2026-01-08 | CFTC Staff Letter 26-01Added
The CFTC Divisions of Market Oversight and Clearing and Risk will not recommend enforcement action against Bitnomial Exchange, LLC and Bitnomial Clearinghouse, LLC, or their participants, for failing to comply with specific swap data reporting and recordkeeping regulations regarding binary and bounded swaps. This relief applies to contracts traded on Bitnomial and cleared through Bitnomial Clearinghouse, provided they are fully collateralized positions. Bitnomial must publish trade timestamps, contract details, quantity, and price, and maintain required records for inspection by the Commission and other authorized regulators.
CFTC published 4 documents in the last 30 days — get each new one by email the day it lands.
CFTC LETTER NO. 26-01 NO-ACTION JANUARY 08, 2026 1 Division of Market Oversight Division of Clearing and Risk Re: No-Action Position with Respect to Commission Regulations 38.8(b), 38.10, 38.951 (In Part), 39.20(b)(2), and Parts 43 and 45, and for Fully Collateralized Swap Contracts Traded Pursuant to the Rules of Bitnomial Exchange, LLC and Cleared by Bitnomial Clearinghouse, LLC Introduction The Division of Market Oversight (“DMO”) and the Division of Clearing and Risk (“DCR” and, together with DMO, the “Divisions”) of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”) are issuing this letter in response to a request 1 (the “Request”) from Bitnomial Exchange, LLC and Bitnomial Clearinghouse, LLC (collectively, “Bitnomial”). Bitnomial requests a no-action position, on their own behalf and on behalf of their participants, from the swap data reporting and recordkeeping requirements of regulations 38.8(b), 38.10, 38.951 (to the extent that regulation 38.951 requires compliance with Part 45 of the Commission’s regulations), 39.20(b)(2), along with Parts 43 and 45 of the Commission’s regulations (collectively, the “Relevant Regulations”). Bitnomial requests a no-action position with respect to reporting “binary and bounded swaps referencing digital assets, economic indicators, and financial outcomes” with the features described in this letter, traded and cleared pursuant to Bitnomial’s rules (the “Bitnomial Contracts”). 2 Bitnomial Exchange, LLC is a designated contract market (“DCM”) and Bitnomial Clearinghouse, LLC is a registered derivatives clearing organization (“DCO”). Background Bitnomial stated in the Request that Bitnomial contemplates listing, “among other products, binary and bounded swaps referencing digital assets, economic indicators, and financial outcomes.”3 Bitnomial stated that Bitnomial Contracts are “fully collateralized.” 4 1 Letter from James Walsh to R. Varma and R. Haynes re: Request for No-Action Relief for Commission Regulations 38.8(b), 38.10, 38.951 (In Part), 39.20(b)(2), Parts 43 and 45, and for Fully Collateralized Swap Contracts Traded Pursuant to the Rules of Bitnomial Exchange, LLC and Cleared by Bitnomial Clearinghouse, LLC (Dec. 18, 2025) (the “Request”). 2 Request at 1. 3 Id. 4 Id. at 2. Commission regulation 39.2 defines a “[f]ully collateralized position” to mean “a contract cleared by a [DCO] that requires the [DCO] to hold, at all times, funds in the form of the required payment sufficient to cover the U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION Three Lafayette Centre 1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 Telephone: (202) 418-5000 www.cftc.gov
2
In the Request, Bitnomial represented that Bitnomial Contracts are swaps under the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”). 5 However, Bitnomial stated that Bitnomial Contracts “are standardized, novated, and fungible” and “[d]esigned to be traded on a central limit order book and cleared through a registered DCO.”6 Thus, according to Bitnomial, although the Bitnomial Contracts are “structured as swaps, the [Bitnomial] Contracts exhibit characteristics traditionally associated with exchange-listed products, such as transparency, fungibility, and standardized terms, and are distinguishable from bilateral or customized swaps in both operation and risk profile.”7 The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”) 8 amended the CEA by adding a definition of “swap.”9 The Dodd-Frank Act required the Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission to further define jointly the term “swap,” and in 2012, the Commissions jointly adopted such further definition. 10 Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, the Commission promulgated various regulations applicable to swaps, including the Relevant Regulations. The Relevant Regulations apply swap reporting and recordkeeping obligations to DCMs, DCOs, and other market participants. In particular, Parts 43 and 45 require, respectively, real-time reporting of swap transaction and pricing data to swap data repositories (“SDRs”) for purposes of public dissemination and reporting of broader swap data to SDRs for the Commission’s use in fulfilling its surveillance and market analysis missions. No-Action Position Requested Bitnomial requested that the Divisions not recommend the Commission take enforcement action against Bitnomial or their participants for failure to report Bitnomial Contracts to an SDR or to fulfill any of the other requirements of the Relevant Regulations. Bitnomial indicated that granting the requested no-action position would be consistent with the Divisions’ previous grants of no-action positions to DCMs and DCOs complying with certain conditions. 11 Bitnomial makes the following representations in support of its request, which it states are “consistent with prior noaction relief”:
12 maximum possible loss that a party or counterparty could incur upon liquidation or expiration of the contract.” 17 C.F.R. § 39.2. 5 Request at 1. 6 Id. 7 Id. 8 Public Law 111–203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010). 9 7 U.S.C. § 1a(47). 10 Further Definition of “Swap,” “Security-Based Swap,” and “Security-Based Swap Agreement”; Mixed Swaps; Security-Based Swap Agreement Recordkeeping, 77 Fed. Reg. 48207, 48236 (Aug. 13, 2012). 11 See Request at 2 (“[T]he CFTC Staff’s historical assessment that DCMs and DCOs complying with the conditions for relief is a suitable substitute for complying with the Relevant Regulations remains true to Bitnomial.”); see also, e.g., CFTC Letter No. 17-31 (Jun. 30, 2017), available at https://www.cftc.gov/csl/17-31/download; CFTC Letter No. 17-32 (Jun. 30, 2017), available at https://www.cftc.gov/csl/17-32/download; CFTC Letter No. 21-11 (Apr. 22, 2021), available at https://www.cftc.gov/csl/21-11/download; CFTC Letter No. 25-02 (Jan. 31, 2025), available at https://www.cftc.gov/csl/25-02/download. 12 Request at 2-3.
