Individual decision · SEC · 29 Jul 2009
The Division will not recommend enforcement action against LIFFE Administration and Management, its affiliates, LCH.Clearnet, and their respective officers, directors, or members under Section 17A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, provided LIFFE A&M acts as the central counterparty for Equity and Index Options without registering as a clearing agency. This relief applies to the revised clearing arrangements where LIFFE A&M assumes the central counterparty role, outsourcing specific functions such as margin parameter determination, position monitoring, and default fund management to LCH.Clearnet. The Division's position is contingent upon LIFFE A&M adhering to the terms and conditions of the Original No-Action Letters and the representations made in the July 29, 2009 request.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20S49
DIVISION OF
TRADING AND MARKETS
July 29,2009
Arthur W. Hahn
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
525 W. Monroe Street
Chicago, IL 60661-3693
Re: Additional No-Action Request ofLIPFE Administration and Management relating to revised clearing arrangements Dear Mr. Hahn:
This letter is in response to your request for no-action relief dated July 29,2009. A copy of your letter is attached with this response. By doing this, we avoid having to repeat or summarize the facts you presented. Each capitalized term in this letter has the same meaning as in your letter. By letters dated May 1, 1992, and March 6, 1996, the staffofthe Division of Trading and Markets ("Division") provided advice that, based on the facts, conditions, and representations described therein (the "Original No-Action Letters") the Division would not recommend enforcement action to the Commission against (1) LIPFE A&M or LIPFE under Section 5 ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), by reason of LIPFE A&M or LIPFE not registering under Section 6 ofthe Exchange Act as a national securities exchange, (2) LIPFE A&M, LIPFE, or LIPFE members under
Section 15 ofthe Exchange Act by reason ofLIPFE A&M, LIPFE, or LIPFE members
not registering under the Exchange Act as broker-dealers, or (3) LCH under Section 17A ofthe Exchange Act by reason ofLCH not registering under the Exchange Act as a clearing agency, ifLIPFE A&M, on behalfofLIFFE and LIPFE members, acted as described in the Original No-Action Letters to familiarize certain registered brokerdealers and large financial institutions in the United States with the LIPFE market. 1 LIPFE A&M is now proposing to change its clearing arrangements such that LIPFE A&M, rather than LCH.Clearnet, will become the central counterparty to all LIPFE contracts. You are requesting, on behalfofLIPFE A&M and LCH.Clearnet, advice that the Division, subject to all ofthe terms and conditions of your letter, will not recommend enforcement action to the Commission against LIPFE A&M, any affiliated company (including LIPFE A&M's ultimate parent, NYSE Euronext), LCH.Clearnet, See Letter from Robert L.D. Colby, Deputy Director, Division, Commission, to Nancy Jacklin, Clifford Chance, dated March 6, 1996; and Letter from William H. Heyman, Director, Division, Commission, to Gary Lynch, Davis Polk & Wardwell, dated May 1, 1992.
Arthur W. Hahn
July 29,2009 any affiliated company (including LCH.Clearnet's parent, LCH.Clearnet Group) or any oftheir respective officers, directors, or members under Section 17A ofthe Exchange Act by reason of LIFFE A&M not registering under the Exchange Act as a clearing agency if LIFFE A&M acts as the central counterparty with respect to Equity Options and Index Options, rather than LCH.Clearnet. Based on the facts and representations in your letter dated July 29,2009, and subject to all ofthe terms and conditions ofthe Original No-Action Letters, the Division will not recommend enforcement action to the Commission against LIFFE A&M, any affiliated company (including LIFFE A&M's ultimate parent, NYSE Euronext), LCH.Clearnet, any affiliated company (including LCH.Clearnet's parent, LCH.Clearnet Group) or any of their respective officers, directors, or members under Section 17A ofthe Exchange Act if LIFFE A&M operates solely in the manner described in your letter without registering with the Commission as a clearing agency. This position ofthe Division concerns enforcement action only and does not purport to express any conclusions on the applicability of statutory or regulatory provisions ofthe federal securities laws. The Division has taken these positions based, in
part, on the fact that the Commission has entered into a Memorandum ofUnderstanding
with the Department ofTrade and Industry ofthe United Kingdom,2 as well as the fact that the United Kingdom Financial Services Authority is a party to the Multilateral Memorandum ofUnderstanding,3 both of which address the sharing of investigative information. This position also is based on the representations that you have made; any different facts or conditions might require a different response, and these positions are subject to modification or revocation ifthe facts and representations set forth are altered. The Division expresses no view with respect to other questions that this transaction may raise, including the applicability of any other federal or state laws. Sincerely, lk(~t.~· Elizabeth K. King Associate Director 2 Memorandum ofUnderstanding on Mutual Assistance and the Exchange of Information Between the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission and the Department ofTrade and Industry ofthe United Kingdom and the Securities and Investment Board (September 25, 1991). 3 Multilateral Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Consultation and Cooperation and the Exchange ofInformation ofthe International Organization of Securities Commission (May 2002).
