Individual decision · SEC · 22 Sep 1992
The SEC staff will not recommend enforcement action if the Missouri Family Trust Fund does not register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and if its Board members and representatives do not register under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, based on the Trust's status as a public instrumentality of the State. The Division of Market Regulation will not recommend enforcement action under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 if the Trust or its representatives do not register as brokers or municipal securities dealers. Additionally, the Division of Corporation Finance will not recommend enforcement action if the Trust does not register under the Securities Act of 1933 or qualify under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, relying on exemptions for public instrumentalities.
, "
SEP 2G 1992
'j
RESPONSE OF THE OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL DIVISION OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT Our Ref. No. 92-415-CC Missouri Family Trust Fund File No. 132-3 By letters dated July 24, 1991, and July 20, August 3, and August 13, 1992, you seek our assurance that we would not recommend that the Commission take enforcement action if (1) the Missouri Family Trust Fund (the "Trust") does not register under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "1940 Act"), in reliance on Section 2(b) of the 1940 Act; and (2) neither the Trustees of the Trust (the "Board") nor the Trust representatives who sell trust accounts (the "Representatives") register under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Act"), in reliance on section 202 (b) of the Advisers Act. 11 The Trust was created directly by statute adopted by the Missouri legislature in 1989, and amended in 1991 (the "Statute"), which declared the Trust "an instrum-entality of the State. II Y The Trust's Board consists of nine members appointed by the Governor with the advice and consent of the State Senate. The Board is required to report annually to the Governor and to both State legislative houses. The Trust is exempt from federal taxation by virtue of an IRS ruling dated May 7, 1992, and from state taxation by provision of the Statute. d/ The Trust provides a vehicle through which private donors can make contributions to provide financial assistance to a designated individual with a mental or physical impairment (the "Beneficiary"). All Trust contributions are administered together, but a separate account is established for each 11 Section 2 (b) and Section 202 (b) respectively provide that the 1940 Act and the Advisers Act do not apply to the United States, a State, or any political subdivision of a State, or any agency, authority or instrumentality of anyone or more of the foregoing, and to any officer, agent or employee of the foregoing acting in the course of his official duty. Y See Mo. Rev. Stat. §§402.200 through 402.225 (Supp. 1992). d/ Your 1991 letter also describes a successor trust, which receives the original contribution made on behalf of a Beneficiary after the Beneficiary no longer participates in the Trust, and a charitable trust, which receives the unused income from a contribution in the event that the donor revokes a contribution. You request our advice only with respect to the status of the Trust under the 1940 Act. We therefore express no opinion as to any issues concerning the successor or charitable trusts.
ì Beneficiary (collectively, the "Accounts"). i/ The Trust's income, net of administrative expenses, is allocated to the Accounts in proportion to the contribution made on each Beneficiary's behalf. The Board is responsible for administering the Trust, and pooling and investing contributions made to the Trust. â/ The statute prohibits Board members from collecting compensation for any services provided on behalf of the Trust, al though they may be reimbursed for actual expenses. Q/ The offer and sale of Accounts is and will continue to be undertaken solely by Representatives acting in the course of their official duties as agents of the Trust. The Representatives perform other duties on behalf of the Trust as well. They do not receive any commission or remuneration for these solicitations. On the basis of the facts and representations contained in your letters and the telephone conversation, we would not i/ Currently, employees of the Missouri Department of Mental Heal th carry out the Trust's routine administrative tasks, such as recordkeeping. In the event this arrangement terminates for any reason, the Trust will hire employees to perform these functions. Telephone conversation, dated September 10, 1992, between Amy R. Doberman and Mary Anne 0' Connell (the "telephone 'conversation") . ) â/ At the time a donor makes a contribution, he or she may name a co-trustee to act with the Board on the Beneficiary's behalf. The Trust, with the consent of the co-trustee, agrees on the amount of income to be used to provide a Beneficiary with benefits. The co-trustee also may choose among several mutual funds, preselected by the Board, in which to invest the donated funds. The Statuteprohibi ts co-trustees from collecting compensation for any services provided on behalf of the Trust, but permits reimbursement for actual expenses. You represent that all co-trustees either will be excluded from the definition of investment adviser, exempt from registration under section 203(b) (3) of the Advisers Act, or, if necessary, will register under the Advisers Act. Accordingly, you have not asked and therefore we express no opinion with respect to the co-trustees' status under the Advisers Act. Q/ The statute does permit payment of reasonable compensation for services rendered by a trust company that serves as a trustee. You represent, however, that no appointment of a trust company has been made or is planned. Accordingly, you have not asked and therefore we express no opinion with respect to status under the Advisers Act of a trust company that may serve as a trustee of the Trust.
