Individual decision · SEC · 17 Nov 2015
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission grants Nokia Corporation an exemption from Rule 14d-10(a)(1) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, permitting the exclusion of two Cuban nationals holding Alcatel Lucent American Depositary Receipts valued at slightly more than $100 from Nokia's exchange offer. This relief is granted because the Cuban Assets Control Regulations implemented by the Office of Foreign Asset Control prohibit Nokia from acquiring securities registered in the name of blocked Cuban nationals, and a license to include them is unlikely to be granted in time. The exemption is strictly limited to this specific application and requires Nokia to discontinue the offer if the underlying facts or representations change.
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 14d-10
November 17, 2015
Response of the Office of Mergers and Acquisitions Division of Corporation Finance
Re:
Nokia Corporation Incoming letter dated November 17, 2015
Via Facsimile & U.S. Mail
Brian V. Breheny Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP 1440 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005-2111
Re: Nokia Corporation's exchange offer for all outstanding ordinary shares and American Depositary Receipts of Alcatel Lucent S.A.
Dear Mr. Breheny:
We are responding to your letter dated November 17, 2015, addressed to Michele M. Anderson and Christina E. Chalk, as supplemented by telephone conversations with us, in regard to Nokia Corporation's exemption request. To avoid having to recite or summarize the facts set forth in your November 17, 2015 letter, we include a copy of your letter with this response. Unless otherwise noted, capitalized terms in this response letter have the same meaning as in your November 17, 2015 letter.
On the basis of the representations and the facts presented in your letter, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission hereby grants an exemption from Rule 14d-10(a)(1) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This exemption permits Nokia to exclude from the Exchange Offer two Cuban nationals who hold Alcatel Lucent ADSs valued at slightly more than $100. We note in granting this relief that the Cuban Assets Control Regulations ("CACR") implemented by the United States Treasury's Office of Foreign Asset Control ("OFAC") prohibits Nokia from acquiring or otherwise dealing with any security registered in the name of a blocked Cuban national including the Blocked Individuals. We further note that Nokia has sought a license from OFAC in order to include the Blocked Individuals in the Exchange Offer but has been advised that such license is highly unlikely to be granted in time to permit them to be included in the Exchange Offer. Finally, we note your representation that if the license is timely granted by OFAC, the Blocked Individuals will be permitted to participate in the Exchange Offer.
The foregoing exemption is based solely on the representations and the facts presented in your letter, as supplemented by telephone conversations with the Commission staff. This relief is strictly limited to the application of the rules listed above to the Exchange Offer. Nokia should discontinue the Exchange Offer pending further consultations with the staff if any of the facts or representations set forth in your letter change. In addition, this position is subject to modification or revocation if at any time the Commission or the Division of Corporation Finance determines that such action is necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Exchange Act.
We also direct your attention to the anti-fraud and anti-manipulation provisions of the federal securities laws, including Sections 9(a), 10(b) and 14(e) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5 and 14e-3 thereunder. Responsibility for compliance with these and any other applicable provisions of the federal securities laws rests with the participants in the Exchange Offer. The Division of Corporation Finance expresses no view with respect to any other questions that the Exchange Offer may raise, including, but not limited to, the adequacy of the disclosure concerning, and the applicability of any other federal or state laws to, the Exchange Offer.
Sincerely,
For the Commission, By the Division of Corporation Finance pursuant to delegated authority,
Michele Anderson Associate Director, Legal Division of Corporation Finance
Incoming Letter:
The Incoming Letter is in Acrobat format.
SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP
I 440 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W.
