Rule · SEC · 18 Jan 2017 · 2017-00421
The Securities and Exchange Commission adopted a final rule to implement the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 by performing the first annual inflation adjustment for civil monetary penalties. This rule updates maximum penalty amounts for violations under the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and certain provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The adjusted penalties apply to violations occurring after November 2, 2015, and are effective as of January 18, 2017.
1Public Law 114–74 Sec. 701, 129 Stat. 599–601 (Nov. 2, 2015), codified at 28 U.S.C. 2461 note. 2Public Law 101–410, 104 Stat. 890–892 (1990), codified at 28 U.S.C. 2461 note. 3Public Law 104–134, Title III, § 31001(s)(1), 110 Stat. 1321–373 (1996), codified at 28 U.S.C. 2461 note. 4See Release Nos. 33–7361, 34–37912, IA–1596, IC–22310, dated November 1, 1996 (effective December 9, 1996), previously found at 17 CFR
201.1001 and Table I to Subpart E of Part 201;
Release Nos. 33–7946, 34–43897, IA–1921, IC– 24846, dated January 31, 2001 (effective February 2, 2001), previously found at 17 CFR 201.1002 and
Table II to Subpart E of Part 201; Release Nos. 33–
8530, 34–51136, IA–2348, IC–26748, dated February 9, 2005 (effective February 14, 2005), previously found at 17 CFR 201.1003 and Table III to Subpart E of Part 201; Release Nos. 33–9009, 34– 59449, IA–2845, IC–28635, dated February 25, 2009 (effective March 3, 2009), previously found at 17 Continued SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 17 CFR Part 201 [Release Nos. 33–10276; 34–79749; IA– 4599; IC–32414] Adjustments to Civil Monetary Penalty Amounts AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) is adopting a final rule to implement the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 (the ‘‘2015 Act’’), which amended the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 (the ‘‘Inflation Adjustment Act’’), as previously amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 (the ‘‘DCIA’’). The 2015 Act requires all agencies to annually adjust for inflation the civil monetary penalties that can be imposed under the statutes administered by the agency. Pursuant to this requirement, this final rule performs the first annual adjustment for inflation of the maximum amount of civil monetary penalties administered by the Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and certain penalties under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This adjustment will apply to all penalties imposed after the effective date of this final rule for violations after November 2, 2015. For violations that occurred on or before November 2, 2015, the Commission is reinstating the penalty amounts in the Commission’s prior penalty adjustments performed under the DCIA. DATES: Effective Date: January 18, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James A. Cappoli, Assistant General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, at (202) 551–7923, or Stephen M. Ng, Senior Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, at (202) 551–7957. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
This final rule implements the 2015 Act,1 which amended the Inflation Adjustment Act.2 The Inflation Adjustment Act previously had been amended by the DCIA 3 to require that each federal agency adopt regulations at least once every four years that adjust for inflation the civil monetary penalties (‘‘CMPs’’) that could be imposed under the statutes administered by the agency. Pursuant to the requirements of the DCIA, the Commission previously adopted regulations in 1996, 2001, 2005, 2009, and 2013 to adjust the maximum amount of the CMPs that could be imposed under the statutes the Commission administers.4
CFR 201.1004 and Table IV to Subpart E of Part 201; and Release Nos. 33–9387, 34–68994, IA–3557, IC– 30408, dated February 27, 2013 (effective March 5, 2013), previously found at 17 CFR 201.1005 and
Table V to Subpart E of Part 201. 5The 2015 Act also applies to minimum penalty
amounts and penalty ranges. See 28 U.S.C. 2461 note Sec. 5(a). All of the statutes administered by the Commission, however, only include maximum penalty amounts. Thus, in this final rule, we only refer to the effect of the 2015 Act on maximum penalty amounts. 6 28 U.S.C. 2461 note Sec. 4(b)(1); Office of Management and Budget, Implementation of the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 (February 24, 2016) (‘‘2016 OMB Guidance’’) at 1, available at https:// www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/ memoranda/2016/m-16-06.pdf. 7Release Nos. 33–10104; 34–78156; IA–4437; IC– 32162 (June 27, 2016). 8 28 U.S.C. 2461 note Sec. 4; 2016 OMB Guidance at 4. 9 28 U.S.C. 2461 note Sec. 3(2). 10 15 U.S.C. 7215(c)(4)(D). 11The Commission may by order affirm, modify, remand, or set aside sanctions, including civil monetary penalties, imposed by the PCAOB. See
Section 107(c) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
15 U.S.C. 7217. The Commission may enforce such orders in federal district court pursuant to Section 21(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As a result, penalties assessed by the PCAOB in its disciplinary proceedings are penalties ‘‘enforced’’ by the Commission for purposes of the Inflation Adjustment Act. See Adjustments to Civil Monetary Penalty Amounts, Release No. 33–8530 (Feb. 4,
2005) [70 FR 7606 (Feb. 14, 2005)].
