Individual decision · SEC · 30 Sep 2005
The Division confirms that executions in the Pacific Exchange's proposed Portfolio Crossing Service are exempt from the tick test of Rule 10a-1 under Regulation SHO’s Pilot Program, provided such executions occur after 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time but before 4:00 a.m. Eastern Time. Additionally, Equity Trading Permit Holders may mark Portfolio Crossing Service orders as "short" rather than "short exempt" in reliance on the Order Masking Letter, provided the service meets the conditions set forth therein. These interpretations expire upon the termination of the Pilot Program, currently scheduled for April 28, 2006.
October 13, 2005
Timothy Elliott Assistant General Counsel - Regulatory Archipelago Holdings, Inc. 100 South Wacker Drive, Suite 1800 Chicago, Illinois 60606
Re:
Request for Clarification Regarding Rule 10a-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 200(g) of Regulation SHO for the Pacific Exchange, Inc.'s Proposed Portfolio Crossing Service File No.: TP-05-87
Dear Mr. Elliott:
In your letter dated September 30, 2005, as supplemented by telephone conversations with the staff of the Division of Market Regulation ("Division"), you requested on behalf of the Pacific Exchange, Inc. ("PCX" or "Exchange"), through its wholly owned subsidiary PCX Equities, Inc. ("PCXE"), clarification regarding Rule 10a-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Exchange Act"), and Rule 200(g) of Regulation SHO in connection with trades executed through the Archipelago Exchange's ("ArcaEx") Portfolio Crossing Service ("PCS") and on behalf of Equity Trading Permit Holders ("ETP Holders") that execute trades through the proposed PCS. 1 Your request is limited to those trades that ETP Holders execute in the PCS process.
A copy of your letter is attached to this response. By including a copy of your correspondence, we avoid having to repeat or summarize the facts you presented. The defined terms in this letter have the same meaning as in your letter, unless otherwise noted.
In your letter you make the following representations, among others:
(i) You state that ArcaEx is an all-electronic stock market which trades equity securities listed with the New York Stock Exchange, Nasdaq, American Stock Exchange and Pacific Exchange, as well as exchange-traded funds and other exchange-listed securities. Currently, ArcaEx operates as the exclusive equities trading facility of PCXE, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the PCX. Only registered broker-dealers who have applied for and received an Equity Trading Permit are permitted to trade on ArcaEx.
(ii) You state that the ArcaEx matching engine follows price-time priority rules for displayed orders and supports additional order types to augment traditional limit and market orders. ArcaEx maintains an electronic file of orders, called the ArcaEx Book. ArcaEx ranks and maintains limit orders on the ArcaEx Book based on a number of execution processes based on order type. At the ETP Holder's option, ArcaEx may route orders that are not matched on the ArcaEx Book to a different market center for execution.
(iii) You state that the proposed PCS rules would provide ETP Holders an alternative method of trade execution and reporting for qualifying portfolio trade activity. Under the proposed rules, ETP Holders would be able to submit qualifying cross orders which are part of a portfolio basket trade in equity securities for execution. Qualifying baskets would be required to include matched buy and sell orders for a minimum of 15 securities having a minimum dollar value of $1 million. ETP Holders would be able to submit eligible orders into PCS at any time trading occurs on the Exchange (currently, 4:00 a.m. Eastern Time to 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time). However, these orders will be held by the system and will not execute until at least one minute after the close of trading on the Exchange, i.e., 8:01 p.m. Eastern Time. Each side of the coupled orders entered into PCS would execute without regard to the priority of other orders entered into PCS or ArcaEx.
In view of these representations, you have requested clarification that: (i) the executions in PCS will be exempt from the tick test of Rule 10a-1 under Rule 202T of Regulation SHO's pilot program ("Pilot Program") because such executions will occur after 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time but before 4:00 a.m. Eastern Time; and (ii) ETP Holders may mark PCS Orders submitted during the trading day as "short" rather than "short exempt" in reliance on the Order Masking Letter, 2 provided that PCS as a market center meets the conditions set forth in such Order Masking Letter.
