Individual decision · SEC · 12 Oct 2010
The SEC grants Members executing trades on the BYX Trading System a limited exemption from Rule 10b-10(a)(2)(i)(A) to disclose counterparty identity, provided trades utilize post-trade anonymity. The Staff will not recommend enforcement action if a Member confirms acting as agent when a customer order executes against an anonymous counterparty that is the Member in principal capacity, subject to No Knowledge and Parity Requirements. Members may rely on the Exchange's retention of identities to satisfy recordkeeping rules 17a-3(a)(1) and 17a-4(a), though they must maintain records if they know the counterparty's identity.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
DIVISION OF
TRADING AND MARKETS
October 12,2010
[Corrected]
Mr. Anders Franzon
VP, Associate General Counsel
BATS
8050 Marshall Drive, Suite 120
Lenexa, KS 66214
Dear Mr. Franzon:
Based on the facts and representations set forth in your letter dated October 6, 2010, we find that it is appropriate in the public interest, and consistent with the protection ofinvestors to grant, and hereby grant, to Membersl that execute trades for their customers on BYX using the BYX Trading System, a limited exemption pursuant to Rule 10b-l0(f) under the Exchange Act from the requirement in Rule lOb-1O(a)(2)(i)(A) to disclose to their customers the name ofthe person from whom a security was purchased, or to whom it was sold, or the fact that such information will be provided upon the customer's written request. This exemption is limited to trades that Members execute on BYX using the post trade anonymity feature described in your letter.2 In granting this exemption, we note in particular, your representation that all orders submitted to the BYX Trading System will automatically match against each other in strict pricetime priority.3 You also request assurance that the Staff will not recommend enforcement action to the Commission under paragraph (a) ofRule 1Ob-l 0 under the Exchange Act if a Member confirri:ls its capacity as "agent" when the Member submits a customer's order to the Exchange, in its role as the customer's agent, and the order is executed on the Exchange in a trade with an anonymous contra-party that turns out to be the Member trading in a principal (including proprietary) capacity. Your request is limited to those situations in which both: (1) the No Knowledge I Unless otherwise noted, each defined term in this letter has the same meaning as defined, directly or by reference, in your letter. 2 This exemption does not apply to orders routed to an away trading center for execution. 3 You represent in your letter that the only exception to price-time priority matching will occur when a Member marks an incoming order with an MTP Modifier. In your letter you state that if an order contains an MTP Modifier, the BYX Trading System will not execute the order against the submitting Member's trading interest submitted under the same unique identifier.
Mr. Anders Franzon
October 12,2010
Requirement; and (2) the Parity Requirement are satisfied.
Based on the facts and representations set forth in your letter, the Staff will not recommend enforcement action to the Commission under paragraph (a) of Rule 1Ob-1 0 if a Member indicates on confirmations to its customers that the Member acted as agent on a customer's behalfwhen a representative ofthe Member submits a customer order to the Exchange on an agency basis and that order is executed on the Exchange in a trade with an anonymous contra-party that turns out to be the Member trading in a principal (including proprietary) capacity, provided that the Member complies with all other requirements of Rule lOb-10 in confirming the customer's order, including paragraph (a)(2)(i) thereof, and provided that the handling and execution ofthe customer order complies with the No Knowledge and Parity Requirements.4 In taking this position, we note in particular your representation regarding your expectation that same firm volume, as a percentage oftotal volume, will not be material for either highor low trading volume securities.5 We also note that Members continue to have a duty of best execution.6 The Office of Financial Responsibility has instructed us to inform you that the Staffwill not recommend enforcement action to the Commission if, iri lieu of making and preserving a separate record, Members rely on the Exchange's. retention of the identities ofthe Members that execliteanonymous trades on the Exchange, for the period specified Rule 17a-4(a), to satisfy the requirements ofRules 17a-3(a)(1) and 17a-4(a) under the Exchange Act. The Staff notes, however, that a Member has the responsibilityto make, keep current, and preserve records of all purchases and sales of securities in accordance with Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4 ofthe Exchange Act for trades on BYX ifthe Member knows the identity ofthe contra-party. These exemptive and no-action positions are subject to modification or revocation if at any time the Commission or Staff determines that such action is necessary or appropriate in furtherance ofthe purposes ofthe Exchange Act. In addition, these positions are based solely upon the representations you have made and are limited strictly to the facts and conditions described in your incoming letter. Any different facts or circumstances, including any change to 4 This Staff position applies only to trades that Members execute on the Exchange's Trading System. This Staff position does not apply to orders routed to an away trading center for execution. S In this regard, we note your representation that, one year after the Trading System becomes fully operational, you will review trade data to determine the actual percentage of same firm volume versus total volume in high and low volume securities to confirm that this number is not material, and that you will create and maintain a record ofyour determination. 6 See, e.g., Regulation NMS, Exchange Act ReI. No. 49325 (February 26, 2004), 69 Fed. Reg. 11126, 11137 (March 9,2004) ("A broker-dealer still must
seek the most advantageous terms reasonably available under the circumstances for all customer orders. A broker-dealer must carry out a regular and rigorous review ofthe quality of market centers to evaluate its best execution policies, including the determination as to which markets it routes customer order flow.").
