Individual decision · SEC · 29 Apr 1997
The Division of Investment Management agrees not to recommend enforcement action if Puerto Rico Balanced Fund, Inc. relies on Section 6(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 to exempt itself from registration. This exemption applies despite the Fund retaining United States sub-advisers, investing in securities of non-Puerto Rico issuers, and engaging in hedging transactions with non-Puerto Rico counterparties. The Fund must ensure its securities are offered and sold only to residents of Puerto Rico, and the staff considers the totality of the Fund's contacts with Puerto Rico rather than any single factor to determine its principal place of business.
~f,4...~,........ .ì....r.~:...~.:.
W~"/';~;;~~~~-" .'"
CR 29 /997: . . .~~~i!r~jr~;?2J£~?¿¿ Ref. No. 97-16-CC
Puerto Rico Balanced
RESPONSE OF THE OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL Fund, Inc. DIVISION OF INVSTMNT MAAGEMENT File No. 132 -3
By letter dated January 10, 1997, you seek assurance that
the staff will not recommend enforcement action to the Commission
if the Puerto Rico Balanced Fund, Inc. (the "Fund") does not
register under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the
"Investment Company Act") in reliance on Section 6 (a) (1) of the
Investment Company Act.
Facts ..~
You represent that the Fund will be organiied as a Puerto
Rico corporation and will register with the Office of the
Commissioner of Financial Institutions of Puerto Rico as a non-
diversified closed-end or open-end management investment company
under the Investment Companies Act of Puerto Rico. You represent
that the Fund's principal office will be located in Puerto Rico,
and the Fund's official books and records will be maintained in
Puerto Rico. You also represent that a majority of the Fund's
officers and directors will be Puerto Rico residents, and the
Fund's hoard meetings and any shareholder meetings will take
place in Puerto Rico.
You state that the Fund's investment objective will be to
seek both capital appreciation and current income exempt (in
whole or in part) from federal and Puerto Rico income taxes. You
state that the Fund will invest its assets in both equity and
debt securities. You further state that the Fund intends to
enter into transactions such as repurchase agreements, reverse
repurchase agreements, and swaps for non-speculative purposes
("hedging transactions"). You state that while the Fund intends
to invest in securities of Puerto Rico issuers i and engage in
hedging transactions with Puerto Rico counterparties, the Fund
also intends to invest in securities of issuers, and engage in
hedging transactions with counterparties, organized and domiciled
outside of Puerto Rico. You maintain that non- Puerto Rico
counterparties often offer the most favorable terms on certain types of transactions.
You represent that the Fund intends to conduct its portfolio
securities and other transactions with Puerto Rico broker-dealers
whenever possible, subject to best price and best execution. You
also state, however, that the Fund intends to use non-Puerto Rico
broker-dealers, because many of the Fund's securities, including
securities of some Puerto Rico issuers, will be traded outside of
Puerto Rico.' i You represent that the ;Fund's portfolio investments will be ' managed by PaineWebber Incórporated of Puerto Rico ("PW Puerto
Rico"), alone or jointly wi'th another Puerto Rico financial
institution (together, the "Advisers,,).1 You state that in order
to obtain investment expertise with respect to equity and
corporate debt s~~urities of non-Puerto Rico issuers, the
Advisers expect to enter into separate sub-investment advisory
agreements with one or more United Stat,es sub-advisers (the "Sub- Advisers"). With respect to certain matters, such as the selection of specific equity securities (and possibly corporate
debt securities), you state that the Sub-Advisers will have full
investment discretion, although they will be accountable to the
Advisers and, ultimately, the Fund, for these decisions. You
state that the Advisers will have sole authority for making
investment decisions for the Fund as to all other securities and
related transactions, such as income securities. other than corporate debt. 2 ._,.,~ You state that a Puerto Rico financial institution (the
"Administrator") will act as administrator for the Fund. You
state that this entity will have full responsibility to assure
that the Fund is provided such services as: (i) preparing the
Fund's financial statements and coordinating with the Fund's
outside auditors in connection with their annual audit; (ii)
monitoring and assisting in the Fund's compliance with all
applicable laws and regulations; and (iii) calculating the Fund's
expense accruals. You also represent that the Administrator,
with the assistance of the Advisers and Sub-Advisers, will have
the responsibility for valuing the Fund's portfolio investments.
The Administrator will also be responsible for (i) calculating
the net asset value of the Fund's common stock (the "Common
Stock"), and (ii) paying other service providers, all of which
will be done from Puerto Rico.
You represent that a custodian bank (the "Custodian")
located in Puerto Rico will hold the Fund's investments, other
than those held in book-entry form. You also represent that the
same or another Puerto Rico financial institution (the "Transfer
Agent") will act as transfer agent for the Fund.
You state that the Fund proposes to issue debt securities,
such as commercial paper and medium-term notes (the "Debt
Securities") and Common Stock (the Common Stock and the Debt
Securities referred to together as the "Securities"). You
represent that the Fund will offer and sell the Securities only
You state that PW Puerto Rico is a broker-dealer
registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that has its
sole place of business, and is incorporated, in Puerto Rico. PW
Puerto Rico is a wholly owned subsidiary of PaineWebber
Incorporated, a Delaware corporation.