ì recommend any enforcement action to the Commission if the Trust, a "public instrumentality," does not register under the 1940 Act in reliance on Section 2 (b). 11 similarly, we would not recommend any enforcement action to the Commission if Board members and the Representatives, as officers, agents or employees of a public instrumentality, do not register under the Advisers Act in reliance on Section 202 (b). In reaching the foregoing conclusions, we note particularly that: (1) the Trust was created specifically by the Missouri legislature to be a "public instrumental i ty;" and (2) Board members are appointed by the State governor and subject to confirmation by the State Senate, and must report annually to both the Governor and the State legislature. The Division of Market Regulation has asked us to inform you that, based on the facts and representations in your letters, it will not recommend any enforcement action to the Commission under
Section 15 (a) of the Securitiea Exchange Act, of 1934 (the
"Exchange Act") if the Trust or the Representatives offer and sell the Accounts as you describe, without registering with the Commission as brokers or municipal securities dealers under
Section 15 (b) or Section 15B (a) of the Exchange Act, respectively.
The Division of Corporation Finance has asked us to inform you that, on the basis of the facts presented, it will not recommend any enforcement action to the Commission, if the Trust, in reliance upon your opinion as counsel that the' exemption from registration provided by Section 3 (a) (2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") and the exemption provided by section 304(a)(4)(A) of the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 '(the "Trust Indenture Act") are available, offers and sells Accounts in the manner and £or the purposes described in your letters without compliance with the registration requirements of the Securities Act or qualification provisions of the Trust Indenture Act. " 11 See Florida Prepaid College Program/Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Program and Trust Fund (pub. avail. Sept. 12, 1990); State of Ohio/Ohio Tuition Trust Authority (pub. avail. Aug. 6, 1990); State of Michigan/Michigan Education Trust (pub. avail. June 30, 1988).
I. 'I .,
) You should note that the Divisions ' positions are based on the facts and representations in your letters and the telephone conversation and that any different facts or representations might require a different conclusion. r ll~¡¿.D&ÍttA~ Amy RJ. Doberman Senior Attorney
" ,
STINSON, MAG & FIZZELL
) 1201 WALNUT STREET
P.O. Box 419251
KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI
64141.6251 TELEPHONE
(81 e) S42-S800
WRITER'S OIRECT OIAL NUMSER
(SI6) 6511-
F'ACSIMILE
(SI6) 6511-34515
THE MAST BUILOING
, 500 WEST IIOTH STREET
OVERLANO PARK, KANSAS 66210-2329
FED E RAL EX PR E S S ""...,A.G!;P"",=""',""=""S.E CT ION Office of the Chief kòlinsQirclfl: -tfO -1~ -= -=:3'Ca') (2) Divis~o~ of Corporatto~ Fina~ce. ~/Jj) 1934 15(a) Securities and Exchan~J:-5sion1Z:L r 193-4 '1~5'Bi 450 Fifth street, N.~. 1939 304~a) (4) Washington, D.C~ 205;41~., a' ~:t~li:) IPubliC' 'J-:JJ r ê . 1:\v~üiabllity .' .anTi Eam.:l.J..y+~\l,r.i.ist Fund Ladies and Gentlemen:
This letter 'is written on behalf of the Missouri Family Trust fund (the "Trust"), a non-profit trust established by state statute to permit private funding of benefits for persons with certain mental or physical impairments. The Trust requests certain interpretative or "no actionll positions from the ,staff (the "Staff") of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") wi th respect to the contemplated of.fering by the Trus t of trus t accounts (the "Accounts"), described below. ' Pursuant to Release No. 33-5127, as modified by Release No. 33- 6269, ,the sections of the federal securities statutes to which this letter relates are identified in the upper right~hand corner. Enclosed are seven copies of this letter, together with exhibits, which the Staff of your Division ordinarily requires, and four addi tional copies of this letter and exhibi ts, one for each statutory section (after the first such section) identified above. Background The Trust was created by a statute adopted by the Missouri state legislature in 1989 which became