Individual decision · SEC · 4 Dec 2019
The Division of Investment Management will not recommend enforcement action against Gladstone Investment Corporation for violating Sections 63 and 23(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and Rule 23c-2 if it files Form N-23C-2 fewer than 30 days prior to, or on the same business day as, redeeming an entire class or series of its preferred shares. This relief applies specifically to closed-end management investment companies electing treatment as business development companies that fully redeem a single class or series of preferred stock. The division bases this position on representations that the filing contains all required information, is permitted under governing documents, and occurs before the redemption or commencement of replacement share offerings.
Dec. 5, 2019
December 5, 2019
Response of the Chief Counsel’s Office
Division of Investment Management
Your letter, dated December 4, 2019, requests our assurance that we would not recommend enforcement action to the Commission against Gladstone Investment Corporation (the “Company”) for violations of Sections 63 and 23(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Act”), and Rule 23c-2 thereunder, if the Company files Form N-23C-2[1] with the Commission fewer than 30 days prior to, including on the same business day as, the Company’s redemption of an entire class or series of its preferred shares, as described in your letter. The Company is a closed-end management investment company that has elected to be treated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the Act.
Section 23(c) of the Act prohibits a registered closed-end investment company from repurchasing its securities, with certain exceptions.[2] Section 23(c)(3) excepts repurchases by a registered closed-end investment company under such circumstances as the Commission may permit by rules, regulations or orders. In 1942, the Commission adopted Rule 23c-2[3], to allow a registered closed-end investment company to “call or redeem any securities of which it is the issuer, in accordance with the terms of such securities or the charter, indenture or other instrument pursuant to which such securities were issued,” subject to certain requirements.
Rule 23c-2 requires, among other things, that the investment company file with the Commission a notice of its intention to call or redeem the securities at least 30 days prior to the date of such redemption, on Form N-23C-2.[4] If all of the outstanding securities of a class or series are to be called or redeemed, the notice needs to state only the title of the securities, the date on which the securities will be called or redeemed, and the applicable provisions of the governing instrument.
You state that calls or redemptions of securities pursuant to Rule 23c-2 often are done as part of a BDC’s or closed-end fund’s refinancing of its capital structure, and the 30 day notice requirement can impair the Company’s ability to raise new capital without incurring additional leverage. You also note that a call or redemption of all of the outstanding securities of a class or series does not present any of the unfair discrimination concerns that are reflected in Section 23(c) and Rule 23c-2.
Based on the facts and representations set forth in your letter, we would not recommend that the Commission take any enforcement action against the Company for violations of Sections 63 and 23(c) of the Act and Rule 23c-2 thereunder if the Company files Form N-23C-2 with the Commission fewer than 30 days prior to, including on the same business day as, the Company’s redemption of an entire class or series of its preferred shares. Because our position is based upon the representations made to us in your letter, any different facts or representations may require a different conclusion.
The statements in this letter represent the views of the Division of Investment Management. This letter is not a rule, regulation or statement of the Commission, and the Commission has neither approved nor disapproved its content.
Asen Parachkevov
Senior Counsel
[1] See The Adoption of Updated EDGAR Manual*,* 62 F.R. 8877 (Feb. 27, 1997), adding EDGAR submission type “N-23C-2” to accommodate filings under Rule 23c-2(b). See also EDGAR Filing Manual (Volume II) EDGAR Filing (Chapter 3, Index to Forms).
[2] Section 23 is made generally applicable to BDCs by Section 63 of the Act.
[3] See Call and Redemption of Securities Issued by Closed-End Registered Investment Companies, 7 F.R. 6669 (Aug. 25, 1942).
[4] See Rule 23c-2(b).
Last Reviewed or Updated: Dec. 5, 2019
Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP
2000 K Street, N.W, Suite 700
Washington, DC 20006-1871
Telephone 202 822 9611
Fax 202 822 0140
STRADLEY
RONON www.stradley.com
1940 Act - Rule 23c-2
Deputy Director and Chief Counsel
Division of Investment Management
United States Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20549 Dear Mr. Cellupica:
We are writing on behalf of Gladstone Investment Corporation (the "Company"), a closed-end management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company ("BDC"). The Company respectfully requests that the Staff ofthe Division of Investment Management (the "Staff') ofthe U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") confirm that it will not recommend enforcement action to the Commission against the Company for violations of Sections 63 and 23( c) ofthe Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "Act"), and Rule 23c-2 thereunder, ifthe Company files Form N-23C-2 with the Commission fewer than thirty days prior to, including on the same business day as, the Company's redemption of an entire class or series of its preferred shares. This letter seeks confirmation of oral no-action relief provided by the Staff to Eric S. Purple of Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP on August 10, 2018.
