2005-10-12

Added · Updated

SEC Division of Investment Management staff letter: Seward & Kissel

The letter requests an interpretation of the term 'substantial portion' in Investment Company Act Rule 3a-6(b)(2) regarding foreign banks. It argues that foreign banks should not be required to maintain a specific quantitative threshold for deposit-taking, provided they are authorized to take deposits and extend credit at levels making the combination of these activities a substantial portion of their business. The correspondence asserts that this approach aligns with the Rule's intent to place foreign banks on equal footing with domestic banks and reflects modern funding practices.

Securities and Exchange Commission logo

US Federal

Securities and Exchange Commission

Scan of the document's first page
Share

SEC published 7 documents in the last 30 days — get each new one by email the day it lands.

Read the rest free, and get an email when SEC publishes again

Lineage: In force

Investment Advisers Act of 19401940Investment Company Act of 19401940Securities Act of 19331933SEC Division of InvestmentManagement staff letter: Sewa…2005-10-12 · this document
amendssupersedesissued underrefers toproposed or not in RegAlertarrows run from the older text to the one that changes it

Source: Securities and Exchange Commission — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works

More like this from SEC

SEC published 7 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.