Individual decision · SEC · 28 Feb 2014
The Division determines that the Transactions constitute a succession under Rule 12g-3(a), allowing New Endo to utilize Endo's Exchange Act reporting history to assess eligibility for Forms S-3, S-4, and S-8. This reporting history may also be applied to determine compliance with Rule 144(c)(1) current public information requirements and to calculate trading volume limitations under Rule 144(e). Additionally, New Endo may be treated as subject to Exchange Act reporting requirements for the Rule 174(b) exemption from prospectus delivery obligations.
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 12g-3
February 28, 2014
Response of the Office of Chief Counsel Division of Corporation Finance
Re:
Endo Health Solutions Inc., Endo International Limited and Paladin Labs, Inc. Incoming letter dated February 27, 2014
Based on the facts presented, the Division's views are as follows. Capitalized terms have the same meanings as defined in your letter.
The Transactions will constitute a "succession" for purposes of Rule 12g-3(a) under the Exchange Act and New Endo will be a "large accelerated filer" for purposes of Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act.
New Endo may take into account Endo's reporting history under the Exchange Act in determining its eligibility to use Form S-3. Endo's reporting history under the Exchange Act may also be used in determining whether New Endo: (1) "meets the requirements for use of Form S-3" within the meaning of Form S-4; and (2) "satisfies the registrant requirements for use of Form S-3" within the meaning of Form S-8.
Endo's Exchange Act reporting history may be taken into account when determining New Endo's compliance with the current public information requirements of Rule 144(c)(1) under the Securities Act.
Average weekly reported trading volume in Endo common shares during the time periods specified by Rule 144(e)(1) under the Securities Act may be taken into account in determining the limitations on the amount of New Endo ordinary shares that may be sold pursuant to Rule 144(e).
New Endo may be treated as an issuer subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act for purposes of the Securities Act Rule 174(b) exemption from the prospectus delivery requirements of Securities Act Section 4(a)(3).
Our positions are based on the representations made to the Division in your letter. Different facts or conditions might require different conclusions.
Sincerely, Michael J. Reedich Special Counsel
Incoming Letter:
The Incoming Letter is in Acrobat format.
SKAD DEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP
I 440 NEW YORK AVENUE, N .W.
FIRM/AFTIUATE OFFICES WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-2 I 1 I BOSTON CHICAGO TEL: (202> 37 I ·7000 HOUSTON LOS ANGE:LES FAX: <202> 393-5760 NE:W YORK www.skadden.com PALO ALTO DIRECT DIAL WILMINGTON 202-.371·71 eo BEIJING DIRECT~AX BRUSSELS 202-661 -90 I 0 FRANKruRr
EMAIL ADORESS
HONG KONG
BRIAN .BREHENY@SKADDEN .COM LONDON
MOSCOW
MUNICH
PARIS
sAO PAULO
SHANGHAI
SINGAPORE
SYONEV
February 27, 2014 TOKYO
TOROtlT'O
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 - Rules 12g-3(a) and 12b-2 Securities Act of 1933 - Forms S-3, S-4 and S-8 Securities Act of 1933 -Rule 144 Securities Act of 1933 - Section 4(a)(3) and Rule 174(b) Division ofCorporation Finance I 00 F Street, N .E. Washington, D.C. 20549 RE: Endo Health Solutions Inc .. Endo International Limited and Paladin Labs. Inc. Dear Sir or Madam:
We are writing on behalfofEndo Health Solutions Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Endo"), Endo International plc (formerly known as Endo International Limited, formerly known as Sportwell Limited), a public limited company incorporated in Ireland ("New Endo") and Paladin Labs Inc., a corporation continued under the laws ofCanada (,.Paladin"), to request advice ofthe staff ofthe Office ofChief Counsel, Division of Corporation Finance (the "Staff') ofthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") with respect to a number of succession-related issues under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). The issues arise out ofthe proposed acquisition by New Endo ofPaladin by means of a plan of arrangement under Canadian law (the "Arrangement"). Under the Arrangement, New Endo will indirectly acquire all ofthe outstanding common shares ofPaladin, without par value (the "Paladin common shares"), from the Paladin shareholders (the "Acquisition") for ordinary shares ofNew Endo and
Office of the ChiefCounsel cash. Holders of Paladin common shares will also receive common shares ofa newly formed Canadian corporation ("Knight Therapeutics") in the Arrangement. Immediately subsequent to and conditioned on the prior consummation of the Acquisition, a wholly owned subsidiary of New Endo will merge with and into Endo (such transaction, the "Merger" and, together with the Acquisition, the "Transactions") with Endo as the surviving corporation in the Merger. Endo shareholders will receive shares ofNew Endo as consideration in the Merger. Following the Transactions, each of Endo and Paladin will be indirect wholly owned subsidiaries ofNew Endo. Background Information
to a registration statement on Form S-4 and the notes are referred to collectively herein as the "Public Debt." None ofthe Endo Debt was registered or required to be registered pursuant to
Section 12 ofthe Exchange Act. As ofJanuary 21, 2014, each class ofPublic Debt was held of
record by less than 300 persons. Following completion ofthe Transactions, New Endo will become an obligor ofthe Convertible Notes, and the Convertible Notes will no longer be convertible into Endo common shares, but rather, in certain circumstances, will be convertible into New Endo ordinary shares in accordance with their terms. Endo's reporting obligations under Section 15( d) ofthe Exchange Act with respect to the Public Debt have been suspended due to the Section 12 registration ofthe Endo common shares. When Endo terminates such Section 12 registration, its reporting obligations under Section 15( d) ofthe Exchange Act will be revived. The Endo common shares and the Public Debt constitute the only classes of securities with respect to which Endo has a reporting obligation under the Exchange Act. Endo has been a reporting company under the Exchange Act for over 13 years and is current in all ofits reporting obligations thereunder. Endo and New Endo represent that, upon completion ofthe Transactions, (i) Endo intends to cause NASDAQ to file a Form 25 with the Commission to deregister the Endo common shares under Section 12 ofthe Exchange Act and (ii) Endo intends to file a Form 15 with the Commission to immediately suspend its reporting obligations under Section 15(d) ofthe Exchange Act with respect to the Endo ordinary shares and the Public Debt. Endo and New Endo further represent that Endo will comply with Endo's reporting obligations under the Exchange Act until the filing of such Form 15. Endo and New Endo further represent that Endo will file an Endo Annual Report on Form 1 0-K for the year ended December 31,2013.
