Individual decision · SEC · 22 Mar 2006
Rydex Specialized Products LLC requests no-action relief from the certification rules in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) and Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K for the Euro Currency Trust. The Sponsor seeks confirmation that the Staff will not recommend enforcement action if the Certifications filed with the Trust’s periodic reports and signed by the Sponsor’s CEO and CFO deviate from the standard form prescribed by Item 601(b)(31). This request addresses the unique structure where the Trust is a passive grantor trust with no officers or employees, and the Sponsor serves as the responsible entity for filing reports.
VIA E-MAIL
500 WOODWARD AVENUE, SUITE 2700
313.234.7100 TEL
313.234.2800 FAX
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
ONE DETROIT CENTER
DETROIT, MI 48226-3489 www.foley.com
CLIENT/MATTER NUMBER
058081-0113
March 22, 2006
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) and
Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Re: Rydex Specialized Products LLC d/b/a “Rydex Investments” (File No. 333-125581); Certification Rules for Quarterly and Annual Reports set forth in Exchange Act Rules 13a14(a) and 15d-14(a) and Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K Ladies and Gentlemen:
This letter revises and replaces our letter delivered to you earlier this afternoon, which is hereby withdrawn. We are writing on behalf of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, sponsor (the “Sponsor”) of Euro Currency Trust (the “Trust”). The Sponsor, on behalf of itself and the Trust, hereby requests from the Division of Corporation Finance (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), “no-action” relief from the rules governing the certification of disclosure in quarterly and annual reports adopted by the Commission pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “SOX Act”) and set forth in Rules 13a-14(a)
and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K. (The certifications required by these particular laws, rules and regulations are referred to as “Certifications” in this letter.) Specifically, we are requesting written confirmation that the Staff will not recommend enforcement action to the Commission if the Certifications filed with the Trust’s periodic reports and signed by the Sponsor’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) deviate from the form of Certification set forth in Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K, as described more fully herein. We believe that the relief requested in this letter is consistent with precedent, the public interest and the protection of investors and would further the purposes intended by the policies and provisions of the SOX Act and the Exchange Act.
exchange for deposits of euro and to distribute euro in connection with redemptions of Baskets. Each Share represents a proportional interest, based on the total number of Shares outstanding, in the euro owned by the Trust (including accrued interest), less the accrued but unpaid expenses of the Trust. The number of Shares outstanding increases and decreases as a result of the creation and redemption of Baskets. Baskets may be created or redeemed only by a Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) participant that is a registered broker-dealer, or another securities market participant such as a bank or other financial institution that is not required to register as a brokerdealer to engage in securities transactions, and that has entered into a Participant Agreement with the Trustee and the Sponsor (“Authorized Participants”). Baskets are created in exchange for deposits of euro by an Authorized Participant and, upon redemption of Baskets, euro are delivered to an Authorized Participant. Authorized Participants may sell the Shares included in the Baskets to other investors. The Sponsor expects that the price of a Share will track fluctuations in the price of the euro and will generally reflect accumulated interest as well as the estimated accrued but unpaid expenses of the Trust. The Trust’s assets consist solely of euro held in two euro-denominated demand deposit accounts maintained by the Depository. The primary deposit account earns interest; the secondary deposit account does not earn interest. The secondary deposit account is only used in connection with mid-month creations and redemptions of Baskets, to account for interest that has been earned on the primary deposit account during the month but not yet paid by the Depository, and to receive interest earned on the primary deposit account, pay Trust expenses and distribute any excess interest to Shareholders. Other than euro delivered under a redemption order, the euro held by the Trust will decrease only if (1) the Trust needs to sell euro to pay Trust expenses, (2) the Trust terminates and liquidates its assets or (3) a sale or distribution of euro is required by law or regulation. Any sale or distribution of euro by the Trust will be a taxable event to Shareholders. It is expected that interest paid by the Depository on the euro held by the Trust will be sufficient to pay the Sponsor’s fee. The Sponsor’s fee accrues daily at an annual nominal rate of 0.40% of the euro in the Trust, which is paid monthly and is the Trust’s only ordinary, recurring expense. Any additional interest earned on the euro held by the Trust will be distributed to Shareholders monthly.