2 Telephone conver~ation among Edward Rubenstein, Brian Kaplowitz, and Susan Matti~ínko (Apr. 8, 1997). 2
to individuals having their principal residence in Puerto Rico,
and entities having their principal office and place of business in Puerto Rico (1~.Puerto Rico residents") . 3 In addition, you represent that the Fund's prospectus, and each certificate for
the Securities, will state that the Securities may be sold,
pledged, hypothecated, or otherwise transferred only to Puerto
Rico residents. You further represent that the Fund's prospectus
will inform investors that if they cease to be Puerto Rico
residents, they must liquidate their investment in the Fund as
soon as it is economically feasible to do so.
You represent that the initial offering of the Common Stock
will be conducted by one or more underwriters,~each of which will
be a Puerto Rico resident. You represent that;the underwriters
. will include PW Puerto Rico and BP Capital Markets, Inc., a
subsidiary of Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, which is a financial
institution chartered and having its principal office and place
of business in Puerto Rico. Broker-dealers that are residents in
Puerto Rico, including PW Puerto Rico and BP Capital Markets,
Inc., will also be responsible for sales of the Debt Securities.
You also represent that the secondary market for the Securities
will be made solely by broker-dealers that are Puerto Rico
residents. Thus, you maintain that neither the issuance of, nor
trading in, the Securities will have a nexus to the United States
or anywhere else outside of Puerto Rico.
Analysis
Section 6 (a) (1) exempts from regulation under the Investment Company Ac t :
Any company organized or otherwise created under the laws of
and having its principal office and place of business in Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands,' or any other possession of the United States; but such exemption shall terminate if any
3 You maintain that because of certain tax advantages,
which are available only to Puerto Rico residents, and the mix
and types of portfolio securities that the Fund will own, the
Fund would not, as an economic matter, be a suitable investment
vehicle for anyone other than Puerto Rico residents. You state
that dividends or interest generated from an investment in the
Fund will be exempt from Puerto Rico and United States income tax
only in the hands of individuals residing in Puerto Rico and
entities organized in Puerto Rico, or elsewhere outside of the
United States with their principal place of business in Puerto
Rico. Moreover, you state that in order for the Fund to comply
with the intra-state offering exemption from registration under
Section 3 (a) (11) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Rule 147
thereunder, the Fund may otfer its Securities only to Puerto Rico residents. rr 3
security of which such company is the issuer is offered for
sale or sold after the effective date of this title, by such
company or an underwriter therefor, to a resident of any
State other ,.than the State in which such company is
organized.
You maintain that the Fund should be viewed as meeting the
requirements of Section 6 (a) (1) of the Investment Company Act,
notwithstanding that the Fund proposes to (i) retain one or more United States entities as Sub-Advisers; (ii) invest in' securities of non- Puerto Rico issuers and enter into hedging transactions with non-Puerto Rico counterparties; and (iii) conduct portfolio
securities transactions with non-Puerto Rico broker-dealers. We
agree. In determining whether a fund has its~~rincipal office
and place of business in Puerto Rico," for pUrpgses of Section 6 (a) (1), the staff considers the totality of a fund's contacts with Puerto Rico, and does not consider anyone factor to be controlling. As a general matter, we believe that the
jurisdiction in which a fund invests its assets should not be a
factor in determining the location of its principal place of
business for purposes of Section 6 (a) (1) .4 Based on the facts and representations in your letter, we
would not recommend enforcement action to the Commission if the
Fund relies on Section 6 (a) (1) of the Investment Company Act and
does not register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. Because this response is based on the facts and representations in your letter ,you should note that different facts or representations may require a different conclusion.
Edward
Senior
4 This response supersedes NTO, Inc. (pub. avail. May 23,
1979) (staff unable to agree that a fund's principal place of
business was Puerto Rico when, among other things, investment
decisions would be made by a non- Puerto Rico investment adviser, and 80% of the fund's assets would be invested in non-Puerto Rico
) securities traded on non-Pu~rto Rico securities exchanges).
; i
I'
4
8 ROW N & WOO D LLP
ONE WORLD TRADE CENTER
NEW YORK. N.Y. 10048-0557
TELEPHONE: 212-839-5300
FACSIMILE: 212-839-5599
'cp. Ar mm'io:: (,((;"'\ Investment Company Act of 1940
:!t1'Ji Section 6(a) (1)
PtTLIO AV~ t. l '1. "ll cr
January 10, 1997
, .~
Office of Chief Counsel -;
Division of Investment Management
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N. W.
Judiciary Plaza
Washington, D. C. 20549
Attention: John O'Hanlon, Esq.
Re: Puerto Rico Balanced Fund, Inc.