Katten
KattenMuchlnRosenman UP
525 W. Monroe Street
Chicago, Il60661"j693
312.9°2.52°0 tel
312.902.1061 fax
ARTHUR W. HAHN
July 29,2009 arthur.hahn@katlenlaw.com
312.902.5241 direct
312.5n.8892 fax
Associate Director
Division of Trading and Markets
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
VVashington, D.C. 20549
Re: Additional No-Action Request of LIFFE Administration and Management relating to revised clearing arrangements Dear Ms. King:
As you are aware, Euronext N.V. ("Euronext") is a Dutch holding -company that was formed in 2000 when the exchanges of Amsterdam, Brussels and Paris merged. In 2002, Euronext acquired LIFFE Administration and Management ("LIFFE A&M" or the "Exchange") and merged with the Portuguese exchange BVLP (Bolsa de Valores de Lisboa e Porto). Since April 2007, Euronext has been a subsidiary of NYSE Euronext. LIFFE A&M is an entity organized under the laws of England and Wales. It is a Recognised Investment Exchange ("RIE") under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, under which recognition has been granted to LIFFE A&M by the UK Financial Services Authority (the "FSA"), the designated agency under the Financial Services and Markets Act
2000. The futures and options market administered by LIFFE A&M is known as the London
International Financial Futures and Options Exchange (the "LIFFE market"). The Exchange lists, inter alia, options contracts on individual stocks that are listed on the London Stock Exchange ("Equity Options") and options contracts on various indices compiled by FTSE International Limited, notably the FTSE 100, the FTSE Eurofrrst 80 and the FTSE Eurofirst 100 ("Index Options,,).1 The registration and clearance of Equity and Index Options are currently performed by LCH.Clearnet Limited ("LCH.Clearnet"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of LCH.Clearnet Group. The Exchange also offers to its members certain OTC processing services, including a mechanism for submitting options contracts, which have been negotiated over-the-counter LlFFE has developed and lists a range of futures and options on futures related to money market and fixed interest rate instruments, commodities and individual stock and stock index futures and Credit Default Swaps, which fall outside the scope of this request. CHICAGO CHARLOTTE IRVING LONDON LOS ANGELES NEW YORK PALO ALTO WASHINGTON, DC WWW.KATIENLAW.COM LONDON AFFILIATE; KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN CORNISH LLP A limited liability partnership including professional corporations
Katten
KattenMuchlnRosenman UP
("OTC"); to LlFFE to have these contracts replaced with equivalent on-exchange options contracts. This service is called Bclear? . A. Relief Previously Granted By letters dated May 1, 1992 and March 6, 1996 (the "Original No-Action Letters"),3 the staff of the Division of Trading and Markets (the "Division") advised LlFFE A&M and LCH.Clearnet that the Division would not recommend enforcement action to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") against (1) LIFFE A&M or any of its officers, directors or members under Section 5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "1934 Act"), by reason of LIFFE A&M not registering under Section 6 of the 1934 Act as a national securities exchange, (2) LIFFE A&M or any of its officers, directors or members under
Section 15 of the 1934 Act by reason of LIFFE A&M or its members not registering under the
. 1934 Act as broker-dealers, or (3) LIFFE A&M, LCH.Clearnet or any of their respective officers, directors or members under Section 17A of the 1934 Act by reason of LCH.Clearnet not registering under the 1934 Act as a clearing agency, if LIFFE A&M and its members acted as described in the Original No-Action Letters to familiarize certain registered broker-dealers and large fmandal institutions in the United States with the LIFFE market.4 . B. Request for Additional Relief LIFFE A&M is proposing to change its clearing arrangements such that LIFFE A&M, rather than LCH.Clearnet, will become the central counterparty to all LIFFE contracts, as described in more detail below. Although LIFFE A&M will outsource certain clearing functions to LCH.Clearnet, LIFFE A&M will act as the central counterparty