Individual decision · SEC · 30 Jul 2009
The Division of Corporation Finance will not object if Neuro-Hitech, Inc. suspends its duty to file periodic and current reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including its Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009. This relief is granted because the Company filed post-effective amendments removing unsold securities from all effective Form S-8 registration statements, which are now effective. The Division assumes Neuro-Hitech will file a certification on Form 15 on or before the due date of its Form 10-Q to make appropriate claims under Exchange Act Rules 12g-4 and 12h-3.
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 12h-3(c)
Response of the Office of Chief Counsel Division of Corporation Finance
RE:
Neuro-Hitech, Inc. Incoming letter dated July 30, 2009
Based on the facts presented, the Division will not object if Neuro-Hitech stops filing periodic and current reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009. In reaching this position, we note that Neuro-Hitech has filed post-effective amendments removing from registration unsold securities under all effective registration statements on Form S-8, and those post-effective amendments are effective. We assume that, consistent with the representations made in your letter, Neuro-Hitech will file a certification on Form 15 making appropriate claims under Exchange Act Rules 12g-4 and 12h-3 on or before the due date of its Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009.
This position is based on the representations made to the Division in your letter. Any different facts or conditions might require the Division to reach a different conclusion. Further, this response expresses the Division's position on enforcement action only and does not express any legal conclusion on the question presented.
Sincerely,
Michael Rosenthall Attorney-Advisor
Incoming Letter:
The Incoming Letter is in Acrobat format.
Arent Fox LLP I Washington, DC I New York, NY I Los Angeles, CA Securities Exchange Act Rule 12h-3 VIAE-MAIL Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Division ofCorporation Finance U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, NE Washington, DC 20549 E-mail: cfletters@sec.gov Re: Neuro-Hitech, Inc. (Commission File No. 001-33426) Ladies and Gentlemen:
Jeffrey E. Jordan
Attorney
202.857.6473 DIRECT
202.8576395 FAX
jordanjetTrey@arentfox.com
This letter amends and restates our prior letter dated July 1,2009. We are writing on behalf ofNeuro-Hitech, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Neuro" or the "Company"), to request that the staff ofthe Division ofCorporation Finance ofthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") issue a no-action letter advising us that the staff concurs in the Company's view that the effectiveness ofthe Company's registration statements on Form S-8 during the Company's current fiscal year, during which these registration statements were required to be updated pursuant to Section 10(a)(3) of Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), would not preclude the Company from utilizing Rule 12h-3 ("Rule 12h-3") under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), to suspend the Company's duty to file with the Commission the reports required by Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, under the circumstances described below. We also ask that the staff confirm that it will not recommend enforcement action to the Commission if, under the circumstances described below, the Company files a certificate on Form 15 ("Form 15") on or before the due date of its next periodic report (i.e., the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009) to suspend the Company's reporting obligations under Sections 13(a) and 15(d) ofthe Exchange Act pursuant to Rule 12h-3. Background Neuro is a specialty pharmaceutical company focused on developing, marketing and distributing branded and generic pharmaceutical products primarily in the cough and cold markets. The Company was initially formed in February 2005. The Company is current in all of SMART IN YOUR WORLD'" 1050 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036-5339 T 202.857.6000 F 202.857.6395 1675 Broadway New York, NY 10019-5820 T 212.484.3900 F 212.484.3990 555 West Fifth Street, 48th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90013-1065 T 213.629.7400 F 213.629.7401
Office of ChiefCounsel its periodic reports through the date ofthis letter. The Company's fiscal year ends on December 31 of each year. Neuro's common stock is registered under Section 12(g) ofthe Exchange Act and constitutes the only class ofCompany securities that is registered under Section 12 ofthe Exchange Act. Neuro has not issued (i) any other class ofsecurities registered or required to be registered under Section 12 ofthe Exchange Act, (ii) any other class ofsecurities subject to the requirements of Section 15(d) ofthe Exchange Act and (iii) any debt securities. The Company's common stock is traded on the OTC Bulletin Board under the ticker symbol "NHPLOB." As ofJuly 27,2009, the Company had 31,520,186 outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, held by 123 record stockholders. The Company's common stock closed at $0.03 per share on July 27,2009. Subject to the receipt ofthe no-action reliefsought in this letter, but before the due date ofits Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009, Neuro intends to file a Form 15 with the Commission to deregister its common stock under Section 12(g) ofthe Exchange Act and also to suspend its duty to file reports under Section 13(a) and Section 15(d) ofthe Exchange Act. The Company acknowledges that, if on the first day of any subsequent fiscal year there are more than 300 holders ofrecord ofits common stock, the suspension ofreporting obligations under Section 15(d) ofthe Exchange Act will lapse, and the Company will be required to resume periodic and current reporting under Section 15(d), as provided in Rule 12h-3. Registration Statements The Company previously filed with the Commission the following registration statements under the Securities Act:
