress testing results in the process of maintaining capital adequacy in case of unforeseen circumstances, including for the purpose of eliminating deficiencies in the process.
The internal capital adequacy assessment process is subject to continuous review of both quantitative and qualitative indicators, including the application of its results, stress testing approaches, risk identification and the information collection process, and validation of risk assessment models. The review is conducted within the framework of the 3 (three) lines of defense, based on their role in ICAAP. The review facilitates timely changes when internal and external factors change.
Chapter 6. Internal Liquidity Adequacy Assessment Process
The bank assesses all balance sheet and off-balance sheet items affecting the level of liquidity risk. The bank assesses the level of liquidity in the market to cover the bank's need for attracting funding for the purpose of regulating liquidity risk.
When managing liquidity risk, the bank takes into account the decline in the value of assets and the impact of their sale during stress on the level of liquidity, profitability and capital.
The bank takes into account the interaction between liquidity risk and other types of risks to which it is exposed.
Liquidity measurement includes an assessment of the bank's cash inflows and outflows to determine the potential deficit of liquid assets in the future. The bank measures and forecasts expected cash flows by assets and liabilities, including off-balance sheet claims and liabilities, at different time horizons under normal conditions and in a number of scenarios, with varying degrees of stress.
Such time horizons include:
the need for liquidity and funding opportunities on an intraday basis;
the need for liquidity and funding opportunities for short and medium-term horizons up to 1 (one) year;
long-term liquidity of more than 1 (one) year.
The bank develops early warning indicators that identify increased liquidity risk and risks of limited funding. The developed indicators identify a negative trend in the level of liquidity, the bank's funding and reflect a real assessment for the purpose of taking immediate measures to mitigate the impact of emerging risks on the bank's financial position.
The bank determines triggers of qualitative and quantitative early warning indicators.
Qualitative or quantitative early warning indicators by their nature include, but are not limited to, the following:
rapid growth of assets, especially those financed by liabilities with the possibility of early withdrawal, or for which no maturity date is established;
increase in concentration in individual assets or liabilities;
increase in gaps in currencies;
decrease in the weighted average maturity of liabilities;
approaching the values of the bank's internal limits and (or) prudential standards defined as acceptable but requiring separate corrective measures in the existing risk management system procedures in order to reduce the level of risk;
negative trends or increased risk associated with the bank's activities;
significant decline in the bank's income, deterioration in asset quality and the bank's overall financial condition;
negative information, including in the media, related to the bank;
downgrade of the bank's credit rating;
decline in share quotations or increase in the cost of the bank's debt;
increase in the cost of corporate or retail funding;
increase in counterparty demands for additional collateral and (or) refusals on new unsecured transactions and on prolongation of terms;
closure or reduction of the established size of credit lines provided for the bank;
increase in outflow of retail deposits;
increase in outflow of term corporate deposits;
difficulties in attracting long-term financing.
The bank actively manages its intraday liquidity position and associated risks in order to timely fulfill payment and settlement obligations, both in normal and stress situations, thereby contributing to the uninterrupted functioning of payment and settlement systems.
The bank manages intraday liquidity risk through procedures that include, but are not limited to, the following:
tracking daily liquidity positions taking into account expected cash inflows and outflows, forecasting the size of potential funding deficit arising at different periods of the operating day;
identifying key clients acting as main sources of incoming or outgoing liquidity flows, forecasting inflows and outflows through establishing constant communication and awareness of upcoming large receipts and withdrawals;
identifying key periods, dates and circumstances in which liquidity flows and possible credit needs are especially high;
understanding the needs of business units;
controlling the intraday liquidity position in relation to expected payments in order to determine the size of necessary additional intraday liquidity or the need to limit liquidity outflow to cover priority payments;
having reliable sources of funding in order to obtain a sufficient level of required intraday liquidity in a short time;
managing the bank's assets that are used as collateral in case of need to obtain daily borrowed funds;
having a sufficient size of such assets, operational mechanisms for collateral;
monitoring outflows of key clients' funds in accordance with intraday needs;
the bank's response measures in case of unforeseen gaps in daily liquidity flows, including measures to ensure business continuity.
The bank ensures the existence of an effective management information system designed to provide the bank's board of directors, the risk management committee and other interested structural units of the bank with information on the bank's exposure to liquidity risk and the state of the bank's liquidity.
