Rule · CFTC · 26 Feb 2013 · 2013-04252
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission issued a final rule amending 17 CFR Parts 10, 12, and 171 to simplify and clarify service, filing, and formatting requirements for administrative and reparations proceedings. The amendments replace formal affidavits of service with signed statements, explicitly permit electronic service and filing via email and fax, and reduce maximum brief lengths to enhance efficiency. Additionally, the Commission clarified the authority of Judgment Officers to conduct formal decisional proceedings and appointed Presiding Officers other than Administrative Law Judges in specific registration-related matters.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510. The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each week. Rules and Regulations Federal Register 12933 Vol. 78, No. 38 Tuesday, February 26, 2013 COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 17 CFR Parts 10, 12 and 171 Proceedings Before the Commodity Futures Trading Commission AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (‘‘Commission’’) is amending its Rules of Practice, Rules Relating to Reparation Proceedings, and its Rules Relating to Review of National Futures Association (‘‘NFA’’) Decisions in Disciplinary, Membership Denial, Registration and Membership Responsibility Actions, to simplify and clarify service, filing and formatting requirements, particularly those requirements applicable to electronic service and filing. The Commission is also amending its Rules Relating to Reparations Proceedings to clarify the authority of its Judgment Officers. DATES: Effective February 26, 2013. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jason Gizzarelli, Director, Office of Proceedings, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street NW., Washington, DC 20581. Telephone:
(202) 418–5395.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 2008, the Commission amended its rules to allow for service via electronic mail (‘‘email’’) for 17 CFR parts 10 and 12, and via facsimile (‘‘fax’’) for Part 12 (service by fax under Part 10 had been permitted by the Commission since 1998.) At that time, the Commission approved these additional means of service to take advantage of technological developments that would be faster and less costly than regular mail. Today, the Commission has amended 17 CFR Parts 10, 12 and 171 to simplify and refine the rules for service, filing and formatting. Additionally, the Commission has amended 17 CFR Parts 10 and 12 to clarify the role and authority of its Judgment Officers. The Commission believes these rule amendments will increase efficiencies and lower costs for parties and for the Commission in administrative enforcement proceedings, in reparations proceedings, and in the appellate review of NFA decisions. Also, the Commission has designed the amendments to the reparations rules to make the reparations forum less legalistic and more user-friendly for pro se parties. Confirmation of Service To ease the burden on parties in reparations cases, many of whom appear pro se, the amended rules drop the requirement of a formal affidavit of service and now require parties to submit a signed ‘‘statement of service’’ that: (1) Confirms that service has been made; (2) identifies each person served; (3) sets forth the date of service; and (4) recites the manner of service. The less formal and less burdensome statement of service effectively serves the same purpose as an affidavit of service:
promoting and assuring the full exchange of information among the parties by requiring service of submissions on all of the parties in the proceeding. A corresponding change has been made to the 17 CFR Part 10 rules regarding confirmation of service. Electronic Service The amendments to the service rules in 17 CFR parts 10 and 12 reflect the Commission’s experience with electronic filing since 2008, which generally has been positive. First, the amendments specifically provide that a party who consents to service by email must specify the email address to be used. Consent is required because it is not yet possible to assume universal access to electronic communication. Second, under these amendments, actual notice that an email or fax transmission was not received will defeat the presumption of receipt that service is complete on transmission and will compel the sender to take additional steps to affect service. Finally, consistent with 17 CFR 12.1(a), which provides that the reparations rules ‘‘shall be construed liberally so as to secure the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of the issues,’’ the Commission expects that as electronic technology continues to advance, its Proceedings Clerk and its presiding officials will provide guidance to parties on standards governing such technical specifications as data formatting, speed of transmission, means to transmit attachments, and security of communication. Filing and Formatting The amended rules simplify and harmonize the filing and formatting requirements contained in 17 CFR parts 10 and 12. First, the amended rules provide that parties filing by personal delivery, mail or commercial delivery service are no longer required to file any copies of an original. Second, the amended rules explicitly provide that parties filing electronically should not also send paper copies of the same documents to the Proceedings Clerk. Third, the amended rules reduce the maximum length of briefs in administrative proceedings from 60 to 50 pages and in reparations proceedings from 35 to 25 pages. Fourth, the amended rules simplify the formatting of filed documents, such as font size, spacing and related issues. Fifth, the amendments clarify that documents that are delivered in person, or delivered by first-class mail, by a more expeditious form of United States mail, or by overnight or similar commercial delivery service will be considered timely filed if they are delivered in person or mailed to the Proceedings Clerk within the time prescribed for filing. Finally, the Commission is also amending 17 CFR 171.8 to allow filing and service by fax and email. Judgment Officer On October 12, 2011, to promote the efficient use of the Commission’s budget and personnel resources, the Commission amended 17 CFR part 12 to authorize its Judgment Officers to conduct formal decisional proceedings. The new 17 CFR part 12 amendments issued today conform the definition of ‘‘Judgment Officer’’ to the authority of Judgment