I. Background
In July of 2018, Gladstone Management Corporation, the Company's SEC registered investment adviser, saw an opportunity to refinance the Company's outstanding series of term preferred stock at a lower interest rate and longer maturity. At the end ofJuly 2018, the Company had outstanding two series ofcumulative term preferred stock: 1,656,000 shares of 6.75% Series B Cumulative Term Preferred Stock ("Series B") and 1,610,000 shares of 6.50% Series C Cumulative Term Preferred Stock ("Series C") (collectively, the "Prior Philadelphia, PA. Harrisburg, PA• Malvern, PA • Cherry H1II, NJ • Wilmington, DE• Washington, DC • New York, NY • Chicago, IL A Pennsylvania Limited Liability Partnership 7.MER ITAS LAW FIRMS WORLDWIDE 4326534v. ]
Series"). 1 Per the terms ofthe Articles Supplementary, the Company undertook on August 15, 2018 to redeem the Prior Series with proceeds obtained in part from an issuance of new term preferred shares. The Company offered a new series ofterm preferred shares, 6.375% Series E Cumulative Term Preferred Stock (the "New Series"). The proceeds from the sale of the New Series were used to fund a portion of the optional redemption of the Prior Series, with borrowings on the Company's credit facility used to retire the remainder of the Prior Series. The New Series has a lower dividend rate and has a term that extends through 2025. The net effect ofthe issuance of the New Series was to refinance the Company's capital structure so that its term preferred shares have a lower dividend rate, and a greater length of existence, which will benefit current common stockholders by providing a lower-cost form of leverage. Prior to redeeming the Prior Series, however, the Company was required to file Form N-23C-2 with the Commission pursuant to Rule 23c-2(b) under the 1940 Act. This rule would have further required that the Company file the notice at least thirty days prior to any redemption of the Prior Series. Compliance with the thirty day advance notice provision would have impaired the Company's ability to raise new capital without incurring additional leverage. As noted above, proceeds from the offering of the shares of New Series were used to redeem the Prior Series. Complying with the thirty day advance notice period would have required the Company to postpone its offering until the expiration ofthe thirty day advance notice period in order to eliminate or minimize the amount of time that the Company had both the Prior Series and the New Series outstanding. If the Company was to have postponed its offering for this period, such a delay might have undermined the Company's ability to take advantage of what the Company's underwriters had indicated was a very attractive and very narrow market window for issuing the New Series. Conversely, sales of the New Series too far in advance of the redemption date of the Prior Series could have caused the Company to maintain a level of leverage that it would not otherwise choose to maintain, could have 1 The Prior Series were issued pursuant to Certificates ofDesignation filed with the State of Delaware, on November 7, 2014 and May 11, 2015, respectively (the "Designations"). In addition, with respect to Series B, a Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Designation was filed with the State of Delaware on August 4, 2015 (the "Amendment," and together with the Designations, the "Articles Supplementary"). The Articles Supplementary required that the Company redeem the Existing Series on December 31, 2021 and May 31, 2022, respectively. The Articles Supplementary also allowed the Company to redeem the Prior Series prior to those dates at its option. 4326534v.l
increased the amount of dividends that it needed to pay preferred shareholders and could have caused the Company to maintain a significant cash position with no investment purpose, which could have affected the performance of the Company. Based on discussions with the Staff, the Company filed the notice required by Rule 23c-2 on August 15, 2018 sixteen days prior to the redemption of the Prior Series on August 31, 2018.2 The filing was filed in advance of the redemption of the Prior Series, and was made contemporaneously with the commencement of the offering of the New Series and contained all of the information required by Rule 23c-2.
