Individual decision · SEC · 14 May 2004
The SEC staff confirms the withdrawal of the San Diego Chapter of the National Association of Investors Corporation's request for relief from enforcement action regarding a pilot project that matches prospective members with investment clubs. The staff noted that the proposal raised complex issues under federal securities laws and that the National Association of Investors Corporation's existing conditional exemption from broker-dealer registration does not extend to these proposed activities. Consequently, the staff indicated they would be unlikely to grant relief that would effectively expand the National Association of Investors Corporation's exemption.
May 14, 2004
Robert A. Carpenter, Director San Diego Chapter National Association of Investors Corporation 6576 Jackson Drive San Diego, CA 92119
Dear Mr. Carpenter:
In your letter of October 29, 2003 on behalf of the San Diego Chapter of the National Association of Investors Corporation ("San Diego Chapter"), you seek assurances that the staff would not recommend enforcement action to the Commission if the San Diego Chapter matches prospective members with investment clubs. Since that time, you have had two conversations with Brian Bussey, Assistant Chief Counsel of the Division of Market Regulation, Nina Mojiri-Azad, Special Counsel of the Division of Corporation Finance, and myself, regarding your request.
As we have discussed with you, your proposal raises a number of complex issues under the federal securities laws, including whether interests in the investment clubs are, themselves, securities. While private counsel may be in a position to explore these issues with you in detail, as a practical matter we note that the National Association of Investors Corporation currently has a conditional exemption from broker-dealer registration for limited activities. 1 This exemption does not extend to the San Diego Chapter's proposed activities, and the staff would be unlikely to grant relief that would effectively expand NAIC's exemption.
This letter confirms that you are withdrawing your request for relief. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 202-942-0073.
Sincerely,
Daniel Fisher Special Counsel
1
See Letter re: NAIC (June 1, 1979) (granting conditional two-year exemption from broker-dealer registration). The Commission extended the conditional exemption on May 28, 1981.
Incoming Letter:
The Incoming Letter is in Acrobat format.
NAIC
Investment Education Since 1951 www.better-investing.org San Diego Chapter
6576 Jackson Drive
San Diego, CA 92119
May 5, 2003
SEC Headquarters
450 Fifth Street NW
Washington, DC 20549
Dear Sir or Madam:
The San Diego Chapter of the National Association of Investors Corporation is conducting a trial project. The purpose of the project is to explore methods of increasing visitors at local Investment club meetings.
Our organizational mission includes a strong emphasis on teaching investment courses to members and the public. Many people hear of investment club activity and want to learn more about it. They are interested in exploring it first hand. The problem exists in that NAIC Chapters and clubs feel the SEC would disapprove of and punish any activity that provides club contact information to inquiring individuals.
The San Diego chapter is very willing and does provide information about starting a club to anyone that inquires. Yet a significant number of inquirers are obviously disappointed as they want to see a club in action before they make a decision about proceeding to club formation. But the chapter has felt constrained by past practices. Those practices include refusing direct contact information with clubs who may be willing to host guests but does include giving information about local “Blue Books”
The San Diego chapter does follow the national custom of providing loose leaf binders (Blue Books) wherein individuals can fill out sheets with personal information and express a desire to join a club as a member. The second book provides clubs an opportunity to show they are considering new members. These books are available at local chapter functions for anyone interested to read.
The current pilot project of the San Diego Chapter is designed to make a clear distinction between visiting a club and joining a club. Specific information is given about the due diligence that both the potential member and the club should exercise prior to any offer of membership. The second major difference is that rather than just toting Blue Books around the Chapter President maintains a file of individuals and clubs open to visitations. When a reasonable match is found the club is contacted and they may extend or not extend an invitation on the basis of their own decision and judgment.
The San Diego Chapter has reviewed the SEC literature on Investment Clubs and has
National Association of Investors Corporation
Investment Education for Individual Investors and Investment Clubs
formed the following opinions.
Investment clubs do not need to register with the SEC provided:
They do not have any passive members. (Any club with passive members is excluded from project participation. NAIC requires active participation by all members)
They do not have more than 100 members: (We know of no club with near that many members)
They do not intend to make a public offering: (we know of no club that intends to make a public offering.)
If any of the three conditions of the Investment Company Act of 1940 do not apply:
The club invests in securities. Applies
The club issues membership interests that are Securities. Does not apply. (No passive members are allowed) The club is not able to rely on an exclusion from the definition of investment company. Clubs cannot rely on any exclusion.
Enclosed you will find the forms used by the San Diego Chapter in the current Project and previous practices as well as some of the statements used by NAIC Regarding this subject.
The San Diego Chapter is working to make the Visitation project forms available on our Web site www.naicsd.org. where interested persons or clubs can download them. In the future we contemplate using public service announcements and other media to make the service more visible to the public.
Our question is: Do any of the activities of this pilot visitation project give rise to any SEC concern to the extent that we should not extend this effort beyond the trial period? Could the SEC consider this a “no action” situation?
Your comments and/or opinions on the above matters will be of great guidance and value to us and will be greatly appreciated.
Yours truly,
Robert A. Carpenter
President, San Diego Chapter NAIC
6576 Jackson Drive
San Diego, CA 92119
(619) 465 9156
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
The documents this one cites, and the documents that cite it.
“If any of the three conditions of the Investment Company Act of 1940 do not apply:”
More like this from SEC
SEC published 5 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.
Source: Securities and Exchange Commission — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added · updated