The bank develops a management reporting system that:
covers all sources of liquidity risk, including risks on contingent liabilities, as well as risks associated with the occurrence of events that entail early repayment of liabilities and the need for a certain amount of liquidity from the corresponding sources;
ensures the presentation of information on liquidity positions broken down by various time horizons;
ensures risk measurement for monitoring liquidity positions, both in normal and stress conditions, by types of currencies in which the bank has significant positions, both on an individual and aggregated basis;
allows monitoring and analysis of the dynamics of unencumbered highly liquid assets, for the purpose of their sale or use as collateral to attract funds upon the occurrence of stress situations;
allows monitoring and analysis of information on factors affecting the level of the stock of liquid assets;
ensures assessment and forecasting of future cash flows broken down by various time horizons, including taking into account stress testing results under various scenarios;
provides for the provision of more detailed and up-to-date information on a more frequent basis during periods of stress.
The management reporting system includes, but is not limited to, the establishment of internal procedures defining:
criteria, composition, internal procedure and frequency of liquidity risk management reporting submitted to various recipients (for example, daily reporting is provided to persons responsible for liquidity risk management, regular – to the management board, risk management committee and board of directors, with increased frequency – during periods of stress situations);
comparison of the current level of liquidity risk with established limits, identification of negative factors leading to negative trends in the liquidity level, as well as ways to limit violations;
messages on violations of liquidity risk limits indicating threshold values, causes of violations and proposals for leveling the current situation;
responsible persons (units) for preparing and communicating information to the relevant recipients.
Information systems ensure the functioning of the liquidity risk management system, including control over compliance with established limits. Information systems correspond to the complexity of the bank's business, risk profile, areas of activity, volume of assets and the bank's role in the financial system.
The bank takes into account costs, benefits and liquidity risks in the process of approving new products for all important types of activity.
The bank's ILAAP takes into account the measurement of costs, benefits and liquidity risks inherent in all areas of the bank's activity (including activity related to contingent risks that do not have a direct effect at the moment but have the possibility of materializing in the future). This allocation of costs, benefits and liquidity risks includes factors related to the expected maturities of assets and liabilities, their liquidity risk characteristics in the market and any other relevant factors, including benefits from access to relatively stable sources of funding.
The diversification goals are part of the funding plans (up to and more than one year) and are taken into account in the process of strategic and budget planning.
The board of directors, the risk management committee and the bank's management board are informed about the characteristics and diversification of funding sources and periodically review the funding strategy in order to immediately respond to changes in the internal and external environment.
An important component of ensuring funding diversification is ensuring access to financial markets, which is of decisive importance in the effectiveness and possibility of attracting funds from depositors and counterparties. Ensuring access to relevant markets takes into account, but is not limited to, the following:
maintaining presence in financial markets selected for funding;
the possibility of strengthening presence in selected funding markets;
identifying, establishing, maintaining relationships with current and potential creditors providing funds;
increasing the bank's capitalization in order to ensure the readiness of creditors to maintain relations with the bank.
The bank determines alternative sources of funding that increase the bank's ability to withstand stress situations and liquidity crises. Depending on the nature, severity and duration of the liquidity crisis, potential sources of financing include, but are not limited to, the following:
growth of deposits;
prolongation of maturity of liabilities;
issuance of short-term and long-term debt instruments;
intra-group transfers of funds, sale of subsidiaries or business lines;
securitization of assets;
sale of available highly liquid assets or conclusion of repo transactions;
containment of growth in volumes in main areas of activity (for example, slowing down lending).
The bank's board of directors, risk management committee and management board periodically assess and monitor the ability to promptly raise funds from each funding source in order to assess effectiveness in ensuring liquidity in the future.
The bank's board of directors approves a funding plan that clearly defines the process for addressing liquidity shortfalls in emergency situations. The funding plan corresponds to the scale of the bank's activities, risk profile, types and complexity of operations, volume of assets and the bank's role in the financial system. The funding plan includes a clear description of a diversified set of adequate, available, feasible potential measures to provide for unforeseen expenses to preserve liquidity and reduce cash shortfalls in various adverse situations.
The funding plan contains:
clearly defined and available sources of financing for unforeseen circumstances, with an assessment of the possible amount of funds raised from these sources;
the time required to raise additional funds from each source of financing for unforeseen circumstances;
clear operational procedures regulating:
the formation of the composition of persons (bodies, divisions) of the bank responsible for developing and implementing the funding plan, indicating powers and areas of responsibility in order to ensure internal coordination and communication;
a detailed algorithm of actions and their prioritization regarding what actions must be taken, who is responsible for taking them, when and how these actions are implemented;
several options for implementing different stress situations.
In order to ensure operational reliability, the funding plan is subject to regular testing and updating.
