1995-08-08
Added · Updated
The SEC staff declined to provide a no-action position regarding Mark A. Bush's plan to establish three affiliated entities for investment-related businesses because the submission lacked sufficient information and legal analysis. The staff highlighted that Section 208(d) of the Investment Advisers Act prohibits indirect violations and warned that an unregistered adviser affiliated with a registered adviser may be integrated for registration purposes if not operated separately. The letter enclosed no-action responses applying this integration concept to different facts and releases on general procedures for requesting no-action letters.
SEC published 7 documents in the last 30 days — get each new one by email the day it lands.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20549
DIVISION OF
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
August 8, 1995
Mark A. Bush
5443 Redwood Road
Columbus, OH 43229
Dear Mr. Bush:
I am writing in response to your letter dated June 5, 1995, in which you request a no-action position concerning your plan to set up three affiliated entities to engage in investment related businesses. One of these entities would register as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 ("Advisers Act"). The other two entities would remain unregistered.
Read the rest free, and get an email when SEC publishes again
Source: Securities and Exchange Commission — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
More like this from SEC
SEC published 7 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.