Individual decision · SEC · 1 Nov 1994
The staff of the Division of Investment Management will not recommend enforcement action to the Commission under Section 22(d) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 if Linsco/Private Ledger Corp. charges its customers a support services fee for transactions in investment company securities while also receiving Rule 12b-1 fees from those investment companies. This relief applies because LPL acts as an agent for its customers in these transactions, meaning Section 22(d) restrictions do not apply to LPL's involvement. The support services fee is paid entirely to Pershing for clearing, custodial, and customer-level accounting services, while the Rule 12b-1 fees compensate LPL for administrative, trade processing, and educational services.
i NOV 1~~4
p Our Ref. No. 94-333-CC
RESPONSE OF THE OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL Linsco/Private Ledger Corp.
DIVISION OF INVESTMNT MAAGEMENT File No. 801-10970
Your letter of June 6, 1994 requests our assurance that we would not recommend enforcement action to the Commission under
Section 22 (d) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (" 1940 Act")
if Linsco/Private Ledger Corp. ("LPL") charges its customers a
support services fee for transactions in investment company
securities while also receiving Rule 12b-1 fees from those
investment companies.
LPL is registered as a broker-dealer under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and as an investment adviser under the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Through its Strategic Asset
Management ("SAM") accounts, LPL, acting as agent, makes
available to customers over 800 no-load and load-waived
investment companies, i/ as well as other securities. LPL
provides SAM account customers with investment advisory,
educational, in-house trade processing, and administrative
services. Customers receive periodic account statements that
reflect account activity and positions, and quarterly performnce reports consolidating income, gain, and performnce informtion. LPL uses a third party, Pershing, ~/ to prepare these reports for
SAM account customers, as well as to provide clearing, custodial,
and customer- level accounting services.
Currently, customers pay LPL an asset -based management fee
of up to 2.2 percent, depending on the size of the account, and
pay no commissions for the purchase or sale of securities in
their SAM accounts. LPL also charges customers a transaction fee
for in-house trade processing services. ~/ LPL pays a portion of
this fee to Pershing. SAM account customers pay no other fees to
LPL. i/ Load-waived investment companies are open-end funds that
waive their regular sales loads for SAM account customers.
Telephone conversation with Alice Pellegrino on
September 12, 1994.
~/ Pershing is a division of Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette
Corporation which is not affiliated with LPL. Telephone
conversation with Alice Pellegrino on September 12, 1994.
~/ The fee is $20 for each purchase or redemption of no-load or
load-waived investment company shares, or for each
redemption of load investment company.shares that have been
transferred by customers from other LPL brokerage accounts
into their SAM accounts.
.:¡
-.. - -:2 '
LPL proposes to eliminate the transaction fee for investment
company share purchases and redemptions and to enter into Rule
12b-1 agreements with certain investment companies that are
available through the SAM accounts. 4/ The Rule 12b-1 fee will
compensate LPL for the administrative, in-house trade processing,
and educational services provided to its customers. LPL also
proposes to charge customers a support services fee with each
purchase or redemption of no-load or load-waived investment
company shares, and with each redemption of load investment
company shares. Pershing will receive this support services fee
as compensation for providing clearing, custodial, 'and customer-
level accounting services.
Section 22 (d) of the 1940 Act prohibits an investment
company from selling its redeemable securities except at "a
current public offering price described in the prospectus" to any
person other than to or through a principal underwriter for
distribution. It further states that "if such class of security
is being currently offered to the public by or through an
underwriter, no principal underwriter of such security and no
dealer shall sell any such security to any person except a
dealer, a principal underwriter, or the issuer, except at a
current public offering price described in the prospectus."
Section 22 (d) , s restrictions do not apply to a broker, as that
term is defined in the 1940 Act. á/ Because LPL purchases and
redeems investment company shares as agent for its customers,
Section 22 (d) does not apply to LPL's involvement in these
transactions and, therefore, does not prohibit the support
services fee. ~/ This response is based on the representations
made to the Division. Any different facts or circumstances might
require a different conclusion.
DCtOv~ o.-
Barbara Chretien-Dar
Senior Counsel
~/ The Rule 12b-1 fees will be calculated as àpercentage of
assets held by SAM account customers in each investment
company.