C. The Sponsor and Rydex Affiliates, Trustee and Depository
i. The Sponsor, its board and officers, and Rydex Affiliates
The Sponsor of the Trust is Rydex Specialized Products LLC, a managermanaged Delaware limited liability company. The Sponsor was formed on September 14, 2005 to act as sponsor of the Trust. The Sponsor has no other function and it has no employees, being serviced solely by the Rydex Affiliates (as defined below) and by outside professionals, all as elaborated below. The Sponsor’s sole member is PADCO Advisors II, Inc. (“PADCO II”), a Maryland corporation. PADCO II, along with its subsidiaries, and PADCO Advisors, Inc. (“PADCO”), manage 51 open-end mutual funds, including two exchange-traded funds, with a
combined net asset value of $14.1 billion at January 31, 2006. Six more exchange-traded funds have been introduced since then. PADCO II, unlike the Sponsor, has employees of its own to conduct its business; PADCO II has twelve employees. PADCO II, PADCO and Rydex Specialized Products LLC all conduct business under the name “Rydex Investments.” Attached to this letter as Exhibit A is an organizational diagram of the Sponsor and its direct and indirect shareholders and PADCO II’s sister companies. Each of PADCO II and PADCO has subsidiaries, unrelated to the Sponsor and the Trust, that do not appear on the diagram. PADCO II is wholly-owned by Rydex Holdings, Inc. (“Rydex Holdings”), a Maryland corporation. Rydex Holdings is a holding company that is the sole owner of PADCO, PADCO II, Rydex Fund Services, Inc. (“Rydex Fund Services”) and Rydex Distributors (collectively, “Rydex Affiliates”). Other than acting as the holding company for the Rydex Affiliates, Rydex Holdings has no operations, nor does it have any employees. (We will explain Rydex Holdings’ limited oversight role below.) All of the stock of Rydex Holdings is held by two irrevocable trusts, the 2003 Dynamic Irrevocable Trust (the “Dynamic Trust”) and the 2003 Irrevocable Trust for the Family of Skip Viragh. The Dynamic Trust controls Rydex Holdings because it owns all of the voting stock of Rydex Holdings, either in its separate capacity or as Voting Trustee under the Rydex Holdings, Inc. Stock Trust Agreement dated December 31,
2005. The Dynamic Trust is an irrevocable trust formed under Pennsylvania law by Skip
Viragh, the founder of Rydex Investments, during his lifetime; Katherine A. Viragh, Mark S. Viragh and Roger E. Young are trustees of the Dynamic Trust and control the decisions thereof by majority vote. Katherine A. Viragh and Mark S. Viragh also serve as directors of Rydex Holdings, along with Robert J. Viragh and Jean M. Dahl, both of whom are not trustees of the trusts. Pursuant to the terms of the trust agreements, the trustees manage investments for the trusts’ beneficiaries, who are members of Skip Viragh’s family and charitable organizations. Neither PADCO II nor any of the other Rydex Affiliates, nor Rydex Holdings, nor the Sponsor, employs any internal auditors. Young & Brophy provides outsourced financial accounting and bookkeeping services for Rydex Holdings and PADCO II. Fitzgerald, Snyder & Co., P.C., of McLean, Virginia, a PCAOB-registered public accounting firm, audits the financial statements of Rydex Holdings and PADCO II, having been engaged for that purpose by the audit committee of the board of directors of Rydex Holdings and by the entire board of directors (there being no audit committee) of PADCO II. The Sponsor is managed by a board of managers comprised of three persons, all of whom are elected by PADCO II.2 Carl Verboncoeur is the CEO of PADCO II and the CEO and Treasurer of the Sponsor. Nick Bonos is the Senior Vice President of PADCO II and the CFO of the Sponsor; he also serves as the Sponsor’s principal accounting officer. Michael Byrum is the President and Chief Investment Officer of PADCO II and the Secretary of the Sponsor. Messrs. Verboncoeur, Bonos and Byrum are the presently-elected directors of the
Section 15 of the Limited Liability Company Agreement of the Sponsor provides that the Sponsor’s
managers may also be referred to as “directors” and the Sponsor’s board of managers may also be referred to as a “board of directors.” Throughout this letter, we have referred to the Sponsor’s “directors” and the Sponsor’s “board of directors.”
