Individual decision · CFTC · 1 Feb 2016 · CFTC Staff Letter 16-04
The Division of Clearing and Risk grants Eurex Clearing AG no-action relief from enforcement for failing to comply with the straight-through processing requirement of Regulation 39.12(b)(7) regarding swaps cleared for U.S. Clearing Members. This relief permits Eurex Clearing to continue clearing proprietary transactions for U.S. persons and futures commission merchants on behalf of U.S. customers, provided it does not accept customer clearing on behalf of U.S. customers. The exemption remains in effect until Eurex Clearing demonstrates compliance with the requirement, which is expected no later than January 2018 due to the delayed implementation of MiFID II.
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581
Telephone: (202) 418-5044
Facsimile: (202) 418-5547 jbandman@cftc.gov a
Jeffrey M. Bandman
Acting Director
Division of Clearing and Risk
CFTC Letter No. 16-04
No-Action
February 1, 2016
Division of Clearing and Risk
Mr. Thomas Book, Chief Executive Officer
Mr. Oliver Haderup, Executive Director
Eurex Clearing AG
Mergenthalerallee 61
65760 Eschborn, Germany
Re: No-Action Relief with Regard to Regulations Implementing Sections 5b(c)(2)(A) and 5b(c)(2)(C) of the Commodity Exchange Act Dear Mr. Book and Mr. Haderup:
On February 1, 2016, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission” or “CFTC”) issued an order granting registration to Eurex Clearing AG (“Eurex Clearing”) as a derivatives clearing organization (“DCO”) pursuant to the requirements of Section 5b(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”)1 and subject to the terms and conditions specified therein (“Order”).2 The Order permits Eurex Clearing to provide clearing services, in its capacity as a registered DCO, for swaps (“Cleared Products”)3 for (i) U.S. persons 4 clearing for their own proprietary business,5 or (ii) futures commission merchants clearing on behalf of U.S. customers, collectively (“U.S. Clearing Members”). As a registered DCO, Eurex Clearing is required to comply with all laws and regulations applicable to such DCOs,
7 U.S.C. § 7a-1(a).
CFTC Eurex Clearing Order of Registration dated February 1, 2016.
Eurex Clearing is permitted to clear swaps, subject to the requirements of Commission Regulation 39.5(a)(2), pursuant to the Order. Under Regulation 39.5(a)(2), a DCO that wishes to accept for clearing any swap that is not within a group, category, type, or class of swaps that the DCO already clears, must request a determination by the Commission of the DCO’s eligibility to clear such swap before accepting the swap for clearing. 17 C.F.R. 39.5(a)(2). 4 For purposes of the Order and this letter, the term “U.S. person” has the meaning set forth in the Commission’s Interpretive Guidance and Policy Statement Regarding Compliance With Certain Swap Regulations, 78 Fed. Reg. 45,292, 45,316–17 (July 26, 2013). 5 The Order applies to proprietary transactions of a U.S. person that is a clearing member of Eurex Clearing and a U.S. person that is an affiliate of a clearing member of Eurex Clearing.
Mr. Thomas Book
Mr. Oliver Haderup
February 1, 2016 including the core principles set forth in CEA Section 5b(c)(2) (“Core Principles”) and Commission regulations (“Regulations”).
In addition, the Order contains a condition with respect to Regulation 39.12(b)(7), which requires a DCO to accept or reject swaps for clearing as quickly after submission as would be technologically practicable if fully automated systems were used (the “straightthrough processing requirement”).7 Under the Order, Eurex Clearing is not permitted to clear or settle transactions for any U.S. Clearing Member until it demonstrates to the Division of Clearing and Risk (“Division”) that it can comply with the straight-through processing requirement. This condition applies to proprietary trades, as well as customer transactions. Eurex Clearing had represented that it would be in compliance with the straight-through processing requirement imposed by the Commission or, alternatively, the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (“MiFID II”), whichever is stricter, prior to the effectiveness of the Order. However, the implementation of MiFID II was delayed. Therefore, Eurex Clearing was unable to comply or demonstrate compliance with the straightthrough processing requirement.