Mr. Anders Franzon
October 12,2010 the operation ofthe Exchange, may require a different response.7 Finally, we express no view with respect to other questions the proposed activities ofthe Exchange or any Members relying on this relief may raise, including the applicability of any other federal or state laws or the applicability of self-regulatory organization rules concerning customer account statements or confirmations. For the Commission,
by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority,8
7 For example, the continued availabilitY ofthese positions is dependent on same firm volume as a percentage of total volume in fact not being material for either high or low trading volume securities one year following the launch ofthe Exchange and thereafter. 8 17 CFR § 200.30-3(a)(32).
October 6, 2010
Mr. James 1. Eastman
Associate Director and Chief Counsel
Division ofTrading and Markets
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20549-0001
Re: Request for a Limited Exemption !i'om Paragraph (a)(2)(i)(A) of Rule lOb-I 0 Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act") and Request for NoAction Relief ti'om Rules 1Ob-l 0(a)(2), 17a-3(a)(I) and 17a-4(a) Under the Act Dear Mr. Eastman:
BATS Y-Exchange, Inc. ("BYX" or the "Exchange") respectfully requests a limited exemption from paragraph (a)(2)(i)(A) of Rule lOb-I 0' under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Act") on behalf of members of the Exchange that execute trades on the Exchange for their customers ("Members"). The Exchange will operate a tillly automated electronic book ("order book") for orders to buy or sell securities ("orders") with a continuous, automated matching function which will provide for strict price-time priority execution ("Trading System"). The order book and rules also provide for post trade anonymity tlU'ough settlement for trades executed through BYX.' BYX also requests, on behal f of its Members, your assurance that the staff of the Division ofTrading and Markets ("Staff") will not recommend that the Commission take any enforcement action under paragraph (a) of Rule IOb-IO under the Act in connection with the activities of Members executing orders for their customers in the circumstances described below. Specifically, BYX requests this relief to permit a Member to indicate on a customer confirmation that the Member acted as agent (where the Member submits a customer's order on BYX in the Member's role as the customer's agent (hereinafter "Customer Order")) and the order is executed in a trade with an anonymous contra-party that turns out to be the Member or one of its affiliates trading in a principal (including proprietary) capacity (hereinafter "Principal Order"), so long as the conditions set out below are met and the Member otherwise complies with all other Paragraph (I) orRule lOb-tO under the Act provides the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or I<Commission") authority to issue exemptions from the requirements contained in paragraphs (a) and (b) of the rules promulgated under the Act. As explained herein the Exchange does not request an exemption for when it reveals the identity of a Member 01' a Member's clearing finn: (i) for regulatory purposes or to comply with all order of a COliI'I or arbitrator; 01' (ii) when a Qualified Clearing Agency (as defined in Exchange Rule I.S(u)) such as the National Securities Clearing Corporation ceases to act fol' a Member or the Member's clenring firm, and determines not to guarantee the settlement of the member's trades, See BYX Rule 11,15. TEL. 913,815,7000 I FAX. 913.815.7119 I 8050 M,IRSHAI.I. DRIVE. SUITE 120 I LENEXA. KS 66214·1585 I BATSTRADING.COM 2
Mr. James 1. Eastman
October G, 2010 requirements of Rule lOb-lOin conlinning the customer's order, including paragraph (a)(2)(i) thereof. This request for no-action relief is limited, however, to those situations in which the following requirements are met: (1) the representatives of the Member or its affiliates submitting Principal Orders do not have knowledge about Customer Orders submitted by the Member and the Member representatives submitting Customer Orders do not have knowledge about Principal Orders submitted by the Member or its aniliates (the "No Knowledge Requirement"); and (2) the Member does not determine 01' influence the selection of the contra-party(ies) against which such Customer Orders will be executed (the "Parity Requirement"). Finally, BYX requests certain no-action relief II'OIn the requirements of Rules 17a-3(a)(1) and 17a-4(a) under the Act, as described below. A. Background - BYX BYX is a registered national securities exchange under Section 6 of the Exchange Act,' The Members of the Exchange ("Members") consist of those broker-dealers admitted to Membership and entitled to enter orders in, and receive executions through, the Exchange's order book 01' otherwise. The Exchange will operate