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We are writing in connection with the proposed
organization of the Puerto Rico Balanced Fund, Inc. (the "Fund"),
to request that the Division of Investment Management (the
"Division") confirm that it will not recommend enforcement action
to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") if
the Fund offers and sells its securities and conducts its
operations in the manner described herein in reliance upon the
exemption from registration under the Investment Company Act of
1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"), contained in Section 6 (a) (1) thereof. Granting our request will require the following
modifications to the requirements first set forth in the no-
action letter issued by the Division to Puerto Rico Investors
Tax-Free Fund, Inc. ("Puerto Rico Fund I") on October 5, 1994
(the "October 5 Letter"), which is attached hereto: (i) the
elimination of the requirement ~hat a specified percentage of the
Fund's assets be invested in Puerto Rico securities; and (ii) the
elimination of the requirement that transactions in such
securities be conducted with Puerto Rico broker-dealers.
Section 6 (a) (1) exempts from 1940 Act registration any issuer organized and having its principal office and principal
place of business in Puerto Ric~, provided that the issuer's
securities are not offered; or sold to United States citizens who
are not residents of Puer:~ Rico. As described more fully below,
we believe the proposed structure of the Fund meets the
requirements of Section 6"(a) (1) .
LOS ANGELES' SAN FRANCISCO' WASHINGTON
BEIJING' HONG KONG' LONDON' SÃO PAULO
TOKYO REPRESENTATIVE OFFICE
FACTS
A. The Fund
The Fund, like Puerto Rico Fund I and several
subsequently organized affiliated funds identical or similar to
Puerto Rico Fund I (together, the "Existing Puerto Rico Funds"),
will be organized as a Puerto Rico corporation and will register
with the Office of the, Commissioner of Financial Institutions of
Puerto Rico as a non-diversified closed-end or open-end
management investment company under the Investment Companies Act
of Puerto Rico, Act No.6 of October 19, 1954, as amended. The
Fund's principal office will be located in Puerto Rico. As
required under Puerto Rico law, the official books and records of
the Fund will be maintained in Puerto Rico and~ as noted below, a
majority of the Fund's officers and directors ,ill be Puerto Rico
residents. In addition, the Fund's board meetings and any
shareholder meetings will take place in Puerto Rico.
As explained in more detail below, the Fund will invest
in corporate and municipal debt securities, as well as equity
securities, including common and preferred stock, of various
issuers. The issuers of those securities may be organized both
within and outside of Puerto Rico. The Fund also may enter into
various types of other transactions with counterparties within and outside of Puerto Rico. These transactions include, for example, repurchase agreements, reverse repurchase agreements and
interest rate and other swaps.
The Fund's investment objective and, accordingly, its portfolio composition, will differ from that of the Existing Puerto Rico Funds. The investment obj ecti ve of each of the Existing Puerto Rico Funds (in the case of the fifth Existing
Puerto Rico Fund, one of two investment objectives) is to achieve
a high level of current income that is exempt from federal and
Puerto Rico income taxes, consistent with the preservation of
capital. The Existing Puerto Rico Funds, which invest primarily
in debt securities, invest at least 67% of their total assets in
securities issued by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and its
political subdivisions, Puerto Rico mortgage-backed securities
and other Puerto Rico tax-exempt securities (the "Puerto Rico
Obligations"). (Although the October 5 letter contemplates a 70%
requirement, the Existing Puerto Rico Funds now adhere to a 67%
limit in reliance on a subsequent no-action letter granted to
Merrill Lynch Puerto Rico Tax-Exempt Fund, Inc. on May 26, 1995.)
In contrast, the Fund will seek to achieve both capital
appreciation and current income exempt (in whole or in part) from
Federal and Puerto Rico income taxes. The Fund will invest a
substantial portion of its assets in equity securities, primarily
common stock, to achieve c~pital appreciation. It also may
invest in equity securities consisting of preferred stock for
income purposes. However~ ¡it is anticipated that the Fund will
seek to achieve current income primarily through investment in various types of debt securities. 2 9667.15
While it is intended that the Fund will purchase
securi ties of Puerto Rico issuers whenever it is prudent to do
so, the Fund will require the maximum flexibility to invest
particularly in equity securities of issuers domiciled outside of
Puerto Rico in order to meet its investment obj ecti ve. i The Fund will also invest in corporate and other debt securities of
non-Puerto Rico issuers.
Similarly, the Fund will engage in transactions, such
as repurchase agreements, reverse repurchase agreements and swaps
for hedging and other purposes, with counterparties located
outside of Puerto Rico where those counterparties offer favorable
terms. For example, the Fund may enter into interest rate swap
agreements with non-Puerto Rico entities. The Fund intends to
use these transactions to hedge its portfolio~aecúrities and Debt
Securities, as defined below, and not as a speç~lative investment. . The Fund intends to conduct its portfolio securities
and other transactions with Puerto Rico broker-dealers wherever
possibl~, subj ect to best price and execution. However, given
that many of the Fund's securities, including securities of some
Puerto Rico issuers, will be traded outside of Puerto Rico, and
that non-Puerto Rico counterparties often offer the most
favorable terms on certain types of transactions, it would be
impractical to require the Fund to conduct a minimum percentage
of transactions with Puerto Rico broker-dealers.