2. Paladin
Paladin is a publicly held corporation continued in Canada and is a specialty pharmaceutical company focused on acquiring or in-licensing innovative pharmaceutical products for the Canadian and world markets. Paladin's principal strategy is to identify and focus on innovative pharmaceutical products in specialty therapeutic fields. Paladin acquires or in-licenses the sales and marketing rights to pharmaceutical products which (i) either have existing sales in the countries Paladin seeks to commercialize the product or have been approved in other countries but have not yet been approved for sale, or (ii) which are in late-stage clinical trials. Paladin common shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol "PLB". Paladin has no securities registered or required to be registered under Section 12 ofthe Exchange Act and no reporting obligations under Section 15(d) ofthe Exchange Act. Paladin's authorized share capital consists of 100,000,000 Paladin common shares and no preferred shares. As ofJanuary 21,2014,20,765,385 Paladin common shares were issued and outstanding, and there were a total of 1,270,675 Paladin stock options with a positive in-the-money amount per share.
February 27, 20 14
5. Transaction Overview
On November 5, 2013, Endo entered into an Arrangement Agreement (the "Arrangement Agreement"), among Endo, New Endo, Paladin, Sportwell II Limited (subsequently renamed Endo Limited), a direct subsidiary ofNew Endo incorporated in Ireland, ULU Acquisition Corp., (subsequently renamed Endo U.S. Inc.), RDS Merger Sub, LLC, a private limited liability company organized in Delaware and an indirect subsidiary ofNew Endo ("Merger Sub") and 8312214 Canada Inc., a corporation incorporated under the laws ofCanada and an indirect subsidiary ofNew Endo ("Can Co 1 "). Pursuant to the terms ofthe Arrangement Agreement, New Endo will indirectly acquire Paladin by means ofthe Acquisition and will become the indirect parent company of Endo by means ofthe Merger. The diagrams in Exhibit A hereto illustrate in simplified terms the current structure ofEndo and the structure ofNew Endo following the effective time ofthe Transactions. The Acquisition involves the indirect acquisition ofall ofthe Paladin common shares by New Endo (by means ofa transfer ofsuch Paladin common shares to Can Co 1, an indirect subsidiary ofNew Endo) and the payment by New Endo, on behalf ofCanCo 1, to the applicable Paladin shareholders of$1.16 in cash, subject to adjustment and 1.6331 newly issued New Endo ordinary shares in partial consideration for the acquisition of each Paladin common share held by such shareholders. Holders ofPaladin common shares (but not holders of Endo common shares) will also receive shares ofKnight Therapeutics as consideration in the Arrangement. In addition, at the effective time ofthe Arrangement, (a) all in-the-money vested options to acquire Paladin common shares will be settled on a cash-less exercise basis for New Endo ordinary shares and common shares ofKnight Therapeutics in an amount reflecting the arrangement consideration; and (b) unvested rights to receive additional common shares under Paladin's share purchase plan will be settled for a cash amount based on the Paladin common share price immediately prior to the effective time. Since Irish law does not recognize fractional shares held ofrecord, the total number ofNew Endo ordinary shares that any Paladin shareholder will be entitled to receive will be rounded down to the nearest whole number and all entitlements to fractional New Endo ordinary shares will be aggregated and sold by an exchange agent, with any sale proceeds being distributed in cash pro rata to the Paladin shareholders whose fractional entitlements have been sold. After giving effect to the Merger and the Acquisition, Paladin shareholders will hold approximately 22.6% ofthe New Endo ordinary shares on a fully diluted basis. Immediately subsequent to and conditioned on the prior consummation ofthe Acquisition, Merger Sub will be merged with and into Endo, with Endo surviving the Merger as a whollyowned, indirect subsidiary ofNew Endo. Pursuant to the Arrangement Agreement each Endo common share outstanding immediately prior to the
effective time ofthe Merger will be cancelled and automatically converted into the right to receive one New Endo ordinary share. After giving effect to the Merger and the Acquisition, Endo shareholders will hold approximately 77.4% ofthe New Endo ordinary shares on a fully diluted basis. At the closing ofthe Transactions, Endo and Paladin will be combined under New Endo, each as indirect wholly owned subsidiaries. New Endo ordinary shares will trade on NASDAQ
under the symboi 11 ENDP11 , the same trading symbol currently used for Endo common shares, and on the Toronto Stock Exchange CTSX11 ). Information to be Available Concerning the Transaction and the Constituent Parties As a result of the legal form ofthe Transactions, (a) New Endo filed a Registration Statement on Form S-4 with the Commission (the 11 Registration Statement11 ), including therein a proxy statement ofEndo, as well as a prospectus and (b) Paladin prepared a separate management information circular as part of a solicitation ofproxies by the Paladin board of directors for use at the special meeting ofPaladin shareholders. The Registration Statement was declared effective by the Commission on January 24, 2014, and, on January 27, 2014, Endo filed the definitive proxy statement included in the Registration Statement with the Commission with respect to the solicitation of proxies from Endo shareholders for approvals relating to the Merger. The meeting ofshareholders ofEndo was held on February 26, 2014, and the meeting of shareholders of Paladin was held on February 24, 2014. At such meetings, among other things, the shareholders of Paladin voted to approve the Arrangement and the shareholders ofEndo voted to adopt the Arrangement Agreement. The closing ofthe Transactions will occur on or about February 28, 2013. The Registration Statement contains or, in the case of Endo, incorporates by reference extensive and detailed descriptions ofthe businesses ofEndo and Paladin, a detailed description ofthe Transactions, historical financial statements and information for each entity (including five years ofselected financial data, management's discussion and analysis and audited financial statements for the three-year periods ended December 31, 2012 for each ofEndo and Paladin, along with unaudited interim financial statements for each ofEndo and Paladin for the most recent interim period), pro forma financial information for the combined entity with Endo as the accounting acquirer along with comparative historical and pro forma per share data, information with respect to the directors and executive officers ofNew Endo and their compensation, a detailed description ofthe New Endo ordinary shares along with a detailed comparison ofthe rights of holders ofEndo common shares as compared to the rights of holders ofNew Endo ordinary shares, and risk factors related to the Transactions and the business ofNew Endo, among other information. The Paladin Circular contains or incorporates by reference the information included in the Registration Statement, and also includes a detailed description ofthe fairness opinion of Paladin's financial advisor, a detailed description of Knight Therapeutics and a detailed description ofthe New Endo ordinary shares along with a detailed comparison ofthe rights of holders ofPaladin common shares as compared to the rights of holders ofNew Endo ordinary shares, among other information. The information that will be
