Individual decision · SEC · 8 May 2006
The Division of Market Regulation takes the position that BATS Trading, Inc. continues to qualify as an electronic communications network and complies with the ECN Display Alternative for exchange-traded and Nasdaq securities linked via the Customer Automated Messaging System or the Intermarket Trading System. The Division will not recommend enforcement action against OTC or exchange market makers subscribing to BATS ECN who enter orders without modifying public quotations in compliance with the Quote Rule and Limit Order Display Rule. This no-action position is conditioned on the accuracy of BATS representations, compliance with applicable rules, and active connectivity with national market centers, with effectiveness limited until June 28, 2006.
Home | Previous Page
May 8, 2006
Mr. David Cummings Chief Executive Officer BATS Trading, Inc. 320 Armour Road, Suite 200 North Kansas City, MO 64116
Re:
BATS Trading, Inc. No-Action Relief Request
Dear Mr. Cummings:
In your letter dated May 4, 2006 ("May 2006 Request Letter"), you request that the Division of Market Regulation ("Division") of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") reaffirm its view that BATS Trading, Inc. ("BATS"), which operates an electronic trading system known as the BATS ECN, would continue to be an electronic communications network ("ECN") as defined in Rule 600(b)(23) of Regulation NMS 1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and would be in compliance with the ECN Display Alternative as described in paragraph (b)(5)(ii) of Rule 602 of Regulation NMS ("Quote Rule") 2 after BATS establishes a new linkage with the National Stock Exchange ("NSX").
The Division previously has taken the view that BATS was an ECN and would be in compliance with the ECN Display Alternative with respect to: (1) exchange-traded securities for which a linkage between BATS ECN, the Computer Assisted Execution System ("CAES"), the Intermarket Trading System ("ITS"), and the Consolidated Quotation System ("CQS") is operational; or (2) Nasdaq securities for which a linkage between BATS ECN and the Nasdaq Market Center is operational, and in each case BATS ECN provides access to certain orders pursuant to the terms of the ECN Display Alternative. 3 The Division also stated that it would not recommend that the Commission take enforcement action against an OTC market maker 4 or exchange market maker 5 that is a subscriber to BATS ECN if the market maker enters orders into BATS ECN without modifying its public quotation in compliance with the Quote Rule and Rule 604 of Regulation NMS ("Limit Order Display Rule"), 6 as applicable.
In the May 2006 Request Letter, you state that BATS ECN is now connected to the NSX through the Customer Automated Messaging System ("CAMS"), which is an automated system operated by NSX that allows NSX members to direct orders in exchange-traded and Nasdaq securities to NSX. You further state that, because NSX is a direct participant in the ITS Plan, NSX members may direct agency and principal orders in exchange-traded securities to, and receive orders from, participating ITS 7 exchanges. You represent that BATS ECN interacts with NSX in substantially the same manner that it interacts with the Nasdaq Market Center.
On the basis of the foregoing, the Division hereby takes the position that BATS ECN would continue to be an ECN and would be in compliance with the ECN Display Alternative with respect to: (1) exchange-traded securities for which a linkage between BATS ECN, CAES or CAMS, ITS, and CQS is operational; or (2) Nasdaq securities for which a linkage between BATS ECN and the Nasdaq Market Center or NSX is operational, and in each case BATS ECN provides access to certain orders pursuant to the terms of the ECN Display Alternative. 8 The Division would not recommend that the Commission take enforcement action against an OTC market maker or exchange market maker that is a subscriber to BATS ECN if such market maker enters orders into BATS ECN without modifying its public quotation in compliance with the Quote Rule and the Limit Order Display Rule, as applicable.
The Division conditions its position on the continuing accuracy of the representations made in from the May 2006 Request Letter and the February 2006 Request Letter. The Division further conditions its position on compliance by BATS with all applicable Commission and self-regulatory organization rules, including any additional requirements applicable to ECNs. Any different facts or conditions — including but not limited to, modifications or revisions to, or expansion of service provided by, BATS ECN — may require a different response. The Division may request additional representations from you regarding the operation of BATS ECN. This no-action position is subject to changes in current law, regulation, and interpretations; any such change may require the Division to reevaluate and withdraw or modify this position. This no-action position concerns enforcement action under Section 11A of the Exchange Act 9 only, and does not express any legal conclusions regarding the applicability of Section 11A or other statutory or regulatory provisions of the federal securities laws.
Compliance with the ECN Display Alternative depends in many respects on the practical effect of the operational conditions established by BATS ECN and the manner of operation of the linkages BATS ECN maintains. Therefore, the Division is limiting the effectiveness of this no-action position until June 28, 2006.
Sincerely yours,
Robert L.D. Colby Acting Director
Endnotes
1 17 CFR 242.600(b)(23).
2 17 CFR 242.602(b)(5)(ii).
3 See letter from Robert L.D. Colby, Acting Director, Division, Commission, to David Cummings, Chief Executive Officer, BATS, dated February 17, 2006 (" February 2006 No-Action Letter "). See also letter from David Cummings, Chief Executive Officer, BATS, to Robert L.D. Colby, Acting Director, Division, Commission, dated February 15, 2006, requesting no-action relief ("February 2006 Request Letter").
4 See 17 CFR 242.600(b)(52) (defining "OTC market maker").
5 See 17 CFR 242.600(b)(24) (defining "exchange market maker").
6 17 CFR 242.604.
7 In the February 2006 Request Letter, BATS represented that, as demand warrants, it intended to register as an ITS/CAES Market Maker, as defined in NASD Rule 5210, and as a CQS market maker, as defined in NASD Rule 4200. BATS now further represents that, as demand warrants, and in conjunction with the CAMS linkage, BATS intends to register with NSX as a Designated Dealer, as defined in NSX Rule 11.9, in those securities that are of interest to BATS subscribers. The Division's position that BATS would be an ECN for exchange-traded and Nasdaq securities is conditioned on BATS registering for and obtaining market maker or Designated Dealer status, as necessary.
8 The Division's no-action position is conditioned on BATS maintaining active connectivity with one or more national market centers. In the event that BATS loses connectivity with a market center, BATS would not be in compliance with the ECN Display Alternative with respect to that market center and the no-action relief described herein would not be available. BATS represents that, if BATS ECN loses connectivity with the Nasdaq Market Center or the NSX, BATS personnel will immediately cancel all quotes previously published by BATS in that market center.
9 15 U.S.C. 78k-1.
http://www.sec.gov/divisions/marketreg/mr-noaction/batstrading050806.htm
Home | Previous Page
Modified: 05/08/2006
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
The documents this one cites, and the documents that cite it.
“as defined in Rule 600(b)(23) of Regulation NMS 1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act")”
More like this from SEC
SEC published 7 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.
Source: Securities and Exchange Commission — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added · updated