12The 2015 Act provided that agencies could seek approval from OMB to reduce the amount of the catch-up adjustment required by the 2015 Act (a ‘‘reduced catch-up determination’’) if: (1) The otherwise required increase of the maximum amount of the CMPs administered by the agency would have a negative economic impact, or (2) the social costs of adopting the otherwise required increase of the maximum amount of these CMPs would outweigh the benefits. See 28 U.S.C. 2461 note Sec. 4(c); 2016 OMB Guidance at 3. As part of the June 2016 interim final rule, the Commission determined that it was not necessary to seek a reduced catch-up adjustment determination, but requested comments on whether the Commission should reconsider this decision. See Release No. 33–10104 at 8. The Commission did not receive any comments on this topic and the Commission affirms its decision not to seek a reduced catch-up adjustment determination. 13 28 U.S.C. 2461 note Sec. 5. 14Office of Management and Budget, Implementation of the 2017 Annual Adjustment Pursuant to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 (Dec. 16,
2016) (‘‘2017 OMB Guidance’’) at 1, available at
https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/ omb/memoranda/2017/m-17-11_0.pdf. 15 15 U.S.C. 78u–1(a)(3). The 2015 Act replaces the inflation adjustment mechanism prescribed in the DCIA with a new mechanism for calculating the inflation-adjusted amount of CMPs. Each agency was first required to use this new mechanism to adjust the maximum amount of its CMPs 5 in an initial ‘‘catch-up’’ adjustment.6 Pursuant to this requirement, the Commission issued an interim final rule adjusting its CMPs on June 27, 2016 (the ‘‘June 2016 interim final rule’’).7 After performing the catchup adjustment, each agency must now perform annual adjustments for inflation, and publish these adjustments in the Federal Register by January 15 of each calendar year.8 A CMP is defined in relevant part as any penalty, fine, or other sanction that:
(1) Is for a specific amount, or has a maximum amount, as provided by federal law; and (2) is assessed or enforced by an agency in an administrative proceeding or by a federal court pursuant to federal law.9 This definition applies to the monetary penalty provisions contained in four statutes administered by the Commission: The Securities Act of 1933; the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Exchange Act’’); the Investment Company Act of 1940; and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 provides the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the ‘‘PCAOB’’) authority to levy civil monetary penalties in its disciplinary proceedings pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 7215(c)(4)(D).10 The definition of a CMP in the Inflation Adjustment Act encompasses such civil monetary penalties.11
II. Adjusting the Commission’s Penalty
Amounts for Inflation
This final rule implements the first of the required annual adjustments under the 2015 Act for all penalties under the Securities Act, the Exchange Act, the Investment Company Act, and the Investment Advisers Act, and certain penalties under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. As the baseline in calculating these new penalty amounts, the Commission uses the penalty amounts in the Commission’s June 2016 interim final rule. The penalty amounts in that interim final rule used the new inflation adjustment mechanism in the 2015 Act as part of the ‘‘catch-up adjustment’’ required by that Act. The Commission affirms that the amounts in the June 2016 interim final rule were correct and that the adjusted amounts were appropriate.12 Pursuant to the 2015 Act, the Commission now adjusts the penalty amounts in the June 2016 interim final rule by multiplying these amounts by the percentage change between the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (‘‘CPI–U’’) for October 2015, and the October 2016 CPI–U.13 OMB has provided its calculation of this multiplier (the ‘‘CPI–U Multiplier’’) to agencies.14 After multiplying the June 2016 interim final rule amounts by this multiplier, the Commission must round all penalty amounts to the nearest dollar to determine the new inflation-adjusted penalty amounts. For example, the CMP for certain insider trading violations by controlling persons under Exchange Act Section 21A(a)(3) 15 was readjusted for inflation on August 1, 2016, to $1,978,690. To determine the new CMP under this provision, the Commission multiplies the current CMP by the CPI–U Multiplier of 1.01636, and rounds to the nearest dollar. Thus, the new CMP for Exchange Act Section 21A(a)(3) is $2,011,061. Below is the Commission’s calculation of the new penalty amounts for the penalties it administers. U.S. code citation Civil monetary penalty description Penalty amounts in June 2016 interim final rule CPI–U multiplier New adjusted penalty amounts 15 U.S.C. 77h–1(g) (Securities Act Sec. 8A(g)).
For natural person ....................................................
For any other person ................................................