Sponsor and also constitute the Sponsor’s audit committee. These gentlemen are not employees of the Sponsor but are instead employees of various Rydex Affiliates. Specifically, Messrs. Verboncoeur and Byrum are employed by PADCO, while Mr. Bonos is employed by Rydex Fund Services. The Sponsor has no employees. Instead, all of the services required by the Sponsor in the conduct of its business are provided by Rydex Affiliates and outside professionals (i.e., law and accounting firms). As we use the term “employee” in this letter, we mean to invoke only the technical “tax” meaning of the word as signifying the business entity that issues a “W-2” form to the individual. Although Messrs. Verboncoeur and Byrum are “employed” by PADCO, by virtue of their offices in PADCO and the Sponsor they also perform services for those entities. Likewise, Mr. Bonos, who is “employed” by Rydex Fund Services, also works for the Sponsor where he is an officer and a director. Five of the twelve employees of PADCO II provide services to the Sponsor relating to the Trust but otherwise the employees and executive officers of PADCO II are not involved in the operations of the Trust. These PADCO II employees focus on facilitating the relationship of the Sponsor with the Trustee and facilitating the delivery of services to the Sponsor by other Rydex Affiliates (particularly Rydex Distributors). Neither Rydex Holdings nor the trusts that own Rydex Holdings are directly involved in the operations of the Trust. Rydex Holdings is a holding company that functions as a private investment vehicle rather than a management company. Accordingly, Rydex Holdings conducts shareholder-level oversight of the businesses of the subsidiaries that are its assets. This oversight occurs at regularly-scheduled meetings in which the affairs of its subsidiaries are reviewed with the senior managers of the subsidiaries. In these meetings, in general, the Sponsor receives neither more nor less attention from Rydex Holdings than other business units receive. Further, neither PADCO II nor Rydex Holdings, nor the trusts that own Rydex Holdings, are parties to the Trust Agreement. None of the Sponsor, Rydex Affiliates, Rydex Holdings, the Dynamic Trust or the 2003 Irrevocable Trust for the Family of Skip Viragh is an affiliate of the Trustee. The Sponsor was responsible for forming the Trust, for registering the Shares and selecting the Depository. The Sponsor’s responsibilities to the Trust are set forth in the Trust Agreement. The Sponsor generally oversees the performance of the Trustee and the Trust’s principal service providers, but does not exercise day-to-day oversight of them. Although the Sponsor is not responsible for the day-to-day operation of the Trust and does not direct the activites of the Trustee, the Sponsor regularly communicates with the Trustee to monitor overall performance of the Trust. Specifically, the Sponsor monitors the interest rate paid by the Depository and has the right to
instruct the Trustee to terminate the deposit account agreement between the Trust and the Depository (the “Deposit Account Agreement”) if the Sponsor considers the interest rate to be noncompetitive. The Sponsor also evaluates the creation and redemption procedures. The Sponsor, with the assistance of Rydex Distributors and Rydex Fund Services, also maintains the website for the Trust. The Sponsor has employed Foley & Lardner LLP as legal counsel for the Trust.
On behalf of the Trust, the Sponsor also is responsible for the periodic reports, current reports on Form 8-K and any other Exchange Act reports required to be filed by the Trust with the Commission, including the financial statements of the Trust required to be included in such reports. Accounting division employees of Rydex Fund Services work with Young & Brophy and with employees of the Trustee to prepare these financial statements for which the Sponsor is responsible. The Trust’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q will be signed by Nick Bonos in his capacity as the CFO of the Sponsor. The Trust’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K will be signed by Carl G. Verboncoeur in his capacity as the CEO of the Sponsor, Nick Bonos in his capacities as the CFO and the principal accounting officer of the Sponsor and a majority of the members of the Sponsor’s board of directors. Any Current Reports on Form 8-K filed by the Trust will likely be signed by the CEO of the Sponsor, Carl G. Verboncoeur. We are not requesting no-action relief on behalf of the Sponsor with regard to the signature requirements of the Trust’s periodic reports or current reports. In the course of preparing the financial statements to be included in periodic reports, current reports and any other Exchange Act reports required to be filed by the Trust, Young & Brophy and accounting employees of Rydex Fund Services, on behalf of the Sponsor, rely on information provided by the Trustee. Section 5.7 of the Trust Agreement requires the Trustee “to furnish to the Sponsor any information from the records of the Trust that the Sponsor reasonably requests in writing that is needed to prepare any filing or submission that the Sponsor or the Trust is required to make” with the Commission. Section 8.1 of the Deposit Account Agreement requires the Depository to “issue, on a daily basis, balance and transactions reports” for the deposit accounts for the previous banking day, and to “send a periodic statement of account” for the deposit accounts as agreed with the Trust. These reports are being provided to the Sponsor and the Trustee. Neither the Trust Agreement nor the Deposit Account Agreement requires information to be provided by the Trustee or the Depository directly to the Sponsor’s CEO and CFO. In performing their duties, however, the Sponsor’s CEO and CFO have access to the information provided to Young & Brophy and Rydex Fund Services and can be expected to review that information periodically. The Sponsor was responsible for all organizational expenses of the Trust and is obligated under the Trust Agreement to assume and pay the following administrative and marketing expenses of the Trust: the Trustee’s monthly fee, typical maintenance and transaction fees charged by the Depository,3 listing fees of the NYSE, registration fees charged by the Commission, printing and mailing costs, audit fees, legal expenses not in excess of $100,000 per year and any applicable license fees. These administrative and
marketing expenses are paid by the Sponsor out of the Sponsor’s fee. The activities and responsibilities of the Sponsor could change if the Sponsor and Trustee were to amend the Trust Agreement, which is not expected. We acknowledge that this no-action request is limited to the present descriptions set forth in this letter and does not Other than the maintenance and transaction fees, the Depository is not paid a fee by the Sponsor or the Trust.