effective on September 29, 1989, when the Director of the Missouri Department of Mental Health ("DMH") notified the Revisor of Statutes of the State of Missouri (the lIState") that DMH had received administra ti ve assurances from the Social Security Administration and the Health Care Financing Administration that participation in the Trust would not jeopardize a beneficiary i s eligibility for public assistance. The statute establishing the Trust was amended during the 1991 session of the Missouri Legislature. The amendment was signed by the Governor on July 7, 1991 and became effective at that time, pursuant to an emergency clause. A copy
) of the statute, as amended (the "Act") is enclosed with this letter as Exhibit A. References to statutory sections or paragraphs not attributed to another statute refer to sections or paragraphs of the Act. The Act is designed to encourage the provision by family and friends of supplemental' medical, social and other services to persons with a mental or physical impairment wi thout the loss of other publicly-funded benefits and programs. See §§ 402.199.2;
402.205.1. The Act seeks to achieve its purpose-through a program
to be administered by the board of trustees of the Trust (the "Board" ) . Under thi s program, relatives and other interested persons will be able to set aside funds th.at will be available to cover expenses not covered by governmental benefit programs for handicapped State residents. The Act contemplates that contributions received by the Trust will be pooled and invested as the Board deems appropriate, wi th the appropriate portion of the Fund allocated to an Account for the lifetime beneficiary speci fied by the donor (the "Benef iciary" ) . Only a person wi th "a mental or physical impairment ... verified by medical findings ... that substantially limits one or more major life activities ..." is eligible to be a designated Beneficiary. See § 402.200 (4) . Trust Administration The Trust ~ay accept contributions from any source (other than from a Beneficiary and his or her spouse). See § 402.215.2(1). At the time a contribution is made the donor may designate a Beneficiary, and also may name a cotrustee (including the donor) to act with the Board on behalf of the Beneficiary. See § 402.215.2 (2) . A Beneficiary is not eligible to be a cotrustee. All contributions (and any earnings) are administered as one trust, but a separate Account is established for each Beneficiary. The income earned by the Trust, after deducting administrative expenses, is allocated to the Accounts in proportion to the contribution made on behalf of each Beneficiary (reduced by any distributions). See § 402.215.2(1). The Board, with the consent of the cotrustee, if any, . - determines when proceeds of an Account will be used to provide benefits to a Beneficiary, as well as the nature and type of benefits to be provided. Procedures are established for handling any dispute between the Board and the cotrustees with respect to use of Account funds for a Beneficiary. See § 402.215.2 ( 3) . Trustees of a successor trust (the "Successor Trust") are designated by the donor at the time of the original contribution. The Successor Trust is administered by its trustees, and not as part of the Trust. The Successor Trust is avilable to receive the original contribution (or a portion
thereof) under certain circumstances where the Beneficiary no longer participates in the Trust, (described below). Thereafter, the Successor Trust is used to provide benefits for the Beneficiary for the rest of his or her life. After the Beneficiary's death, the remaining principal and accumulated income of the Successor Trust is distributed to such person or persons as the donor designates. See § 402.215.2(9). Any donor, during his lifetime, may revoke any contribution to the Trust. If at the time of revocation, the Beneficiary has not received any benefits from the Account, the entire original contribution (as defined in § 402.200(7)) is returned to the donor. If the Beneficiary ,has received any benef i ts from the Account, ninety percent of the original contribution, reduced by any distributions, will be returned to the donor. If the entire original contribution is not returned to the donor, the balance is deposited in a separate fund (the . . "Charitable Trust"). In either event, all income on the Account not previously used for the benefit of the Beneficiary is deposited in the Charitable Trust. See § 402.215.2(4). The Chari table Trust is administered as part of the Fund, but as a separa te Account. The income a ttributable to the Chari table Trust . is used to provide benefits for individuals who are eligible to be Beneficiaries, but who either have no immediate family or whose immediate family, in the opinion of .the Board, is financially unable to make a contribution to the Trust sufficient to provide benefi ts. Beneficiaries of the Chari table Trust are selected by the Board. See § 402.215.2(10). Any cotrustee, other than the original donor, may, upon wri tten notice to -the Trust, seek to withdraw the original contribution, reduced by any distributions. If the Board determines that the reason for withdrawal is suff icient, the Board distributes to the trustee of the Successor Trust the applicable portion of the original contribution. See § 402.215.2 (5) . In the event that a Beneficiary moves from the -state or otherwise ceases to be eligible, for services provided by the State Department of Mental Health, the Board may terminate that Beneficiary's Account and distribute the applicable portion (ranging from 75% to 90%) of the original contribution, to the trustee of the Successor Trust. See § 402.215.2 (6) . The trustee of the Successor Trust holds, administers and distributes the principal and income of the Successor Trust for the maintenance, support, health, education and general well-being of the Beneficiary. See § 402.215.2(9). If the Benef iciary dies before receiving any benef its provided by the Account, the entire original contribution is distributed to such person or persons as the donor shall have designated. Any undistributed net income is deposited in the Charitable Trust. If at the time of the Beneficiary's death, the
\
)
Beneficiary had received benefits provided by the use of the Account funds, fifty percent of the original contribution, reduced by any distributions, is distributed to such person or persons as the donor designated, and the balance of the Account is distributed to Charitable Trust. See § 402.215.2(8). Except for the rights to revoke the Account described above, 'no donor or cotrustee has the right to sell, assign, convey, or otherwi se encumber, any interest in an Account. See § 402.217.2. Further, no Beneficiary has any vested or property right in the Trust or the power to conveyor transfer any interest in the Trust or an Account. See § 402.217.1. In no event does the donor or a trustee ever receive more' than the donor i s original contribution. "Original Contribution" is defined to exclude any appreciation in value, from any source, and can not include more than the total of the contributions made to an Account. See § 402.200(7). The Trust The Trust is a public body corporate and politic, although intended to function independently, through its Board. See § 402.210.1. The Act requires that the nine-member Board be appointed by the Governor of the Sta te, wi th the advice and consent of the State Senate, from among specified categories of ,nominees. The Board members serve for fixed, staggered terms, ranging from one to three years~ See § 402.210.1. The Board is required to account annually to the-5tate' s Governor, the pres ident pro tempore- of . the Senate and the Speàker of the House of Representatives. See § 402.210.5. Board meetings are subject to the provisions of the State's Open Meetings Act (see § 402.210.4), and Board members are enti tled to coverage by the State Legal Expense Fund. See Opinion 112-90 of William Webster, Missouri Attorney General, a copy of' which is a ttached as Exhibit B. The Act provides that the property, income and operations of the Trust are exempt from all taxation by the State and any political subdivision thereof. See § 402.205.3. The Trust also is exempt from federal income taxation under the Internal Revenue Code. The Board has applied for revenue rulings from the Internal Revenue Service regarding the tax exempt status of both the Trust and the Chari table Trust. A posi ti ve response is anticipated wi thin ninety days. We will be happy to provide copies of those rulings upon receipt.