The necessary liquidity stock is comparable to the bank's established risk appetite for liquidity risk. This requires determining the necessary size of the stock of unencumbered highly liquid assets against estimates of liquidity needs under stress. Assessment of liquidity needs in current conditions and during stress periods includes:
both contractual and non-contractual cash outflows (inflows);
unconditional requirement of depositors to withdraw funds;
and takes into account the inability to obtain unsecured financing, as well as loss or reduction of access to liquid funds.
The necessary liquidity stock is mainly formed from the highest quality liquid assets, such as:
cash;
liquid government securities;
financial instruments that can be sold during the most adverse stress scenarios and less adverse ones in the form of unencumbered liquid assets sold or used as collateral without significant losses or discount.
General characteristics of the definition of highly liquid assets include:
transparency of its structure and risk characteristics;
ease and certainty of valuation;
the existence of a liquid market for this asset in all stress scenarios;
available market volumes for the asset, including the bank's stocks relative to normal market turnover;
absence of legal, regulatory or operational obstacles to the use of these assets for obtaining financing at any time to meet liquidity needs.
Effective collateral management is carried out through the following, but not limited to, procedures that determine:
assessment of the bank's needs for assets to be used as collateral, including assets currently pledged, taking into account the timing of their release;
assessment of the suitability of each type of asset for use as collateral in relation to each type of main counterparty and secured financing markets;
diversification of assets to be used as collateral by issuer, volume relative to financial market capabilities and counterparties, price sensitivity to avoid excessive concentration, and taking into account various market stress scenarios;
monitoring of collateral by issuers, geographic location, currencies, in order to assess how promptly assets are mobilized if necessary.
The bank periodically conducts stress testing on various factors of short-term and long-term scenarios focused both on the bank's specifics and on large-scale market stresses and a combination of both scenarios in order to analyze and quantify their impact on the level of liquidity, on the bank's cash flows, profitability and solvency.
The results of stress tests conducted are reviewed by the bank's board of directors. Based on the results of the review, measures are taken to eliminate or mitigate consequences to limit impacts on the bank, create the necessary liquidity stock and adjust the liquidity level.
The results of stress tests play a key role in forming the bank's funding plan and in determining the strategy and ILRMF.
The stress testing process includes the following:
the bank analyzes the impact of stress scenarios on the liquidity position, assesses the level of liquidity risk occurrence when the internal and external environment changes, at different time periods (short-term, long-term), including on an intraday basis;
the degree and frequency of stress testing corresponds to the chosen business model, scale of activity, types and complexity of operations, as well as the bank's role in the financial system. The bank has the ability to increase the frequency of stress testing in deteriorating market conditions or at the request of the bank's board of directors or the risk management committee;
the bank's board of directors participates in the stress testing process in terms of approving stress testing procedures, scenarios (including considering conservative stress scenarios even during periods of liquidity surplus), evaluating results and, as a result, taking measures to minimize the liquidity risk identified during stress testing;
the bank takes into account in stress testing the likely behavioral reaction of other market participants to market stress events and the extent to which the overall result amplifies market movement and exacerbates market strain.
When developing stress testing scenarios and assumptions, the bank is guided by the following:
scenarios include all main funding and liquidity risks in the market to which the bank is potentially exposed;
the bank considers short-term and protracted, as well as idiosyncratic and market scenarios, regardless of how high the current liquidity level is, including:
simultaneous absence of liquidity in several previously highly liquid markets;
serious difficulties in access to secured and unsecured funding;
currency convertibility restrictions;
serious operational or settlement failures affecting one or more main payment or settlement systems;
the bank takes into account the relationship between the reduction of liquidity in the market and funding restrictions;
during stress testing, the bank considers the relationship of various types of risks;
the bank takes into account liquidity needs in many currencies and several main payment and settlement systems;
the bank adheres to a conservative approach in determining stress testing assumptions. Based on the type and severity of the scenario, the bank considers the appropriateness of a number of assumptions in relation to its activities, which include, but are not limited to, the following:
narrowing of liquidity across the entire market;
outflow of retail and corporate funding;
lack of access to new secured and unsecured funding sources;
emergence of a need for significant discounts to sell assets and (or) conduct repo;
default of counterparties, including in the interbank market;
likelihood of additional margin and collateral calls;
likelihood of changes in financing terms;
liquidity directed to fulfill contingent liabilities on off-balance sheet instruments and operations, including credit lines;
planned change in asset volume;
non-renewability of interbank deposits;
inability to use credit lines provided to the bank;
impact of triggers of a significant credit rating downgrade;
conversion of the bank's client funds;
reduction in the ability to sell liquid assets taking into account legal, regulatory, operational and time restrictions;
limited access to funds of the authorized body, quasi-state sector companies;
limited operational ability of the bank to sell assets;
significant downgrade of the bank's credit rating;
appearance of negative information about the bank affecting the level of confidence in the bank.