available concerning Endo, Paladin, the Transactions and the combined business ofEndo and Paladin is at least as extensive as the information that would be
Office ofthe ChiefCounsel available with respect to the combined business ifEndo were to acquire Paladin directly via merger or similar transaction and report the transaction on a Form 8-K. New Endo will also file a Form 8-K reporting the consummation ofthe Transactions no later than four business days following the closing ofthe Transactions, including therein the disclosures and information required by Item 2.01 ofForm 8-K, the financial statements and pro forma information required under Item 9.01 ofForm 8-K (within 71 days following the closing, in accordance with the requirements of Item 9.01), as well as, to the extent applicable, disclosures required by the other items of Form 8-K. Immediately following the consummation of the Acquisition and the Merger, although New Endo will be incorporated in Ireland, New Endo will be obligated to file reports under the Exchange Act and will not be a foreign private issuer. Reasons for Choice ofTransaction Structure To effect the Transactions, Endo could have structured the Transactions as a holding company reorganization and acquisition (the "Holdco Structure") which would have been substantially similar to the structures outlined in the GrajTech Int'l Ltd. (available November 4,
2010) and World Access, Inc. (available October 28, 1998) no-action letters. Under such Holdco
Structure, Endo would have formed a direct, wholly owned subsidiary ("Holdco") and caused Holdco to form two wholly owned merger subsidiaries. Endo would then have entered into a merger agreement with Holdco, the merger subsidiaries and Paladin, pursuant to which one merger subsidiary would merge into Endo and the other merger subsidiary would merge into Paladin such that, as a result, Paladin and Endo would become direct, wholly owned subsidiaries ofHoldco. In fact, the current structure ofthe Transactions is similar to the Holdco Structure. In the Transactions, New Endo (the equity ofwhich is directly held 50% by Endo and 50% by Paladin) has formed two acquisition subsidiaries, one ofwhich will acquire Paladin pursuant to the Arrangement and the other ofwhich will merge with and into Endo in the Merger. The ultimate outcome ofthe Transactions, from a corporate law perspective, is in substance no different than would have been the case in a Holdco Structure. In both cases, upon consummation ofthe Transactions, Endo would be a wholly-owned subsidiary of an Irish parent company, with the former Endo shareholders owning approximately 77.4% ofthe combined company, and the former Paladin shareholders owning approximately 22.6%. However, Endo believes that the current structure ofthe Transactions provides Endo and its shareholders with a number of benefits, including greater certainty with respect to the expected tax treatment ofthe Transactions. We also note that Endo could have chosen to effect the Transactions by simply establishing a new wholly owned subsidiary of Endo and entering into an agreement providing for the acquisition of Paladin by such subsidiary, with the holders of Paladin ordinary shares receiving the same percentage ownership interest in Endo that they would hold in New Endo under the current structure. In that situation, there would be no actual "succession" under Rule 12g-3(a), since the Endo common shares would remain registered under the Exchange Act, Endo would retain its reporting history for all purposes and Endo would remain eligible to use FormS
regard, upon completion ofthe Transactions, the directors ofEndo immediately prior to the Transaction will become the directors ofNew Endo. In addition, Endo's Chief Executive Officer, ChiefFinancial Officer, ChiefLegal Officer and other current members of senior management will constitute the executive officers ofNew Endo upon the completion ofthe Transactions. In short, New Endo will have substantially the same directors and executive officers and the same NASDAQ trading symbol as Endo has today, and its business will remain substantially similar. In addition, at the effective time ofthe Merger, all outstanding Endo stock options, restricted stock units and restricted stock awards will be assumed by New Endo and converted into New Endo stock options, restricted stock units and restricted stock awards, respectively, on the same terms and conditions as were applicable to the Endo stock options, restricted stock units and restricted stock awards immediately prior to the effective time. We believe that Endo's public disclosures regarding the Transactions to date have been consistent with the substantive effect of the Transactions. For example, its press release dated November 5, 2013, announcing the transaction was entitled "Endo to Acquire Specialty Pharmaceutical Company Paladin Labs" and its investor presentation dated the same date describes the Transaction as an "Acquisition of Paladin Labs". While New Endo will be an Irish entity and will have organizational documents that differ in certain respects from those ofEndo, many ofthe principal attributes of Endo common shares and New Endo ordinary shares will be similar. We recognize, however, that there will be differences between the rights of holders of Endo common shares under Delaware law and the rights of holders ofNew Endo ordinary shares following the Transactions (which differences would arise regardless of whether the Transactions were structured under the Holdco Structure or the current structure). Detailed disclosure is included in the Registration Statement with respect to differences between Delaware and Irish corporate law, including a detailed comparison ofthe rights of holders of Endo common shares and New Endo ordinary shares and the respective organizational documents ofEndo and New Endo. Generally, the differences between Endo's charter documents and New Endo's memorandum and articles of association as they will be in effect from and after the effective time ofthe Transactions are either (i) as required by Irish law (i.e., as a result of differences in Irish law and Delaware law, New Endo's memorandum and articles of association include provisions not included in Endo's charter documents and exclude provisions that are included in Endo's charter documents) or (ii) in order to preserve the current rights ofEndo's shareholders and powers ofthe board of directors of Endo as compared to those ofNew Endo following the Transactions. Employee Benefit Matters Each option to purchase
