Individual decision · SEC · 31 Jul 2009
The Division of Investment Management will not recommend enforcement action to the Commission against Maxim Series Fund, Inc., GW Capital Management LLC, Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company, and other participating insurance companies for violations of existing exemptive orders if these entities do not comply with the orders' terms and conditions. This non-enforcement assurance applies provided that the Fund, its adviser, and the participating insurance companies do not rely on the exemptions from Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a), and 15(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940. Instead, the entities must comply directly with the statutory requirements of those sections, including restrictions on purchaser types that the Fund intends to bypass.
Investment Company Act of 1940 — Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a) and 15(b) Maxim Series Fund, Inc., et al.
RESPONSE OF THE OFFICE OF INSURANCE PRODUCTS DIVISION OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
Maxim Series Fund, Inc., et al.
Based on the facts and representations in your letter dated July 31, 2009, and without necessarily agreeing with your legal analysis, we would not recommend enforcement action to the Commission against Maxim Series Fund, Inc. (the "Fund"); GW Capital Management LLC, doing business as Maxim Capital Management, LLC ("MCM"); Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company ("GWL&A") and its separate accounts participating in the Fund; and any other life insurance company and its separate accounts participating in the Fund (collectively with GWL&A and its separate accounts participating in the Fund, "Participating Insurance Companies") for violations of the terms and conditions of certain existing orders 1 granting exemptions from Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a), and 15(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, if the Fund, MCM, and the Participating Insurance Companies do not comply with the terms and conditions of the existing orders, provided that the Fund, MCM, and the Participating Insurance Companies do not rely on the exemptions. The Fund, MCM, and the Participating Insurance Companies will instead comply with Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a), and 15(b) of the Investment Company Act. The terms and conditions of the existing orders that the Fund does not intend to comply with include restrictions pertaining to the types of purchasers that can hold fund shares.
Because our position is based on the facts and representations in your letter, you should note that different facts or representations may require a different conclusion. Further, this response expresses the position of the Division on enforcement only and does not purport to express any legal conclusions on the issues presented.
Patrick F. Scott Senior Counsel
1
Maxim Series Fund, Inc., et al. , Investment Company Act Release Nos. 19616 (Aug. 6, 1993) (notice) and 19676 (Sept. 2, 1993) (order) (File No. 812-8392); Maxim Series Fund, Inc., et al. , Investment Company Act Release Nos. 23988 (Sept. 1, 1999) (notice) and 24057 (Sept. 28, 1999) (amended order) (File No. 812-11620).
Incoming Letter
The Incoming Letter is in Acrobat format.
http://www.sec.gov/divisions/investment/noaction/2009/maximseries073109.htm
JORDENBuR'r
1025 THOMAS JEFFERSON STREET, N.W.
SUITE 400 EAST
WASHINGTON, D.C. zooo7-5zo8
(zoz) 965-8IOO
FAx: (zoz) 965-81o4
Gary O. Cohen
(202) 965-8152
.oc)jordenusa.com
Ann B. Furman
(202) 965-8130 abf(?O.jorden usa.corn
777 BRICKELL AVENUE
SUITE 500
MIAMI, FL 3313I-Z8o3
(305) 37z-z6oo
FAx: (3o5) 37z-99z8
175 POWDER FOREST DRIVE
SUITE 301
SIMSBURY, CT 06089-9658
(860) 392-5000
FAx: (86o) 39z-5o58
Assistant Director
Office of Insurance Products
Division of hwestment Management
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549-6829
Re: Maxim Series Fund, Inc.
Dear Mr. Kotapish:
On behalf of Maxim Series Fund, Inc. (the "Fund"), GW Capital Management, LLC, doing business as Maxim Capital Management, LLC ("MCM"), Great-West Life & Almuity Insurance Company ("GWL&A") and its separate accounts participating in the Fund, and any other life insurance company and its separate account(s) participating in the Fund (collectively with GWL&A and its separate accounts participating in the Fund, "Participating Insurance Companies"), we are writing to request written assurance that the staff of the Division of Investment Management (the "Staff') will not recommend any enforcement action to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") for violations of the terms and conditions of certain orders granting exemptions from Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a) and 15(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act") ("existing exemptive orders") 1 if the Fund, MCM and Participating Insurance Companies do not comply with the terms and conditions of the existing exemptive orders, provided that the Fund, MCM and Participating Insurance Companies do not rely on the exemptions. The terms and conditions that the 1Maxim Series Fund, Inc., et al., Investment Company Act Release Nos. 19616 (Aug. 6, 1993) (notice) and 19676 (Sept. 2, 1993) (order) (File No. 812-8392); Mccxim Series Fund, lnc., et al., Investment Company Act Release Nos. 23988 (Sept. 1, 1999) (notice) and 24057 (Sept. 28, 1999) (order) (File No. 812-11620). JORDEN BURT LLP WW_TJ.JORDENBURT. COM
Jom ENBvm:
Fund does not intend to comply with include restrictions pertaining to the types of purchasers that can hold Fund shares. 2 Our request for no-action assurance begins with the proposition that the Fund, MCM and Participating Insurance Companies are not relying on the exemptions from Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a) and 15(b) of the 1940 Act. Reliance on the exemptions, of course, requires compliance with the terms and conditions of the existing exemptive orders. We would like your assurance that, if the Fund, MCM and Participating Insurance Companies forgo these exemptions, and instead comply with the terms of Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a) and 15(b) of the 1940 Act, each may do so without complying with the terms and conditions of the existing exemptive orders. Background The Fund is a Maryland corporation, registered with the Commission as an open-end management investment company under the 1940 Act. Portfolios of the Fund ("Portfolios") are available as investment options under variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies offered by Participating Insurance Companies. Portfolios also are available as investment options under qualified pension and retirement plans and may be available to other holders. Shares of the Portfolios are offered for sale pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the 1940 Act. 3 MCM serves as investment adviser to each Portfolio. MCM, a Colorado limited liability company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of GWL&A, is registered with the Commission as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. In 1993 and 1999 the Commission issued the existing exemptive orders to the Fund, MCM 4 and Participating Insurance Companies granting exemptions from 2 Changes in federal tax law have created the oppommity for the Fund to increase its asset base through the sale of Fund shares to college savings plans, among others holders, an opportunity the Fund intends to take without reliance on the exemptions granted by the existing exempfive orders or any new exemptive order. See 26 C.F.R. § 1.817-5(f)(3)(iv), (v) & (vi); Diversification Requirements for Variable Annuity, Endowment, andLife Insurance Contracts, Final Regulations, TD 9385, 73 Fed. Reg. 12263 (Mar. 7, 2008). 3 Maxim Series Fund, Inc., Registration Nos. 2-75503 and 811-03364. 4 GW Capital Management, LLC was an applicant under the existing exempfive orders prior to the time it started doing business as MCM. MCM is the same entity as GW Capital Management, LLC.