an order book for orders with a continuous, automated matching function, in compliance with the Exchange's rules and Regulation NMS under the Act ("Reg NMS"). Liquidity will be derived from orders to buy and orders to sell submitted to the Exchange electronically by its Members from remote locations. The order book and the Exchange's rules will provide for strict price-time priority execution. Under Rule 11.12, orders will be prioritized on a strict price-time basis, first by price and then by time. Incoming orders are first matched for execution against orders in the BATS order book. Orders that cannot be executed are eligible for routing to away trading centers.' All trades will be executed through the Exchange's Trading System on an anonymous basis. The transaction reports produced by the Trading System will indicate the details of transactions executed in the Trading System but shall not reveal contra patty identities. Transactions executed in the Trading System will also be cleared and settled anonymously.' The order book's matching system algorithm permits orders originated by a BYX member to execute against other orders from the same participant on the same basis as orders tl'Om other Members. In the order book's handling of displayed orders, which is based on strict BYX received approval of its application for registration as a national securities exchange on August 13, 20 IO. See Exchange Act Release No. 62716 (August 13,20 I0). Exchange rules cited herein werc approved as part of the application. Sec BYX Rule 11.13. The Exchange understands that the exemptive and no-action rcliefwould not apply to any situation in which the Trading System routes an order to an away trading center for execution, as such executions would be governed by the rules of
tile away trading center. Except for the conditions set forth in BYX Rule 11.15. See supra n. 2. TEL. 913.815.7000 I FAX. 913.815.7119 I 8050 MARSHALL DRIVE, SUITE 120 I LENEXA, KS 66214·1585 I BATSTRADING.COM
Mr. James L. Eastman
October 6, 20 I0 price-time priority, a Member could receive an execution against itself, and under the Exchange's Rules, the Member would not know that it was the contra-side of the trade at the time of execution. BYX does permit a Member to prevent its incoming orders ii'om being executed against its own trading interest. Specifically, Members have the ability to use match trade prevention ("MTP Modifier"). Once set, the system will not execute the order against the Member's trading interest submiltedunder the same unique identifier.' For example, if Member l, a Member of the Exchange, submits an order to sell with the MTP modifier, the system will determine whether Member I has a bid that is at the best bid price for the security under the same unique identifier as the order to sell. If Member I 's bid is first in time among several Member bids at the best price, the system will, in accordance with Member I's instructions, cancel 01' adjust either or both of the orders when the matching contra party order has the same unique identifier. 7 B. Rule IOb-l 0
i. Conlra-Parly identity Requirement
Rule IOb-l 0, among other things, requires a broker-dealer to disclose to its customers the identity of the party the broker-dealer sold to 01' bought ii'om to fill the customer's order. Specifically, under paragraph (i)(A) of Rule lOb-IO(a)(2), when a broker-dealer is acting as agent for a customer, some other person, 01' for both the customer and some other person, the broker-dealer must disclose "[t]he name of the person Ii'om whom the security was purchased, 01' to whom it was sold, for such customer or the fact that the information will be furnished upon written request of such customer" (the "Contra-Party Identity Requirement"). A broker-dealer can provide this information on the confirmation, or it has the option to provide the information to a customer at a later time after receiving a written request from the customer. A broker-dealer has this option as long as it discloses on the confirmation that the contra-party information is available upon written request. Trades are executed with total anonymity at BYX, where the identity of the actual contraparty is not revealed when the trade is executed.' Therefore, Members will not know the identity of the party to whom they sold securities or from whom they purchased securities. Without this information, Members cannot comply with the Contra-Party Identity Requirement. To permit BYX Members to utilize BYX without violating Rule IOb-I 0, the Exchange is seeking an exemption, on behalf of such Members, from the Contra-Party Identity Requirement when Members execute transactions at BYX. 6 See I3YX Rule 11.9(1). Members lise the MTP modifier for compliance and business reasons. For example, using the modifier prevents order flow from appearing as a wash sale on an Exchange or broker/dealers' compliance reports. Additionally, using the modifier allows firms to internalize order flow rather than sending it to an exchange for execution, 8 Except for the conditions set forth in BYX Rule 11.15. See supra u. 2. TEL. 913.815.7000 I FAX. 913.815.7119 I 8050 MARSHALL DRIVE. SUITE 120 I LENEXA. KS 66214-1585 I BATSTRADING.COM