Response:
Rule 10a-1
Rule 200(a) of Regulation SHO 3 defines the term "short sale," and Rule 10a-1 governs short sales generally. Paragraph (a) of Rule 10a-1 covers transactions in any security registered on a national securities exchange, if trades in such security are reported pursuant to an "effective transaction reporting plan" ("Reported Securities"). A short sale of a Reported Security may not be effected at a price either: (1) below the last reported price of a transaction reported in the consolidated transaction reporting system ("minus tick"); or (2) at the last reported price if that price is lower than the last reported different price ("zero-minus tick").
Rule 202T of Regulation SHO 4 is a temporary rule that creates procedures for the Commission to establish, through separate orders, a Pilot Program. Pursuant to Rule 202T, the Commission may exclude designated securities from the operation of the "tick" test of Rule 10a-1(a) and any short sale price test of any exchange or national securities association (collectively, a "Price Test"). The Commission has approved two orders relating to the Pilot Program. 5 Pursuant to the Pilot Orders, there are three different categories of securities in the Pilot Program: (a) the securities identified in Appendix A of the first Pilot Order that are never subject to short sale Price Tests; (b) the securities that are eligible for the Pilot Program from 4:15 p.m. Eastern Time until the open of the consolidated tape the next day; and (c) all other securities, which are not subject to a short sale Price Test from the close of the consolidated tape until the open of the consolidated tape the next day 6 (the "Category C Pilot Securities"). The Pilot Program began on May 2, 2005 and will end on April 28, 2006. The Commission may from time to time approve further orders affecting the Pilot Program.
Accordingly, on the basis of your representations and the facts presented, and without necessarily concurring in your analysis, the Division hereby confirms that executions in PCS will be exempt from the tick test of Rule 10a-1 under the Pilot Program, provided that such executions occur after the close of the consolidated tape (8:00 p.m. Eastern Time) but before the open of the consolidated tape the next day (4:00 a.m. Eastern Time). This interpretation is subject to change in the event that the times at which the consolidated tape opens and closes change in the future. In addition, the suspension of the tick test for the Pilot Securities will expire upon termination of the Pilot Program, currently scheduled for April 28, 2006.
Rule 200(g)
Rule 200(g) of Regulation SHO provides that a broker-dealer must mark all sell orders of any equity security as "long," "short," or "short exempt." Rule 200(g)(2) requires that a short sale order must be marked "short exempt" if the seller is relying on an exception from the tick test of Rule 10a-1 of the Exchange Act or any short sale Price Test of any exchange or national securities association. Since short sales in Pilot Securities effected during any pilot period would be exempt from any such Price Test, these orders would be required to be marked "short exempt." However, on April 15, 2005, the Division issued the Order Masking Letter to the Securities Industry Association confirming that the Division would not recommend to the Commission enforcement action against a broker-dealer that marks "short," rather than "short exempt," a short sale effected in any security included in the Regulation SHO Pilot Program. 7 Each broker-dealer relying on the Order Masking Letter must route orders during the Pilot Program to market centers that have certain "masking" processes in place. Because PCS Orders will not be subject to the tick test, as they qualify as "Category C Pilot Securities," an ETP Holder may mark such orders as "short," rather than "short exempt," if all of the conditions set forth in the Order Masking Letter are satisfied.
Accordingly, on the basis of your representations and the facts presented, and without necessarily concurring in your analysis, the Division hereby confirms that ETP Holders may mark PCS Orders submitted during the trading day as "short" rather than "short exempt" in reliance on the Order Masking Letter relating to Pilot Securities, provided that PCS as a market center meets the conditions set forth in the Order Masking Letter. 8 This interpretation is also subject to change in the event that the times at which the consolidated tape opens and closes changes in the future. In addition, the suspension of the tick test for the Pilot Securities will expire upon termination of the Pilot Program, currently scheduled for April 28, 2006.
The foregoing interpretations regarding Rule 10a-1 of the Exchange Act and Rule 200(g) of Regulation SHO are based solely on your representations and the facts presented, and are strictly limited to the application of these rules to the proposed transactions as described above. Such transactions should be discontinued, pending presentation of the facts for our consideration, in the event that any material change occurs with respect to any of those facts and representations. The interpretations are subject to modification or revocation if at any time the Commission or the Division determines that such action is necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Exchange Act.