Endo common stock under any Endo Incentive Plans, whether vested or unvested, that is outstanding immediately prior to the effective time ofthe Merger will be converted, on substantially the same terms and conditions as were applicable under such option before the effective time ofthe Merger, into an option to acquire New Endo ordinary shares equal to the number ofshares subject to the Endo option immediately prior to the effective time ofthe Merger multiplied by the equity exchange ratio (as defined below), at an exercise price per share equal to the exercise price per share applicable to such option immediately prior
Office ofthe ChiefCounsel
February 27,2014 to the effective time ofthe Merger divided by the equity exchange ratio. For purposes ofthis letter, "equity exchange ratio" means, at the time ofcalculation, the ratio ofthe number ofEndo common shares to New Endo ordinary shares. Each other Endo equity award that is outstanding immediately prior to the effective time ofthe Merger under any Endo Incentive Plan, including outstanding Endo performance share units and deferred share units held by Endo' s nonemployee directors, will be converted, on substantially the same terms and conditions as were applicable under such equity award before the effective time ofthe Merger, into a right to receive the number ofNew Endo ordinary shares equal to the number ofshares subject to such equity award immediately prior to the effective time ofthe Merger multiplied by the equity exchange ratio. In addition, purchase rights under ongoing offerings under Endo's employee stock purchase program will be converted into purchase rights to acquire New Endo ordinary shares on substantially the same terms and conditions as were applicable before the effective time ofthe Merger. Each ofthe current Endo Incentive Plans and the Endo employee stock purchase program will be assumed by New Endo as ofthe effective time ofthe Merger. Each right to acquire one Paladin common share pursuant to an option to purchase Paladin common shares under the Paladin stock option plan that is outstanding at the effective time ofthe Arrangement will fully vest and will be settled in exchange for one Knight Therapeutics common share plus an amount ofNew Endo ordinary shares equal to 1.6331 multiplied by a factor generally determined by dividing (y) the sum ofthe per share cash consideration payable in the Arrangement plus the amount that the closing price of a Paladin common share on TSX on the trading day immediately preceding the effective date ofthe Arrangement exceeds the exercise price for each Paladin common share subject to the option (the " in-the-money-amount per share") by (z) the closing price ofa Paladin common share on TSX on the trading day immediately preceding the effective date ofthe Arrangement. Ifthe in-themoney amount per share is equal to or less than zero then the consideration for the settlement of such right will be zero. All purchase rights ofeach participant under the Paladin employee share purchase plan will be cancelled for a cash amount equal to 25% ofthe aggregate number ofshares purchased on behalfofthat participant under the Paladin employee share purchase plan, with the participant's contributions in respect ofeach ofthe eight fiscal quarters ending immediately prior to the effective time ofthe Arrangement (but excluding any Paladin common shares purchased with such participant's contributions after November 5, 2013 that exceeded his or her rate of contribution before that date), multiplied by the closing price ofa Paladin common share on TSX on the trading day immediately preceding the
effective date ofthe Arrangement. Each ofthe Paladin stock option plan and the Paladin employee share purchase plan will be terminated at the effective time ofthe Arrangement.
Office ofthe ChiefCounsel
New Endo will authorize confonning amendments to the Endo Incentive Plans necessary to reflect the assumption ofthe Endo Incentive Plans and, in certain cases, the extension ofsuch plans to employees ofNew Endo and its subsidiaries. The plans under which such options rights and benefits with respect to New Endo ordinary shares will be administered after such assumption are referred to herein as the "New Endo Plans." Summary of Request for Relief We respectfully request that the Staff concur in the following conclusions, each of which is discussed more fully under the heading "Discussion and Analysis" below. (a) Rules 12g-3(a) and 12b-2. The Merger constitutes a "succession" for purposes of Rule 12g-3(a) under the Exchange Act, and the New Endo ordinary shares will be deemed registered under Section 12(b) ofthe Exchange Act upon consummation ofthe Merger, and that New Endo, as successor to Endo, will be deemed a large accelerated filer for purposes of Exchange Act Rule 12b-2. (b) Availability ofForms S-3 and S-8 and Ability to Incorporate by Reference into Form S-4. New Endo requests that the Staffconfinn that New Endo may, prior to the filing of its initial Annual Report on Fonn 1 0-K, use Fonn S-8 or post-effective amendments to the Registration Statement (assuming a sufficient number ofshares are included in the Registration Statement) to register the securities covered by the New Endo Plans and any new benefit plans, stock purchase plans or stock incentive plans ofNew Endo. In addition, New Endo requests that the Staffconfinn that upon completion ofthe Transactions, New Endo may include Endo's reporting history and status prior to the Merger in detennining whether New Endo meets the eligibility requirements for the use ofFonns S-3 and S-8 and the ability to incorporate by reference into Fonn S-4. (c) Availability of Rule 144. New Endo, upon consummation of the Merger, may include Endo's reporting history and status in detennining whether New Endo meets the current public infonnation requirements in Rule 144(c)(l), and the most recent report or statement published by Endo prior to the Merger and the average weekly reported volume oftrading in Endo common shares during the time periods specified in Rule 144( e)( 1) occurring prior to the time ofthe Merger may be taken into account by holders ofNew Endo ordinary shares for purposes ofthe Rule 144( e) volume limitations. (d) Section 4(a)(3) Prospectus Delivery Requirement and Rule l74(b). New Endo requests that the Staff confinn that in accordance with Rule 174(b) under the Securities Act, New Endo need not comply with the prospectus delivery requirements of Section 4(aX3) ofthe Securities Act.
