Rule · CFTC · 20 Dec 2012 · CFTC Staff Letter 12-61
The Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight provides no-action relief allowing U.S. banks wholly owned by foreign entities to calculate their de minimis threshold for swap dealer registration without including the swap activity of their foreign affiliates. This relief applies to nationally chartered banks regulated by the OCC, Federal Reserve, or FDIC, provided their ultimate foreign owner is registered as a swap dealer and their U.S. parent is a financial holding company supervised by the Federal Reserve. Eligible banks must maintain separate legal existence, financial capitalization, and operational capabilities from their foreign affiliates, and must not have swap obligations guaranteed by those affiliates. To claim this relief, a bank must file a materially complete claim via email to the Division, which becomes effective upon filing.
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581
Telephone: (202) 418-5977
Facsimile: (202) 418-5407 gbarnett@cftc.gov
Division of Swap Dealer and
Intermediary Oversight
Gary Barnett
Director
CFTC Letter No. 12-61
No-Action
December 20, 2012
Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight Re: No-Action Relief: U.S. Bank Wholly Owned by Foreign Entity May Calculate De Minimis Threshold Without Including Activity From Its Foreign Affiliates Ladies and Gentlemen:
This letter responds to requests from multiple market participants received by the Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight (“Division”) of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”) asking for relief with respect to the ability of a U.S. bank that is wholly owned by a foreign entity to rely on the de minimis exception to the swap dealer registration requirement under Commission Regulation 1.3(ggg)(4). 1 Specifically, the entities requesting the relief are foreign-owned U.S. banks, and they request that they be permitted to determine whether they satisfy the de minimis exception without having to consider the swap activity of their foreign affiliates (including their foreign owner). On May 23, 2012, the Commission prescribed rules addressing certain definitions under
section 1a of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”), as amended by the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”), including the definition of a swap dealer and the “de minimis exception” to the swap dealer definition, among other things. 2
The Dodd-Frank Act required that the Commission exempt from designation as a swap dealer any entity “that engages in a de minimis quantity” of swap dealing “in connection with transactions with or on behalf of customers.” Accordingly, the Commission promulgated Commission Regulation 1.3(ggg)(4), which sets forth the factors that must be satisfied to qualify for the de minimis exception. Under Commission Regulation 1.3(ggg)(4), a person is not deemed to be a swap dealer where the aggregate effective notional amount of swap dealer activity – including swap dealer activity by a person controlling, controlled by or under common control with such person – over the immediately preceding 12 months, does not exceed: (1) $3
1
17 CFR 1.3(ggg)(4).
2
See Further Definition of “Swap Dealer,” “Security-Based Swap Dealer,” “Major Swap Participant,” “Major Security-Based Swap Participant,” “Major Security-Based Swap Participant” and “Eligible Contract Participant,” 77 Fed. Reg. 30596 (May 23, 2012) (hereinafter “Adopting Release”).
billion, subject to a phase in level of an aggregate effective notional amount of more than $8 billion, applied in accordance with Commission Regulation 1.3(ggg)(4)(ii); and (2) $25 million when the counterparty is a “special entity,” as defined in Section 4s(h)(2)(C) of the Act 3 and Commission Regulation 23.401(c). The Commission made clear in the Adopting Release that the notional thresholds set forth in the de minimis exception encompass swap dealing positions entered into “by an affiliate controlling, controlled by or under common control with the person at issue.”4 The foreign-owned U.S. banks represent that they engage in an amount of swap activity that would entitle them to rely on the de minimis exception, and that they would qualify for the exception if only they could calculate their swap positions without including the swap positions of their foreign affiliates that will timely register as swap dealers. The foreign-owned U.S. banks believe that the following factors constitute appropriate boundaries that justify the evaluation of their swaps activities under the de minimis exception without taking into consideration the swap positions of their foreign affiliates: (1) the strength of the banks’ respective U.S. financial holding companies and the banks’ stand-alone and publicly available financial profiles; (2) the banks’ separate legal existence and oversight by a prudential U.S. banking regulator; and (3) the banks’ independent and distinct swaps operations from those of their foreign affiliates. These considerations are described more fully below. The foreign-owned U.S. banks are subject to comprehensive U.S. prudential banking regulation. As national banks regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”), they are subject to significant restrictions on their transactions with their foreign affiliates under Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation W. They also are separated from their foreign affiliates by an intermediary U.S. bank holding company that is organized under U.S. law and subject to the supervision, regulation, and examination of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”) under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHCA”). The foreign-owned U.S. banks and their U.S. parent holding companies are subject to regulatory capital requirements that do not look to the resources of the banks’ foreign affiliates. The holding companies are “financial holding companies” (as defined under the BHCA), with assets that independently meet the higher standards established by the Federal Reserve for bank holding companies that are “well capitalized” and “well managed” (as such terms are defined under the BHCA) without relying on the capital strength of their foreign parents. Further, the financial holding companies voluntarily issue public quarterly earnings releases and file quarterly and annual financial statements (Forms 8-K, 10-Q, and 10-K)
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In light of the foregoing, the Division will not recommend that the Commission take enforcement action against any U.S. bank that is wholly owned by a foreign entity for failure to consider the swap dealing activities of its foreign affiliates, or the U.S. branches of such affiliates, with respect to swap positions executed from and after October 12, 2012, when
3
7 U.S.C. § 6s(h)(2)(C).
4 Adopting Release, supra note 2, at 30632 n.444.
determining whether such U.S. bank satisfies the de minimis exception to the swap dealer definition and registration requirements, so long as the U.S. bank meets the following conditions:
hold itself out to the public and all other persons as a legal entity separate from its foreign affiliates and any other person. Although marketing and other materials may reference the foreign-owned U.S. bank’s affiliation with its foreign affiliates, the foreign-owned U.S. bank will at all times conduct its swaps business in its own name, with all swap trading documentation (e.g., ISDA Master Agreements and confirmations), and required disclosures of material risks and characteristics, showing only the foreign-owned U.S. bank and not any of its affiliates as the relevant counterparty to the customer.
7. To the extent a foreign-owned U.S. bank claiming no-action relief under this no-action
letter may hereafter be unable to observe any of the foregoing conditions, the foreignowned U.S. bank agrees to notify the Division promptly to determine whether such changed circumstances alter the relief provided. If the Division determines that relief is no longer appropriate in such circumstances, the foreign-owned U.S. bank would agree to register as a swap dealer or cease swap dealing activities within two months of the date of such determination. Claiming the No-Action Relief This relief is not self-executing. Rather, an eligible foreign-owned U.S. bank must file a claim to perfect the relief. A claim of no-action relief by such a bank will be effective upon filing, so long as the claim is materially complete. Specifically, the claim of no-action relief must:
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Frank Fisanich, Chief Counsel, at 202-418-5949. Very truly yours, Gary Barnett Director Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight cc: Regina Thoele, Compliance National Futures Association, Chicago
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
More like this from CFTC
CFTC published 2 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.
Source: Commodity Futures Trading Commission — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added · updated