$8,156
81,559
1.01636
1.01636
$8,289
82,893
For any other person/fraud ....................................... 407,794 1.01636 414,466 For natural person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others or gains to self. 163,118 1.01636 165,787 For any other person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others or gain to self. 788,401 1.01636 801,299 15 U.S.C. 77t(d) (Securities Act Sec. 20(d)).
For natural person ....................................................
For any other person ................................................
8,908
89,078
1.01636
1.01636
9,054
90,535
For natural person/fraud ........................................... 89,078 1.01636 90,535 For any other person/fraud ....................................... 445,390 1.01636 452,677
U.S. code citation Civil monetary penalty description Penalty amounts in June 2016 interim final rule CPI–U multiplier New adjusted penalty amounts For natural person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others. 178,156 1.01636 181,071 For any other person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others. 890,780 1.01636 905,353 15 U.S.C. 78u(d)(3) (Exchange Act Sec. 21(d)(3)).
For natural person ....................................................
For any other person ................................................
8,908
89,078
1.01636
1.01636
9,054
90,535
For natural person/fraud ........................................... 89,078 1.01636 90,535 For any other person/fraud ....................................... 445,390 1.01636 452,677 For natural person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others or gains to self. 178,156 1.01636 181,071 For any other person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others or gain to self. 890,780 1.01636 905,353 15 U.S.C. 78u–1(a)(3) (Exchange Act Sec. 21A(a)(3)). Insider Trading—controlling person .......................... 1,978,690 1.01636 2,011,061 15 U.S.C. 78u–2 (Exchange Act Sec. 21B).
For natural person ....................................................
For any other person ................................................
8,908
89,078
1.01636
1.01636
9,054
90,535
For natural person/fraud ........................................... 89,078 1.01636 90,535 For any other person/fraud ....................................... 445,390 1.01636 452,677 For natural person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others. 178,156 1.01636 181,071 For any other person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others. 890,780 1.01636 905,353 15 U.S.C. 78ff(b) (Exchange Act Sec. 32(b)). Exchange Act/failure to file information documents, reports. 525 1.01636 534 15 U.S.C. 78ff(c)(1)(B) (Exchange Act Sec. 32(c)(1)(B)). Foreign Corrupt Practices—any issuer ..................... 19,787 1.01636 20,111 15 U.S.C. 78ff(c)(2)(B) (Exchange Act Sec. 32(c)(2)(B)). Foreign Corrupt Practices—any agent or stockholder acting on behalf of issuer. 19,787 1.01636 20,111 15 U.S.C. 80a–9(d) (Investment Company Act Sec. 9(d)).
For natural person ....................................................
For any other person ................................................
8,908
89,078
1.01636
1.01636
9,054
90,535
For natural person/fraud ........................................... 89,078 1.01636 90,535 For any other person/fraud ....................................... 445,390 1.01636 452,677 For natural person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others or gains to self. 178,156 1.01636 181,071 For any other person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others or gain to self. 890,780 1.01636 905,353 15 U.S.C. 80a–41(e) (Investment Company Act Sec. 42(e)).
For natural person ....................................................
For any other person ................................................
8,908
89,078
1.01636
1.01636
9,054
90,535
For natural person/fraud ........................................... 89,078 1.01636 90,535 For any other person/fraud ....................................... 445,390 1.01636 452,677 For natural person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others. 178,156 1.01636 181,071 For any other person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others. 890,780 1.01636 905,353 15 U.S.C. 80b–3(i) (Investment Advisers Act Sec. 203(i)).
For natural person ....................................................
For any other person ................................................
8,908
89,078
1.01636
1.01636
9,054
90,535
For natural person/fraud ........................................... 89,078 1.01636 90,535 For any other person/fraud ....................................... 445,390 1.01636 452,677 For natural person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others or gains to self. 178,156 1.01636 181,071 For any other person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others or gain to self. 890,780 1.01636 905,353 15 U.S.C. 80b–9(e) (Investment Advisers Act Sec. 209(e)).
For natural person ....................................................
For any other person ................................................
8,908
89,078
1.01636
1.01636
9,054
90,535
For natural person/fraud ........................................... 89,078 1.01636 90,535 For any other person/fraud ....................................... 445,390 1.01636 452,677 For natural person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others. 178,156 1.01636 181,071 For any other person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others. 890,780 1.01636 905,353 15 U.S.C. 7215(c)(4)(D)(i) (SarbanesOxley Act Sec. 105(c)(4)(D)(i)).
For natural person ....................................................
For any other person ................................................
131,185
2,623,700
1.01636
1.01636
133,331
2,666,624
15 U.S.C. 7215(c)(4)(D)(ii) (SarbanesOxley Act Sec. 105(c)(4)(D)(ii)).
For natural person ....................................................
For any other person ................................................