Discussion and Analysis
(a) Rules 12g-3(a) and 12b-2
Rule 12g-3(a) under the Exchange Act provides that where, in connection with a "succession" by merger, securities of an issuer that are not already registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act are issued to holders of any class of securities of another issuer that are already registered under Section 12(b) or 12(g) ofthe Exchange Act, then the unregistered securities shall be deemed to be registered under the same paragraph of Section 12 ofthe Exchange Act, subject to certain enumerated exceptions. The definition of "succession" in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2 contemplates the direct acquisition ofthe assets comprising a going business. In the Merger, although New Endo would be acquiring assets of a going business, it would be doing so indirectly, with Endo continuing as a wholly owned subsidiary ofNew Endo. However, we are ofthe view that the structure ofthe Transactions should not prevent New Endo from being deemed to have made a "direct acquisition" ofthe business ofEndo and thus to be the successor to Endo under Rule 12g-3(a). Indeed, the Staffhas taken similar positions with respect to transactions in which the assets "directly acquired'' remain in a subsidiary ofthe successor company rather than proceeding to direct ownership by the successor, including in the Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (available January 12, 2012) no-action letter and in various holding company reorganization structures. See, e.g., Grafl'ech Int'l. Ltd, supra, Pediatrix Medical Group Inc. (available November 22, 2008), Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. (available February 20, 2008), Roper Industries, Inc. (available July 19, 2007), Hecla Mining Co. (available October 31, 2006) and World Access, Inc., supra. These various holding company reorganization structures include the structures detailed in the Grafl'ech Int'l. Ltd. and World Access, Inc. no-action letters that, in each case, involved a holding company reorganization and the acquisition ofa private company or companies thereafter, which structure, as indicated above, is substantially similar to the structure ofthe Transactions. Given that we view the difference between the Transactions and the Holdco Structure as a matter ofform and not substance, and that the structure ofthe Transactions is substantially similar to structures in which the Staff has previously granted relief under Rule 12g-3(a), we are ofthe view that, ifthe Merger is consummated, New Endo should be deemed the successor to Endo, particularly given the detailed information that is and will be available regarding the Transactions and the constituent companies and, as explained above, our view that the Transactions will not fundamentally alter the nature ofthe business currently conducted by Endo. Additionally, eligibility for relief under Rule 12g-3(a) should not be impacted by the fact that the Paladin common shares are not registered under the Exchange Act. As described above, Endo could have chosen to effect the Transactions by a more typical subsidiary
acquisition structure, such as a merger, which would not have raised any issues regarding "successor" registration. This subsidiary acquisition structure would have resulted in a consolidated business identical to the business that will be operated by New Endo following the Transactions, but would not have provided the same level ofcertainty regarding the tax and other related strategic
benefits ofthe Transactions as currently structured. To deny relief under Rule 12g-3(a) would penalize Endo for structuring the Transactions in a manner that it believes is in the best interests ofEndo and its shareholders. Moreover, the purpose behind Rule 12g-3 is "to eliminate any possible gap in the application ofExchange Act protection to the securityholders ofthe predecessor" (see Section 250.01 of the Division's Exchange Act Rules Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations), and to deny the application ofRule 12g-3 to the issuance ofNew Endo common shares in the Transactions would have the effect of creating such a potential gap in the Exchange Act protections for Endo shareholders, solely because Endo chose to structure the Transactions in a manner that was beneficial to its shareholders. Finally, we note that the staff has granted relief under 12g-3(a) in similar transactions where securities were issued to holders of shares that were not registered under the Exchange Act, including in the holding company structure described GrafFech Jnt'l. Ltd., supra, where holding company securities were issued to shareholders of a private company. Although Paladin does not have securities registered under the Exchange Act, it is a public company, with the Paladin common shares registered in Canada and traded on the TSX. We also note that the express wording ofRule 12g-3(a)(2) provides that such deemed registration would not occur ifthe class of securities issued would be held ofrecord by less than 300 persons. However, we believe that the application ofRule 12g-3(a) is appropriate notwithstanding the fact that New Endo may have less than 300 record holders upon consummation ofthe Transactions, and the Staffhas granted no-action relief from the 300 record holder threshold of Rule 12g-3(a)(2) in a number ofsuccessor situations. See, e.g., Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc., supra, Gali/eo Holding Corp. (available Dec. 19, 2008), Harveys Casino Resorts (available October 31, 2000), !PC Information Systems, Inc. (available May 20, 1999) and American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. (available March 29, 1999). See also Section 250.02 ofthe Division's Exchange Act Rules Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations. Like many other companies, although New Endo may have less than 300 record holders, New Endo will continue to be widely held following the Transactions by several thousand beneficial owners. In our view, the application of Rule 12g-3(a) to the Transactions even though New Endo may have fewer than 300 record holders is consistent with the reliefthat the Staff has granted in similar circumstances as well as the protection of investors. Accordingly, it is our view that Rule 12g-3(a) should be available to New Endo, notwithstanding Rule 12g-3(c)(2). As noted above, Endo is a large accelerated filer under Exchange Rule 12b-2. The Staff has taken the position on prior occasions that a successor issuer would be a successor to a predecessor's status as a large accelerated
filer under Exchange Act Rule 12b-2. See, e.g., Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc., supra, Willbros Group, Inc. (available February 27, 2009); Ga/ileo Holding Corp., supra, and Roper Industries, Inc., supra. For the reasons set forth above and given the purpose behind Rule 12g-3, we respectfully request that the Staff concur in our opinion that, upon consummation ofthe Merger, the New Endo ordinary shares should be deemed registered under Exchange Act Section 12(b) by virtue ofthe operation ofRule 12g-3(a). We further request that the Staff concur in our opinion that New Endo, as successor to Endo, will succeed to Endo's filer status for purposes of Exchange
Act Rule 12b-2 and will therefore be deemed a large accelerated filer under Exchange Act Rule 12b-2. (b) Availability of Forms S-3 and S-8 and Ability to Incorporate by Reference into Form S-4 (i) Availability of Form S-8 New Endo intends to file registration statements on Form S-8 or post-effective amendments to the Registration Statement (assuming a sufficient number of shares are included in the Registration Statement) to register the securities covered by the New Endo Plans. In order for such New Endo Plans to be operational upon completion ofthe Transactions, and therefore to operate for the benefit ofthe current and former directors, employees, consultants and other participants ofthe New Endo Plans without interruption, New Endo, subject to a favorable response to this letter, intends such registration statements or post-effective amendments to be filed and become effective prior to or upon completion ofthe Transactions and prior to the filing by New Endo ofits initial Annual Report on Form 1 0-K. As stated above, Endo common shares and other employee benefit plan interests in Endo are registered on Form S-8 for distribution pursuant to the Endo Incentive Plans. Effective upon the effectiveness ofthe Transactions, all options, rights and benefits granted under the Endo Incentive Plans will become options, rights and benefits with respect to New Endo ordinary shares and other employee benefit plan interests in New Endo and the Endo Incentive Plans will be assumed as the New Endo Plans, as described above. The Staff has previously taken the position that a successor issuer may fulfill its registration requirements with respect to employee stock option, restricted stock and similar benefit plans by filing a registration statement with respect thereto prior to or following completion ofthe succession transaction. See Perrigo Company (available December 17, 2013), Actavis, Inc., supra, Eaton Corp., supra, ConocoPhillips, supra, Kerr-McGee Corporation, supra, AOL Time Warner Inc., supra, NSTAR, supra, Texas Utilities Company (available June 4, 1997), Time Warner Inc. (available October 10, 1996) ("Time Warner Ill''). In particular, the Staff has taken the position that a successor issuer may register securities issuable pursuant to employee benefit plans on Form S-8, as appropriate, if(a) the opportunity to participate in the plans subject to Form S-8 registration statements will be offered only to existing employees (as defined in the letters cited below) ofthe two companies subject to a transaction and their subsidiaries and (b) no securities will be sold or issued pursuant to such registration statements until the effective time ofsuch transaction. See Perrigo Company, supra, Actavis, Inc., supra, Eaton Corp., supra, ConocoPhillips, supra, Kerr-McGee Corporation, supra, AOL Time Warner Inc., supra, NSTAR, supra, Texas Utilities Company, supra, Time Warner Inc., supra.