B. The Fund's Service Providers
Investment Advisorv Arranaements. As is the case with
the Existing Puerto Rico Funds, the Fund's portfolio investments
will be managed by PaineWebber Incorporated of Puerto Rico
(" PaineWebber Puerto Rico"), alone or jointly with another Puerto
Rico financial institution (together, the "Investment Advisers") .
PaineWebber Puerto Rico is a broker-dealer registered under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "1934 Act II) , having its sole place of business in Puerto Rico. PaineWebber
Puerto Rico, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PaineWebber
Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, also is incorporated in
Puerto Rico.
The Investment Advisers expect to enter into a separate
sub-investment advisory agreement with each of one or more United
States sub-advisers (the II
Sub-Advisers " ), one of which may be Mitchell Hutchins Asset Management Inc., an affiliate of
PaineWebber Puerto Rico, which would advise primarily with
respect to the Fund's equity investments. The retention of the
Sub-Advisers is necessary primarily to obtain investment
) i Of course, the Fund will comply with any applicable investment requirements imposed by Puerto Rico law. For purposes of our request, however, the Division should assume that no such requirements are applicable. 3 9667.15
expertise with respect to equi,ty and corporate debt securities of non-Puerto Rico issuers. With respect to certain matters, such as the selection
of specific equtty securities (and possibly, corporate debt
securities), the Sub-Advisers will have full investment
discretion, although they will be accountable to the Investment
Advisers and, ultimately, the Fund, for these decisions. In
other areas, the Sub-Advisers will act in a more consultative
role. For example, it is expected that the Sub-Advisers will provide information and advice concerning such matters as general economic conditions and overall asset allocation and other
security-specific advice. This consultative advice, while
substantively valuable to the Investment Advisers, will be nonbinding on the Investment Advisers and the Fung. Thus, the
Investment Advisers will have sole authority for making
investment decisions for the Fund as to all other securities and
related transactions, as they do for the Existing Puerto Rico
Funds.
Administrative Arranqements. As is the case with the Existing Puerto Rico Funds, a Puerto Rico financial institution
will act as administrator (the "Administrator") for the Fund.
This entity will have full responsibility to assure that the Fund
is provided with such services as (i) preparing the Fund's
financial statements and coordinating with the Fund's outside
auditors in connection with their annual audit, (ii) monitoring
and assisting in the Fund's compliance with all applicable laws
and regulations, and (iii) calculating the Fund's expense accruals. The portfolio investments of the Fund will be valued in
Puerto Rico by the Administrator with the assistance of the Investment Advisers and the Sub-Advisers, as is the case with the
Existing Puerto Rico Funds. The net asset value of the common
stock (the II Common Stock") issued by the Fund will be calculated
in Puerto Rico, and payments to other service providers will be
made from within Puerto Rico. The official records of the Fund
must, under Puerto Rico law, and will be maintained by the Fund
in Puerto Rico.
Custodial and Transfer Aqencv Arranqements. The
investments of the Fund (other than those held in book-entry form
including, among others, those that are eligible for deposit with
The Depository Trust Company (IIDTCII)) will be physically held by
a custodian bank (the "Custodian") located in Puerto Rico. The
same or another Puerto Rico financial institution (the "Transfer
Agent") also will act as transfer agent for the Fund, as is the
case with the Existing Puerto Rico Funds. Transfer agency
functions will include,for example, (i) issuing and recording
the appropriate number of, shares of Common Stock as authorized
and holding such shares in the appropriate shareholder account;
(ii) effecting transfers" øf shares of Common Stock by the registered owners thereof, ,upon receipt of appropriate documentation issued by the Fund; (iii) preparing and
9667.15 4
transmitting payments for dividends and distributions declared by
the Fund; (iv) acting as agent for shareholders pursuant to any
dividend reinvestment plan of the Fund; and (v) issuing
replacement certificates for those certificates alleged to have
been lost, stoleD or destroyed. The Transfer Agent will perform
similar functions with respect to any debt securities issued by
the Fund.
Auditinq Arranaements. Fund audits will be conducted
by Puerto Rico resident partners/managers of a nationally
recognized public accounting firm with operations in Puerto Rico.
C. Securi ties Issued by the Fund
The Fund proposes to issue the Commòñ Stock and debt
securities, such as commercial paper and mediùm-term notes (the
"Debt Securities" and, together with the Common Stock, the
"Securities"). Both types of Securities will be offered and sold
only to residents of Puerto Rico, as described below. 2 For
purposes of the discussion herein, entities having their
principal office and principal place of business located in
Puerto Rico are referred to as residents of Puerto Rico.