II. Analysis
Rule 23c-2(b), which was adopted in 1942 pursuant to Section 23(c) of the 1940 Act,3 states in pertinent part:
A registered closed-end investment company which proposes to call or redeem any securities of which it is the issuer shall file with the Commission notice of its intention to call or redeem such securities at least 30 days prior to the date set for the
call or redemption ....
The notice must contain certain required information including: ( 1) the title of the class of securities to be called or redeemed, (2) the date on which the securities are to be called or redeemed, (3) the applicable provisions of the governing instrument pursuant to which the securities are to be called or redeemed and, ( 4) if less than all the outstanding securities of a class or series are to be called or redeemed, the principal amount or number of shares and the basis upon which the securities to be called or redeemed are to be selected. We believe that a full redemption of a series or class of preferred stock by a closedend fund does not present any of the unfair discrimination concerns reflected in Section 23( c) and Rule 23c-2, as such full redemption necessarily treats all preferred shareholders equally. 4 2 See Form N-23C-2 filed by Gladstone Investment Corp. on August 15, 2018. 3 See Call and Redemption of Securities Issued by Closed-End Registered Investment Companies, 7 Fed.Reg. 6669 (1942). Section 63 of the 1940 Act applies Section 23 to business development companies "to the same extent as if the [BDC] were a registered closed-end investment company ...." As a result, Rule 23c-2 also applies to a BDC. 4 Similarly, the text of Rule 23c-2 indicates the Commission's view that partial redemptions by lot or on a pro rata basis would not unfairly discriminate against any holder of the (footnote continued on next page) 4326534v.1
We respectfully submit that the rule's adopting release does not provide a rationale for the thirty day notice requirement. In addition, while the rule requires filing the notice with the Commission, as opposed to delivery of such notice to affected shareholders, we are not aware of any statement by the Commission that addresses or explains the purpose of the thirty-day advance notification period. However, we believe that since the adoption ofthe Rule, technology and communication systems have advanced to the point that this amount of lead time is no longer necessary. While the thirty day notification period might have been useful in the historical context of 1942 when the rule was adopted, it seems to be less essential in an age of electronic filings and rapid communications. 5 The Company believes that its request is supported by technological advances in the ability to disseminate information that have occurred since the Rule's adoption, the lack of any potential overreaching related to this type of redemption, and by recent Staff experience with abbreviated notice periods under the Rule. We respectfully submit that the Company's request appears to be consistent with past Staff action and views in this area. We have examined the Rule 23c-2 notices that have been filed on the Commission's EDGAR database since 2008. We have identified at least 775 separate instances in which a closed-end management investment company or BDC has filed a Rule 23c-2 notice with the Commission stating that the notice is being filed less than thirty days prior to the redemption date pursuant to permission granted by the Commission staff. 6
III. Conclusion
We believe that the requested relief is further supported by the following representations made by the Company:
securities of the class or series being redeemed. We note, however, that we are not seeking the Staffs view on such partial redemptions, as the Company intends to redeem each series fully. 5 We note that filings of notices under 23c-2(b) have been required to be filed electronically on EDGAR since 1997. See Adoption of EDGAR Filer Manual, SEC Rel. No. IC-22522 (Feb. 27, 1997). 6 Based on a review of EDGAR filings, the first instance of such a filing occurred on March 11, 2008. From that date to October 11, 2019, there have been 1,442 Forms N-23c-2 filed with the Commission ( excluding amended filings). 4326534v. l
Please contact me at (202) 507-5154 if you need additional information or would like to discuss these matters further. Very truly yours, g ~ ,
7 The Company respectfully submits that it is possible that the Company may file the Notice on the same business day as, but in all such cases immediately prior to, the steps outlined in this representation. 4326534v.l
cc: Nadya Roytblat, Assistant Chief Counsel, Division oflnvestment Management, David Marcinkus, Branch Chief, Division of Investment Management Asen Parachkevov, Senior Counsel, Division of Investment Management David Gladstone, Chairman and CEO - Gladstone Capital Corporation Michael LiCalsi, Internal Legal Counsel - Gladstone Capital Corporation 4326534v.l
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
The documents this one cites, and the documents that cite it.
“violations of Sections 63 and 23( c) ofthe Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "Act")”
More like this from SEC
SEC published 5 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.
Source: Securities and Exchange Commission — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added · updated