Accordingly, New Endo will limit the opportunity to participate in the New Endo Plans subject to a Form S-8 registration statement or post-effective amendments to the Registration Statement to existing employees ofNew Endo and its subsidiaries and certain qualified former employees ofEndo and its subsidiaries. Such persons fall within the General Instruction A.l(a) definition of employees. 1 Finally, New Endo will not issue or sell any securities pursuant to any New Endo Plans under the Form S-8 registration statements or post-effective amendments to the Registration Statement prior to the completion ofthe Transactions. In view ofthe foregoing, including the limitations described above, we request that the Staff confirm our opinion that New Endo may file registration statements on Form S-8 or posteffective amendments to the Registration Statement (assuming a sufficient number of shares are included in the Registration Statement) to register the securities covered by the New Endo Plans and any new benefit plans, stock option plans or stock incentive plans ofNew Endo and allow them to become effective prior to or upon the completion ofthe Transactions. The Staff has taken this position in other cases involving similarly structured transactions. See Actavis, Inc., supra, Eaton Corp., supra, ConocoPhi//ips, supra, Kerr-McGee Corporation, supra, AOL Time Warner Inc., supra, NSTAR, supra, Texas Utilities Company, supra, Time Warner Inc., supra. (ii) Availability ofForms S-3 and S-8 and Ability to Incorporate by Reference into Form S-4, Generally General Instruction I.A.7 to Form S-3 under the Securities Act deems a successor registrant to have met the conditions for eligibility to use Form S-3 set forth in General Instruction LA.l, 2, 3 and 5 to Form S-3 if(a) its predecessor and it, taken together, do so, provided that the succession was primarily for the purpose of changing the state ofincorporation ofthe predecessor or forming a holding company, and that the assets and liabilities ofthe successor at the time of succession were substantially the same as those ofthe predecessor, or (b) all predecessors met the conditions at the time ofsuccession and the registrant has continued to do so since the succession. Endo currently meets the eligibility conditions of Form S-3 and the ability to incorporate by reference into Form S-4. The proposed succession ofNew Endo to the business and assets ofEndo will not, however, meet the requirements ofeither clause (a) or clause (b) of General Instruction l.A.7. We strongly believe, however, that the form ofthe Transactions should not dictate the result, and that the Staffs view on our opinion that New Endo General Instruction A.I(a) to Form S-8. Former employees ofEndo and its subsidiaries who are continuing participants in the Endo Incentive Plans, such as retired or disabled employees who have post-termination rights to exercise stock options or other awards under certain Endo Incentive Plans for up to the
remainder ofthe original term of the awards, will be afforded the same opportunity under the New Endo Plans to exercise employee stock options or other awards as is permitted under the terms ofthe Endo Incentive Plans. Pursuant to General Instruction A.l(a)(3), such persons are within the Form S-8 definition of employees, and references herein to "employees" include these persons. In addition, pursuant to Generallnstruction A.l (a)(I), the definition of employee includes directors, officers and consultants, and references herein to "employees" include these persons.
Office ofthe ChiefCounsel can take into account Endo's reporting history and status for the purposes set forth below should be based on the substance ofthe Transactions. We note that the purpose ofthe short form registration is to eliminate unnecessary, duplicative disclosure while ensuring that securityholders, investors and the marketplace are provided with the necessary information upon which to base an investment decision. We believe the continued eligibility ofNew Endo for short-form registration following the Transactions is appropriate because, among other things:
compliance with its Exchange Act reporting obligations;
conducted by Endo or the extent ofinformation available to investors related to Endo.
Our view on the appropriateness of permitting New Endo to take into account Endo1 s reporting history and status prior to the Transactions for determining New Endo1 s Form S-3 eligibility is influenced by the substantive effect ofthe Transactions, which, similar to the Grafl'ech Int'l Ltd no-action letter and the contemplated Transactions, would result in Endo and Paladin being wholly-owned subsidiaries of an Irish parent company (in the form ofNew Endo), ofwhich the former Endo shareholders would own on a fully diluted basis approximately 77.4% upon consummation ofthe Transactions. Our view is also influenced by the fact that publicly available information about Paladin, the Transactions and the combined business ofEndo and Paladin is greater for the Transactions than would have been the case had the Transactions been effected by Endo as the legal acquiror in more typical subsidiary acquisition structure, with only a proxy statement and Form 8-K being filed by Endo and provided to its shareholders. Most importantly, however, our view is influenced by the fact that not permitting New Endo to take into account Endo's reporting history and status prior to the Merger for determining New Endo1 s Form S-3 eligibility would penalize Endo for structuring the Transactions in a manner that it believes is in the best interests ofEndo and its shareholders, given the tax and other related strategic benefits ofthe Transactions as currently structured. IfEndo had instead chosen to acquire Paladin (in legal form), continued use ofEndo1 S reporting history would not be at issue. In each case, however, the ultimate outcome ofthe Transactions from a corporate law perspective is the same. Upon completion ofthe Transactions, the former shareholders ofEndo will own approximately 77.4% ofthe outstanding shares ofNew Endo on a fully diluted basis, and the Transactions have been described in press releases and public filings as an acquisition of Paladin by Endo.