Because of the tax advantages of the Fund, which are
available only to Puerto Rico residents, and the mix and types of
portfolio securities it owns, the Fund would not, as an economic
suitable investment vehicle for anyone other than
residents of Puerto Rico . Dividends or interest generated from
an investment in the Fund will only be exempt from Puerto Rico
and United States income tax in the hands of individuals residing
in Puerto Rico and entities organized in Puerto Rico or elsewhere
outside of the United States with their principal place of
matter, be a
business in Puerto Rico. 3
2 As noted above, the Fund proposes to enter into swaps, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements with entities that are not residents of Puerto Rico. We believe that these transactions should not be deemed to violate the requirements of Section 6 (a) (1) of the 1940 Act. 3 Under Section 933 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), the Puerto Rico source income of individuals who are bona fide residents of Puerto Rico during the entire taxable year in which dividends or interest is earned is not subject to United States income tax. Also, the Puerto Rico source income of Puerto Rico or non-United States juridical persons generated by their operations in Puerto Rico is not effectively connected with a trade or business conducted in the United States and, as such, is not subject 'to United States income tax. See Code Sections 871 (b), 882 ~a) and 864 (c) (4) (A). Interest payments made by the Fund will, constitute Puerto Rico source income,
(continued. . . )
9667.15 5
The Securities will be offered exclusively to
individuals who have their principal residence in Puerto Rico,
and to persons, other than individuals, whose principal office
and principal place of business are located in Puerto Rico, and
the prospectuses"offering the shares of Common Stock and the Debt
Securitieg (each a, "Prospectus") will so state.4 In addition,
as will be stated in each Prospectus and in a legend on the
certificates for the Securities, such Securities may be sold,
pledged, hypothecated or otherwise transferred only to Puerto
Rico residents. Each Prospectus also will inform those investors
who cease to be residents of Puerto Rico of their obligation to
liquidate their investment in the Fund as soon as it is
economically feasible to do so. While the Fund acknowledges that
it is uncertain how such an obligation may be enforced, it is
worth noting that investors who no longer resicl in Puerto Rico
will no longer have available the tax benefits-.~that make the Fund
an attractive investment.
The initial offering of Common Stock will be conducted
by one or more underwriters, each of which will be a resident of
Puerto Rico. The underwriters will include PaineWebber Puerto
Rico and BP Capital Markets, Inc. ("BP Capital Markets"), a
subsidiary of Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, which is a financial
institution chartered and having its principal office and place
of business in Puerto Rico. BP Capital Markets is a broker-
dealer registered under the 1934 Act that has its sole place of
business in Puerto Rico. The secondary market for shares of
Common Stock will be made solely by broker-dealers resident in
Puerto Rico, including PaineWebber Puerto Rico and BP Capital Markets. Thus, neither the issuance of, nor trading in, shares of Common Stock will have a nexus to the United States or
anywhere else, outside of Puerto Rico.
The Debt Securities of the Fund will be designed to
produce ihcome that is exempt (in whole or in part) from United
States and Puerto Rico income taxes for eligible investors.
Accordingly, the Debt Securities will be offered, sold or
transferred solely to residents of Puerto Rico. Such sales and
transfers also will be made solely by broker-dealers residents in
Puerto Rico, including PaineWebber Puerto Rico and BP Capital
Markets.
3 ( . . . continued) pursuant to the interplay between Section 861 (a) (1) and
Section 1.863-6 of the regulations promulgated under the
Code.
The above requirements must be met for the Fund to
comply with the intr~~state offering exemption from
registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
(the "1933 Act"), próvided by Section 3 (a) (11) of the 1933 Act and Rule 147 thereunder. 6 4 9667.15
The foregoing describes the proposed operations of the Fund. The issues that are the subject of the instant request involve: (i) the retention of one or more United States entities
as sub-advisers; (ii) whether the Fund should be restricted in
its ability to invest in securities of non-Puerto Rico issuers
and enter into various types of transactions with non-Puerto Rico
counterparties; and (iii) whether the Fund's portfolio securities
and other transactions need to be conducted with Puerto Rico
broker-dealers. For the reasons set forth more fully below, we believe that the Fund may properly rely on Section 6 (a) (1) notwithstanding the retention of a United States sub-adviser and
the elimination of restrictions on portfolio securities and other
transactions. We further believe that while the operations of
the Fund present a particularly compelling case for granting this
request, the same conclusion should extend to~gther funds having
a similar Puerto Rico nexus (~, the Existing Puerto Rico
Funds), regardless of their investment objectines.
DISCUSSION
I. Section 6 (a) (1) of the 1940 Act
Section 6 (a) of the 1940 Act provides in relevant part
that:
The following investment companies are exempt from
the provisions of (the 1940 Act) :
(1) Any company organized or otherwise
created under the laws of and having its
principal office and place of business in
Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, or any other
possession of the United States; but such
exemption shall terminate if any security of
which such company is the issuer is offered
for sale or sold after the effective date of
(the 1940 Act), by such company or an
underwriter therefor, to a resident of any
State other than the State in which such
company is organized.
We believe that the Fund should be viewed as meeting
the requirements of Section 6 (a) (1) of the 1940 Act. As described above, the Fund is incorporated and has its principal
office in Puerto Rico, and should be viewed as having its
principal place of business in Puerto Rico.