Mr. James L. Eastman
October 6, 20 I0
The Contra-Party Identity Requirement, in conjunction with the other requirements of paragraph (a)(2) of Rule IOb-l 0, is designed to provide customers with information that could alert them to potential conflicts of interest their broker-dealer may have had when handling their orders.' The Exchange believes an exemption from the Contra-Party Identity Requirement when Member trades through BYX would not diminish the public policy and investor protection objectives of the Contra- Party Identity Requirement of Rule IOb-I O. The Exchange believes the potential for a conflict of interest is less likely in those circumstances when a Member trades through BYX because the trades are executed at the best price available on the Exchange and the contra-party is determined based upon multiple factors not controlled by the Member. In such situations, Members are not permitted the discretion in executing the order that would normally give rise to the opportunity for a conflict of interest.
2. Identification as Agent on Co/?firmation
The Exchange requests no-action relief, on behalf of its Members, to permit Members to indicate on a customer confirmation that the Member has acted as agent where the Member submits a customer's order through the electronic trading facilities of BYX, in the Member's role as the customer's agent, and the order is executed in a trade with an anonymous contra-party that turns out to be the Member or one of its affiliates trading in a principal (including proprietary) capacity. a. No Knowledge Requirement This request is limited to those circumstances in which the representatives of a Member and its affiliates submitting Principal Orders do not have knowledge about Customer Orders submitted by the Member, and the Member representatives submitting Customer Orders have no knowledge about Principal Orders submitted by the Member or its affiliates. A Member will be able to satisfy the No Knowledge Requirement if it implements and utilizes an effective system of internal controls such as appropriate information barriers, that operate to prevent the representatives of the Member or its affiliates submitting Principal Orders from obtaining knowledge about the Customer Orders submitted by the Member, and the representative of the Members submitting Customer Orders from obtaining knowledge about the Principal Orders submitted by the Member or its affiliates. To be etIective, such a system of internal controls must include specific policies and procedures that prevent each Principal Order submitter separated by the information barriers from obtaining knowledge regarding Customer Orders submitted by the Member, and each Customer Order submitter separated by the information barriers from obtaining knowledge regarding Principal Orders submitted by the Member or its affiliates. b. Parity Requirement , Paragraph (a)(2) of Rule IOb-I 0 requires a broker-dealer to disclose on a confirmation to a customer the capacity in which the broker-dealer handled the customer's order (i.e., as agent or principal), and whether the bl'Okel'~dealer acted as agent for some other person, or as agent for both the customer and some other persoll. Paragraph (i)(D) of Rule IOb-I 0(a)(2) requires a broker-dealer to disclose to its customer the source and amount of remuneration received, or to be received, by the broker-dealer in connection with the trade. TEL. 913.815.7000 I FAX. 913.815.71 19 I 8050 MARSHALL DRtVE. SUITE t20 I LENEXA, KS 6621.-1585 I BATSTRADtNG.COM
Mr. James 1. Eastman
October 6, 20 I0
In addition to this No Knowledge Requirement, this request is limited to those situations in which the Member does not in any way determine or intluence the selection of the trading interest against which a customer order will be executed." As stated, BYX's order book will not support functionality that would allow a broker-dealer to select or int1uence against whom its orders will be executed." Where the Customer Order and the Principal Order are executed against each other by the order book, a Member indicating in the confirmation that the finn has acted as agent does not increase the risk of fi'aud against the customer, where the No Knowledge Requirement and the Parity Requirement are met. To the contrary, the matching of the agency and the proprietary trading interests occurs at the best price available and the contra-side is determined based upon priority factors established by the rules of the Exchange. 12 Moreover, the proposed action does not diminish investor protection because it does not relieve a Member's duty of best execution."