á/ United States v. National Ass'n of Sec. Dealers, 422 U.S.
694 (1975). See also Charles Schwab & Co. (pub. avail.
Aug. 6, 1992); A. WaYne Harrison (pub. avail. Sept. 20,
1977) .
~/ Although LPL may have selling dealer agreements with funds that are available to both its SAM aceount customers and to " its other brokerage customers, you state that LPL acts solely in an agency capacity when it sells these funds to SAM account customers. Telephone conversation with Robert
C. Hacker on October 4, 1994.
,-. --r__-.
KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART
SOUT LOBBY - 9TH FLOOR
1800 M STET N~. BOSTON, MA
WASHINGIN, D.c. 20036-5891 HARISBURG, PA MIAMI, FL TELEPHONE (202) 778-90 NEW YORK, NY TELEX 440209 KL DC UI PITfBURGH, PA FACSIMILE (202) 778-9100 ROBERT C. HACKER (202) 778-9016 1940 Act/22 (d)
ACT rl Ai - 4-0
SECTION ~a Cd')
RULE Assistant Chief Counsel
Division of Investment Management PUBLIC Securities and Exchange Commission AVAILABILIT l (- I ~ q4 450 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20549 Re: Linsco/Private Ledger Corp.
Dear Ms. Donohue:
We are writing to you on behalf of our client, Linsco/
Private Ledger Corp. ("LPL"), to request that the staff of the
Division of Investment Management of the Securities and Exchange
Commission ("Commission") advise LPL that it would not recommend
any enforcement action based on Section 22 (d) of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 ("1940 Act") if LPL charges its customers a
per transaction charge to cover clearing, custodial, and
customer- level accounting services provided by Pershing, a
division of Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corporation
("Pershing"), in connection with investments in certain mutual
funds and receives Rule 12b-1 fees from those mutual funds" all
as described below.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
LPL is a broker-dealer registered under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and is a member of the National Association
of Securities Dealers, Inc. and the Boston Stock Exchange. LPL
is also an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Pershing provides execution, clearance, and back office services for LPL, including services in
connection with the purchase and sale of mutual fund shares.
DC-145091.1
KIRKATRICK & LOCKHRT
SOUT LOBBY. 9TH FLOOR
180 M ST N~. BOON, MA
WASHINGIN, D.C. 20036-5891 HASBURG, PA TEHONE (202) 778-90 MII, FL NE YORK, NY 1E +4209 K1 DC UI ROBERT C. HACK EAIMIL (202) 778-9100 PITBURGH, PA (202) 778-9016 1940 Act/22 (d)
Assistant Chief Counsel
Division of Investment Management
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D. C. 20549
Re: Linsco/private Ledger Corp.
Dear Ms. Donohue:
We are writing to you on behalf of our client, Linsco/ Private Ledger Corp. ("LPL"), to request that the staff of the Division of Investment Management of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("commission") advise LPL that it would not recommend any enforcement action based on section 22 (d) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 ("1940 Act") if LPL charges its customers a per transaction charge to cover clearing, custodial, and customer-level accounting services provided by Pershing, a division of Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities corporation ("Pershing"), in connection with investments in certain mutual
funds and receives Rule 12b-1 fees from those mutual funds, all
as described below.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
LPL is a broker-dealer registered under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and is a member of the National Association
of Securities Dealers, Inc. and the Boston Stock Exchange. LPL
is also an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Pershing provides execution, clearance, and back office services for LPL, inCluding services in
connection with the purchase and sale of mutual fund shares.
DC-145091.1
KIRKATRCK & LOKHT
The LPL strategic Asset Management Program
LPL's strategic Asset Management ("SAM") account is a
flexible fee-based asset management account available to
investors with a minimum investment of $25,000. Through the SAM
account, investors may invest in no-load and load waived mutual
funds, individual stocks and bonds, and options (buying puts and writing covered calls only). Subject to certain restrictions, investors may bring existing mutual fund and individual security
holdings into the SAM account to be consolidated with new
purchases. In the case of individual security holdings and
mutual funds purchased wi thin the previous two years in an LPL
brokerage account that are transferred to the SAM account, the
customer may be entitled to a credit for a portion of the SAM
Account Fee if an LPL investment representative earned
commissions on the securities or if the securities might
otherwise be liquidated prematurely.