A. Retention of Sub-Advisers Outside of Puerto Rico
We believe that
'the fact that sub-advisory services may
be provided to the Fund by one or more entities located outside
of Puerto Rico (~, in xpe United States) does not change the
Fund's essential nature as a Puerto Rico enterprise. To put the
9667.15 7
role of the Sub-Advisers in context, it is worthwhile to again
identify the extensive contacts of the Fund and its service
providers with Puerto Rico. Those contacts are: (1) the Fund
will be incorporated and have its principal office in Puerto
Rico, and will maintain its official books and records in Puerto
Rico, (2) PaineWebber Puerto Rico, a Puerto Rico corporation
doing business solely in Puerto Rico, and possibly another Puerto
Rico financial institution will act as investment adviser (s) to
the Fund, (3) a Puerto Rico financial institution will enter into
an administration agreement with the Fund pursuant to which it
will provide all aspects of Fund administration, (4) the Fund
will be registered and regulated as an investment company under
Puerto Rico law, (5) the Fund will be designed to maximize tax
benefits for Puerto Rico residents, to the extent consistent with
its overall investment objective, (6) the Cus~Qdian will hold all
Fund assets in Puerto Rico, other than those beld in book-entry
form, including DTC-eligible securities" (7) tñe Administrator
will value the Fund's assets in Puerto Rico, (8) a majority of
the Fund's officers and directors will be Puerto Rico residents,
(9) the shares of Common Stock of the Fund, as well as its Debt
Securities, will be sold by Puerto Rico underwriters solely to
Puerto Rico residents, (10) the secondary market for the Common
Stock and the Debt Securities will be maintained in Puerto Rico,
(11) neither such Common Stock nor the Debt Securities may be
transferred to any person that is not a resident of Puerto Rico,
(12) investors in the Fund will be made aware of their obligation
to liquidate their investment in the Fund if they cease to be
residents of Puerto Rico, when such liquidation becomes
economically feasible, (13) the Fund's Transfer Agent will be a
Puerto Rico entity, (14) Fund audits will be conducted by Puerto
Rico resident partners/managers of a nationally recognized public accounting firm with operations in Puerto Rico, and (15) the Fund's board meetings and any shareholder meetings will take
place in Puerto Rico. We believe that these contacts demonstrate
that the Fund is fundamentally a Puerto Rico entity, its
principal place of business is Puerto Rico and it is doing
business in Puerto Rico.
The Division has issued very few' no-action letters
regarding Section 6 (a) (1). Nevertheless, direct support for
advisory services, with full investment discretion, being
rendered outside of Puerto Rico may be found in Merrill Lvnch
Puerto-Rico Tax-Exempt Fund, Inc. (pub. avail. May 26, 1995)
("Merrill Lvnch Puerto Rico"). In Merrill Lvnch Puerto Rico, the Division granted a no-action request under Section 6 (a) (1) to an open-end, non-diversified Puerto Rico investment company (the
"Company"). The Company intended to retain a United States
investment adviser, although it would employ Puerto Rico entities
for administration, transfer agency and custodian services.
As mentioned above and unlike the situation in the
Merrill Lvnch Puerto Rico 'letter, in which the United States
investment adviser made ~l investment decisions, the Sub-
Advisers in the instant case will have investment discretion
solely with respect to equity securities and, pos,sibly, corporate
9667.15 8
debt securities. The Puerto Rico-based Investment Advisers will
have sole investment discretion as to all of the Fund's other
securities. We believe that since the Division has allowed the
retention of a United States adviser with investment discretion
with respect to all investments, the retention of one or more
United States sub-advisers with investment discretion only with
respect to equity and corporate debt investments of the Fund, a
fortiori, should pose no disqualification for the exemption
provided by Section 6(a) (1) of the 1940 Act.s
We recognize that the Company in the Merrill Lvnch
Puerto Rico letter agreed to invest at least 67% of its total
assets in Puerto Rico Obligations and to conduct portfolio
transactions involving Puerto Rico Obligations with Puerto Rico
broker-dealers. However, we do not believe ttrgse facts are
required by Section 6 (a) (1). We believe this ""roposition is supported by analogous no-action responses in the offshore fund
area. While those responses involve Section 7 (d) of the 1940 Act, rather than Section 6 (a) (1), they involve a similar issue of whether a fund organized outside of the United States has
sufficient United States contacts as to require registration
under the 1940 Act. 6
The Division has issued several no-action letters to
the effect that registration of an offshore fund is not required
despite the existence of a United States investment adviser and
s Additional support for certain advisory services being rendered outside of Puerto Rico may be found in Inners~ace Medical Capital Corp. (pub. avail. July 21, 1992) (" Innerspace"). The Innerspace letter involved a Puerto Corporation" ) organized to qualify as
an "investment capital fund II under Puerto Rico law and which
was to invest entirely in securities issued by a Delaware
Rico corporation (the II
corporation that had agreed to use the proceeds of the
Corporation's investment to establish a manufacturing
facility in Puerto Rico. The Corporation obtained no-action
assurance and was deemed to have its principal place of
business in Puerto Rico, notwithstanding that it retained a
United States corporation to provide certain necessary
investment expertise. The October 5 Letter itself also
offered partial support by permitting retention of a United
States sub-adviser on a consultative basis.