Officers to conduct formal decisional proceedings. These new amendments also provide that Judgment Officers may conduct sua sponte discovery in voluntary decisional proceedings, as they can in summary and formal decisional proceedings. This
1 17 CFR 10.2(n) defines a ‘‘Presiding Officer’’ as ‘‘a member of the Commission, an Administrative Law Judge, or a hearing officer designated by the Commission to conduct a hearing on a specific matter, or the Commission itself * * *.’’ In some types of proceedings, statutory provisions constrain the choice of Presiding Officer. For example,
section 6(c)(4)(C)(iii) of the Commodity Exchange
Act (‘‘CEA’’), 7 U.S.C. 9(4)(C)(iii), requires that proceedings pursuant to section 6(c)(4), 7 U.S.C. 9(4), must be heard by either the Commission or an ALJ. By contrast, other provisions of the CEA leave the choice of Presiding Officer to the discretion of the Commission. For example, CEA section 8a(2), 7 U.S.C. 12a(2), which applies in certain circumstances where a court or administrative agency has previously made a determination regarding a registrant’s conduct, authorizes the Commission to revoke registration ‘‘with such a hearing as may be appropriate’’ and does not specify what type of official must preside. 2See generally 17 CFR 3.55 through 3.64 and 17 CFR 10.1(a). amendment will help ensure that the evidentiary record is adequately developed in voluntary decisional proceedings. The amendment to 17 CFR 10.8, which authorizes the Commission to appoint a Presiding Officer other than an administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) to conduct proceedings within the scope of 17 CFR part 10, unless some other provision of law requires the use of an ALJ in a particular category of proceeding,1 clarifies that Presiding Officers who are not ALJs can carry out the same functions as ALJs in certain proceedings to deny, condition, suspend, revoke or place restrictions on registration. Registration-related proceedings are subject to procedural rules set forth in the Commission’s rules at 17 CFR part 3, as well as the 17 CFR
part 10 Rules of Practice.2 This
amendment will make clear the Commission’s intent that references to ALJs in both 17 CFR part 10 and part 3 shall apply to non-ALJ Presiding Officers when the Commission appoints such Presiding Officers in registrationrelated proceedings. Prior to this amendment, the second sentence of 17 CFR 10.8 stated:
If the Commission determines that a proceeding within the scope of this subpart shall be conducted before a Presiding Officer who is not an Administrative Law Judge, all provisions of this part that refer to and grant authority to or impose obligations upon an Administrative Law Judge shall be read as referring to and granting authority to and imposing obligations upon the designated Presiding Officer. This amendment adds the phrase ‘‘or of Part 3 of this title’’ following the words ‘‘this part’’ in this sentence. Related Matters A. No Notice Is Required Under 5 U.S.C. 553 The Commission has determined that these amendments are exempt from the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553, which generally require notice of proposed rulemaking and provide other opportunities for public participation. According to the exemptive language of 5 U.S.C. 553, these amendments pertain to ‘‘rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice,’’ as to which there exists agency discretion not to provide notice. In addition, notice and public procedure are unnecessary in this case because the proposed amendments are self-explanatory. If made effective immediately, they will promote efficiency and facilitate the Commission’s core mission without imposing a new burden. For the above reasons, the notice requirements under 5 U.S.C. 553 are inapplicable. B. Regulatory Flexibility Act The Regulatory Flexibility Act (‘‘RFA’’), 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., requires agencies with rulemaking authority to consider the impact those rules will have on small businesses. With respect to persons seeking Commission review of final exchange and NFA decisions, and initial decisions in reparation and administrative enforcement matters, the amendments impose no additional burden and in fact ease existing burdens by providing more options, greater certainty and increased predictability concerning filing and service. Accordingly, the Chairman, on behalf of the Commission, hereby certifies, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), that the amendments will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small businesses.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The amendments to 17 CFR parts 10, 12 and 171 do not impose a burden within the meaning and intent of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq. D. Cost-Benefit Analysis
Section 15(a) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C.