Stress scenarios are analyzed by the bank on a regular basis in order to confirm their relevance. The analyses take into account changes in market conditions, changes in the nature, volume of assets or complexity of the business model and activities of the bank, actual experience in stress situations.
The bank's board of directors approves stress testing scenarios and adopted assumptions, as well as stress testing results. The validity of the choice of scenarios and corresponding assumptions of the bank is documented and reviewed together with the stress test results.
The stress test results and projected risks, as well as subsequent actions to minimize negative impact are communicated to and discussed with the bank's board of directors and divisions involved in the liquidity risk management process. The bank's board of directors integrates the results of the stress testing process into the bank's strategic and budget planning process. Stress testing results are used in setting internal limits.
The bank's board of directors includes stress testing results in the assessment and planning of the funding plan, including for the purpose of correcting deficiencies in the plan.
Based on the self-assessment results and upon identification of inconsistencies and (or) weaknesses in the process, the bank draws up an action plan containing information on corrective actions to be implemented, including information on responsible parties, expected deadlines, and necessary resources.
Chapter 7. Business Continuity Management
The bank manages business continuity through procedures, but not limited to, listed in paragraphs 63-71 of the Rules.
The business impact analysis of the bank is conducted to determine the time frames for recovery of critical activities, as well as to identify the resources necessary for the resumption and continuation of key activities in the event of unforeseen circumstances (critical resources).
To conduct the business impact analysis, the bank:
evaluates the volume of possible losses due to downtime in the provision of critical products and services over time;
establishes the maximum acceptable downtime period for each type of activity by identifying:
the maximum period of time within which the activity is resumed;
the period of time within which the normal level of activity is resumed;
identifies the types and levels of performance of activities, assets or other resources that must be continuously maintained in a minimum operable state and (or) restored within established time frames to provide critical products and services;
determines the volume of resources minimally necessary for the restoration and further implementation of critical activities in emergency mode;
establishes the target recovery time for each critical activity. The target recovery time is less than the maximum allowable downtime of the corresponding product or service;
establishes the target recovery point between the last data backup and the start of downtime of the critical activity;
ranks critical activities by target recovery time, highlighting priority ones;
identifies suppliers, counterparties, other interested parties on which the bank's critical activities depend and how these persons assist the bank in the event of unforeseen circumstances.
When determining personnel as a resource necessary to maintain critical activities, the bank determines:
the required number of employees;
the necessary skills and competencies;
When determining premises as a resource necessary to maintain critical activities, the bank determines:
primary and alternative sites;
premises requiring enhanced protection;
When determining technology as a resource necessary to maintain critical activities, the bank determines:
information technology services supporting critical activities;
telecommunication services supporting critical activities;
other technologies supporting critical activities, including perimeter security, cash collection technologies;
When determining information as a resource necessary to maintain critical activities, the bank determines:
information necessary for performing critical activities, including the bank's internal documents;
the volume of information requiring restoration (target recovery point);
methods of storage, protection and restoration of information;
The bank determines the suppliers, external services and supply on which the performance of critical activities depends;
The bank determines the volume of financial resources potentially available for the implementation of the plan(s) for ensuring continuity and restoration of the bank's activities in the event of unforeseen circumstances.
When choosing measures to manage unforeseen circumstance risks, the bank takes into account the results of the business impact analysis and determines, among other things, the internal procedure for interaction with external suppliers involved in recovery work, with external counterparties (depositors, creditors), the bank's shareholders, with the authorized body and other authorities, as well as with the media and other interested parties.
When choosing measures to manage unforeseen circumstance risks, the bank takes into account, but is not limited to, the following factors:
the maximum acceptable downtime period for a critical activity;
the costs of implementing the plan(s) for ensuring continuity and restoration of activities;
the consequences of not taking measures;
the realism of risks and the magnitude of losses from their realization;
consistency with the established goals of the business continuity management system;
consistency with the bank's business continuity management policies and procedures.
The bank determines measures to maintain key knowledge and competencies to ensure the continuity of its activities. Measures include, but are not limited to, the following:
regulating the internal procedure for carrying out critical activities;
maintaining a list of additional personnel competencies not used in everyday activities for the redistribution of functions in conditions of staff shortage;
training personnel in professional skills, including conducting cross-functional training.