6 Section 7 (d) generally provides:
No investment company, unless organized or otherwise
created under the laws of the United States or of a State,
and no depositor or trustee of or underwriter for such a'
company not so organ~zed or created, shall make use of the
mails or any means or instrumentality of interstate
commerce, directly ór' indirectly, to offer for sale, sell,
or deliver after sale1 in connection with a public offering,
any security of which such company is the issuer...
9667.15 9
administrator, even when there are investments in securities of
United States issuers and United States broker-dealers may be used. For example, the Division issued such a no-action letter in Shearson International Dollar Reserves (pub. avail. July 15,
1981), where a Luxembourg open-end fund having a Luxembourg
manager and investing primarily in United States dollar-
denominated money market instruments including, among other
things, certificates of deposit of United States and non-United
States banks and interest-bearing deposits therein, had a United
States investment adviser, administrator, sub-custodian and
distributor. Similarly, in Merrill Lvnch & Co., Inc. (pub.
avail. May 12, 1986), the Division issued a positive no-action
letter response with respect to non-United States open-end funds,
notwithstanding the existence of a United States investment
adviser and custodian. But ~ NTO, Inc. (pub~ avail. May 23,
1979) ("NTO, Inc. "), in which the Division de~rmined that
Section 6 (a) (1) was unavailable to a Puerto Rico-incorporated
investment company designed to invest in securities traded in
markets outside of Puerto Rico, and whose investments were
determined by a United States investment adviser and held by a
United States custodian.
The Fund in the instant situation will have fewer
United States contacts than any of the above funds. It will have
a Puerto Rico resident entity performing all of the Fund's day-
to-day administrative and transfer agency functions in Puerto
Rico. The Fund also will have solely Puerto Rico underwriters,
and have custody of all of its assets, other than those that are
eligible for book-entry, in Puerto Rico.
In addi t ion, we note by analogy that under Sect ion 864 (b) (2) (A) (ii) of the Code, the principal office of an
investment company is not determined by the location of its
investment adviser or the nature of its investments. Thus, such
a company may, despite the existence of a United States sub-
adviser and United States investments, be deemed to have its
principal office outside the United States. Under this Code
provision, a corporation that performs "all or a substantial portion" of ten functions (the "ten factors" or "ten commandments") at an office or offices outside of the United
States is considered to have its principal office outside the
Uni ted States. 7
The ten functions are:
(i) communicating with its shareholders (including the
furnishing of financial reports); (ii) communicating with
the general public; (iii) soliciting sales of its own stock;
(iv) accepting the subscriptions of new stockholders; (v)
maintaining its principal corporate records and books of account; (vi) auditLng its books of account; (vii) disbursing payments of dividends, legal fees, accounting fees and officers' and directors' salaries; (viii) (continued. . . ) 10 7
In evaluating whether a corporation's activities fit wi thin the safe harbor, the acti vi ties performed by its agents and service providers are taken into account. We submit that
just as the Fund would thereby be deemed to have its principal
office in Puerta- Rico and not the United States for purposes of
the Code, the Fund should be viewed as having its principal place
of business in Puerto Rico for purposes of Section 6 (a) (1) .8 B. Requirements as to Portfolio
Securities and Other Transactions
and the Use of Puerto Rico Broker-Dealers
While investors in the Existing Puerto Rico Funds will
also benefit if aii of the percentage limitations on the Fund's
assets described in the October' 5 Letter were' ~emoved, the
removal of those limitations is imperative for.khe successful
operation of the proposed Fund. As described above, the Fund
will seek to achieve current income and capital appreciation.
The Fund, therefore, will invest in equity securities, as well as
in a wider variety of types of debt securities, than the Existing
Puerto Rico Funds. While it is intended that the Fund will
purchase equity and debt securities of Puerto Rico issuers
whenever it is prudent to do so, the Fund will require the
maximum flexibility to meet its investment objective. In
addition, the elimination of percentage limitations would avoid
the necessity for the difficult task of defining precisely the
concept of a "Puerto Rico Issuer" in the context of a company
issuing corporate debt or equity securities. In that regard, we
note that there are relatively few public companies in Puerto
Rico in which the Fund could invest, and those that exist tend to
be concentrated in financial services. Consequently, we believe
it is important that the Fund not be required to invest any
minimum percentage of its assets in securities of Puerto Rico issuers. As a corollary, we request that the Fund be exempt from
the requirement of the October 5 Letter that a corresponding 67%
percent of the Fund's investment transactions be conducted with
Puerto Rico broker-dealers. Given that many of the Fund's
securities, including securities of some Puerto Rico issuers,
7 ( . . . continued) publishing or furnishing the offering and redemption price
of the shares of stock issued by it; (ix) conducting
meetings of its shareholders and board of directors; and
(x) making redemptions of its own stock.