encompass future changes, for example, to the structure of the Trust or the Sponsor. Neither the Trustee nor the owners of the Shares have the authority to remove the Sponsor as sponsor of the Trust. The Sponsor, however, may resign; in that case, the Trustee would be required to appoint a successor sponsor, to act as sponsor itself or to terminate the Trust. The Sponsor does not and will not engage in activities unrelated to its duties as the sponsor of the Trust. The Sponsor may in the future act as the sponsor for products that are similar in nature to Euro Currency Trust. To qualify as a grantor trust under the Code, which is an essential feature of the Trust, the Trust cannot be actively managed. Although it is theorectically possible for a grantor trust to have officers and directors, this would be highly unusual because they would not have any authority or discretion to vary the investments of the trust.4 Accordingly, the Trust has no directors, officers or employees and is not actively managed. As noted above and in accordance with Section 5.1 of the Trust Agreement, the Sponsor generally oversees the performance of the Trustee and the Trust’s principal service providers, but does not exercise day-to-day oversight of the Trust. Currently, the Sponsor has a board of directors, it has an audit committee consisting of all three incumbent directors (Messrs. Verboncoeur, Bonos and Byrum), and it has three executive officers (the same three gentlemen). The Sponsor’s board of directors, among other bodies, is responsible for oversight of the Sponsor and the Trust. More specifically, the Sponsor’s audit committee and its entire board of directors, who are the same three people in each case, are responsible in the first instance for overseeing the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Trust, audits of the financial statements of the Trust and compliance by the Trust with internal control requirements and disclosure controls and procedures imposed by the SOX Act and implementing SEC regulations. Additional oversight and control is afforded by PADCO II, as explained below. The Sponsor’s audit committee has sole authority to retain and terminate the external auditors for the Trust, including sole authority to approve the fees and terms of retention of such auditors. The Sponsor’s audit committee has unlimited access to the external auditors of the Trust. The Sponsor’s audit committee will evaluate the external auditor’s qualifications, performance and independence, including that of the lead partner. The audit committee has retained PCAOB-registered PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent certified public accountants of the Trust. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP audited the financial statements of the Trust included in the Form S-1 and will audit the financial statements and will provide an attestation report on management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting and its opinion on internal control over financial
reporting in the Trust’s periodic reports. Additionally, these auditors will have direct access to the Sponsor’s audit committee. The foregoing Treas. Reg. § 301.7701-4(c)(1) (an “investment trust” is not treated as a trust for tax purposes if any person has a power under the trust agreement to vary the investment of the certificate holders).
responsibilities are currently the only responsibilities of the audit committee, although these resposibilities may be augmented by the Sponsor’s board of directors. The executive officers of the Sponsor are a CEO (who also serves as the Treasurer), a CFO (who also serves as the principal accounting officer) and a Secretary. The CEO and CFO of the Sponsor serve as the Sponsor’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively. While the Sponsor’s CEO and CFO exercise oversight of the Sponsor and the Trust, they do not oversee the day-to-day operations of the Trust, as the Trust is a passive investment vehicle that is not actively managed. The CEO and CFO report to the Sponsor’s auditors, to PADCO II’s auditors, to PADCO II’s board of directors, to the Sponsor’s audit committee and to the board of directors of Rydex Fund Services all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Trust’s or the Sponsor’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information and any fraud, whether or not material, that involves persons who have a significant role in the Trust’s or Sponsor’s internal control over financial reporting. (We call these deficiencies, weaknesses and frauds “Reportable Information” in this letter.) The Sponsor’s CFO will, from time to time, present a status report about the Trust to the Sponsor’s audit committee. The Sponsor’s CEO and CFO will also provide quarterly written reports about the Trust’s status to the Sponsor’s entire board. In addition, the Sponsor’s CEO and CFO are responsible for establishing the disclosure controls and procedures of the Trust and the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting and will provide periodical reports to the audit committee with respect to the status of the Trust’s compliance with Section 404 of the SOX Act. The CEO and the CFO of the Sponsor are not actively managing the Trust in the manner that a principal executive officer and a principal financial officer of a more conventional registrant would employ. They are the persons, however, who most closely resemble the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of a conventional, actively-managed registrant. Because the Sponsor has no employees whatsoever and has no officers or directors other than Messrs. Verboncoeur, Bonos and Byrum, various employees of the Rydex Affiliates, together with outside professionals (i.e., the accounting and law firms identified in this paragraph) retained by the Sponsor, perform services relating to the Trust. For example, employees of PADCO II oversee the relationships between the Sponsor and the Trustee, the Sponsor and the Depository and the Sponsor and Authorized Participants. They also monitor the Basket creation and redemption processes and the interest rate paid by the Depository. For Rydex Holdings and its direct and
indirect subsidiaries, accounting services are provided by Rydex Fund Services; Young & Brophy also provides accounting services to PADCO II. Accordingly, it is employees in the accounting division of Rydex Fund Services, working with employees of the Trustee, who prepare the financial statements required in the periodic reports filed by the Trust. Employees in the information technology division of Rydex Fund Services maintain the Sponsor’s website. Employees of Rydex Distributors are responsible for developing a marketing plan for the Trust, preparing marketing materials regarding the Shares, including the content on the Trust’s website, executing the marketing plan for the Trust and