Under the SAM program, LPL acts for its customers as an
agent through which they may purchase or sell shares of over
eight hundred no-load and load waived mutual funds. LPL provides
its customers with investment advisory services, periodic account
statements, quarterly performance reports consolidating their
income, gain and performance information, recordkeeping, and
other services. It also provides in-house trade processing
through a trade desk and a centralized computer linkage to its
network of investment representatives, who are primarily
responsible for accepting and placing their customers' orders.
No commissions are paid for the purchase and sale of securities
in the SAM accounts. currently , LPL receives no 12b-1 fees in connection with mutual fund shares purchased in the SAM accounts.
LPL clears SAM account transactions through pershing.
Pershing provides LPL's customers with clearing, custodial, and
customer- level accounting services in connection with
transactions in their SAM accounts. In addition, during any month that there is acti vi ty wi thin their account, investors will recei ve from pershing a monthly account statement showing account acti vi ty as well as positions held in the account at the month end, and any required conf irmations of transactions that occur within the account. Investors with inactive accounts will recei ve quarterly account statements. In order to cover the costs of the clearing, custodial, and
customer-level accounting services provided by Pershing in connection with investments by SAM account customers, including
purchases and sales of mutual fund shares, LPL pays Pershing a
KIRKATRICK & LOCKHT
service fee on each transaction executed on behalf of SAM account
investors. current fee arrangement
LPL currently charges SAM account customers a standard
asset-based management fee in return for advisory, research and
related analytical services provided to SAM account customers.
The amount of this fee varies, up to a maximum of 2.2 %, depending
on the dollar value of assets under management in each account in
accordance with a fee schedule set forth in LPL's Form ADV. LPL
pays a substantial portion of this fee to its investment
representatives that are responsible for managing the customer
accounts affected. LPL also imposes a charge for processing
transactions in the SAM accounts. In the case of mutual fund
transactions, the charge is $20 for each purchase or redemption
of no-load and load-waived fund shares, and for each redemption
of load fund shares transferred by customers into their SAM
accounts. LPL pays a portion of this charge to Pershing for each
purchase or redemption of no-load and load-waived fund shares,
and for each redemption of load fund shares to compensate
Pershing for its clearing, custodial, and customer- level
accounting services to the SAM accounts. LPL retains the balance
of the fee to compensate it for reporting, recordkeeping, and inhouse trade processing services in connection with SAM account
transactions and its development of promotional and educational
materials for use by its investment representatives in connection
wi th the servicing of their customer accounts.
proposed fee arrangement
LPL proposes to continue its asset-based management fee for
the SAM accounts at its current level, but to eliminate the
transaction charge for mutual fund transactions. To compensate
LPL for its various administrative, in-house trade processing,
and promotional and educational services, which previously were
covered by a portion of the transaction charge, LPL proposes to
enter into agreements with certain mutual funds, shares of which
are available through LPL's SAM accounts, pursuant to which LPL
will provide such services in return for fees paid by those funds
under Rule 12b-1 plans ("12b-1 Fees"). The 12b-1 Fee as to each
fund would be calculated as a percentage of assets held by SAM
account customers in the fund, and it would be up to the funds to
determine whether payments would be made by the fund, its
manager, or its distributor.
To compensate Pershing for its clearing, custodial, and
customer- level accounting services in connection with the SAM
accounts, LPL. proposes to charge SAM account customers a per
transaction services charge ("Support Services Fee") for each
purchase or redemption of no-load and load-waived fund shares,
and each redemption of load fund shares. LPL intends to
negotiate a Support Services Fee with Pershing that will be
comparable to rates charged by other providers of similar
services. LPL will not receive any portion of the support
Services Fee. The proposed support Services Fee will be fully
disclosed to SAM account customers.
DISCUSSION
LPL believes that its proposal to collect 12b-1 Fees and
charge a Support Services Fee on the purchase and redemption of
mutual fund shares in the SAM accounts would comply with the
terms of section 22 (d) of the Act. LPL also believes that the
proposed fee arrangement with respect to the SAM accounts is in
accord with the prior no-action letters issued by the Commission
staff granting favorable relief to brokers that charge
transaction fees in connection with the purchase and sale of no-
load and low load mutual fund shares.