Discussion
Given the purpose for which Accounts are intended to be established, their lack of transferability, the limited circumstances under which they may be terminated, and the fact that the donor can never receive any of the income on his initial contribution (or investment), we do not believe that the Accounts should properly be deemed "securities II for purposes of any of the federal securi ties laws identified above. In any event, however, given the nature and organization of the Trust, its purposes and the significant governmental functions intended to be performed by it, its accountability tó the State and the other factors described above, we bel ieve the Trust is.a "public instrumentality" of the state and, thus, that the Accounts (if deemed to be securities) are exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 pursuant to § 3 (a) (2) thereof, by virtue of being issued by such an "instrumentali ty. " For the same reason, we believe that the Accounts are exempted from the provisions of the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 by § 304(a)(4)(A) thereof. We also believe that the Accounts (if deemed to be securities) are "municipal securi ties" as defined in § 3(a)(29) of the Securities Exchange Act of,1934 and, therefore, by virtue of the provisions of § 3 (d) of that sta tute, that Board members or off icers or other employees of the Trust who, acting in the course of their official duties as such, offer or "sell" the Accounts on behalf of the Trust, would not be "brokers" (incli.iding "municipal securities brokers ii ), as defined' in that statute, solely by reason of such acti vi ty, nor would the Trust be deemed a "dealer" or "municipal securities dealer" solely by reason of establishing the Accounts or by offering or "selling" them through the Board members. Finally, in light of § 2(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, which provides that no provision of that title shall apply to a state or any instrumentali ty of a state, we believe that, despite the investment activity contemplated by the Trust, the Trust is not required to register as an investment company under that statute. The legislative history of § 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act supports our conclusions. In 1934, the pertinent portion of that section, which previously exempted securities issued by "any State of the United States, or by any political subdivision of a State or Territory, or by any public instrumentality of one or more States or Terri tories exercising an essential governmental function," was amended to delete the phrase "exercising an essential governmental function." The Conference Report ) concerning that amendment indicates that it was adopted for the purpose of extending "the scope of the public instrumentali ty exemption to expanding acti vi ties in which governments are engaging." H.R. Rep. No. 1838 (Conference Report), 73rd Cong., 2d
)
Sess. 40 (1934). The importance of providing basic support for persons with a substantial mental or physical impairment long has been recognized in this country. Under these circumstances, we believe the functions to be performed by the Trust would render it a "public instrumentali ty" even under the prior version of § 3(a)(2), as well as under the 1934 version currently in effect. Further, we believe that the term "instrumentality of a state" as used in § 3(a)(29) of the Securities Exchange Act and § 2(b) of the Investment Company Act is most properly interpreted consistently wi th § 3 (a) (2) of the Securi ties Act, in light of the nearly contemporaneous enactment of these statutes and their similar purposes. We believe our conclusions also are supported by the Commission's determination in Michigan Education Trust (available June 30, 1988). For your convenience, a copy of that no-action letter request is attached as Exhibit C. Conclusion We hereby respectfully request the Staff i s concurrence wi th our opinion that the above-described offering of the Accounts may proceed (i) wi thout registration of the Accounts under the Securities Act, (ii) without use or qualification of an indenture or indenture trustee under the Trust Indenture Act ~ (iii) wi thout registration of the Trust