In addition, as noted by the Commission in the 1982 Integrated Disclosure System Release (Release No. 33-6383), short-form registration is appropriate when there exists "widespread following in the marketplace." Endo is widely followed by investors and analysts, has a total market capitalization of approximately $7.9 billion, as ofJanuary 21, 2014, has a trading volume approaching an average of 1.6 million shares, and has been an Exchange Act reporting company for over 13 years. As New Endo, that widespread following is expected to continue. The purpose ofshort-form registration is to also "enhance [a company1 s] ability to access the public securities markets" as described by the Commission in Securities Act Release No. 33-8878. Indeed, ifEndo lost its reporting history (in the form ofNew Endo), it could seriously and adversely affect its ability to opportunistically access the capital markets, a penalty that should not result from a focus on the form, rather than the substance, ofthe Transactions. We strongly believe that allowing New Endo to take into account Endo's reporting history is appropriate given the widespread, direct, and contemporaneous accessibility to Endo's historical disclosure as well as the Registration Statement and Proxy Statement filed in connection with the Transactions. In this regard, any registration statement on Form S-3 filed by New Endo after the Merger and prior to the filing ofNew Endo's initial annual report on Form 10-K would specifically (i) incorporate by reference Endo's historical Exchange Act reports, which reports will continue to be accessible at little or no cost to those interested in obtaining the information; (ii) include historical financial statements ofPaladin (either directly or via incorporation by reference from a New Endo Form 8-K that directly includes the Paladin financial statements); and (iii) include pro forma financial information giving effect to the Transactions. In this regard, we note that the disclosure about New Endo available to investors in a Form S-3 and a Form S-1 would not be meaningfully different. In each case, the line item disclosure requirements of Form S-1 would be addressed and the financial statement filing requirements would be the same. However, the material difference between filing a Form S-3 and a Form S-1 for New Endo would be the administrative burden and cost to New Endo in preparing Form S-1 registrations, as well as the loss to New Endo ofappropriate flexibility and an efficient means to access the capital markets. We also believe that a standalone Form S-1 that does not incorporate Endo's historical Exchange Act reports could be confusing and could potentially make it more difficult for investors to properly identify any differences to the previously understood aspects ofEndo's and Paladin's respective businesses (which understanding would be based on investors' prior assessment ofthe Registration Statement and Proxy Statement filed in connection with the
Transactions). The separation of the Knight Therapeutics business to the Paladin shareholders does not alter the analysis set forth above. In connection with the Transactions, shares of Knight Therapeutics are being distributed only to holders ofPaladin common shares and, following the consummation ofthe Transactions, Knight Therapeutics will be a separate public company in Canada, with a separate board of directors and shareholder base. Knight Therapeutics is not part ofthe successor registrant, New Endo. We note that the Staff has granted Form S-3 eligibility relief on prior occasions as it relates to holding company reorganizations. See, e.g., Grafl'ech Int'l. Ltd., supra, News Corp.
Ltd. (available November 3, 2004), Reliant Energy, Inc. (available December 21, 2001), Northwest Airlines Corp. (available December 16, 1998) and World Access, Inc., supra. The facts set forth in the Grafl'ech Int'l. Ltd. no-action letter involved a holding company reorganization that was to be immediately followed by the acquisitions oftwo private companies. Assuming the acquisition ofthe private companies as contemplated in the Graffech lnt'l. Ltd. no-action letter, the private company shareholders would own 16.5% ofthe holding company parent. The proposed Transaction is not substantively different from the transactions described in the Graffech lnt'l. Ltd. no-action letter (as noted above, on a post-Transaction basis, the historic shareholders ofPaladin would slightly over 20% ofthe share capital ofNew Endo). While the holding company reorganization in the GrajTech Int'l. Ltd. no-action letter did not involve a change in the jurisdiction of incorporation (both Graffech and the new holding company were incorporated in Delaware), we nonetheless believe that the Transactions is in substance the same as the transactions addressed in the Graffech Int'l. Ltd. no-action letter. Indeed, the Staff has on prior occasions not objected to a successor's use of Form S-3 where the successor changed jurisdiction from Delaware to Ireland. See, e.g., Perrigo Company, supra; Eaton Corp., supra. Accordingly, we are ofthe opinion that after the completion ofthe Transactions New Endo may take into account the activities and status ofEndo prior to the completion ofthe Merger in determining whether New Endo meets the eligibility conditions of Form S-3, and in determining whether New Endo "meets the requirements for use of Form S-3" as such phrase is used in the General Instructions ofForm S-4 and "satisfies the registrant requirements for use of Form S-3" as such phrase is used in the General Instructions ofForm S-8 and, assuming New Endo meets all ofthe other requirements for the use of Form S-3, New Endo will be eligible immediately after the completion ofthe Transactions to use Form S-3 and to incorporate by reference into Form S-4. The Staff has taken similar positions with respect to satisfaction ofthe eligibility conditions of Forms S-3 and S-4 in the context oftransactions similar to the Transactions. See Actavis, Inc., supra, Starburst II, Inc. and Sprint Nextel Corp., supra, Tower Group, Inc., supra, Eaton Corp., supra, Pentair, Inc., (available Sept. 20, 2012), Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc., supra, Ga/ileo Holding Corp., supra; Duke Energy Corp., supra; Friedman, Billings, Ramsey Group Inc., supra; ConocoPhillips, supra; Kerr-McGee Corporation, supra; AOL Time Warner Inc., supra; NSTAR, supra. Similarly, it is our opinion that New Endo, upon completion ofthe Transactions, will be entitled to rely on the prior activities and Exchange Act reports of Endo in determining whether it shall be deemed to have met the requirements of General Instruction A to Form S-8
and that New Endo will meet the eligibility requirements ofForm S-8. We note, as discussed above, that the Staff has on numerous occasions permitted a holding company to file registration statements on Form S-8 or post-effective amendments to a Form S-4 following a succession transaction to register shares to be issued pursuant to assumed employee benefit plans. See, e.g., Actavis, Inc., supra, Eaton Corp., supra, Gali/eo Holding Corp., supra; Duke Energy Corp., supra; Friedman, Billings, Ramsey Group Inc., supra; ConocoPhillips, supra; Kerr-McGee Corporation, supra; AOL Time Warner Inc., supra; NSTAR, supra.