JORDENBURT
Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a) and 15(b) of the 1940 Act in cases where Fund shares are sold to and held by:
,, variable annuity and variable life insurance ("VLI") separate accounts of both affiliated and unaffiliated life insurance companies; and
JORDENBURT
The board of directors of the underlying fired must monitor for the existence of any material irreconcilable conflict among the interests of various variable insurance contract owners investing in the underlying fund, and the underlying fund's board of directors must determine what action, if any, should be taken in response to such conflicts; Participating insurance companies, the fund adviser, and qualified pension and retirement plans investing in an underlying fund must monitor for material irreconcilable conflicts, report any such conflicts to the underlying fund's board of directors and provide the board of directors with information that the board reasonably requests; O In the event of a material irreconcilable conflict, participating insurance companies must agree to any actions that the underlying fund's board of directors determines to take to resolve the conflict; and If a qualified pension or retirement plan invests in an underlying fired, it must agree to sign a participation agreement with the underlying fund if it owns 10 percent or more of the underlying fimd's assets and agree to take any actions that the underlying fund's board of directors determines to resolve a conflict. Discussion
Section 9(a) of the 1940 Act makes it unlawful for any company to serve as an
investment adviser or principal underwriter of any registered investment company if an affiliated person of that company is subject to disqualification as enumerated in Section 9(a)(1) or (2) of the 1940 Act. The existing exemptive orders provide exemptions from
Section 9(a) under certain circumstances, limiting the application of the eligibility
restrictions to affiliated individuals or companies that directly participate in management or administration of the underlying investment company. Sections 13(a), 15(a) and 15(b) of the 1940 Act require a vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities on certain matters. The existing exemptive orders provide exemptions from Sections 13(a), 15(a) and 15(b) of the 1940 Act to permit Participating Insurance Companies to disregard the voting instructions of contract owners with respect to shares of the underlying investment company in certain circumstances. A life insurance company that relies on the exemptions from Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a) and 15(b) of the 1940 Act granted by the mixed and shared funding
JORDENBuRT exemptive orders obtains exemptions in advance of the time that the exemptions are needed. The exemptions apply immediately for use in a future contingency that may never eventuate. Consequently, a life insurance company may choose not to rely on the exemptions from Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a) and 15(b) of the 1940 Act afforded by the mixed and shared funding exemptive orders and instead apply to the Commission for an exemptive order if and when the need arises. Conclusion The Fund, MCM and Participating Insurance Companies are not relying on the exemptions granted by the existing exemptive orders. The Fund does not intend to comply with the terms and conditions of the existing orders, including restrictions pertaining to the types of purchasers that can hold Fund shares. Based upon the foregoing, therefore, we respectfully request that the Staff recommend no enforcement action to the Commission for violations of the terms and conditions of the existing exemptive orders if the Fund, MCM and Participating Insurance Companies do not comply with the terms and conditions of the existing exemptive orders, provided that the Fund, MCM and Participating Insurance Companies do not rely on the exemptions from Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a) and 15(b) of the 1940 Act granted by the existing exemptive orders. We appreciate the Staff's consideration of this request. Should you need additional information or have any question regarding this request, please contact either one of the undersigned at the above numbers. CO: Andrew J. Donohue, Director Susan Nash, Associate Director Gary 2ohen Ann B. Furman
JOmsENBuRT
Zandra Bailes, Branch Chief
Patrick F. Scott, Senior Counsel
Division of Investment Management
Beverly A. Byrne, Esq.
Ryan L. Logsdon, Esq.
Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company
Josephine Cicchetti, Esq.
Jorden Burr LLP wdc#210636
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
The documents this one cites, and the documents that cite it.
“violations of the terms and conditions of certain orders granting exemptions from Sections 9(a), 13(a), 15(a) and 15(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act")”
“Shares of the Portfolios are offered for sale pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the 1940 Act.”
More like this from SEC
SEC published 7 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.
Source: Securities and Exchange Commission — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added · updated