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-2 I
TEL: (202) 37 1-7000
FAX: C202) 393-5760 www.skadden.com EMAIL ADDRESS BRIAN. 8REHENY@5KADDEN .COM November 17, 2015 U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20459
Michele M. Anderson
Associate Director (Legal)
Christina E. Chalk
Senior Special Counsel
Office of Mergers and Acquisitions
RE: Request for Exemption from Rule 14d-10(a)(l) under the Exchange Act by Nokia Corporation Dear Ms. Chalk:
We are writing on behalf of our client, Nokia Corporation, a Finnish corporation ("Nokia"), in connection with its exchange offer comprised of two offers (separately, the "U.S. Offer" and the "French Offer" and collectively, the "Exchange Offer") to acquire all of the outstanding ordinary shares, nominal value EUR 0.05, all outstanding American depositary shares ("ADSs") and all outstanding bonds convertible into or exchangeable for shares of Alcatel Lucent S.A. ("Alcatel Lucent"), first announced by Nokia and Alcatel Lucent on April 15, 2015. In connection with the U.S. Offer, on August 14, 2015, Nokia filed a registration statement on Form F-4 (the "Registration Statement") (File No:
333-206365) with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"), subsequently amended on October 22, 2015, November 6, 2015 and November 12, 2015. The Commission declared the Registration Statement effective on November 13, 2015. Nokia has not yet filed a tender offer statement on Schedule TO and Alcatel Lucent has not yet filed a Schedule 14D-9. Nokia filed the French Offer with the French market regulator, the Autorite des marches financiers (the "AMF") on October 29, 2015. The AMF approved the French offer document on November 12, 2015 and set the launch date for the French Offer for November 18, 2015. It is expected that the Exchange Offer will be open for 26 French trading days beginning on November AFFILIATE OFFICES BOSTON
CHICAGO
HOUSTON
LOS ANGELES
NEW YORK
PALO ALTO
WILMINGTON
BEIJING
BRUSSELS
FRANKFURT
HONG KONG
LONDON
MOSCOW
MUNICH
PARIS
SAO PAULO
SEOUL
SHANGHAI
SINGAPORE
SYDNEY
TOl\YO
TORONTO
November 17, 2015
18, 2015 and the subsequent offering period (if any) is expected to be open for 15 French trading days thereafter, in each case in accordance with French law and as permitted by the AMF. Only the AMF is allowed to delay the launch date or extend the length of the French Offer or any subsequent offer periods and any such delay or extension would be governed by French law and the AMF General Regulation.
I. Requested Exemptive Relief
We hereby respectfully request that the staff (the "Staff') of the Commission's Division of Corporation Finance grant Nokia exemptive relief from the provisions of Rule l 4d-l O(a)(l) (Equal Treatment ofSecurity Holders) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), for the exclusion from the Exchange Offer of two Cuban nationals who hold Alcatel Lucent ADSs (the "Blocked Individuals") and who are non-designated blocked individuals pursuant to the Cuban Assets Control Regulations ("CACR") implemented by the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Asset Control ("OFAC"), provided that the Exchange Offer is otherwise conducted as described in the Registration Statement and in compliance with the Exchange Act.
II. Reason for the Requested Relief
On September 16, 2015, Nokia learned that 28 Alcatel Lucent ADSs are held by the Blocked Individuals. The total U.S. dollar value of the blocked Alcatel ADSs is slightly more than $100. Nokia understands that the accounts of the Blocked Individuals are currently blocked by the depositary of the Alcatel Lucent ADSs.
Section 515 .202 of the CACR prohibits, among other things, the
acquisition or transfer of, or otherwise dealing in, any security registered or inscribed in the name of a blocked Cuban national, unless authorized by the grant by OF AC of a license. After analyzing the application of Section 515.202 to the Blocked Individuals and discussions with OF AC staff, Nokia requested such a license from OFAC on October 14, 2015. This OF AC license, if granted, would permit Nokia to transact with the Blocked Individuals in the Exchange Offer as well as certain transactions Nokia may undertal(e following the Exchange Offer, including a squeeze-out transaction or the cancelation of the depository agreement with the Alcatel Lucent depositary. Ifthe OFAC license is timely granted, Nokia will allow the Blocked Individuals to participate in the Exchange Offer. However, we have been advised by OF AC staff that it is highly unlikely the OF AC license, if granted, will be in place sufficiently in advance of the anticipated commencement date or even the closing date of the Exchange Offer to allow Nokia to extend the Exchange Offer to the Blocked Individuals.