as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, and (iv) without registration of the Trust as a dealer or municipal securi ties dealer or of its Board members, off icers or employees as brokers or municipal securi ties brokers under the Securi ties Exchange Act. ' In the event that the Staff is not inclined to provide concurrence wi th our views, we request an opportunity to di scuss the matter prior to any final decision. If any Staff member of your Division or of any other Division to which you may consider it appropriate to refer certain of these requests has any questions or requires further information, please contact the undersigned at (816) 691-3190. In any case, we would appreciate being informed, by letter or telephone call, of the identity of the Staff member (s). assigne~ to consider this letter. Very truly yours, STINSON, MAG & FIZZELL ~ /);; 17 Ò- '/Î /1 Ii B - ¡ïh/ ~/t,.-c ~)L/ y - MaryCAnne '0' Connell MAOC/laa Enclosures cc: Mr. Gerald Zafft
STINSON, MAG & FIZZELL l
TEL.EPHONE
(S 16) S42-S600
WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER
(SI61691-3190
1201 WALNUT STREET p, 0, Box 419251 KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI' 64141-6251 F'ACSIMILE eS161691-3495 THE MAST BUIL.DING '500 WEST IIOTH STREET OVERLAN D PARK, KANSAS 66210-2329 July 20, 1992 Securi ties & Exchange Commission 450 5th street, N.W. ' Washington, D.C. 20549 Attention: Mr. Thomas Harman Re: Missouri Family Trust Fund' - No-Action Letter Request dated Ju 1 y 24, 1 99 i Dear Mr. Harman:
This letter is submi tted in response to my telephone conversati6ns with Mr. Stoller and Mr. Dill with respect to the above-captioned no-action letter request. Enclosed are copies of determination letters from the Internal Revenue Service stating that the Missouri Family Board of Trustees (the "Board"), which administers the Missouri Family Trust Fund (the "Fund"), and the Charitable Trust of the Missouri Family Trust ( the "Charitable Trust") are exempt from federal income taxation pursuant to
Section 5601 (c) (3) of the Internal. Revenue Code;
As noted in my letter dated- July 24, 1991, contributions to the Fund, although allocated to individual accounts, will be pooled for investment and will be invested by the Board in its discretion. This will confirm that those investments may include purchases of securi ties. Representatives of the Fund have confirmed to us that solicitation of participations in the Fund and the offer and sale of accounts will be undertaken solely by representatives of the Fund (possibly including members of the Board) acting in the course of their off icial duties. Any such representa ti ves of the Fund will perform services on behalf of the Fund otherwise than in connection wi th such solici ta tion. No commissions or remuneration will be paid for such solici ta tion. In fact, Section 402.210.2 of the Missouri Revised Statutes provides that no Board member, trustee or individual co-trustee of any account established under the Fund will receive compensation for services (other than reimbursement for necessary expenses actually incurred). That statute does permit payment of "reasonable compensation" for
\
!
Securi ties & Exchange Commission -2- July 20, 1992 services to any trust company serving as a trustee. It would appear, therefore, that Section 202 (b) of the Investment Advisers Act would render the provisions of that statute inapplicable to any natural person serving as an officer, trustee, Board member or other agent of the Fund or the Chari table Trust. If any staff member of your Division, or of any other Division, has any additional questions or requires further information, plase contact me at (816) 691-3190. Very truly yours, ::INS11 MAGèC7)i~ Ma~Anne 0 r Connel 1 MAOC/sr cc: Mr. Lawrence B. Stoller - Mail stop 10-6 Mr. Alex Dill Mr. Gerald Zafft )
.J
" ,
STINSON, MAG & FIZZEL.L
ì
1201 WALNUT ST'U;:ËT
P. o. Box 419Z!51
KA.NSAS CITY. MISSOURI e4141-6251 n:l.i:PHO~E C81 lSI 842.151500 WRITER'! OIPUCT ClIAL NUMBER (81151891.3190 ,. AC$Il041 1.£ (8181 $~1'349!l n~J: M"ST aUII.i:iIHCl 7'00 W!.IST 1I0TH $TREtT OVE"LANO "'ARK, KANSAS 1181IQ'Z3Zl August 3 i 1992 VIA FACSIMILE - 202-504-2395 Ms. Amy Doberman Securi ties & Exchange Commission 450 5th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20549 Re: Missouri Family Trust - No-Action Letter Request Dear Me. Doberman:
~
I
This letter will confirm our telephone conversation of earlier today. A representative of the Missouri Family Trust confirmed to me today that the trust has not appointed a trust company trustee i and has no intention to do so. Mr. Jerry Zafft advised me that the provision for a trust company trustee and for compensation to any such entity may be deleted in the next amendment to the statute as it was included based on ,a belief that such a structure was necessary to comply with securities laws. In any event, the Missouri Family Trust does not seek a no-action position -or advice on the issue of whether a trust company serving, as a trustee to the Trust is required to register as an investment adviser under the ~nvestment Advisers Act of 1940. Very truly yours, STINSON, MAG & FIZZELL By Mar~e O' Connell H ~O'C~ MAOC/sr cc: Mr. Jerry Zafft
, '08~13-S2 02:29PM FROM SMF send 1 P02 ') STINSON, MAG & FIZZELL. TEI.CliHON E
(ei.) .......00
W~I,.¡;I'l.1i gIAi:CT 01"'1. HUM.Eft lalS) 15el-3190 120 I W"',"NUT STFlEET P. O. Box 419251 KANSAA CITY, MISSOURI 64141-f52!51 I"AeSIMIi.£ (.,$) .utl.~4.' 'l'HE MAST aiJlLOINO " aOO WtST IIOTH STIU:i:T CVEI'lLANC PARK, KANSA. Søi 10-1:11. August 13, 1992 VIA FACSIMILE - 202-504-2395 MS. Amy Doberman Securi ties. & Exchange Commission 450 5th Street, N ~w. Washington, D.C. 20549 Re: Missouri Family Trust Fund Dear Ms. Doberman:
This will confirm our telephone conversation of yesterday regarding the role of a co-trustee. As you are aware, a donor to the Missouri Family Trust Fund (the "Fund") may designate, one or more co-trustees, (who may be the donor or other individuals) to ac~ together with the Fund t s Board of Truste~s on behalf of the ,beneficiary named by the donor. The co-trustee, in addi tion to determining how funds from the beneficiary's accounts are used f6r the benefit of the beneficiary, also may make some investment decisions for that account. Under the current investment policy adopted by the Fund's Board, a co-trustee may direct that up to 90% of the amount over $5,000 in the account be invested in one of two money market funds or one of five mutual funds selected by the Board of Trustees. The co-trustee may chanqe the investment option periodically. In addition, a 00- trustee may direct that stock contributed to the Fund continue to be held without being sold until the co-trustee designates otherwise or until the Board of Trustees determines that the investment is either unsafe or insecure or that the sale of the stock is in the best interest of the aocount. A representative of the Fund has represented to us that all co-trustees will either be excluded from the definition of "investment adviser" under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Actll), will be exempt from registration under the Advisers Act pursuant to Section 203(b) (3) of the Advisers Act or will be registered as investment advisers under the Advisers Act. Accordingly, the Fund does not request the Commission's opinion on the status of co-trustees under the Advisers Act.
11.0.8-13-:92 02:29PM FROM SMF send 1 P03 . , ) Ms. Amy Doberman -2- August 13, 1992 If you, or any other Staff member of your division has addi tional questions, or if you require further information, please contact me. We appreciate your assistance. Very truly yours, STINSO~, MAG & FIZZ~Lr'.- /':() By 11 .. L U i e-.Jit' Mar~Anne 0' Connell MAOC/sr co: Mr. Gerald J. Zafft )
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
The documents this one cites, and the documents that cite it.
“exemption provided by section 304(a)(4)(A) of the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 '(the "Trust Indenture Act") are available”
“you seek our assurance that we would not recommend that the Commission take enforcement action if (1) the Missouri Family Trust Fund (the "Trust") does not register under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "1940 Act")”
More like this from SEC
SEC published 5 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.
Source: Securities and Exchange Commission — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added · updated