3
4 regulations 38.8(b), 38.10, 38.951 (only to the extent that regulation 38.951 requires compliance with Part 45 of the Commission’s regulations), 39.20(b)(2), as well as the applicable provisions of Parts 43 and 45 of the Commission’s regulations, or the requirements of the relevant CEA provisions pursuant to which the Relevant Regulations were promulgated, with respect to Bitnomial Contracts, subject to the following conditions: 14
5
This letter expresses a staff position only with respect to enforcement of the Relevant Regulations. This letter does not state any legal conclusion regarding the characteristics or legality of Bitnomial Contracts or the conduct of any person covered by the no-action position. 16 This letter and the no-action position taken herein represent the views of the Divisions only, and do not necessarily represent the positions or views of the Commission or of any other Commission division or office. This letter and the no-action position taken herein are not binding on the Commission. 17 Except as explicitly provided in this letter, the no-action position taken herein does not excuse persons from compliance with any applicable requirements of the CEA or Commission regulations. Further, this letter, and the no-action position contained herein, are based upon the representations made to the Divisions. Any different, changed, or omitted material facts or circumstances may render this letter void. As with all no-action letters, the Divisions retain the authority to, in their discretion, further condition, modify, suspend, terminate or otherwise restrict the terms of the no-action position provided herein. If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Paul Chaffin, Division of Market Oversight, at (202) 418-5185 or pchaffin@cftc.gov; Alicia Viguri, Division of Market Oversight, at (202) 418-5219 or aviguri@cftc.gov; Owen Kopon, Division of Market Oversight, at (202) 418-5360 or okopon@cftc.gov; or Daniel O’Connell, Division of Clearing and Risk, at (202) 418-558 or doconnell@cftc.gov. Sincerely, ____________________ Thomas Smith Acting Director Division of Market Oversight ____________________ Richard Haynes Acting Director Division of Clearing and Risk 16 For the avoidance of doubt, this letter is not intended to address whether any of the Bitnomial Contracts are consistent with any statutory or regulatory requirement, including with respect to the requirements of CEA section 5c(c)(5)(C) or Commission regulation 40.11. 17 C.F.R. § 40.11. 17 See 17 C.F.R. § 140.99(a)(2) (“A no-action letter binds only the issuing Division . . . and not the Commission or other Commission staff.”).
Sign in to read the rest — it's free
Source: Commodity Futures Trading Commission — original document
Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
2026-02-04
CFTC Staff Letter 26-04: Withdrawal of CFTC Staff Advisory 25-36
2026-01-30
CFTC Staff Letter 26-03: Preservation of Legacy Swap Status in Internal Corporate Merger
2026-01-28
Revisions to Business Conduct and Swap Documentation Requirements for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants; Correction
2026-01-27
CFTC Staff Letter 26-02: No-Action Position on Timing for Implementation of 2024 Part 17 Large Trader Reporting Final Rule
2025-12-30
Revisions to Business Conduct and Swap Documentation Requirements for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants
2025-12-19
CFTC Staff Letter 25-50: No-Action Position on CPO and CTA Registration for Certain Private Funds
2025-12-19
CFTC Staff Letter 25-51: No-Action Position on Excluding Energy Commodity End-User Swaps from Swap Dealer De Minimis Calculations
2025-12-18
CFTC Staff Letter 25-49: Extension of No-Action Position for Intended-to-be-Cleared Swaps on Eligible UK Trading Venues
More like this from CFTC
CFTC published 4 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.