providing strategic and tactical research on the global foreign exchange market. Foley & Lardner LLP has been engaged to serve as legal counsel to the Trust. With respect to internal control over financial reporting, the roles and resources of the Sponsor, its CEO and CFO and the Sponsor’s service providers are strengthened significantly by the role and resources of the Sponsor’s sole shareholder, PADCO II. PADCO II, like PADCO, manages numerous funds offered by Rydex Investments. PADCO II has twelve employees, who perform a variety of functions including management, fund advice, sales and marketing and human resources. As we explain elsewhere, the accounting services needed by the Sponsor are provided by Rydex Fund Services and Young & Brophy. To the extent that PADCO II employees servicing the Sponsor have accounting training and acumen, they will read accounting information that comes to them from time to time in the course of performing their duties and can be expected to disclose any and all Reportable Information “up the ladder” to the PADCO II board of directors. PADCO II also has a board of directors that meets quarterly with management to discuss the affairs of PADCO II and its subsidiaries, including the Sponsor. This board oversees the Sponsor and other PADCO II subsidiaries from the shareholder level and, accordingly, does not concern itself with, or engage in, day-to-day management of the Sponsor. The PADCO II board of directors and the Rydex Fund Services board of directors both exclude all of the officers of the Sponsor. Accordingly, PADCO II’s board excludes the CEO and CFO of the Sponsor, who are the individuals we suggest should sign the Certifications. Although PADCO II does not have an audit committee, it does have a firm of external auditors, PCAOBregistered Fitzgerald, Snyder & Co., P.C., which has been engaged by, and reports to, the PADCO II board of directors. PADCO II’s board functions as an audit committee in receiving and processing these reports because PADCO II does not have a stand-alone audit committee. As explained more fully below, we propose to modify the Certifications to reflect internal control processes in which Reportable Information is disclosed to PADCO II’s external auditors and board of directors.
ii. The Trustee
The Bank of New York, a banking corporation with trust powers organized under the laws of the State of New York, serves as the Trustee of the Trust. The Trustee’s duties are primarily ministerial and the Trustee has little discretion under the Trust Agreement. The Trustee is not responsible for the overall performance of the Trust. The Trustee is responsible for the day-to-day administration of the Trust, including keeping the Trust’s operational records. Specifically, the Trustee’s responsibilities, as set forth in the Trust Agreement, are to pay the Trust’s expenses (which will ordinarily be only the Sponsor’s fee), to calculate the NAV of the Trust and the NAV per Share each business day, as described below, to receive and process orders from Authorized Participants to create and redeem Baskets and to coordinate the processing of such orders with the Depository and DTC. Finally, following payment of the Sponsor’s fee and other Trust expenses, if any, the Trustee will convert any interest earned by the Trust that exceeds the Trust’s expenses into U.S. dollars and distribute this amount to the Shareholders. Shareholders of record on the record date fixed by the Trustee for any distribution are entitled to receive their pro-rata portions of the distribution.
As noted above, Section 5.7 of the Trust Agreement requires the Trustee “to furnish to the Sponsor any information from the records of the Trust that the Sponsor reasonably requests in writing that is needed to prepare any filing or submission that the Sponsor or the Trust is required to make” with the Commission. The Trustee determines the NAV of the Trust each business day by valuing the euro held by the Trust on the basis of the “Noon Buying Rate,” which is the U.S. dollar/euro exchange rate as determined by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York as of 12:00 p.m. (New York time) on each day that the NYSE is open for regular trading.5 Investors may obtain, 24 hours a day, foreign exchange pricing information based on the spot price of euro from various financial information service providers. Current spot prices are also generally available with bid/ask spreads from foreign exchange dealers. In addition, the Trust’s website (www.currencyshares.com) provides ongoing pricing information for euro spot prices and the Shares. Market prices for the Shares are also available from a variety of sources, including brokerage firms, financial websites and other information service providers. The NAV of the Trust is published by the Sponsor each day that the NYSE is open for regular trading and is posted on the Trust’s website. Under the Trust Agreement, the Sponsor has some direction over certain activities of the Trustee. Specifically, the Trustee shall effect a split or a reverse split of the Shares if requested to do so by the Sponsor; when a record date must be fixed, the Trustee does so in consultation with the Sponsor; and the Sponsor can direct the Trustee to sell euro if such sale is required by law or regulation. In addition, the Sponsor may, in its sole discretion, direct the Trustee to terminate the Trust if any of the following events occur:
the Shares are de-listed from the NYSE and are not listed for trading on
another U.S. national securities exchange or through the NASDAQ Stock Market within five business days from the date the Shares are de-listed;
the Commission determines that the Trust is an investment company under
the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended;
the net asset value (“NAV”) of the Trust remains less than $100 million
for 30 consecutive business days at any time after the first 90 days of the Shares being eligible for trading on the NYSE;
all of the Trust’s assets are sold;
To calculate the NAV, the Trustee adds to the amount of euro in the Trust at the end of the preceding day accrued but unpaid interest, euro receivable under pending purchase orders and the value of other Trust assets, and subtracts the accrued but unpaid Sponsor’s fee, euro payable under pending redemption orders and other Trust expenses and liabilities, if any.
the aggregate market capitalization of the Trust, based on the closing price
for the Shares, remains less than $300 million for five consecutive trading days; or
the DTC is unwilling or unable to perform its functions under the Trust
Agreement.
