2011-06-29
Added · Updated
J.P. Morgan Securities requests assurance that the staff will not recommend enforcement action if registered investment advisers pay it cash solicitation fees despite a judgment permanently enjoining the firm from violating securities laws. The firm undertakes to comply with the judgment, including paying $18.6 million in disgorgement and $133 million in civil penalties, and to disclose the judgment to solicited persons within 48 hours of contract entry or at entry if a five-day termination right exists. This disclosure obligation applies for ten years from the judgment date.
SEC published 7 documents in the last 30 days — get each new one by email the day it lands.
Boston
Hartford
Hong Kong
London
Los Angeles
New York
Orange County
Portland
San Francisco
Santa Monica
Silicon Valley
Tokyo
Walnut Creek
Washington
Bingham McCutchen LLP
Suite 300
85 Exchange Street
Portland, ME 04101-5045
T 207.780.8274
F 207.78o.8278
bingham.com
Herbert F. Janick III
Direct Phone: 20 7.780.8270
Direct Fax: 207.780.8280 herbjanick@binghain.com anick@bingham.com Via FedEx (advance copy via email) Douglas J. Scheidt, Esq. Associate Director and Chief Counsel Division of Investment Management U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20549 Re: SEC v. J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (f/k/a J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.) 11-CV-4206 Dear Mr. Scheidt:
We submit this letter on behalf of our client , J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (f/k/a J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.) ("J . P. Morgan Securities") in connection with the settlement of the above-captioned civil action (the "Action") brought by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the "Court"). The Action related to alleged violations of the federal securities laws by J.P. Morgan Securities in connection with its sale of a collateralized debt obligation ("CDO") to institutional investors. J.P. Morgan Securities, a broker-dealer registered under Section 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and an investment advisor registered under Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (as amended, the "Advisers Act"), seeks the assurance of the staff of the Division of Investment Management (the "Staff") that it would not recommend any enforcement action to the Commission under Section 206(4) of the Advisers Act and Rule 206(4)-3 thereunder (the "Rule") if any investment adviser that is required to be registered pursuant to Section 203 of the Advisers Act pays to J.P. Morgan Securities, or any of its associated persons, as defined in Section 202(a)(17) of the Advisers Act, a cash solicitation fee, directly or indirectly, for the solicitation of advisory clients in accordance with the Rule notwithstanding the existence of the Judgment' (as described below) that otherwise would preclude such an investment adviser from paying such a fee, directly or indirectly, to J.P. Morgan Securities or certain related persons. While the Judgment does not operate to prohibit or suspend J.P. Morgan Securities or any of its associated persons from being associated with or (except as provided in Section 9(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "Company Act"), from which Section relief is ' Securities and Exchange Commission v. J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (f/k/a J.P. Morgan Securities Inc), Case No . I 1-CV-4206 (S.D.N.Y., June 29, 2011). A/74299389.3/0803142-0000340905
Read the rest free, and get an email when SEC publishes again
Source: Securities and Exchange Commission — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
More like this from SEC
SEC published 7 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.