In addition, your attention is directed to the anti-fraud and anti-manipulation provisions of the Exchange Act, particularly Sections 9(a) and 10(b), and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Responsibility for compliance with these and any other applicable provisions of the federal securities laws must rest with the Exchange. The Division expresses no view with respect to any other questions that the proposed transactions may raise, including, but not limited to, the adequacy of the disclosure concerning, and the applicability of any federal or state laws to, the proposed transactions.
Very truly yours,
James A. Brigagliano Assistant Director
Endnotes
1 PCX submitted this request letter in conjunction with a proposed rule change filed by PCX under Section 19 of the Exchange Act, and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, to add certain PCXE rules to establish PCS. See SR-PCX-2005-73, Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52472 (September 20, 2005).
2 See no-action letter to Ira Hammerman, Senior Vice President and General Counsel of the Securities Industry Association (April 15, 2005).
3 17 CFR 242.200.
4 17 CFR 242.202T.
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50104 (July 28, 2004), 69 FR 48032 (August 6, 2004), and Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50747 (November 29, 2004), 69 FR 70480 (December 6, 2004).
6 The consolidated tape currently operates from 4:00 a.m. Eastern Time to 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time. However, the times at which the consolidated tape opens and closes may change in the future.
7 See no-action letter to Ira Hammerman, Senior Vice President and General Counsel of the Securities Industry Association (April 15, 2005).
8 PCS must (a) institute procedures to "mask" the short sale character of transactions so that they are executed without regard to the applicable Price Test; (b) monitor on a regular basis and re-institute the Price Test for any security that ceases to be included in the Pilot Program; and (c) make, keep, and furnish promptly upon request, the books and records of such activities as required under applicable rules and regulations. Id.
Incoming Letter:
The Incoming Letter is in Acrobat format.
SEP-30-2005 13:47 ARCHIPELAGO
W archipelago.
September 30,2005
VIA OVERNIGHT MAIL
Mr. James Brigagliano
Assistant Director
Division of Market Regulation, Office of Trading Practices US. Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, NE Washington, D.C. 20549-9303 Re: Request for Clarification Regarding Rule IOa-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 200(9) of Regulation SHO for the Pacific 14:wchangt., Inc.'s Prouosed Portfolio Crossing Service Dear Mr. Brigagliano:
The Pacific Exchange, Inc. ("PCX or "Exchange"), through its wholly owned subsidiary PCX Equities, Inc. ("PCXE), respectfully requests clarification regarding Rule 10a-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Act") and Rule 200(g) of Regulation SHO (17 CFR 242.200 et seq.) in connection with trades executed through the Archipelago Exchange's ("ArcaEx") Portfolio Crossing Service ("PCS') and on behalf of Equity Trading Permit Holders ("ETP Holders") that execute trades through the proposed PCS. The Exchange submits this letter in conjunction with a proposed rule change filed by the Exchange under Section 19 of the Act, and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, to add certain PCXE rules to establish PCS.' A copy of the proposed rule change is attached to this letter. The request is limited to those trades that ETP Holders execute in the PCS process. A. Background -Description of ArcaEx The Archipelago Exchange ("ArcaEx") is an all-electronic stock market which trades equity securities listed with the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), Nasdaq, American Stock Exchange (AMEX) and Pacific Exchange, as well as exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and other exchange-listed securities. Currently, ArcaEx operates as the exclusive equities trading facility of PCX Equities, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Pacific Exchange, ' See SR-PCX-2005-73, SEC Release No. 34-52472 (September 20,2005). Archipelago Holdings, Inc. 100 South Wacker;Drivc Suite 1800 Chicago, Illinois 60606 1' 312.960.1696 li 312.960.1369 uncw.archipclay,.com
SEP-30-2005 13:47 ARCHIPELAGO
September 30,2005
Mr. James Brigagliano
Inc. (PCX).' Only registered broker-dealers who have applied for and received an Equity Trading Permit are permitted to trade on ArcaEx. The ArcaEx matching engine follows price-time priority mles for displayed orders and supports additional order types to augment traditional limit and market orders. ArcaEx maintains an electronic file of orders, called the ArcaEx Book. ArcaEx ranks and maintains limit orders on the ArcaEx Book based on a number of execution processes based on order type. At the ETP Holder's option, ArcaEx may route orders that are not matched on the ArcaEx Book to a different market center for execution. B. Proposed Rule to Adopt PCS The proposed PCS rules would provide ETP Holders an alternative method of trade execution and reporting for qualifying portfolio trade activity. Under the proposed mles, ETP Holders would be able to submit qualifying cross orders which are part of a portfolio basket trade in equity securities for execution. Qualifying baskets would be required to include matched buy and sell orders for a minimum of 15 securities having a minimum dollar value of $1 million. ETP Holders would be able to submit eligible orders into PCS at any time trading occurs on the Exchange (currently, 4:00 a.m. Eastern Time to 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time). However, these orders would be held by the system and would not execute until at least one minute after the close of trading on the Exchange, i.e., 8:01 p.m. Eastern Time. Each side of the coupled orders entered into PCS would execute without regard to the priority of other orders entered into PCS or ArcaEx.