November 17, 2015
Therefore, Nokia seeks this exemptive relief to allow it to commence and close the Exchange Offer and exclude the Blocked Individuals from it.
III. Discussion and Relief Requested
Rule l 4d-10( a)(l) restricts a bidder from making a tender offer unless "the tender offer is open to all security holders of the class of securities subject to the tender offer." However, as discussed above, under the relevant OF AC sanctions regulations Nokia is prohibited by federal law from extending the Exchange Offer to the Blocked Individuals. As a result, Nokia is requesting an exemption from Rule 14d-10. The Commission has a longstanding policy of considering relief from its "all holders" rule when, as it noted in 2008, under "special circumstances ... a bidder can demonstrate unusual facts warranting an accommodation." See Commission Guidance and Revisions to the Cross-Border Tender Offer, Exchange Offer, Rights Offerings. and Business Combination Rules and Beneficial Ownership Reporting Rules for Certain Foreign Institutions (Release 33-8957 (September 19, 2008)). For instance, the Staff provided relief from the "all holders" requirement in Rule 14d-10 to companies where compliance with Rule l 4d-10 would lead to a violation under federal law. The Staff permitted Freeport-McMoRan Energy Partners to exclude certain holders from its exchange offer for all units of American Royalty Trust on the basis that allowing certain American Royalty Trust holders to become holders of Freeport-McMoRan Energy Partners would have violated the laws regulating federal oil and gas leases. Freeport-McMoRan Energy Partners derived most of its income from land held through federal oil and gas leases. Such leases could only be held by, among other entities, partnerships made up only of U.S. citizens. Therefore, Freeport-McMoRan Energy Partners believed it would be a violation of federal law for a person prohibited by law from holding federal oil and gas leases to acquire an interest in it through the exchange offer. On that basis, FreeportMcMoRan Energy Partners sought an exemption or no action relief from Rule l 4d-l 0 and the Staff granted it permission to exclude from its exchange offer "persons who are prohibited by law from holding interest in federal oil and gas leases" including individuals who are not "citizens of the United States." See Freeport-McMoRan Energy Partners (September 2, 1987). We are aware that Exchange Act Rule l 4d-l O(b)(2) provides an exemption from Rule 14d-10(a)(l) that allows a bidder to exclude "all security holders in a state where the bidder is prohibited from making the tender offer by administrative or judicial action pursuant to a state statute after a good faith effort by the bidder to comply with such statute." We do not believe, however, that the terms of Section 515.202 of the CACR satisfy the requirements of Rule 14d10(b)(2). Nevertheless, the rationale the Commission based the adoption of Rule 14d-10(b)(2) on applies equally to the facts of this matter. After making a good
November 17,2015 faith effort to comply with Rule 14d-10(a)(l), Nokia currently is prohibited from making the Exchange Offer to all Alcatel Lucent security holders because of a U.S. statute. The relief from the all holders rule granted in Freeport-McMoRan Energy Partners is also similar to that requested by Nokia here because extending the Exchange Offer to the Blocked Individuals would violate the federal sanctions program with respect to Cuba. We, therefore, request exemptive relief from Rule l 4d-l0 under the Exchange Act to allow Nokia to exclude the Blocked Individuals from the Exchange Offer as outlined in this letter.
We appreciate the Staffs prompt consideration of this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (202) 371-7180 or Scott V. Simpson at +44 (0) 20 7519 7040 with any questions regarding this matter. cc: Scott V. Simpson, Skadden, Arps 1273589-LONSROlA- MSW
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
The documents this one cites, and the documents that cite it.
“promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act")”
More like this from SEC
SEC published 7 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.
Source: Securities and Exchange Commission — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added · updated