The bank determines measures to reduce the impact on the provision of critical products and services due to the absence of primary premises. These measures include, but are not limited to, the following:
provision of alternative premises;
relocation of personnel to other bank premises;
use of workplaces of employees performing non-critical work;
work from home or in remote premises.
When choosing an alternative premises, the bank takes into account, but is not limited to, the following features:
security of the premises;
access to the premises;
proximity to the main premises;
availability of necessary communications.
The bank determines measures to maintain the operability of information technology and communication services necessary to ensure business continuity.
The bank determines measures to ensure the integrity, availability and confidentiality of information necessary to ensure business continuity in the event of a critical event.
The bank determines the list of resources used (including material supply, financial resources) and measures to ensure their availability, including from external suppliers and counterparties and other interested parties in the event of a critical event, which includes:
storage of additional resources, including technological and telecommunication equipment, in warehouse premises;
agreements with the supplier on urgent delivery (replacement) of resources in the warehouse;
availability of alternative resource suppliers.
the list of the bank's critical activities, as well as the maximum allowable downtime, including those requiring restoration;
the target recovery time for critical activities, including for information technology and telecommunications;
measures to minimize the risk of loss of reputation;
the decision-making procedure for activation, including a list of employees responsible for confirming activation and the conditions under which activation of the plan is required;
the list of employees informed about the activation of the plan;
communications within the team of employees involved in recovery and emergency provision of critical products and services;
communications with external organizations involved in ensuring business continuity;
communications with the authorized body;
communications with the media and clients;
communications with counterparties and other interested parties during recovery work;
communication methods;
the scheme for involving third-party organizations in the recovery process;
the scheme for involving counterparties and interested parties of the bank in the process of restoring the bank's activities;
the sequence and locations of restoration of the bank's critical activities;
the timing and locations of restoration of critical information technology services, as well as the sequence of actions for their restoration, including restoration of network infrastructure in a new building, restoration of basic functionality, applications and databases, synchronization, backup, telecommunications;
the timing and locations of mobilization of necessary resources;
cancelling the emergency mode of operation, including criteria allowing a decision to be made to end work in emergency mode;
transition to the normal day-to-day functioning mode;
restoration of disrupted internal banking processes after elimination of the consequences of unforeseen circumstances;
control over the execution of each test;
evaluation of testing results;
preparation of a protocol on the testing, its results and feedback, including necessary corrective actions;
agreement of the protocol with the heads of the bank's divisions involved in testing the plan(s) for ensuring continuity and (or) restoration of activity;
The report on the results of the testing with proposals, if necessary, for improving the plan(s) for ensuring continuity and (or) restoration of activity is sent to the risk management committee for review and to the bank's board of directors for approval.
Chapter 8. Information Technology Risk Management
The bank ensures the independence of the structural division for risk management from the structural division for information technology.
The bank ensures the existence of a management information system, including but not limited to the establishment of an internal procedure defining the criteria, composition and frequency of reporting on the bank's information technology risk management, and the responsible persons (divisions) for preparing and communicating information to the relevant recipients.
Chapter 9. Information Security Risk Management
The bank ensures the independence of the structural division for risk management from the structural division for information security.
Chapter 10. Compliance Risk Management
The compliance control division organizes procedures for compliance with the requirements of the civil, tax, banking legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on state regulation, control and supervision of the financial market and financial organizations, the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on currency regulation and currency control, on payments and payment systems, on pension provision, on the securities market, on accounting and financial reporting, on credit bureaus and the formation of credit histories, on collection activities, on mandatory deposit insurance, on countering the legalization (laundering) of proceeds from crime and the financing of terrorism, on joint-stock companies, the legislation of foreign states affecting the bank's activities, as well as the bank's internal documents regulating the procedure for the bank's provision of services and conduct of operations on the financial market, and provides complete and reliable information to the board of directors on the existence of compliance risk.
The risk management committee is responsible for developing the compliance risk management policy, subject to approval by the board of directors and containing the main principles of compliance risk management, including the principles for creating a compliance culture in the bank, on the basis of which compliance risk is identified and managed at all levels of the bank's structure.
The compliance control division is a structural division of the bank independent of any activity of the bank's structural divisions constituting the first line of defense.