C. Short Sale Regulation
As discussed above, ETP Holders would be able to enter PCS Orders at any time during the Exchange's trading day. However, all PCS Orders would be held by the Exchange so that PCS executions occur after the close of trading. Because executions in PCS would occur after 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time but before 4:00 a.m. Eastern Time, the Exchange believes such transactions would be exempt from the tick test of SEC Rule l0a-I under the SEC's pilot program.3 To the extent the Commission determines that relief from short 2 The SEC approved the establishment of ArcaEx as a facility of the PCX Equities, Inc. in 2001. See SEC Release No. 34-44983 (Oclober 25,2001); also see SEC Release No. 34-52497 (September 22.20051, an order approving certain rule changes designed to facilitate a merger of the Exchange and Archipelago Holdings, Inc. 3 See Rule 202T and Securities Exchange Act Releases No. 50103 (July 28,2004) and No. 50104 (July 28, 2004).
SEP-30-2005 13:47 ARCHIPELAGO
September 30,2005
Mr. James Brigagliano sale price test regulation from PCS is appropriate or required, the Exchange requests such re~ief.~ PCS Orders submitted by ETP Holders during any particular trading day will be subject to the order marking requirements of Regulation SHO. The Commission recently granted noaction relief to enable broker-dealers to mark exempt short sales as "short" rather than "short exempt" (the "Order Masking Letter") under certain circum~tances.~ The Exchange is of the view that the Order Masking Letter applies to the PCS on the same terms as it applies to normal trading on ~rca~x.~ Therefore, the Exchange believes it is not necessary to seek the same no-action relief for PCS, provided that PCS as a market center meets the conditions set forth in the Order Masking Letter. To the extent the Commission determines that relief is appropriate or required under Regulation SHO for PCS, the Exchange requests such relief. We understand the interpretations requested in this letter might be subject to change in the event the timing of the opening and closing of the consolidated tape is modified or the pilot program is suspended by the Commission. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to call me at 312-442-7170. Sincerely, Timothy Elliott Assistant General Counsel - Regulatory Archipelago Holdings, Inc. cc: Liza Orr, Market Regulation Kevin O'Hara Janet Angstadt 'The Exchange notes that the Commission has granted exemptive relief from SEC Rule 10a-1 in thc past for other self-regulatory organization after hours crossing facilities. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-29237 (May 24, 1991). 'See April 15,2005 no-action lctter to Ira Hammerman, Senior Vice President and General Counsel of the Securities Industry Association. As proposed, the PCS is simply one aspect of the ArcaEx rule set.
SEP-30-2005 13:47 ARCHIPELAGO
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
(Release No. 34-52472; File No. SR-PCX-2005-73) September 20,2005 Self-Regulatory Organizations; Pacific Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to the Establishment of a Portfolio Crossing Service Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ('Act")' and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,' notice is hereby given that on June 7,2005, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. ("PCX" or "Exchange") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") the proposed rule change as described in Items I, 11, and 111 below, which Items have been prepared by the PCX. On September 14, 2005, the PCX filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.3 The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change, as amended, from interested persons.