Discussion
During the pendency of Eurex Clearing’s application for registration, the Division granted no-action relief to Eurex Clearing which permitted it to clear certain interest rate swap (“IRS”) transactions on behalf of U.S. Clearing Members in connection with their proprietary IRS clearing business. In order to avoid an interruption in clearing services for such transactions due to Eurex Clearing’s non-compliance with the straight-through processing requirement and in light of the MiFID II delay, the Division believes that it is appropriate to grant no-action relief to Eurex Clearing so that it may continue to clear proprietary trades in
CFTC Eurex Clearing Order of Registration dated February 1, 2016. See also 7 U.S.C. § 7a-1(c)(2)(A). To obtain and maintain registration as a DCO, Eurex Clearing must comply with the Core Principles and the regulations implementing the Core Principles set forth in Part 39. 17 C.F.R. § 39.12(b)(7). The Division understands that the implementation of MiFID II has been delayed by one year, which would postpone the implementation date for MiFID II to January 2018. Accordingly, Eurex Clearing would be expected to comply with the straight-through processing requirement no later than January 2018. See CFTC Letter Nos. 13-44 (Jul. 11, 2013), 14-27 (Mar. 10, 2014), 14-156 (Dec. 23, 2014), and 15-54 (Sept. 30, 2015) and their attachments (if any), available at:
http://www.cftc.gov/idc/groups/public/@lrlettergeneral/documents/letter/13-44.pdf, http://www.cftc.gov/idc/groups/public/@newsroom/documents/letter/14-27.pdf, http://www.cftc.gov/idc/groups/public/@lrlettergeneral/documents/letter/14-156.pdf, and http://www.cftc.gov/idc/groups/public/@lrlettergeneral/documents/letter/15-54.pdf, respectively. No-action relief was also given to U.S. Clearing Members for failure to clear certain IRS transactions through a registered or exempt DCO pursuant to the requirements of Section 2(h)(1)(A) of the CEA and the implementing regulations thereunder, as applicable.
Mr. Thomas Book
Mr. Oliver Haderup
February 1, 2016
IRS for U.S. Clearing Members. Consistent with the Order, the Division also believes that the clearing of proprietary transactions for U.S. Clearing Members should be permitted for all Cleared Products. The Division believes that granting no-action relief in this instance is appropriate to promote competition and enhance choice in clearing services for the Cleared Products. Grant of No-Action Relief Based on the facts presented and the representations Eurex Clearing has made, the Division will not recommend that the Commission take enforcement action against Eurex Clearing for failure to comply, as a registered DCO, with the requirements of Regulation 39.12(b)(7), 10 subject to the following conditions:
(1) Product Scope. This relief is limited to Cleared Products as defined herein (and consistent with the Order) that are accepted for clearing by Eurex Clearing for U.S. Clearing Members; (2) Participant Scope. The relief applies to Eurex Clearing in connection with the provision of clearing services, as a registered DCO, for the proprietary11 transactions of U.S. Clearing Members in the Cleared Products (Eurex Clearing will not accept, and no Eurex clearing member will offer for clearing through Eurex Clearing, the Cleared Products on behalf of a U.S. customer12); and (3) Duration. The no-action relief shall expire at such time as Eurex Clearing demonstrates to the Division compliance with the straight-through processing requirement. The position taken herein concerns enforcement action only and does not represent a legal conclusion with respect to the applicability of any provision of the CEA or the Commission’s regulations. In addition, the Division’s position does not necessarily reflect the views of the Commission or any other division or office of the Commission. Because this position is based upon the representations contained in supplemental materials to Eurex Clearing’s DCO application, it should be noted that any different, changed, or omitted
10 To the extent that Regulation 39.12(b)(7) implements requirements in Sections 5b(c)(2)(A) and 5b(c)(2)(C) of the CEA, the relief provided herein encompasses those statutory requirements. 11 The term “proprietary account” is defined in Regulation 1.3(y), 17 C.F.R. § 1.3(y). The relief granted herein to U.S. Clearing Members includes transactions of a parent or affiliate of a U.S. Clearing Member. 12 The scope of the relief provided herein does not extend to customer clearing by U.S. Clearing Members or U.S. customer clearing by any clearing member of Eurex Clearing. The term “customer” is defined in Regulation 1.3(k) of the Commission’s regulations, 17 C.F.R. § 1.3(k).
Mr. Thomas Book
Mr. Oliver Haderup
February 1, 2016 material facts or circumstances may require a different conclusion or render this letter void. Finally, as with all no-action letters, the Division retains the authority to condition further, modify, suspend, terminate, or otherwise restrict the terms of the no-action relief provided herein, in its discretion. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Laura Astrada at (202) 418-7622, or Alicia Lewis, Special Counsel, at (202) 418-5862. Sincerely, Jeffrey M. Bandman Acting Director
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
A newer document in RegAlert replaces this one.
“CFTC Letter No. 16-04 (Feb. 1, 2016) has now expired pursuant to its own terms.”
“See CFTC Letter Nos. 13-44 (Jul. 11, 2013), 14-27 (Mar. 10, 2014), 14-156 (Dec. 23, 2014), and 15-54 (Sept. 30, 2015) and their attachments (if any)”
“See CFTC Letter Nos. 13-44 (Jul. 11, 2013), 14-27 (Mar. 10, 2014), 14-156 (Dec. 23, 2014), and 15-54 (Sept. 30, 2015) and their attachments (if any)”
“See CFTC Letter Nos. 13-44 (Jul. 11, 2013), 14-27 (Mar. 10, 2014), 14-156 (Dec. 23, 2014), and 15-54 (Sept. 30, 2015) and their attachments (if any)”
Amended 1 time · last 2018-12-20
More like this from CFTC
CFTC published 1 document in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.
Source: Commodity Futures Trading Commission — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added · updated