The Trustee can be removed by the Sponsor only if the Trustee is adjudged bankrupt or insolvent, or a receiver for the Trustee or its property has been appointed or a trutee or liquidator or any public officer has taken charge or control of the Trustee or of its property or affairs.
iii. The Depository
The Depository was selected solely by the Sponsor but, pursuant to Section 6.6 of the Trust Agreement, is “subject at all times and in all respects to the directions of the Trustee and will be responsible solely to it.” Pursuant to Section 6.6 of the Trust Agreement, the Trustee shall terminate the Deposit Account Agreement if the Trustee is directed to do so by the Sponsor. The Depository accepts euro deposited with it by Authorized Participants in connection with the creation of Baskets and facilitates the transfer of euro into and out of the Trust through the euro deposit accounts maintained with it by the Trust. D. The Shares and Shareholders’ Limited Rights The Shares represent units of fractional undivided beneficial interest in, and ownership of, the Trust, and have no par value. Shares are issued and redeemed by the Trust in integral Baskets, and only Authorized Participants are permitted to create or redeem Baskets. The Trustee is authorized under the Trust Agreement to create and issue an unlimited number of Shares. Any creation and issuance of Shares in excess of the amount registered with the Commission on the Form S-1 will be registered by the Sponsor with the Commission (and registered for listing on the NYSE). All Shares are evidenced by global certificates issued by the Trustee to DTC and registered in the name of Cede & Co. as nominee for DTC. The global certificates evidence all of the Shares outstanding at any time. The Shares are transferable only through the book-entry system of DTC. A Shareholder that is not a DTC participant will only be able to transfer its Shares through DTC by instructing the DTC participant holding its Shares (or by instructing the indirect DTC participant or other entity through which its Shares are held) to transfer the Shares. Transfers are to be made in accordance with standard securities industry practice. Individual Shares are listed on the NYSE and trade under the ticker symbol “FXE.” The Shares are traded in the secondary market in the same manner as other equity securities. Bear Hunter Structured Products LLC, the member firm appointed by the NYSE to be the specialist of the Trust’s Shares, maintains a market for the Shares that trade on the NYSE. The price of the Shares trading in the secondary market is based on a current bid/offer market. Transactions involving the sale of Shares in the secondary market -- which are between
purchasers and sellers and do not involve the Trust -- are subject to customary brokerage commissions and charges. The price of the Shares on the NYSE has not varied materially from the value of the euro (plus interest and less expenses) represented by such Shares due to the arbitrage opportunities resulting from the creation and redemption mechanics available to the Authorized Participants. If interest earned on the euro held by the Trust exceeds Trust expenses, the Trustee will convert the excess euro into U.S. dollars and distribute it monthly to Shareholders as described above. As disclosed in the “Risk Factors” section of prospectus contained in the the Form S-1, owners of Shares do not have the rights typically available to shareholders of a business corporation, including, for example, the right to bring “oppression” or “derivative” actions. Apart from the rights afforded to them by federal and state securities laws, Shareholders have only those limited rights relative to the Trust, the Trust property and the Shares that are set forth in the Trust Agreement. They do not have the right to elect directors of the Sponsor. Pursuant to the Trust Agreement, Shareholders representing 75% or more of the Shares outstanding may elect to terminate the Trust. Additionally, Shareholders representing 66-2/3% or more of the Shares outstanding may vote to remove the Trustee. Shareholders may not vote on any other matter. If the Trust is terminated and liquidated, then the Trustee will distribute to the Shareholders, upon surrender of their Shares, euro held by the Trust.
