Rule · FRB · 30 May 2014
Supervised institutions must ensure borrowers obtain increased flood insurance for designated loans securing Other Residential Buildings if coverage falls below new limits effective June 1, 2014. Lenders must notify borrowers to obtain additional coverage at their expense and purchase it on the borrower’s behalf if the borrower fails to do so within 45 days. Institutions may charge borrowers for premiums and fees incurred. This guidance applies to state member banks, including those with $10 billion or less in consolidated assets.
BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20551
DIVISION OF CONSUMER
AND COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
CA 14-3
May 30, 2014
TO THE OFFICERS AND MANAGERS IN CHARGE OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS SECTIONS AND TO EACH DOMESTIC BANKING ORGANIZATION SUPERVISED BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
SUBJECT:
Interagency Statement on Increased Maximum Flood Insurance Coverage for Other Residential Buildings
Applicability to Community Banking Organizations: This guidance applies to all state member banks, including those with $10 billion or less in consolidated assets.
On July 6, 2012, Congress enacted the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 (the Biggert-Waters Act), which amended the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973. Section 100204 of the Biggert-Waters Act increased the maximum limits of building coverage available for non-condominium residential buildings designed for use for five or more families (classified as “Other Residential” buildings by the National Flood Insurance Program). The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has announced the availability of insurance under the Standard Flood Insurance Policy (SFIP) reflecting these increased maximum limits effective June 1, 2014.
In response to the availability of SFIPs with the increased limits, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Farm Credit Administration, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the Agencies) are issuing the attached “Interagency Statement on Increased Maximum Flood Insurance Coverage for Other Residential Buildings.” This statement conveys the Agencies’ expectations of supervised institutions with regard to any loans secured by Other Residential buildings located in a Special Flood Hazard Area that may be affected by the availability of increased maximum insurance for these types of properties.
Federal Reserve Banks are asked to distribute this letter and the accompanying guidance to state member banks and bank holding companies, as well as to supervisory and examination staff. If you have any questions concerning this guidance, please contact Lanette Meister, Senior Supervisory Consumer Financial Services Analyst, at (202) 452-2705. In addition, questions may be sent via the Board’s public website.[1]
signed by
Tonda Price
Acting Director
Division of Consumer and Community Affairs
Attachments:
Interagency Statement on Increased Maximum Flood Insurance Coverage for Other Residential Buildings
Cross References:
CA13 – 2, “Interagency Statement on the Impact of the Biggert-Waters Act”
[1] See http://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/contactus/feedback.aspx.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Office of the Comptroller of the Currency National Credit Union Administration Farm Credit Administration Interagency Statement on Increased Maximum Flood Insurance Coverage for Other Residential Buildings Under Section 100204 of the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012, the maximum limit of building coverage available for non-condominium residential buildings designed for use for five or more families, classified as “Other Residential Buildings” by the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), has been increased from $250,000 per building to $500,000. The maximum contents coverage for all policies covering Other Residential Buildings will remain $100,000 per policy. The new coverage limits are available for new policies, policy renewals, or existing policies with change endorsements1 effective on or after June 1, 2014.2
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Farm Credit Administration, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the Agencies) have issued flood insurance regulations requiring that, when a lender makes, increases, extends, or renews a loan secured by property located in a Special Flood Hazard Area (a “designated loan”), the property must be covered by flood insurance for the term of the loan.3 The amount of insurance required is the lesser of:
same time the policyholder is notified. Additionally, FEMA has instructed insurers to include a message on the Renewal Notice advising affected policyholders that higher limits are available. A policyholder may purchase increased coverage through a change endorsement on an existing policy as of May 1, 2014, to ensure that the increased coverage amount goes into effect as of June 1, 2014.5 If a financial institution or its servicer receives notification of the increased flood insurance limits available for an Other Residential Building securing a designated loan, the Agencies expect supervised institutions to take any steps necessary to determine whether the property will require increased flood insurance coverage. Although a lender is not required to perform an immediate full file search of its loan portfolio, for safety and soundness purposes a lender may want to review its loan portfolio to determine whether additional flood insurance coverage is required for certain properties in light of the availability of increased flood insurance coverage for Other Residential Buildings. The Agencies have explained previously in Interagency Questions and Answers Regarding Flood Insurance:
Apart from the requirements mandated when a loan is made, increased, extended or renewed, a regulated lender need only review and take action on any part of its existing portfolio for safety and soundness purposes, or if it knows or has reason to know of the need for NFIP coverage. Regardless of the lack of such requirement in the Act and Regulation, however, sound risk management practices may lead a lender to conduct scheduled periodic reviews that track the need for flood insurance on a loan portfolio. 6 If, as a result of the increase in the maximum limit of building coverage for Other Residential Buildings, the lender or its servicer makes a determination on or after June 1, 2014, that the building securing the designated loan is now covered by flood insurance in an amount less than required, it should take steps to ensure that the borrower obtains sufficient coverage. If an affected borrower has not provided evidence of the increased flood insurance, the lender or its servicer must notify the borrower that the borrower should obtain additional flood insurance at the borrower’s expense for the remaining term of the loan. If the borrower fails to obtain sufficient coverage within 45 days after notification, the lender or its servicer must purchase coverage on the borrower’s behalf. The lender or its servicer may charge the borrower for the cost of premiums and fees incurred in purchasing the insurance, including premiums and fees incurred for coverage beginning on the date on which flood insurance coverage did not provide a sufficient coverage amount. 5 Ibid. 6 Interagency Questions and Answers Regarding Flood Insurance, 74 Fed. Reg. 35914, 35935 (July 21, 2009) (Question and Answer No. 7).
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
RegAlert holds no document that amends or replaces this one. This is not a check that it is in force: confirm with the regulator.
“On July 6, 2012, Congress enacted the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 (the Biggert-Waters Act), which amended the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973.”
“Cross References: CA13 – 2, “ Interagency Statement on the Impact of the Biggert-Waters Act ””
More like this from FRB
FRB published 7 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.
Source: Federal Reserve Board — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added · updated