The independence of the compliance control division is ensured by the following factors:
the compliance control division has the status of an independent structural division;
employees of the compliance control division do not hold positions on a part-time basis in other structural divisions of the bank;
the head and employees of the compliance control division are not placed in a situation where a conflict of interest is possible between their compliance risk management duties and any other duties assigned to them;
employees of the compliance control division, within their competence, have access to and, if necessary, require any information from the bank's structural divisions, the bank's subsidiaries, and also engage employees of the bank and its subsidiaries to assist in performing the compliance control function.
verification of compliance by the bank's divisions with the compliance risk management policy taking into account the requirements of the civil, tax, banking legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on state regulation, control and supervision of the financial market and financial organizations, the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on currency regulation and currency control, on payments and payment systems, on pension provision, on the securities market, on accounting and financial reporting, on credit bureaus and the formation of credit histories, on collection activities, on mandatory deposit insurance, on countering the legalization (laundering) of proceeds from crime and the financing of terrorism, on joint-stock companies;
verification of compliance by the bank with the requirements of the civil, tax, banking legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on state regulation, control and supervision of the financial market and financial organizations, the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on currency regulation and currency control, on payments and payment systems, on pension provision, on the securities market, on accounting and financial reporting, on credit bureaus and the formation of credit histories, on collection activities, on mandatory deposit insurance, on countering the legalization (laundering) of proceeds from crime and the financing of terrorism, on joint-stock companies, regulating the issues of the bank's provision of services and conduct of operations on the financial market, as well as the legislation of foreign states affecting the bank's activities in order to determine the degree of the bank's exposure to compliance risk;
personnel training on compliance risk management issues;
Certain compliance risk management functions, in accordance with the bank's internal documents, are delegated, if necessary, to other structural divisions of the bank, provided there is no conflict of interest.
Combining the functions of the chief compliance controller and the head of the compliance control division is permitted.
Interaction between the chief compliance controller and the board of directors and (or) the risk management committee is carried out on a regular basis.
Information on the appointment and dismissal of the chief compliance controller is communicated to the authorized body.
At the request of the authorised body, the bank's board of directors shall provide justification for the reason for adopting such a decision.
The compliance risk management system is based on 3 (three) lines of defence:
bank employees;
the compliance control subdivision;
the internal audit subdivision.
Internal procedures and the procedure for refusing to establish and for terminating business relationships with a client shall be developed taking into account the risk factors posted on the internet resource of the authorised body. Information on instances of refusal to establish and of termination of business relationships shall be sent to the authorised body quarterly, no later than the 5th (fifth) day of the month following the reporting quarter;
Chapter 11. Internal Control
Effective internal control is ensured through the formation of proper management control and a control culture (control environment).
Management control and control culture (control environment) characterise the general attitude, awareness and practical actions of the bank's board of directors and the bank's management board aimed at creating and effectively operating the internal control system.
The bank's internal control system is based on the following principles:
participation in the internal control process of all structural subdivisions and employees of the bank and the organisation of internal control as a day-to-day activity at all levels of management;
coverage by internal control of all areas of activity and business processes and regulation of internal control procedures for all areas and business processes of the bank;
carrying out internal control on an ongoing basis (continuity).
The internal control system shall be adjusted as any new or uncontrolled material risks are identified, including those related to the introduction of new services and products.
Control actions within the framework of separation of duties help minimise conflicts of interest and the conditions for their occurrence, the commission of unlawful actions, and also prevent giving one and the same structural subdivision and (or) employee the opportunity to:
perform banking operations and other transactions and simultaneously record them in accounting;
authorise the payment of money and carry out its actual payment, taking into account the limits established by the bank's internal documents;
conduct operations on the accounts of the bank's clients and on accounts reflecting the bank's own financial and economic activities;
assess the reliability and completeness of documents submitted when granting a loan and monitor loan repayment;
perform actions in any other areas of activity in which a conflict of interest arises.
Depending on the bank's operations, the following control methods are applied:
dual control (the "four eyes" and "joint access" principles).
The "four eyes" principle requires that the work of one employee be checked (approved) by another employee in order to involve the second employee in verifying the correctness of the calculation, authorisation and documentation of the operation.
The "joint access" principle presupposes a procedure under which 2 (two) or more employees are equally responsible for the physical protection of valuables and documents. Responsibility is established by the relevant internal document of the bank and is communicated to all employees;
analysis of operations.
Preliminary analysis of an operation for the purpose of preventing an incorrect or unauthorised operation.
Subsequent analysis after its completion for the purpose of uncovering the fact of an unauthorised operation.
To ensure the effectiveness of the subsequent analysis, it is necessary that the person carrying out the subsequent analysis be independent of the employees conducting that operation;
reports on the results of operations to provide the bank's management with information on the bank's performance indicators, financial conditions and deviations from the budget;
training of the bank's personnel in control techniques and error detection;
ensuring data protection;
ensuring protection against personnel errors;
checking for errors in order to detect them in a timely manner.
Internal control over the functioning of information systems and technical means provides for control of information technology systems carried out in order to ensure their security, uninterrupted and continuous operation.