2. Request for Relief
A. Application of Certification Rules Adopted Under Section 302 of the SOX Act and Set Forth in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) and Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K The Trust is subject to the reporting requirements of Sections 13 and 15(d) of the Exchange Act and the requirements to file Certifications with its periodic reports as set forth in
Section 302 of the SOX Act, Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) and Item 601(b)(31)
of Regulation S-K. The Sponsor, on behalf of itself and the Trust, requests no-action relief from the Staff regarding the Certifications. Specifically, the Sponsor requests written assurance that the Staff will not recommend enforcement action to the Commission if the Certifications filed with the Trust’s periodic reports and signed by the Sponsor’s CEO and CFO are modified in the manner set forth in Annex A to this letter. As described above, the Trust, being a grantor trust, is a passive investment vehicle with no directors or audit committee and no officers or employees of its own. The Trust acts only through the Trustee and the Sponsor. The Trustee’s purposes and activities are ministerial -- to issue and redeem Shares in exchange for deposits and distributions of euro, to hold euro through the Depository, to distribute interest remaining after payment of expenses to Shareholders and, if necessary, to sell euro to pay the Trust’s expenses if interest earned is insufficient. The Sponsor has no employees, either. Its three officers oversee performance of the
•
•
•
•
below.6
We acknowledge that interpretive guidance and no-action relief granted by the Staff in the letters described below is limited to the facts and circumstances described in the particular letters. In Bank of America N.A. (Nov. 13, 2002), the Staff stated that royalty trusts could modify the Certifications and be in compliance with Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act. The trusts in Bank of America were Delaware and Texas statutory trusts that held the net profits of royalty interests in oil and gas properties. Like the Trust, these trusts were passively managed and were prohibited from engaging in business and commercial activities. These trusts also had no officers, directors or audit committees. Therefore, the Staff granted relief to permit modified Certifications to be signed by the trustees. In Mitsubishi Motors Credit of America, Inc. (Mar. 27, 2003), the Staff stated that a securitization trust would be in compliance with Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act if they provided the same certifications required of asset-backed issues. The securitization trust held receipts from automobile leases and loans. Like the Trust, the securitization trust was passively managed and had no officers, directors or audit committee. Therefore, the Staff granted interpretive relief to permit modified Certifications signed by the trustees. In Merrill Lynch Depositor, Inc. (Mar. 28, 2003), the Staff stated that certain investment trusts could modify the Certifications and be in compliance with Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act. The trusts held investment-grade securities or trust-preferred securities. The trusts were passively managed and had no officers, directors or audit committees. Each trust had both a depositor and a trustee. Pursuant to the trust agreement, the depositor had responsibilities similar to those of the Sponsor. The depositor was responsible for arranging for the deposit of securities into the trust, paying the trust’s expenses and filing periodic reports with the Commission. The trustee performed ministerial duties, including making distributions to investors, establishing accounts, providing proxy statements to investors and periodically reporting to investors. Given the role of the depositor and the trustee, the Staff stated that it would not recommend enforcement action if modified Certifications were signed by officers of the depositor. In Hechinger Liquidation Trust (May 14, 2003), the Staff stated that it would not recommend enforcement action if a liquidation trust modified the Certifications. The liquidation trust was formed to liquidate assets of an insolvent company that was subject to a liquidation plan approved by a federal bankruptcy court. The liquidation trust was actively managed by a liquidation trustee but had no officers, directors or an audit committee. A committee representing creditors had oversight of the liquidation trustee. The liquidation trustee, however, had substantial power
and authority, including all power and authority that could have been exercised by any officer, director or shareholder of the company subject to liquidation. Asset-Backed Securities Rule (Rel. Nos. 33-8518 and 34-50905) dated December 22, 2004 and effective March 8, 2005.
Therefore, the Staff granted no-action relief in regard to modified Certifications to be signed by the liquidation trustee. On December 22, 2004, the Commission adopted rules codifying in Item 601(b)(31)(ii) of Regulation S-K the Staff position that certain asset-backed issuers could file modified Certifications (Rel. Nos. 33-3518 and 34-50905). Because asset-backed issuers typically lack a principal executive officer and a principal financial officer, Item 601(b)(31)(ii) permits the senior officer in charge of the securitization of the depositor or the senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the servicer to sign the Certifications. Furthermore, the Certifications were tailored in other respects to reflect the unique characteristics of asset-backed issuers. All of the examples given above demonstrate the willingness of the Staff and the Commission to permit modifications of the Certifications to accommodate the particular circumstances of issuers that do not conform to the prototypes for which the Certification requirements were drafted. With respect to trusts, the Staff has typically permitted the trustee of a trust to execute the Certifications when the trust lacks officers and a board of directors. In Merrill Lynch Depositor, Inc., however, the depositor was permitted to execute the Certifications on behalf of the trust, despite the fact that there was also a trustee, since the depositor’s duties included responsibility to file periodic reports with the Commission and the trustee’s duties were ministerial. Consistent therewith and as described below, when the Staff has considered trusts that had sponsors, like the Trust, the Staff has permitted the sponsors of the trusts to execute the Certifications. We believe that the Trust’s operations and the duties and responsibilities of the Sponsor are virtually indistinguishable from those of streetTRACKS Gold Trust (“streetTRACKS Trust”) and iShares COMEX Gold Trust (“iShares Trust”), as described in the streetTRACKS Gold Trust no-action letter made publicly available on February 18, 2005 (“streetTRACKS Gold”) and the iShares COMEX Gold Trust no-action letter made publicly available on May 19, 2005 (“iShares Gold”). In streetTRACKS Gold, the Staff stated that it would not recommend enforcement action if the streetTRACKS Trust filed modified Certifications signed by the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the streetTRACK Trust’s sponsor. Both the streetTRACKS Trust and the Trust are special-purpose grantor trusts formed under New York law solely to offer, on a continual basis, non-diversified, exchange-traded financial products designed to track the price of assets held by the trusts. Both the streetTRACKS Trust and the Trust have no officers, directors or audit committees. Similarly, the trustees in both cases perform only ministerial duties and the sponsors have authority to make decisions on behalf of the trusts. In streetTRACKS Gold, paragraph five of the
Certifications was modified to require the certifying officers to make certain disclosures to streetTRACKS Trust’s auditors, to the sponsor’s parent’s auditors, to the audit committee of the sponsor’s parent’s board of directors and to the sponsor’s external auditors. Likewise, the proposed form of Certification in
Annex A to this letter would require the certifying officers to make disclosures to the Trust’s
auditors, to the sponsor’s parent’s (i.e., PADCO II’s) auditors, to the audit committee of the sponsor’s parent’s (i.e., PADCO II’s) board of directors and to the Sponsor’s audit committee.