Background
section 22 (d) of the 1940 Act generally prohibits mutual
funds, underwriters, and dealers from selling fund shares to the
public "except at a current public offering price described in
the prospectus." For many years, the Commission viewed the
imposition of any charge for transactions in shares of no-load
funds as a violation of section 22 (d) because of prospectus
representations concerning no-load status. In 1974, however, the
Commission authorized the Division of Investment Management staff to view favorably interpretative requests with respect to proposals that brokers that act independently of funds and their
underwriters be permitted, under certain circumstances, to charge
reasonable fees for sales-related services rendered in connection
with transactions in shares of no-load funds. The Commission
stated that permitting such charges would provide brokers with an
incenti ve to recommend no- load fund shares somewhat comparable to
that existing with other securities, and would compensate brokers
for services rendered in connection with no-load purchases.Y
Because the broker would be compensated for the purchase or sale
of shares by their customers, not by the fund or its distributor,
Y See SEC Announces Mutual Fund Distribution Proqram, Investment Company Act Release No. 8570 (November 4, 1974).
the Commission concluded that they would be acting as brokers, not as dealers in violation of section 22 (d) . Thereafter, the Commission staff advised various brokers
that it would not recommend enforcement action if the brokers
charged transaction fees for services in connection with the
purchase and redemption of no-load fund shares.Y In at least
one letter, the staff has taken the position that it would not
recommend enforcement action if a broker charged a transaction
fee for sales-related services in connection with the purchase
and redemption of low-load fund shares where no load reallowance
was paid to the broker. See Charles Schwab & Co. (pub. avail.
Feb. 2, 1987). Recently, the staff also took the position that it
would not recommend enforcement action if a broker-dealer charged
certain active traders in investment company shares transaction
fees for effecting purchases and redemptions of the shares while
also receiving fees pursuant to Rule 12b-1 plans from those
investment companies designed to compensate the broker-dealer for
non-sales-related services, such as shareholder recordkeeping and
transfer agent services. Charles Schwab & Co. (pub. avail. Aug.
6, 1992) ("schwab IV").
Selling dealers~and others in a mutual fund's distribution
network would be prohibited under section 22 (d) from charging a sales-related fee that was not disclosed in the fund's
prospectus. Thus, in each of these no-action letters, the staff
has emphasized that the broker must be independent of the fund's
regular distribution network in order to ensure that the sales-
related transaction fee imposed by the broker would not be viewed
as being related to the distribution of the fund shares. See,
~, Kidder, Peabody & Co. (pub. avail. Mar. 30, 1987). The
staff has also emphasized that an investor should not be charged
twice for the same services (i. e., "double dipping"), which could
occur if the investor both paid for distribution costs through a
sales load or distribution-related 12b-1 fees and paid an
additional sales-related transaction fee that covered the same
distribution costs. See,~, Olde & Co., Inc. (pub. avail.
Aug. 31, 1984).
Under LPL's proposal, LPL would enter into agreements with
the funds in accordance with Rule 12b-1, pursuant to which LPL
would provide in-house trade processing, account recordkeeping,
Y See,~, Charles Schwab & Co. (pub. avail. Feb 8, 1982); Fahnstock & Co. (pub. avaiL. Dec. 22, 1974)'; Rose & Company
Investment Brokers, Inc. (pub. avail. June 23, 1986); First
American Investment, Inc. (pub. avail. Dec. 18, 1985).
and administrative services, and promotional and educational
information to its investment representatives and their
customers. LPL also may have selling dealer agreements with a number of the funds available for purchase through SAM accounts
that provide sales load waivers for SAM account purchases, as
well as with load funds whose shares have been transferred into
SAM accounts by customers. Thus, LPL might be considered a part
of the distribution network for at least some of the mutual funds
offered through the SAM accounts. LPL's proposal, however, will
be consistent with section 22 (d) and the above-mentioned no-
action letters because LPL will not charge any additional sales-
related transaction fee on purchases and sales of fund shares in
the SAM accounts and will not engage in double dipping.
