2017-04-14
Added · Updated
Macquarie Capital (USA) Inc. requests assurance that the Division of Investment Management staff will not recommend enforcement action if registered investment advisers pay cash solicitation fees to MCUSA or its associated persons, despite MCUSA being disqualified under Rule 206(4)-3 by a Final Judgment. MCUSA undertakes to comply with Rule 206(4)-3 as if not disqualified and to disclose the Final Judgment in writing to solicited persons no less than 48 hours before contract execution or at contract entry if a five-day termination right exists. This disclosure obligation applies until April 1, 2025, ten years from the entry of the Final Judgment.
SEC published 7 documents in the last 30 days — get each new one by email the day it lands.
S1DELEY1 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP BEIJING
60 STATE STREET BOSTON
36TH FLOOR BRUSSELS
BOSTON, MA 02109 CENTURY CITY
+1 617 223 0300 CHICAGO
+1 617 223 0301 FAX DALLAS
GENEVA emarino@sldley.com
+1 617 223 0362 FOUNDED 1866
April 14,2017
By E-Mail and Overnight Courier
Associate Director and Chief Counsel
Division of Investment Management
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE
Washington, DC 20549-0506
HONG KONG SAN FRANCISCO
HOUSTON SHANGHAI
LONDON SINGAPORE
LOS ANGELES SYDNEY
MUNICH TOKYO
NEW YORK WASHINGTON, D.C.
PALO ALTO
Re: In the Matter of SEC v. Macquarie Capital (USA) Inc., Case No. 15-CV-02304 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2015) Dear Mr. Scheidt:
We are writing on behalf of Macquarie Capital (USA) Inc. ("MCUSA"), the defendant in the injunctive action captioned above brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") in 2015. MCUSA seeks the assurance of the staff of the Division of Investment Management ("Staff') that it would not recommend enforcement action to the Commission under Section 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Act"), or Rule 206(4)-3 thereunder (the "Rule"), if an investment adviser registered or required to be registered pursuant to Section 203 of the Advisers Act pays MCUSA or any of its associated persons a cash payment directly or indirectly for the solicitation of advisory clients, notwithstanding the entry of final judgment as to MCUSA by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on April 1, 2015 (the "Final Judgment"), as described below. While the Final Judgment does not prohibit or suspend MCUSA or any of its associated persons from being associated with or acting as an investment adviser (except as provided in Section 9(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "Company Act"), for which exemptive relief was separately granted to Sidley Austin (NY) LLP is a Delaware limited liability partnership doing business as Sidley Austin LLP and practicing in affiliation with other Sidley Austin partnerships.
Read the rest free, and get an email when SEC publishes again
Source: Securities and Exchange Commission — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
More like this from SEC
SEC published 7 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.