Rule · FRB · 29 Mar 2013
State member banks with $10 billion or less in consolidated assets must notify borrowers of lapsed flood insurance and force-place coverage if unpaid within 45 days. These lenders must terminate force-placed policies within 30 days of receiving confirmation of existing coverage, refund overlapping premiums, and accept private flood insurance meeting Act standards. Escrow accounts are required for loans outstanding or entered into after July 6, 2014, unless the institution has under $1 billion in assets and lacked prior escrow requirements. Violations incur civil money penalties up to $2,000 per incident, with no annual cap.
BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20551
DIVISION OF CONSUMER
AND COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
CA 13-2
March 29, 2013
TO THE OFFICERS AND MANAGERS IN CHARGE OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS SECTIONS AND TO EACH DOMESTIC BANKING ORGANIZATION SUPERVISED BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE:
SUBJECT:
Interagency Statement on the Impact of Biggert-Waters Act
Applicability to Community Banking Organizations: This guidance applies to all state member banks, including those with $10 billion or less in consolidated assets.
On July 6, 2012, Congress amended the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 when it enacted the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 (the Biggert-Waters Act). Certain provisions of the Biggert-Waters Act impact regulations and guidance that the federal financial institution supervisory agencies have provided to lenders to assist them in complying with federal flood insurance statutes. In response, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the National Credit Union Administration, and the Farm Credit Administration (the Agencies) developed the attached guidance to inform financial institutions about these provisions of the Biggert-Waters Act.
This guidance identifies and describes several provisions of the Biggert-Waters Act that will become effective when the Agencies publish implementing regulations. The guidance further discusses two lender-related provisions of the Biggert-Waters Act, those addressing force placement and civil money penalties, which became effective immediately upon enactment. The Biggert-Waters Act revises the maximum civil money penalty for a violation of the Flood Disaster Protection Act to $2,000 per violation. The Board of Governors may assess civil money penalties up to the statutory maximum for flood insurance violations that occurred on or after July 6, 2012.
Federal Reserve Banks are asked to distribute this letter and the accompanying guidance to state member banks and bank holding companies, as well as to supervisory and examination staff. If you have any questions concerning this guidance, please contact Lanette Meister at (202) 452-2705.
signed by
Sandra F. Braunstein
Director
Division of Consumer and Community Affairs
Attachments:
Interagency Statement on the Impact of Biggert-Waters Act (PDF)
1
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Office of the Comptroller of the Currency National Credit Union Administration Farm Credit Administration Interagency Statement on the Impact of Biggert-Waters Act March 29, 2013 The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the National Credit Union Administration, and the Farm Credit Administration (the Agencies) developed this guidance to inform financial institutions about revisions to the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (the FDPA). This guidance discusses the effective dates of certain provisions of the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 (the Act), enacted July 6, 2012, and the impact of the Act on the Agencies’ proposed Interagency Questions and Answers. Biggert-Waters Act Amendments
2
It is the Agencies’ position that the force placement provisions of the Act described above became effective upon enactment.
3
Biggert-Waters Act and Impact on Agency Guidance The Agencies proposed question and answer 62 to address whether a borrower may be charged for the cost of flood insurance that provides coverage for the 45-day force placement period (2009 Interagency Questions and Answers, 74 FR 35914 (July 21, 2009) and 2011 Interagency Questions and Answers, 76 FR 64175 (Oct. 17, 2011)).2 Because the Act addresses this issue, proposed question and answer 62 is no longer necessary. In addition, the Agencies proposed revised question and answer 60 and proposed revisions to previously finalized question and answer 57. The Agencies do not intend to finalize proposed questions and answers 57 and 60 at this time. After final regulations have been promulgated, the Agencies expect to undertake a review of the Interagency Questions and Answers and may propose changes as appropriate. 2 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2009-07-21/pdf/E9-17129.pdf and http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-10- 17/pdf/2011-26749.pdf.
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
RegAlert holds no document that amends or replaces this one. This is not a check that it is in force: confirm with the regulator.
“On July 6, 2012, Congress amended the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 when it enacted the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012”
“Cross References: CA13 – 2, “ Interagency Statement on the Impact of the Biggert-Waters Act ””
More like this from FRB
FRB published 7 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.
Source: Federal Reserve Board — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added · updated