Office of ChiefCounsel
Office of ChiefCounsel because the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Commission on March 31, 2009, as amended on April 30, 2009, had the technical effect of updating the 2006 Registration Statement and the 2007 Registration Statement (collectively, the "Registration Statements") by reference under Section 10(a)(3). The purpose ofRule 12h-3 is to permit a company to suspend its reporting obligations when its securities are held by a small number of persons. The Commission staff has repeatedly indicated that a literal reading ofRule 12h-3(c) is not always justified by public policy. In the proposing release to revise Rule 12h-3, the Commission stated that the purpose of periodic reporting under Section 15(d) is "to assure a stream of current information about an issuer for the benefit of purchasers in the registered offering, and for the public, in situations where Section 13 ofthe Exchange Act would not otherwise apply" and that "this [Rule 12h-3(c)] limitation is in keeping with the philosophy reflected in Section 15(d) ofthe Exchange Act that generally the investing public should have available complete information about the issuer's activities at least through the end ofthe year in which it makes a registered offering." Exchange Act Release No. 34-20263 (October 5, 1983) (the "Proposing Release"). See also I.C. Isaacs & Company, Inc. (available August 13,2008); Questar Assessment Inc. (available June 13,2008); SunCom Wireless Holdings, Inc. (available February 29,2008); RARE Hospitality International, Inc. (available January 22, 2008); International Securities Exchange, Inc. (available January 3,2008); MaiLcom Business Messaging Services, Inc. (available March 27, 2000). On July 1,2009, the Company filed post-effective amendments to each ofthe Registration Statements to deregister any common stock that remained unsold; the post-effective amendments became effective immediately upon filing. Accordingly, no investors are able to purchase securities pursuant to these Registration Statements, and so the protection of Section 15(d) is no longer necessary for potential purchasers. The Commission staff has previously found that a sale ofshares under a registration statement that had been automatically updated by periodic reports did not preclude an issuer, otherwise eligible under Rule 12h-3, from filing a Form 15 to suspend any further obligations to file periodic reports. See e.g., I.e. Isaacs & Company, Inc. (available August 13,2008); Questar Assessment Inc. (available June 13,2008); SunCom Wireless Holdings, Inc. (available February 29,2008). Furthermore, the Commission staff has also concurred in allowing issuers to file a Form 15 notwithstanding that such issuers had effective registration statements that had been automatically updated during the current fiscal year. See e.g., Bausch & Lomb Incorporated (available November 6, 2007); Summit Bank Corporation (available March 15,2007). In the Proposing Release, the Commission
acknowledged that Congress recognized, with respect to Section 15(d), that the benefits of periodic reporting by an issuer may not always be commensurate with the financial and administrative burdens imposed, particularly where smaller
Office ofChiefCounsel companies with a small number of public stockholders are involved. See e.g., I.C. Isaacs & Company, Inc. (available August 13,2008); Questar Assessment, Inc. (available June 13,2008); Planet Technologies, Inc. (available February 7, 2008). Neuro satisfies each ofthe elements set forth in Rule 12h-3 for suspension ofits reporting obligations under Section 15(d): (i) in accordance with Rule 12h-3(a), Neuro has filed all reports required by Section 13(a), without regard to Rule 12b-25, for its three most recent fiscal years and through the date ofthis letter for its current fiscal year and (ii) in accordance with Rule 12h3(b)(l)(i), Neuro has fewer than 300 stockholders ofrecord. According to the Company's stock transfer agent, as ofJuly 27,2009, Neuro had 123 holders ofrecord ofits common stock. In addition, as reflected in the Company's amendment to its Annual Report on 10-K, filed with the Commission on April 30, 2009, as of April 27, 2009, employees or affiliates ofthe Company beneficially owned 57.8% ofthe Company's common stock. Its largest stockholder beneficially owns approximately 50.2% ofthe Company's common stock. The preparation of periodic reports impose a financial burden on Neuro and involve significant management efforts. Such burdens and efforts are disproportionate to the number of record holders who are not employees, directors or affiliates ofthe Company, and disproportionate to the benefits to be derived given the recent limited trading activity in the Company's common stock. There were no transactions in the Company's common stock on approximately 31 % ofthe trading days in the preceding 12 months, including no transactions on approximately 36% ofthe trading days in this calendar year. Thus, requiring the continued filing of Exchange Act reports by Neuro under Section 15(d) would not serve the purpose of Section 15(d) and is significantly burdensome to Neuro. In the Company's circumstances the financial burdens of continued reporting are disproportionate to any benefits. As reported in its periodic reports, the Company has reported losses since its inception, and it is likely that it will continue to experience losses. The Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet included in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 states that the Company's cash, cash equivalents and accounts receivable total $890,755 while its accounts payable and accrued expenses total $830,988. Since March 31, 2009, the Company's cash reserves have further diminished, and the Company has been compelled to contract it operations in an effort to conserve its dwindling resources. Under the circumstances, the costs and expenses ofreporting are unnecessary and excessively burdensome, particularly in light ofthe limited benefits the Company's shareholders and the investing public are likely to receive through continued registration and reporting. Thus, requiring the continued filing of Exchange Act reports by the Company