From the standpoint of internal control, mandatory recording of all the bank's operations and transactions shall be ensured.
Control over ensuring the timeliness, reliability and sufficiency of the bank's financial information requires verification of the following (but is not limited to them):
information systems ensuring the maintenance of accounting in the bank for compliance with the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan in the field of accounting and financial reporting and IFRS;
the existence in the bank of internal documents on accounting matters;
ensuring chronological and timely registration of operations and events in accounting;
ensuring the possibility of generating financial statements as at the end of each operating day;
compliance of synthetic (summary) accounting with analytical (detailed) accounting;
conducting regular checks of accounting records by employees who are not involved in the process of authorising or recording operations in the financial statements;
making accounting entries on the basis of primary documents and ensuring the proper execution and safekeeping of primary documents.
Material deficiencies in internal control shall be brought to the attention of the bank's board of directors.
The internal audit subdivision shall assess the effectiveness of internal control.
The Risk Management Committee shall exercise control over the functioning of the internal control system.
Chapter 12. Internal Audit
The head and employees of the internal audit subdivision shall not hold any other position, shall not be members of a collegial body of the bank, and shall not combine duties in the bank and (or) subsidiary organisations.
The internal audit subdivision shall be guided in its activities by international internal audit standards.
The internal audit unit shall carry out an independent, comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of the corporate governance, internal control, and risk management systems.
The internal audit unit shall use a risk-based approach when developing its plans and actions, form an independent, reasoned opinion regarding the risks inherent in the bank's activity, and conduct appropriate assessments of internal processes.
conducting audits in any of the bank's units and in any areas of activity on the basis of a risk-based approach;
the absence of involvement of the internal audit unit in the development, implementation and application of internal control measures;
the absence of a conflict of interest in the activities of employees of the internal audit unit;
rotation of duties performed among employees of the internal audit unit where this can be carried out without detriment to the competence and professionalism of the employees;
the absence of a link between the remuneration of employees of the internal audit unit and the financial results of the bank's structural units. The bonus portion of the remuneration of the head and employees of the internal audit unit shall be established in such a way as to exclude the occurrence of a conflict of interest and not to cast doubt on the independence and objectivity of the internal audit unit;
providing the internal audit unit's reports for consideration by the board of directors and the audit committee, and for familiarization without the right to adjust such reports – to the bank's management board;
the head of the internal audit unit shall report directly to the bank's board of directors, which appoints him to the position, monitors his activity and, if necessary, decides on his dismissal;
information on the adoption of a decision to dismiss the head of the internal audit unit shall be communicated to the authorized body. Upon receipt of a request from the authorized body, the bank shall provide an explanation of the reasons for adopting such a decision;
the ability of employees of the internal audit unit to collect and perceive information, verify and evaluate identified facts and interact with employees of the internal audit unit;
the responsibility of the head of the internal audit unit for staffing the employees, and constant monitoring and assessment of the required level of skills;
the level of qualification and skills of employees of the internal audit unit and (or) engaged external experts that meets the requirements of professional competence, and the ability to carry out internal audit of the audited areas of the bank's activity at the proper level;
advanced training in order to keep up with changes in the internal and external environment;
conscientious performance of job duties by employees of the internal audit unit, their responsibility, integrity and honesty;
maintaining the confidentiality of information obtained in the course of performing job duties;
exclusion of the occurrence of a conflict of interest. Employees of the internal audit unit hired from among the bank's employees shall not be allowed, for the subsequent 12 (twelve) months from the day of their transfer to the internal audit unit, to conduct an audit of the unit in which they worked;
employees of the internal audit unit shall comply with the requirements of internal documents, the banking legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, and the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on joint-stock companies.
assessment of the organization of the risk management process, including the duties of structural units;
assessment of the bank's compliance with the risk appetite strategy and the procedures for determining risk appetite;
assessment of the effectiveness of the internal procedure for informing and disseminating issues and decisions adopted within the framework of risk management;
assessment of the effectiveness of risk management systems, including identification, assessment, monitoring and control, response, and reporting on risks arising in the bank's activity;
assessment of the process of generating data in information systems used within the framework of risk management for the purpose of ensuring accuracy, reliability and completeness;
assessment of the process of approval and application of risk assessment models, including verification of the consistency of approaches, the relevance, independence and reliability of data sources used in these models.