The Existing Puerto Rico Funds are foreign corporations under Section 7701 of ,the Code, and because they satisfy the
"ten factor" test unq.er Section 864 (b) (2) (A) (ii) of the
Code, they are not subject to United States federal income
tax on their net income. Thus, they are taxed like offshore funds. '
11
8
9667.15
will be traded outside of Puerto Rico, the above requirement
should be eliminated, particularly in light of the need to obtain
best price and execution. 9, Similarly, the Fund intends to enter
into other transactions with Puerto Rico counterparties when the
terms of those t~ansactions are advantageous to the Fund.
Wi th regard to the foregoing requests, we do not
believe it is necessary under Section 6 (a) (1) for the Fund to
invest in securities of Puerto Rico issuers, enter into a minimum
amount of transactions with Puerto Rico entities, or use Puerto
Rico broker-dealers to any specified degree. As the above-
mentioned no-action responses involving Section 7 (d) of the 1940
Act indicate, the registration of an offshore fund is not
required despite the potential for unlimited investments in
securities of United States issuers or transacbions with United
States broker-dealers or other entities. Furt~ermore, as
indicated above, the "ten factor" test has no provision that a,
corporation invest in securities of non-United States issuers or
conduct trades offshore in order for it to be deemed to have its
principal office outside the United States. In fact, Section 864 (b) (1) (A) of the Code states that trading in stocks or securities through a broker in the United States is not a trade
or business in the United States.
In addition, the Commission staff appears to have taken
a similar view in the context of commodities vehicles relying on
the intrastate offering exemption of Rule 147 under the 1933 Act.
See, ~, C. S. Tradinq Partnership No.2 (pub. avail. May 7,
1981) ("C.S. Trading") i Gem Foods, Inc. (pub. avaiL. August 15,
1977). But ~ Euqene T. Ichinose, Jr. (pub. avail. February 15, 1979). In C. S. Trading, the Division of Corporation Finance
permi t ted a Pennsylvania partnership, among other things, to trade commodities futures through an out-of-state broker on
exchanges located outside of Pennsylvania. 10 Similarly, we
submit that it is not necessary under Section 6 (a) (1) to require
that a minimum percentage of the Fund's investments be in
securities of Puerto Rico issuers.
Finally, we wish to reemphasize that notwithstanding
any relaxation of the above restrictions, the Fund's tax benefits
are available only to persons who are residents of Puerto Rico.
In that regard, the Fund is designed to provide Puerto Rico
9 The Fund intends, however, to conduct its portfolio transactions with Puerto Rico broker-dealers wherever possible, subject to best price and execution. 10 There was, however, a limit on the percentage of the net offering proceeds that the partnership could place with the out-of-state broker to satisfy margin requirements. While it is not clear" the no-action letters seem to indicate that such a~ limitation is intended to address the location of assets rather than the nature of the partnership's portfolio transactions;
9667. is
12
investors with current income, including income exempt (or
partially exempt) from Puerto Rico and Federal income tax (and
capital appreciation). Therefore, we understand that the Fund,
like the Existing Puerto Rico Funds, will be exclusively tailored
to the Puerto R~ço market, will be attractive as an investment
vehicle solely to investors who are residents of Puerto Rico and
will be sold only to Puerto Rico residents.
CONCLUSION
We respectfully submit that the Fund should qualify for the exemption provided by Section 6 (a) (1) of the 1940 Act, notwithstanding the proposed retention of a non-Puerto Rico entity as sub-adviser, the elimination of percentage requirements as to the Puerto Rico nature of the Fund's investment and other transactions and the elimination of the requii;~ment that such transactions be conducted with Puerto Rico bro~er-dealers. The Fund will have numerous and substantial contacts with Puerto Rico such as to make it readily apparent that the Fund's principal place of business is located in Puerto Rico for purposes of Section 6 (a) (1). As required by Section 6 (a) (1), the Fund will sell its Securities only to Puerto Rico residents, and these Securities may subsequently be transferred only to qualified persons. We appreciate your prompt attention to this request.
If you have any comments or questions, please feel free to call
either Brian M. Kaplowitz ((212) 839-5370) or Susan Mattisinko
((212) 839-5428) of Brown & Wood LLP or Victoria E. Schonfeld
((212) 713-8853) of Mitchell Hutchins Asset Management Inc.
Very truly yours,
/;.' . '" -~
/1 ¡
/.)-'-y; l ¡~';':-l, J.l./'
~
9667.15 13
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
The documents this one cites, and the documents that cite it.
“This response supersedes NTO, Inc. (pub. avail. May 23, 1979) (staff unable to agree that a fund's principal place of business was Puerto Rico when, among other things, investment decisions would be made by a non- Puerto Rico investment ad…”
“Under Section 933 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), the Puerto Rico source income of individuals who are bona fide residents of Puerto Rico during the entire taxable year in which dividends or interest is earne…”
“if the Puerto Rico Balanced Fund, Inc. (the "Fund") does not register under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "Investment Company Act") in reliance on Section 6 (a) (1) of the Investment Company Act.”
“You state that PW Puerto Rico is a broker-dealer registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that has its sole place of business, and is incorporated, in Puerto Rico.”
More like this from SEC
SEC published 5 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.
Source: Securities and Exchange Commission — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added · updated