SEP-30-2005 13:47 ARCHIPELAGO
(http://www.pacificex.com). at the PCX's principal office, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
11. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis
for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing w-ith the Commission, the PCX included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The PCX has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
SEP-30-2005 13:47 ARCHIPELAGO
A. Submitting Orders into PCS
SEP-30-2005 13:47 ARCHIPELAGO
B. Execution of Orders in PCS
As discussed above, ETP Holders may enter PCS Orders at any time during the Exchange's trading day.6 When the Exchange receives a PCS Order, it would hold such order until the end of trading, currently 5:00 p.m. Pacific Time. All PCS Orders received during any particular trading day would be executed simultaneously in PCS at least one minute after the close oftrading on the Exchange but in no event later than 8:59 p.m. Pacific Time. Each individual order component of a PCS Order would not interact with other PCS Orders or other orders residing in the Arca book7 in any way. As set forth in the proposed rules, PCS would not be subject to many trading rules applicable to normal trading on Arca~x.' Trading halts occurring during the normal market hours in one or more individual stocks would not affect the execution of PCS Orders. However, if there is a market-wide halt in a symbol (= a halt initiated pursuant to PCXE circuit breaker rules) that is still in effect at 1:00 p.m. Pacific Time, the Exchange would halt trading in such symbol through its PCS.
C. Trade Reporting in PCS
The Exchange would handle trade reporting for PCS executions in one of two different ways, depending on whether a particular PCS component execution involved exchange-listed or Nasdaq securities. With respect to exchange listed securities, the Exchange would not disseminate last sale reports in the individual exchange-listed stocks that comprise the The New York Stock Exchange's ("NYSE") Crossing Session I1 is another after hours session which allows member firms the ability to cross program trades. NYSE's Crossing Session 11, however, does not accept orders until after the close of regular trading. 7 - See PCXE Rule I. 1(a). 8 For example, because executions in PCS would occur after 8:00 p.m. ET but before 8:00 a.m. ET, PCS trades would not be subject to short sale price tests under the SEC's pilot program. See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 50104 (July 28, 2004), 69 FR 48032 (August 6,2004); and 50747 (November 29,2004), 69 FR 70480 (December 6,2004).
SEP-30-2005 13:48 ARCHIPELAGO
component order executions in PCS. Instead, PCS executions in exchange-listed securities would be transmitted to SIAC for publication on the "tape" on an aggregate basis9 The system would calculate the total shares and total dollar amounts of all exchange-listed symbols executed in PCS in any particular trading day. The Exchange would then transmit this total as an administrative message over the high speed line to SIAC. The Exchange would not consolidate the exchange-listed volume attributable to PCS with the volume in those securities occurring in the non-PCS trading session occurring on ArcaEx. With respect to Nasdaq-listed securities, the Exchange would report symbols individually to Nasdaq as regular transactions as of the following m~rning.'~ This reporting procedure mirrors the current ArcaEx trade reporting practice for Nasdaq trades occurring after 3:30 p.m. Pacific Time. All PCS executions, whether exchange-listed or Nasdaq securities, will be "covered sales" occurring on the Exchange for the purposes of Section 3 1 of the Act. The Exchange will report PCS activity to the Commission in Part I1 of Form R3l. D. Commission Approval of Similar SRO Trading Sessions In the past, the Commission has approved the creation of crossing sessions operated by other self-regulatory organizations which provide for alternative execution and reporting services for exchange member portfolio trades." For example, the NYSE has operated its Crossing The Securities Industry Automation Corporation ("SIAC") is the information processor for exchange-listed securities. ArcaEx would coordinate with STAC to ensure it would be able to receive messages from ArcaEx reflecting aggregate PCS executions. lo Nasdaq is the securities information processor for Nasdaq-listed securities. Section 11 of the Nasdaq Unlisted Trading Privileges Plan deals with trade reporting for Nasdaq securities after 6:30 p.m. Eastern Time. I' Securities Exchange Act Release No. 29237 (May 24, 1991), 56 FR 24853 (May 31,
1991) (order approving SR-NYSE-90-52 and SR-NYSE-90-53, the "NYSE CS 11
Approval Order"). See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 38077 (December 23, 1996), 61 FR 69124 (December 31, 1996) (order approving SR-Amex-96-43, a rule
SEP-30-2005 13:48 ARCHIPELAGO