under Section 15(d) would not serve the purpose of Section 15(d) and would be significantly burdensome to the Company and its shareholders. We note that the staff has granted no-action relief in a range of circumstances where the literal application ofRule 12h-3(c) would yield relatively little public benefit in light ofthe burdens on
Office ofChiefCounsel the issuer of compliance with reporting requirements under the Exchange Act. See e.g., I.C. Isaacs & Company, Inc. (available August 13,2008); Questar Assessment, Inc. (available June 13,2008); Planet Technologies, Inc. (available February 7, 2008); International Securities Exchange (available January 3, 2008); Bausch & Lomb Incorporated (available November 6, 2007); WaveRider Communications, Inc. (available March 31,2006). We also note that the staff has in other instances provided no-action relief despite the fact that more than a very limited number ofrecord holders continue to hold securities in cases where, as here, there were no sales under applicable registration statements in the year in which no-action relief was requested. See Beverly Hills Bancorp Inc. (available March 13,2009); Metro One Telecommunications, Inc. (available March 4,2009). There are no holders ofstock options issued under the Q-RNA Plan. All ofthe options issued under the Q-RNA Plan expired. There are only seven holders ofsecurities issued pursuant to the Employee Plan and Director Plan, only one of which is not already a stockholder ofrecord. Notwithstanding the termination ofthe 2007 Registration Statement, the current and future holders ofsecurities issued pursuant to such plans will not be disadvantaged by the absence of periodic reports under the Exchange Act. The holders ofthose securities are six of the Company's seven directors and the Company's recently departed Chief Financial Officer. The Company's directors and recently departed Chief Financial Officer have access to information about the Company and have the ability to ask questions of executive officers prior to making a decision to exercise any securities. Rule 701 ofthe Securities Act will permit Neuro to offer and sell securities pursuant to its employee stock incentive plans in compliance with Rule 701 once Neuro terminates its reporting status. See NewCity Communications, Inc. (available October 6, 1988). After the filing ofthe Form 15, issuance ofsecurities pursuant to the employee stock incentive plans will comply with Rule 701 ofthe Securities Act. Rule 701 exempts from the registration requirements under the Securities Act certain offers and sales ofsecurities made under the terms of compensatory benefit plans and written compensation arrangements by an issuer not subject to the reporting requirements ofthe Exchange Act. Neuro's employee stock incentive plans satisfy the eligibility requirements ofRule 701, and upon the effectiveness ofthe Form 15 certification, Neuro will become eligible as an issuer to utilize the exemption under Rule 701. Securities issued under Rule 701 will be restricted securities as defined in Rule 144, as provided by Rule 701 (g). Therefore, the resale ofshares acquired upon the exercise ofsuch securities may only be resold pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act or pursuant to an exemption from registration under the
Securities Act. See, e.g., Planet Technologies, Inc. (available February 7, 2008).
Office ofChiefCounsel
Conclusion
We respectfully request, for the foregoing reasons, that the Commission staff advise us that it will not recommend enforcement action to the Commission if, under the circumstances described in this letter, the Company files a Form 15 on or before the due date of its next periodic report (i.e., the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009) to deregister the Company's common stock under Section 12(g) ofthe Exchange Act and to suspend the Company's reporting obligations under Section 15(d) ofthe Exchange Act pursuant to Rule 12h-3 with respect to the Company common stock, effective immediately upon the filing ofthe Form 15. Alternatively, we request an exemption, pursuant to Section 12(h) ofthe Exchange Act, from any obligation ofthe Company to file reports under the Exchange Act under the circumstances described herein. Ifthe Commission staff disagrees with any ofthe views expressed in this letter, we respectfully request an opportunity to discuss the matter with the Commission staff before it issues a written response to this letter. In accordance with footnote 68 of SEC Release No. 33 7427 (July 1,1997), we are transmitting a copy ofthis letter by email. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact the undersigned. Sl..... nce.'.... ely, .. ... 11' /~{I~ Je~YE.JoQ cc: Mr. David Ambrose, Chief Executive Officer, Neuro-Hitech, Inc. ..
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
The documents this one cites, and the documents that cite it.
“Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")”
“Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act")”
More like this from SEC
SEC published 7 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.
Source: Securities and Exchange Commission — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added · updated