The distinction between streetTRACKS Gold and the present situation is that the sponsor of streetTRACKS Trust had external auditors and the Sponsor does not. Unlike the streetTRACKS Trust’s sponsor, however, the Sponsor does have a board of directors whose members also function as the audit committee of the Sponsor. The internal control protocol stated in this letter and reflected in paragraph 5 of the form of Certification attached as Annex A requires that relevant information be reported to PADCO II’s board of directors, the audit committee of the Sponsor’s board of directors and the Rydex Fund Services board of directors and reported “out” to the Trust’s external auditors and PADCO II’s external auditors. These external auditors, in the course of examining PADCO II’s financial statements, will necessarily receive and evaluate relevant information received concerning the Sponsor and the Trust; they can be expected to apprise their clients of any significant deficiency, material weakness or fraud. For these reasons, we believe that the processes we are proposing for the reporting of significant deficiencies, material weaknesses and fraud, as well as the particular modifications that we are proposing to the Certifications, are no less protective of investors than the processes and Certifications accepted in streetTRACKS Gold. In iShares Gold, the Staff also said that it would not recommend enforcement action if the trust modified the Certifications and if the Certifications were signed by an officer of the trust’s sponsors. Both the iShares Trust and the Trust are special-purpose grantor trusts formed under New York law solely to offer, on a continual basis, non-diversified, exchangetraded financial products designed to track the price of assets held by the trusts. Both the iShares Trust and the Trust have no officers, directors or audit committees. In iShares Gold, paragraph five of the Certifications was modified to require the certifying officers to make certain disclosures to the trust’s auditors, the auditors of the trust’s sponsor and the audit committee of the sponsor’s board of directors. Because the sponsor of the iShares Trust had an operating history, independent business activities, its own board of directors and an audit committee of the board of directors and was and is subject to the oversight of, and regulation by, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency – none of which is present in this case -- we are not requesting the same no-action relief given in iShares Gold. We are proposing to require “reporting up” to the sponsor’s parent’s audit committee and external auditors, whereas the iShares Gold protocol does not require reporting above the sponsor level. Because of the similarities between PADCO II and the iShares Trust’s sponsor, however, we believe that the processes we are proposing for the reporting of significant deficiencies, material weaknesses and fraud, as well as the particular modifications that we are
proposing to the Certifications, are no less protective of investors than the processes and Certifications accepted in iShares Gold. As can be seen from the Staff’s no-action positions in streetTRACKS Gold and iShares Gold, the Certification requirements should be tailored to the unique characteristics of passive investment vehicles, such as the Trust. We submit that the proposed modifications to the Certifications stated in this letter are consistent with precedent, the purposes of the securities laws and the protection of investors.
Accordingly, on behalf of the Sponsor and the Trust we respectfully request confirmation in writing from the Staff that it will not recommend enforcement action to the Commission if the Sponsor, on behalf of the Trust, files Certifications executed by its principal executive and financial officers in the form of Annex A as exhibits to the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and the Annual Reports on Form 10-K that the Sponsor will file on behalf of the Trust. Any questions or concerns about this request should be directed to Patrick Daugherty at (313) 234-7103 or, in his absence, to Jonathan S. Mallin at (313) 234-7106. We very much appreciate the diligence and professionalism of the Staff in working through the details of this request with us. Should the Staff believe, for any reason, that it is unable to grant the relief that we are requesting, we would appreciate the opportunity to discuss the matter before the issuance of a negative response. FOLEY & LARDNER LLP By Patrick Daugherty Patrick Daugherty cc: Jonathan S. Mallin, Esq. (Foley & Lardner LLP) George T. Simon, Esq. (Foley & Lardner LLP)
Annex A
Proposed Form of Certification
I, [identify the certifying individual], certify that:
Inc.’s auditors and the board of directors of PADCO Advisors II, Inc. and the board of directors of Rydex Fund Services, Inc. and the audit committee of Rydex Specialized Products LLC’s board of managers (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves persons who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date:_________________________________ ______________________________________ [Signature] [Title]
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
The documents this one cites, and the documents that cite it.
“Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “SOX Act”)”
“Securities Exchange Act of 1934”
“Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”)”
“Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”)”
“Investment Company Act of 1940”
More like this from SEC
SEC published 5 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.
Source: Securities and Exchange Commission — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added · updated