C. Books and Record Retention
Rule l7a-3(a)(l) under the Act requires that broker-dealers make and keep current records of all purchases and sales of securities, including "the name or other designation of the person from whom purchased or received or to whom sold or delivered." Rule 17a-4(a) under the Act requires that the records be preserved for six (6) years, the first two (2) years "in an easily accessible place." The SEC has issued no-action relief for Rule lOb-I 0 under these circumstances. See Leiters from Paula " Jenson, Deputy Chief Counsel, Division of Trading and Markets, to Eric W. Hess, General Counsel and Secretary, EDGA Exchange, Inc. and EDGX Exchange, Inc. (May 26, 20 I0); Leller fl'o", James L, Eastman, Associate Director and Chief Counsel, Division of Trading and Markets, to Eric Swanson, SVP, General Counsel, BATS Exchange, Inc. (February 25, 20 I0); LeiteI' li'OJH Brian A. Bussey, Assistant Chief Counsel, Division of Trading and Markets, to J. Craig Long, Foley & Lardner LLP (October 23, 2008); Letter from Brian A. Bussey, Assistant ChiefCoullsel, Division of Market Regulation, to James C. Yang, Chief Regulatory Officer, National Stock Exchange (October 13,2006); Leller from Brian A. Bussey, Assistant Chief Counsel, Division of Market Regulation, to Edward S, Knight, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, Nasdaq (January 26, 2005); and Letter from Brian A. Bussey, Assistant Chief Counsel, Division of Market Regulation, to Aleksandra Radakovic, Vice President, lP Morgan Securities Inc. (August 4, 2005). Ifsueh functionality were to be offered in the future, BYX understands that the relief requested by this " leiter would not apply to this functionality. 12 The Exchange expects that same firm volume, i.e., an execution in which a firm's agency order is matched against the same finn's principal (including proprietaJ)') trading interest, as a percentage of total volume in a security through the Trading System will not be material for either high 01' low trading volume securities. The Exchange represents that as pm1 of its regulatory program, the Exchange will review trade data to determine the percentage of same firm volume versus total volume in high and low volume securities to confirm that this number is not material. The Exchange will create and maintain a record of such determinations. 13 See Regulation NMS, Exchange Act Release No, 49325 (Feb. 26, 2004), 69 Fed. Reg. 11126, 11137 (March 9, 2004)("A broker-dealer still must seek the most advantageous terms reasonably available uuder the circumstances for all customer orders. A broker-dealer must carry Ollt a regular and rigorous review of the quality of the market centers to evaluate its best execution policies, including the determination as to which markets it routes customer order Oow,") TEL, 913,815.7000 I FAX. 913.815,7119 I 8050 MARSHALL DRIVF, SUITF 120 I LFNFXiI, KS 66214-1585 I BilTSTRilDING.COM
Mr. James L. Eastman
October 6, 2010
The Exchange asks that the Commission staff not recommend enforcement action to the Commission if, in lieu of making and preserving a separate record, a broker-dealer relies on the Exchange's retention of the identities of Members that execute anonymous trades through BYX to satisfy requirements of Rules 17a-3(a)( I) and 17a-4(a) uncleI' the Act. A broker-dealer would retain the responsibility to make, keep current and preserve records of all purchase and sales of securities in accordance with Exchange Act Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4 for trades through BYX if the broker-dealer knows of the contra-party, including those instances where BYX discloses the contra-party to a trade.
In view of the foregoing, the Exchange respectfully requests that the Commission issue an exemption and such other relief as reflected in this letter. If you have any questions, please contact me at (913) 815-7154. Sincerely, Anders Franzon VP, Associate General Counsel cc: Mr. Joseph Furey (SEC) Mr. Raymond Lombardo (SEC) Mr. Ignacio Sandoval (SEC) Ms. Heidi Pilpel (SEC) Mr. Eric Swanson (BATS) TEL.913.815.7000 I FAX. 913.815.7119 I 8050 MARSHALL ORIVE. SUITE 120 I LENEXA. KS 66214·1585 I BATSTRADlNG.COM
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
More like this from SEC
SEC published 7 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.
Source: Securities and Exchange Commission — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added · updated