2002-07-16
Added · Updated
The Division of Corporation Finance will not object if PaeTec Corp. fails to comply with the Section 12(g) registration requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for options granted under the 1998 Incentive Compensation Plan and the 2001 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. This relief applies to the period beginning April 30, 2001, and remains in effect until the Company registers any class of its securities under the Securities Act of 1933 or becomes subject to Exchange Act reporting requirements for another class of securities. The position is based on representations that the Company had more than 500 record holders of options and total assets exceeding $10 million as of December 31, 2000.
SEC published 7 documents in the last 30 days — get each new one by email the day it lands.
Home | Previous Page
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Section 12(g); Section 12(h)
No Action, Interpretive and/or Exemptive Letter:
July 16, 2002
Response of the Office of Chief Counsel Division of Corporation Finance
Re:
PaeTec Corp. (the "Company") Incoming letter dated July 9, 2002
Based on the facts presented, the Division will not raise any objection if the Company does not comply with the registration requirements of Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), which arose at the end of the Company's 2000 fiscal year, with respect to options granted and to be granted pursuant to the Company's 1998 Incentive Compensation Plan and 2001 Stock Option and Incentive Plan in the manner and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in your letter. This position applies to the period beginning April 30, 2001 and will remain in effect until the Company first registers any class of its securities under the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Company becomes subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act with respect to any other class of its securities. This position is based on the representations made to the Division in your letter. Any different facts or conditions might require the Division to reach a different conclusion. Further, this response only represents the Division's position on enforcement and does not purport to express any legal conclusion on the question presented. Sincerely, David C. Lee Special Counsel
Read the rest free, and get an email when SEC publishes again
Source: Securities and Exchange Commission — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
More like this from SEC
SEC published 7 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.