Individual decision · CFTC · 21 Mar 1997 · CFTC Staff Letter 97-16
The Division of Trading and Markets will not recommend enforcement action against entity Y for allowing entity X, a charitable foundation, to participate in a Pool without meeting the standard Qualified Eligible Participant criteria of Rule 4.7(a). This no-action assurance applies solely when the foundation's investment decisions are made by individual A, who established and funds the foundation, is registered as an associated person of Y, and is themselves a Qualified Eligible Participant with over $25 million in investments. Entity Y remains subject to all other applicable provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act and Commission regulations, including antifraud and reporting requirements.
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581
Telephone: (202) 418-5430
Faci1mile: (202) 418-5536
DIVISION OF
1RADING & MARKETS
Dear
March 21, 1997
Re: Request to Treat Charitable Foundation as a Qualified Eligible Participant Under Rule 4.7(a) This is in response to your letter dated February 27, 1997, to the Division of Trading and Markets ("Division") of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("Commission"), as supplemented by telephone conversations with Division staff, in which you request that "X", a charitable foundation, be treated as a qualifird eligible participant ("QEP") for purposes of Rule 4.7(a). The decision to treat "X" as a QEP is necessary to allow "Y" to continue to claim relief under Rule 4.7(a) in connection with its operation of the "Pool" in the ~vent that it allows "X" to become a participant in the Pool. Based upon the representations made in your letter, as supplemented, we understand the pertinent facts to be as follows. "X", a charitable organization as defined in Section 501(c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code, was established solely for the purpose of making charitable contributions and incurs no material expenses other than accounting expenses. "X" has approximately $740,000 in net assets and wishes to invest approximately $500,000 of its assets in the Pool. As you note in your letter, "X" does not come within the definition of a QEP because it does riot meet the portfolio and total asset criteria of Rule 4.7(a). In support of your request to treat "X" as a QEP, you explain that the trustee of, and the person who makes the investment decisions for, "X" is "A". Among other things, "A" also:
(1) established and is the sole source of funding of "X"; (2) is 1 Commission rules referred to herein are found at 17 C.F.R. Ch.
I. (1996) .
2 Commission records indicate that "Y" filed a notice of claim of exemption pursuant to Rule 4.7 with respect to its operation of the Pool on February 4, 1997. 'I ••. 1 ;
registered as an associated person of "Y"; and (3) i~ a QEP with an investment portfolio of more than $25 million and more than 25 years of investment experience. "A" consents to the treatment of "X" as a QEP with repect to its investment in the Pool. Based upon the representations made in your letter, as sypplemented, the Division believes that your request has merit. Accordingly, the Division will not recommend that the Commission take any enforcement action against "Y" for failure to comply with the QEP criteria of Rule 4.7(a) with respect to "X" solely on the ground that "Y" allows "X" to become a participant in the Pool. This letter is based upon the representations made in your letter, as supplemented. Any different, changed or omitted facts or circumstances might require us to reach a different conclusion. In this regard, we request that you notify us immediately in the event the operations or activities of "X" change in any way from those represented to us. We note that this letter relieves "Y" solely from the QEP criteria of Rule 4. 7 (a) with respect to partic·ipation of "X" in the Pool and does not excuse "Y" from compliance with any other applicable requirements contained in the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 u.s.c. § 1 et seq. (1994) ("Act") I or in the Commission's regulations issued thereunder. For example, "Y" remains subject to the antifraud provisions of Section 4Q of the Act, 7 U.S.C. 6Q, to the reporting requirements for traders set forth in Parts 15, 18, 19 of the Commission's regulations and to all other applicable provisions of Part 4. Further, this letter represents the views of the Division only and does not necessarily represent the views of the Commission or of any other office or division of the Commission. If you have any questions concerning this correspondence, please 3 See Division of Trading and Market Interpretative 1 95-72, [Current Transfer Binder] Comm. Fut. L. Rep. ______ 1_26, 50_2 (August 21, 1995) ._ Letter No. (CCH)
contact me or Gary L. Goldsholle, an attorney on my staff, at (202) 415-5450.
Very truly yours,
Susan C. Ervin
Chief Counsel
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
The documents this one cites, and the documents that cite it.
“does not excuse "Y" from compliance with any other applicable requirements contained in the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 u.s.c. § 1 et seq. (1994) ("Act")”
More like this from CFTC
CFTC published 2 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.
Source: Commodity Futures Trading Commission — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added · updated