If, during audits by the internal audit unit, material facts are identified of decisions being adopted by the bank's management board in the presence of a negative opinion of the risk management unit(s), such facts shall be communicated by the internal audit unit to the bank's board of directors;
verification of the organization of the internal control system;
assessment of internal control processes and procedures;
assessment of management information on internal control for reliability, completeness and timeliness;
assessment of the effectiveness of internal processes for assessing capital and liquidity adequacy, the adequacy of the ratio of capital, liquidity and risks assumed by the bank, and compliance with mandatory ratios;
assessment of stress testing processes for the level of capital and liquidity, taking into account the frequency of stress tests, the objectives of testing, the realism of scenarios and assumptions made, and the reliability of the processes;
The internal audit unit shall assess the effectiveness of risk management processes and the preparation of reporting for the bank's management and the authorized body;
Assessment of the effectiveness of processes and procedures for managing compliance risk and ML/TF risk;
assessment of the process of generating initial financial data for the purpose of ensuring their adequacy, accuracy and completeness, and the subsequent transfer of key data, including financial results, valuation of financial instruments and their impairment;
assessment of the process of approval and application of pricing models, including verification of the consistency of approaches, the relevance, independence and reliability of data sources used in these models;
assessment of existing control mechanisms to prevent and detect violations of the rules for conducting operations;
assessment of the bank's procedures for measuring and monitoring banking positions in liquidity, currency and interest rate for compliance with the bank's risk profile, the external environment and minimum regulatory requirements;
sample testing of the bank's transactions for their compliance with policies and procedures during the audit and assessment of the effectiveness of internal control measures in relation to these transactions;
assessment of the effectiveness of accounting processes, including control procedures.
The internal audit report shall be sent to the bank's management board for familiarization, and the identified material facts and conclusions drawn shall be sent for consideration by the audit committee and the bank's board of directors.
The annual audit plan shall be based on a risk assessment and shall be revised during the year if necessary.
Chapter 13. Outsourcing
Appendix
to the Resolution of the Board
of the National Bank
of the Republic of Kazakhstan
dated "12" November 2019 No. 188
List of normative legal acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan, as well as structural elements of certain normative legal acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan, recognized as no longer in force
Resolution of the Board of the National Bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated 26 February 2014 No. 29 "On approval of the Rules for forming the risk management and internal control system for second-tier banks" (registered in the Register of state registration of normative legal acts under No. 9322, published on 17 April 2014 in the information and legal system "Adilet").
Paragraph 22 of the List of normative legal acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan to which amendments and additions are made, approved by Resolution of the Board of the National Bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated 27 August 2014 No. 168 "On introducing amendments and additions to certain normative legal acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan" (registered in the Register of state registration of normative legal acts under No. 9796, published on 12 November 2014 in the information and legal system "Adilet").
Paragraph 4 of the List of certain normative legal acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan to which amendments and additions are made on issues of regulation of the financial market, payments and payment systems, approved by Resolution of the Board of the National Bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated 29 October 2018 No. 267 "On introducing amendments and additions to certain normative legal acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan on issues of regulation of the financial market, payments and payment systems" (registered in the Register of state registration of normative legal acts under No. 18123, published on 11 January 2019 in the Reference Control Bank of normative legal acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan).
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
RegAlert holds no document that amends or replaces this one. This is not a check that it is in force: confirm with the regulator.
“3. Paragraph 4 of the List of certain normative legal acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan to which amendments and additions are made on issues of regulation of the financial market, payments and payment systems, approved by Resolution of th…”
“1. Resolution of the Board of the National Bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated 26 February 2014 No. 29 "On approval of the Rules for forming the risk management and internal control system for second-tier banks" (registered in the Reg…”
“2. Paragraph 22 of the List of normative legal acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan to which amendments and additions are made, approved by Resolution of the Board of the National Bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated 27 August 2014 No. 1…”
“In accordance with the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan of 31 August 1995 "On banks and banking activity in the Republic of Kazakhstan", the Board of the National Bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan RESOLVES:”
“Identification by second-tier banks... is carried out in compliance with the requirements established by the Rules for Forming a Risk Management and Internal Control System for Second-Tier Banks, Branches of Non-Resident Banks of the Repub…”
“The concept of operational risk is defined by the Resolution of the Board of the National Bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated 12 November 2019 No. 188”
Against On introducing amendments and additions to certain regulatory legal acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan on issues of regulation of the financial market, payments and payment systems (2018-10-29)
1222 new obligations · 1 change of scope · 1 change of who is bound · 16 not carried over
42 obligations are the same in both texts.
The first 60 of 1222 are shown.
“Not carried over” means the sentence has no counterpart in this text; the rule can still be in force in another text.
More like this from NBK
NBK published 4 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.
Source: National Bank of Kazakhstan — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added