Rule · CFTC · 7 Jan 1998 · CFTC Staff Letter 98-01
The Division of Trading and Markets confirms that U.S. persons qualifying as Eligible Swaps Participants (ESPs) may claim exemptive relief under Part 35 of the Commission's regulations when entering into swap agreements with non-U.S. financial institutions, provided both parties qualify as ESPs and all other conditions are met. These conditions require that the swap agreement is not part of a fungible class of standardized agreements, that creditworthiness is a material factor in the transaction, and that the agreement is not entered into or traded on a multilateral transaction execution facility. If the non-U.S. financial institution does not qualify as an ESP or if any of these conditions are not satisfied, the U.S. ESP cannot claim the exemptive relief provided by Part 35.
98-01
CFTC Letter No. 98-01
January 7, 1998
Division of Trading & Markets
Re: Eligible Swaps Participants Pursuant to Part 35 Dear :
This is in response to your letter dated October 16, 1997, to the Division of Trading and Markets ("Division") of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("Commission"). By your correspondence, you inquire on behalf of "X" about any constraints that exist for United States persons that qualify as "Eligible Swaps Participants" ("ESPs") who enter into swap agreements in the OTC swaps markets with non-U.S. financial institutions.
Part 35 of the Commission's regulations provides an exemption for swap agreements which meet
the requirements set forth therein from all provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act ("Act")1 and regulations issued thereunder2 , with the exception of Sections 2(a)(1)(B), 4b, 4o, 6(c), 9(a)(2) and Rule 32.9. Specifically, Part 35 requires that: (1) all participants to the swap agreement must qualify as ESPs as defined in Rule 35.1(b)(2); (2) the swap agreement must not be part of a fungible class of agreements that are standardized as to their material economic terms; (3) the creditworthiness of any party having an actual or potential obligation under the swap agreement would be considered to be a material factor in entering into or determining the terms of the swap agreement, including price terms, etc.; and (4) the swap agreement is not entered into and traded on or through a multilateral transaction execution facility. In response to your question concerning transactions between U.S. ESPs and non-U.S. financial institutions, as long as both parties qualify as ESPs and all of the other above mentioned conditions have been met, the swap agreement would qualify for treatment under Part 35. However, if the non-U.S. financial institution is not an ESP as defined in Part 35.1(b)(2) and/or any of the above mentioned conditions have not been met, then the U.S. ESP could not claim the exemptive relief provided by Part 35. Should you have any questions concerning this correspondence, please do not hesitate to contact me or Charles O'Brien, an attorney on my staff, at (202) 418-5450. Sincerely,
I. Michael Greenberger
file:///S|/Website%20Management/LegacyDataCopyasof2010-04-21/tm/letters/98letters/tm98-01.htm (1 of 2) [5/6/2010 7:30:15 PM]
98-01
Director
1 7 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. (1994).
2 Commission rules referred to herein are found at 17 C.F.R. Ch. I (1997). file:///S|/Website%20Management/LegacyDataCopyasof2010-04-21/tm/letters/98letters/tm98-01.htm (2 of 2) [5/6/2010 7:30:15 PM]
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
RegAlert holds no document that amends or replaces this one. This is not a check that it is in force: confirm with the regulator.
“Part 35 of the Commission's regulations provides an exemption for swap agreements which meet the requirements set forth therein from all provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act ("Act")1”
More like this from CFTC
CFTC published 2 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.
Source: Commodity Futures Trading Commission — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added · updated