Office ofthe ChiefCounsel
(c) Rule 144
Affiliates ofNew Endo who desire to sell New Endo ordinary shares, absent registration under the Securities Act, must sell those shares pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act or some other applicable exemption. Rule 144( c) under the Securities Act requires that, in order for sales of securities to be made in reliance on the "safe harbor" provided by Rule 144, there must be made available "adequate current public information" with respect to the issuer for purposes ofsuch Rule. The purpose of Rule 144( c )(1) is to ensure that adequate, detailed information about the registrant and its securities is available for public inspection. Immediately after the Merger, New Endo will have satisfied each ofthe requirements ofRule 144(c)(1), except that it will not have been subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or 15( d) ofthe Exchange Act for a period of at least 90 days. For the reasons set forth above under "Availability of Forms S-3 and S-8 and Ability to Incorporate by Reference into Form S-4" above, we believe that Endo's reporting history should be taken into account for purposes of determining whether New Endo satisfies the Rule 144(c)(1) eligibility requirements since strict compliance with the 90-day waiting period is not necessary to effectuate the purpose ofRule 144(c)(1) in light ofthe comprehensive disclosures in prior reports and future reports filed by Endo, the Registration Statement and any Exchange Act reports to be filed by New Endo after the closing ofthe Merger. In these circumstances, we believe that there will be information available covering New Endo that is both adequate and current for purposes ofRule 144(c)(l). The Staff has taken similar positions in the context of various holding company and other transactions. See, e.g., GrajTech Int'l. Ltd, supra, Willbros Group, Inc., supra, Pediatrix Medical Group, Inc., supra, Mentor Corporation (available September 26, 2008), Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., supra, Reliant Energy, Inc, supra, Northwest Airlines Corp., supra, and World Access, Inc., supra. Based on the foregoing, we respectfully request that the Staffconcur in our opinion that the Endo's reporting history under the Exchange Act prior to the Merger may be taken into account in determining whether New Endo has complied with the current public information requirements of Rule 144(c)(l) following the Merger. For the same reasons, we respectfully request that the Staff concur in our opinion that, for purposes of Rule 144, the most recent report or statement published by End prior to the effective time ofthe Merger and the average weekly reported volume oftrading in Endo common shares during the time periods specified in Rule 144(e)(1) occurring immediately prior to the effective time ofthe Merger may be taken into account by holders ofNew Endo ordinary shares in determining the applicable limitation on the amount ofNew Endo ordinary shares that may be sold in compliance with Rule 144(e)(1) and (2) after the
Merger. We believe that our opinion is consistent with positions stated above and the previous determinations ofthe Staff in connection with holding company reorganization transactions. See, GrajTech Int'l. Ltd, supra, Lamalie Associates, Inc. (available December 15, 1998) and El Paso Natural Gas Co. (available May 21, 1998).
(d) Section 4(a)(3) Prospectus Delivery Requirement and Rule 174(b) Rule 174(b) under the Securities Act provides that no prospectus need be delivered pursuant to Section 4(a)(3) ofthe Securities Act ifthe issuer is a reporting company under the Exchange Act immediately prior to the filing of a registration statement. As noted earlier, Endo is a reporting company under the Exchange Act. Because New Endo will, immediately following the Transactions, have, on a consolidated basis, the same assets, liabilities, business and operations as Endo and Paladin, on a consolidated basis, immediately prior to the Transactions (excluding the assets being contributed to Knight Therapeutics), New Endo will be the successor-in-interest to Endo and Paladin, it is our opinion that dealers ofNew Endo ordinary shares should be able to rely on Rule 174(b) with respect to the prospectus delivery requirements of Section 4(a)(3) ofthe Securities Act.
For the reasons set forth above, we respectfully request the concurrence of the Staffin each ofour conclusions set forth in this letter. If you require further information, please contact the undersigned at (202) 371-7180, or in my absence, Brandon Van Dyke at (212) 735-3743 or Andrew J. Brady at (202) 371-7344. If your conclusions differ from ours, please contact the undersigned prior to responding in writing to this letter so that we may clarify our views. cc : Caroline Manogue Executive Vice President & Chief Legal Officer Endo Health Solutions Inc.
Endo
Pharmaceuticals
Valera Inc.
(Delaware)
CPECLLC
(Delaware)
Ledgemont
Royalty Sub LLC
(Delaware)
Exhibit A
Indicative Endo corporate structure prior to the Transactions.
J
Generics
International (US
Parent), Inc.
(Delaware)
ENDO
HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC.
(Delaware)
Endo Phannaceuticals Inc.
(Delaware)
I
T
Endo
Pharmaceuticals
Solutions Inc.
(Delaware)
1
1
!- l
American Medical
Systems Holdings,
Inc.
(Delaware)
I
American Medical
Systems, Inc.
(Delaware)
I
AMS Sales
Corporation
(Delaware)
l
AMS Research
Corporation
(Delaware)
I
Exhibit A
ENOO INTERNATIONAL PLC
(Ireland)
I Endo Limiled (Ireland) l r lnterCo 2 (Ireland) <ll I I Endo Luxembourg Holding
Company S.A r.l. (Luxembourg)
Endo Health Solutions Inc.
(Delaware)
I
Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(Delaware)
T
I I
Endo
Pharmaceuticals
Solutions Inc.
(Delaware)
Generics
International
(US Parent), Inc.
(Delaware)
American Medical
Systems Holdings, Inc.
(Delaware) l I I
Endo Pharmaceuticals American Medical Paladin Labs Paladin Labs Paladin Labs USA Valera Inc. (Delaware) CPECL~IJ r----1 Systems, Inc. (Delaware) Europe Limited (Ireland) (Barbados) Inc. (Barbados) Inc. (Delaware) (Delaware) , ' AMS Sales AMS Research r Corporation Corporation I (Delaware) (Delaware) (I) As defined in the Plan ofArrangement, as it may be amended in accordance with its terms. Amalco (Canada) Paladin Labs Inc. (Canada) Litha Healthcare Group (South Africa)
67.8 50.01
Laboratorios Paladin de
Mexico S.A. (Mexico)
Ledgemont Royalty 1~1 Sub LLC
(Delaware)
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
The documents this one cites, and the documents that cite it.
“Securities Exchange Act of 1934 - Rules 12g-3(a) and 12b-2”
“Securities Act of 1933 - Forms S-3, S-4 and S-8”
More like this from SEC
SEC published 7 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.
Source: Securities and Exchange Commission — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added · updated