19(a), requires the Commission to consider the costs and benefits of its action before issuing a new regulation. CEA section 15(a) further specifies that costs and benefits shall be evaluated in light of five broad areas of market and public concern: (1) Protection of market participants and the public; (2) efficiency, competitiveness, and financial integrity of futures markets; (3) price discovery; (4) sound risk management practices; and (5) other public interest considerations. The amendments to 17 CFR parts 10, 12 and 171 will not create any significant change in the Commission’s adjudicatory process. In fact, the amendments will enhance the protection of market participants and the public by making filing and service more certain, faster and cheaper. The amendments do not bear directly upon the risk-benefit factors, but reduce costs and increase the efficiency of litigation that arises pursuant to the operation of futures markets. List of Subjects 17 CFR Part 10 Administrative practice and procedure, Authority delegations (Government agencies), Commodity futures. 17 CFR Part 12 Administrative practice and procedure, Commodity futures, Consumer protection. 17 CFR Part 171 Administrative practice and procedure, Commodity futures. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission amends 17 CFR parts 10, 12 and 171 as follows:
PART 10—RULES OF PRACTICE
of part 3 of this chapter that refer to and grant authority to or impose obligations upon an Administrative Law Judge shall be read as referring to and granting authority to and imposing obligations upon the designated Presiding Officer.
(c) Briefs. An original of all briefs submitted under this section shall be filed with the Proceedings Clerk.
PART 12—RULES RELATING TO
REPARATIONS
Judgment Officer means an employee of the Commission who is authorized to conduct all reparations proceedings. In appropriate circumstances, the functions of a Judgment Officer may be performed by an Administrative Law Judge;
1155 21st Street NW., Washington, DC 20581; or faxing the document to (202) 418–5532; or emailing it to PROC_Filings@cftc.gov in accordance with the conditions set forth in paragraph (a)(2) of this section. (g) To be timely filed under this part, a document must be delivered in person; mailed by first-class or a more expeditious form of United States mail or by an overnight or similar commercial delivery service; or faxed or emailed to the Proceedings Clerk within the time prescribed for filing.
(a) To rule upon discovery-related motions, and to take such action pursuant to § 12.35 as is appropriate if a party fails to comply with a discovery order; (b) To issue orders for the production of documents and tangible things and orders for written testimony, as provided in § 12.34; (c) To issue subpoenas pursuant to § 12.34 and § 12.36;
PART 171—RULES RELATING TO
REVIEW OF NATIONAL FUTURES ASSOCIATION DECISIONS IN DISCIPLINARY, MEMBERSHIP DENIAL, REGISTRATION AND MEMBER RESPONSIBILITY ACTIONS
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 20, 2013, by the Commission. Melissa D. Jurgens, Secretary of the Commission. [FR Doc. 2013–04252 Filed 2–25–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6351–01–P
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
More like this from CFTC
CFTC published 2 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.
Source: Commodity Futures Trading Commission — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added · updated