to these transactions. Accordingly, we request your advice that the Division would not recommend enforcement action to the Commission against LIFFE A&M, any affiliated company (including LIFFE A&M's ultimate parent, NYSE Euronext), LCH.Clearnet, any affiliated company (including LCH.Clearnet's parent, LCH.Clearnet Group) or any of their respective officers, directors or members under Section 17A of the 1934 Act by reason of LIFFE A&M not registering under the 1934 Act as a clearing agency, if, consistent with the activities described in the Original NoAction Letters and in the options disclosure document previously filed with the Commission, 2 The Bclear service provides a means by which agreed OTC options contracts may be submitted to LIFFE A&M for processing; it may not be used to submit orders for execution on LIFFE CONNECT®. 3 SEC No-Action Letter to LIFFE, dated May 1, 1992 and SEC No-Action Letter to LIFFE, dated March 6, 1996. 4 In accordance with the relief granted under the Original No-Action Letters, LIFFE A&M also familiarizes such registered broker-dealers and large financial institutions with Bclear and makes Bclear available to such broker-dealers and large financial institutions.
Katten
KattenMuchlnRosenman LLP which describes, among other things, the Bclear service for processing OTC options contracts, LIFFE A&M acts as the central counterparty with respect to Equity Options and Index Options, rather than LCH.Clearnet.
C. Revised Clearing Arrangements
LIFFE A&M intends to tenninate its current arrangements with LCH.Clearnet pursuant to which LCH.Clearnet acts as central counterparty to all LIPPE contracts, and become central counterparty itself, in place of LCH.Clearnet. LIFFE A&M will outsource certain clearing functions (including banking and clearing member default management) to LCH.Clearnet for an annual fee. To facilitate these changes, LIFFE A&M will adopt revised rules regarding the registration, clearance and settlement of trades and default management. LIFFE A&M is also introducing automatic real-time registration of trades.s LIFFE A&M will operate its post-trade systems and functions on its own behalf and cease operating certain of these systems and functions on LCH.Clearnet's behalf, as it does currently.6 LIFFE A&M is in the process of obtaining FSA consent to become a self-clearing RIE, which willpermit it to become the central counterparty to LIFFE contracts. In doing so, LIFFE A&M must provide detailed information explaining how it, in view of its new central counterparty role, will meet the Recognition Requirements set out pursuant to the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. fu addition, fonnal FSA approval is required with respect to the new version of the LIFFE Default Rules, which reflect the new role of LIFFE A&M as central counterparty and the role of LCH.Clearnet as the manager of any clearing member defaulters. These rules will become effective when the new arrangements commence. D. Process for the Registration and Clearance ofExchange Contracts LIFFE rules provide for members to trade for their own account and/or for their customers, but all transactions must be in the name of the member effecting the trade and that member will be counterparty to those transactions. Thus, a LIFFE member will be considered to be "acting as principal" for purposes of the LIFFE Rules, even though the member may be acting as agent for other purposes. This means that any LIFFE transaction automatically generates a sequence of matching contracts: between customer and member, between member and clearing 5 Under current processes, LlFFE trades are registered with LCH.Clearnet at the end of the day, rather than real time. Real-time registration will simplify the contractual structure underlying the dearing of trades and remove any intra-day uncertainty about whether or not trades will be registered and/or about the extent of risk to an undisclosed counterparty. 6 In particular, LIFFE A&M currently licenses its Trade Registration System and Clearing Processing System ("TRS/CPS") to LCH.Clearnet to enable LCH.Clearnet to undertake post-trade registration and processing. Under the new arrangement, these functions will be undertaken directly by LIFFE A&M.