Session 11, which allows for the execution and reporting of crosses of multiple-stock aggregateprice buy and sell orders, for over thirteen years.'2 In the Commission's NYSE CS I1 Approval Order, the Commission explained its rationale for approving the NYSE's proposed rules: "the Commission believes that CS I1 would benefit the investing public by offering members the opportunity to enter crossing portfolio orders with their customers after-hours to be executed against each ~ther."'~ Inthe NYSE CS I1Approval Order, the Commission invited other exchanges to offer similar services to compete with the Crossing Session 11, stating, "if the regional exchanges or the NASD desire to compete with the OHT [Off-Hours Trading] facility, they could provide a similar service." The Exchange, in this filing, seeks to establish a service to compete with the NYSE Crossing Session 11. The Exchange believes that its proposed PCS would benefit the investing proposal to establish an Amex trading session to execute, after normal trading hours, '' certain aggregate-price basket trade orders). See NYSE CS I1 Approval Order. SR-NYSE-90-53, which was NYSE's proposing release for its Crossing Session 11, can be found at Securities Exchange Act Release No. 28640 (November 21, 1990), 55 FR 49739 (November 30, 1990) ("NYSE CS I1 Proposing Release"). l3 See NYSE CS I1 Approval Order at 13. In the NYSE CS I1 Proposing Release, the ESEoffered an additional rationale: "[Tlhe Exchange is trying to respond to the significant increase in overseas trading of listed stocks due to the export of orders from the United States resulting from structural and regulatory factors. In particular, the development of trading strategies involving the contemporaneous execution of multiple stocks at a single, aggregate price, often in conjunction with index options and futures, has resulted in a demand for their execution that will supplement the single-stock execution facilities traditionally offered by the NYSE." NYSE CS I1 Proposing Release at 2. The Commission stated that the establishment of a portfolio trade facility "could help to recapture overseas trades of US. stocks by providing a mechanism by which portfolio trades arranged off the floor can be effected in an exchange trading system." See NYSE CS I1 Approval Order at 13. The Commission felt that such a service would help to protect the investing public and benefit the marketplace overall given that the services would bring "institutional trades that currently are being exported overseas for execution within the purview of U.S. regulatory bodies." See NYSE CS I1 Approval Order at 13.
SEP-30-2005 13:48 ARCHIPELAGO
public by offering ETP Holders the opportunity to enter crossing portfolio orders to be executed against each other and would therefore provide investors and ETP Holders with greater opportunities for executing large portfolio trades. Request for Exemptive Relief In connection with the Exchange's request for approval of the proposed PCS, the Exchange is also requesting exemptive relief in a separate letter from Rule 11Aa3-1 under the Act in connection with trades executed through ArcaEx's PCS. In summary, the Exchange requests exemptive relief from the requirement in Rule 11Aa3-1 that the Exchange disseminate on a consolidated basis trading volume for each of the component securities executed on the Exchange's PCS. In addition, the Exchange has requested clarification kom the Commission with respect to the application of Rule 10a-1 under the Exchange Act and Regulation SHO.
2. Statutow Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change, as amended, is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the ~ct,'~ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the AC~," in
particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principals of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, and to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system. B. Self-Repulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. l4 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). l5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5),
SEP-30-2005 13:48 ARCHIPELAGO
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received from Members, Participants or Others Written comments on the proposed rule change were neither solicited nor received.
111. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission
Action
Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the Exchange consents, the Commission will:
(A) by order approve such proposed rule change, as amended, or (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change, as amended, should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic comments:
0 Use the Commission's Internet comment form (l~ttp:l/www.sec.aov/ruleslsro.shtml); or Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include File Number SR-PCX-2005- 73 on the subject line. Paper comments:
Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F Sheet, NE, Washington, DC 20549-9303.
SEP-30-2005 13:48 ARCHIPELAGO
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-PCX-2005-73. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (htt~://www.sec.eo~lrules/sro.shtml). Copies ofthe submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Section, Station Place, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the PCX. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
SEP-30-2005 13:48 ARCHIPELAGO
submissions should refer to File Number SR-PCX-2005-73 and should be submitted on or before [insert date 21 days from publication in the Federal Register]. For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.16 Jonathan G. Katz Secretary l6 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). TOTAL P.I3
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
More like this from SEC
SEC published 7 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.
Source: Securities and Exchange Commission — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added · updated