The support Services Fee charged by LPL will be paid
entirely to Pershing for its clearing, custodial, and customer-
level accounting services. The amount of the Support Services
Fee would remain fixed at the same per transaction rate for all
SAM account customers regardless of the size or frequency of a
customer's transactions. It is calculated on a per transaction
basis because the clearing, custodial, and customer-level
accounting services provided by Pershing are generally triggered
by activity within an account. Thus, a customer is charged for
Pershing's services only to the extent that the customer, through
purchase or redemption acti vi ty wi thin its account, requires the
clearing, custodial, and customer-level accounting services that
Pershing provides.
The support Services Fee in no way resembles a commission or
sales charge paid to a broker for sales-related services, since
no portion of the fee will cover sales-related activities.
Although, in performing its clearing services for the SAM
accounts, PerShing receives from LPL's central in-house trade
processing facility customer buy and sell orders, transmits them
to the funds, and undertakes to ensure that deli very and payment
are properly carried out, Pershing does not sell or redeem fund
shares on behalf of SAM customers. LPL performs the fundamental
sales- and redemption-related services for the SAM accounts. For
example, LPL, through its various investment representatives,
markets the mutual funds available through the SAM accounts,
gathers investment information from the customers, recommends and
implements the appropriate mutual fund investments for the
customers, takes customer buy and sell orders, and processes all
orders through its trade desk and execution system for ultimate
clearance through Pershing. LPL will not charge its customers
any sales-related transaction fee for these' services or retain any portion of the support Services Fee paid to Pershing.
Furthermore, under the proposal, LPL would not receive
compensation that would constitute double payment for the same
services. The 12b-1 Fees received by LPL would compensate LPL
for performance reporting, in-house trade processing,
recordkeeping, and the promotional and educational materials
provided to its investment representatives and their customers.
The support Services Fee charged to SAM account investors would
be paid entirely to pershing to cover its clearing, custodial,
and customer-level accounting services. Although the support
Services Fee would be calculated on a per transaction basis, it
does not cover any services already paid for as part of a fund's
sales load or 12b-1 fees. See Schwab iv. Thus, LPL's proposal
to charge a Support Services Fee and accept 12b-1 Fees would not
result in LPL being compensated twice for the same sales-related services. In granting no-action relief in Schwab iV, the staff allowed
Schwab to charge transaction fees for effecting purchases and
redemption of mutual fund transactions on behalf of certain
customers, while receiving 12b-1 fees from those funds. The
staff did not "view the shareholder subaccounting, and transfer
agency services (provided by Schwab in return for 12b-1 fees) as
being incompatible with Schwab acting solely as broker." Thus,
the staff did not consider such services to be equivalent to the
sales-related services offered by dealers. LPL believes that the
same analysis permits LPL to both accept 12b-1 Fees to cover its
recordkeeping, in-house trade processing, and sales-related
promotional and educational services and to charge its customers
a per transaction support Services Fee to cover the non-salesrelated clearing, custodial, and customer-level accounting
services provided by Pershing.
CONCLUSION
LPL's SAM account program provides LPL's customers with a
much more efficient means of buying and selling mutual fund
shares than can be obtained by dealing directly with the funds
themselves. In addition, it offers investors special services
that more easily allow development of personal financial
portfolios directed toward fulfilling customers' particular
investment needs. The acceptance of 12b-1 Fees from the funds
will result in lower transaction costs for the SAM accounts;
therefore, under the proposed fee arrangement, LPL will be able
to provide SAM account customers, at lower cost, with services
equivalent to those they currently enjoy. Ìf LPL is denied
reasonable compensation for managing the program and ensuring
that investors receive efficient and effective clearing,
custodial, and customer-level accounting services with respect to
mutual fund share transactions, it may be compelled to limit the
full range of services it provides to SAM account customers.
Such a result would in no way further the cause of investor
protection that the 1940 Act, including section 22 (d) thereunder,
was designed to promote.
LPL hereby respectfully requests that the staff advise that
it would not recommend to the commission that any action be taken
if LPL institutes the fee arrangement described above. If you
have any questions, require further clarification, or are
disinclined to issue the requested no-action letter, please call
the undersigned at (202) 778-9016. Thank you for your attention
to this matter.
Sincerely,
~~
Robert c. Hacker
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
The documents this one cites, and the documents that cite it.
“LPL is registered as a broker-dealer under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.”
“LPL is registered as a broker-dealer under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.”
More like this from SEC
SEC published 5 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.
Source: Securities and Exchange Commission — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added · updated