Katten
KattenMuchlnRosenman LLP member and between clearing member and central counterparty. The purpose of these rules is to ensure that a party to a transaction need only to look. to its immediate counterparty for perfonnance and need not concern itself with parties at other points along the contractual chain. Under the new arrangement, contract fonnation will generally follow the same process as under current rules, except for the elimination of one step as a result of real-time registration? With real time registration, at the moment an Equity Option or Index Option is executed on the LIFFE market, it will be discharged and replaced by two registered exchange contracts, one between the buying clearing member and LIFFE A&M as central counterparty and the other between the selling clearing member and LIFFE A&M as central counterparty. In addition, in respect of business done by non-clearing members and clients, there will be a chain of back-toback contracts with each party in the contractual chain acting in the capacity of principal, as is the case today. Where a client has dealt through a non-clearing member, the process by which such contracts are created is as follows:
(i) between client and non-clearing member;
(ii) between non-clearing member and clearing member; and (iii) between clearing member and LIFFE A&M as central counterparty. Thus, under the new arrangement, LIFFE A&M is the counterparty to clearing members each acting as principal, in respect of, inter alia, Equity Options and Index Options registered by such clearing members with LIFFE A&M. This applies both to transactions executed through the central order book and to transactions submitted to LIFFE A&M via Bclear. In the event of a LIFFE clearing member default, the positions of the defaulting member automatically novate to LCH.Clearnet as counterparty under the LIFFE default rules, and LCH.Cleamet becomes the counterparty to LIFFE A&M in respect of the relevant positions to enable continuing perfonnance by LIFFE A&M to the market (LIFFE A&M remaining the central counterparty throughout). To facilitate this novation, LCH.Cleamet will become a special member of the LIFFE market and LIFFE A&M will become a special member of LCH.Clearnet. Under the current process, after a trade is executed by non-clearing members but prior to registration with LCH.Clearnet. a "related contract" is created between the clearing members on each side of the transaction. This related contract is then registered with LCH.Clearnet and replaced. through novation, with contracts in the same terms between LCH.Clearnet and each of the parties to the related contract. As a result of realtime trade registration, the related contract is no longer necessary and this step will be eliminated. 7
Katten
KattenMuchinRosenman UP
PageS
E. Clearance and Settlement Functions
Katten
KattenMuchinRosenman LLP
3. Management of the Default Fund
Management of the default fund remains a primary LCH.Cleamet function. Although in the future LCH.Clearnet will consult with LIFFE A&M regarding structural changes to the default fund, the default fund will continue to be governed by LCH.Cleamet rules and arrangements, including its Risk Committee and member involvement. The contribution of LIFFE clearing memberslLCH.Clearnet members to the default fund related to LIFFE A&M . positions is set forth· in the current default fund rules of LCH.Clearnet. In the new arrangements, LIFFE A&M will be informed by LCH.Clearnet of changes in LIFFE members' contributions and the overall size of the default fund.
4. Default Management
Pre-default. Under the new arrangements, and as at present,. LIFFE A&M and LCH.Clearnet will coordinate their activities and decisions regarding the management of a member that is deemed to be in distress but not yet declared a defaulter. Default. In the event that LIFFE A&M calls a default of a LIFFE A&M clearing member, the positions will novate to LCH.Clearnet under LIFFE A&M's new default rules. LIFFE A&M will have the authority either to declare a non-clearing member or a LIFFE clearing member in default. LIFFE A&M will automatically declare a default if LCH.Clearnet declares a LIFFE member a defaulter in such LIFFE A&M member's capacity as an LCH.Cleamet member. On declaration of a default of a LIFFE clearing member by LIFFE A&M, LCH.Cleamet is not automatically obliged to declare that member in default as well. LCH.Clearnet may decide not to call a default (e.g. on the basis of its oversight of other (non-LIFFE A&M) business of the member), or LCH.Clearnet may call a default and act in accordance with normal LCH.Cleamet default management procedures. In either case, automatic novation to LCH.Clearnet of all LIFFE positions, will take place as provided for in the new LIFFE A&M default rules.8 Novation and default management. Following a default novation, and when LCH.Clearnet acts on behalf of the defaulter under its default rules or for its own account, balancing contracts shall be created between LIFFE A&M and LCH.Clearnet in accordance with the following default novation process:
Katten
KattenMuchinRosenman LLP
Katten
KattenMuchinRslsenman llP
July 29,2009
If you have any questions or require additional information concerning this request, please contact the undersigned at 312-902-5241. Very truly yours, AWH:kmg 60742727
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
The documents this one cites, and the documents that cite it.
“...against (1) LIPFE A&M or LIPFE under Section 5 ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act")...”
More like this from SEC
SEC published 5 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.
Source: Securities and Exchange Commission — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added · updated