983,888
19,677,750
1.01636
1.01636
999,984
19,999,678
Pursuant to the 2015 Act, the Commission has determined that the adjusted penalty amounts in this final rule (and all penalty adjustments performed pursuant to the 2015 Act) will apply to penalties imposed after the effective date of the adjustment for violations that occurred after November 2, 2015, the 2015 Act’s enactment date.
16One commenter to the June 2016 interim final rule requested that the Commission re-evaluate the application of the adjusted penalty amounts included in that interim final rule to violations that occurred before the enactment of the 2015 Act (see Ltr. from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Aug. 15, 2016). Our determination to apply the penalty amounts in this final rule to violations that occurred after November 2, 2015, renders the commenter’s request moot. As explained below, the penalty amounts in this final rule supersede the penalty amounts in the June 2016 interim final rule. 17 28 U.S.C. 2461 note Sec. 4(a)(2); 2017 OMB Guidance at 3. 18The Web site will also list the penalty amounts for violations that occurred on or before November 2, 2015. 19 28 U.S.C. 2461 note Sec. 4(a). 20 28 U.S.C. 2461 note Sec. 4(b)(2). 21 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B). This finding also satisfies the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 808(2), allowing the amendment to become effective notwithstanding the requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 (if a federal agency finds that notice and public comment are impractical, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest, a rule shall take effect at such time as the federal agency promulgating the rule determines). 22 5 U.S.C. 603. 23 44 U.S.C. 3501 et. seq. 24The Commission did not receive any comments on the economic analysis in the June 2016 interim final rule. 25 15 U.S.C. 78u–1(a)(2). 26For example, 15 U.S.C. 77t(d)(2)(A), after adjusting for inflation as required by the 2015 Act, provides that the amount of the penalty shall not exceed the greater of $9,054 for a natural person or $90,535 for any other person, or the gross amount of pecuniary gain to such defendant as a result of the violation. Consistent with this determination, the Commission is reinstating the penalty amounts contained in its prior penalty adjustments under the DCIA for violations that occurred from December 10, 1996, through November 2, 2015.16 The Commission’s prior penalty adjustments under the DCIA were previously included in the Code of Federal Regulations at 17 CFR 201.1001through 1005 and Tables I through V to Subpart E. In the June 2016 interim final rule, Section 201.1001 and
Table I were replaced with the new
penalty amounts from the interim final rule, and Sections 201.1002 through
201.1005 and Tables II to V were
removed. As part of this final rule, the information in these tables will be added back into the Code of Federal Regulations. However, for ease of reference, the information in these tables will be consolidated and included in a single section (17 CFR 201.1001(a)) and Table (Table I to Section 201.1001). Further, each penalty adjustment performed pursuant to the 2015 Act supersedes the prior adjustments under that Act. Thus, the penalty amounts in this final rule supersede the amounts in the June 2016 interim final rule (except that for the first day this final rule is effective, the prior year’s penalty amounts shall apply, see 28 U.S.C. 2461 note Sec. 6). Because of this, the amounts in the June 2016 interim final rule will be removed from the Code of Federal Regulations. The penalty amounts in this final rule, however, need only be published in the Federal Register and will not be added to the Code of Federal Regulations, in accordance with the 2015 Act and OMB guidance.17 As a result, the Commission is amending 17 CFR 201.1001 to add subsection (b) to indicate that all penalty adjustments performed under the 2015 Act will be published in the Federal Register and will be made available on the Commission’s Web site.18 This framework will avoid the necessity of revising the Code of Federal Regulations every year to include the new inflation-adjusted penalty amounts.
Section 201.1001(b) will also clarify that
penalty adjustments performed pursuant to the 2015 Act will only apply to violations that occurred after November 2, 2015, the enactment date of the 2015 Act.
III. Procedural and Other Matters
The Commission is required by the 2015 Act to adjust the CMPs within its jurisdiction for inflation using a statutorily prescribed formula and the 2015 Act mandates that agencies perform this adjustment annually by January 15th of each year.19 The 2015 Act further provides that these annual adjustments shall be made ‘‘notwithstanding section 553 of title 5, United States Code.’’ 20 In light of this Congressional mandate, the Commission is not required to provide for public notice and comment pursuant to the notice and comment provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act.21 Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, a regulatory flexibility analysis is required only when an agency must publish a general notice of proposed rulemaking.22 Because public notice and comment is not required for this final rule, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required. Further, this rule does not contain any collection of information requirements as defined by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 as amended.23
IV. Economic Analysis 24
The Commission is sensitive to the costs and benefits that result from its rules. This regulation merely adjusts CMPs for inflation as required by the 2015 Act. It has no impact on disclosure or compliance costs. The Commission further notes that the CMPs ordered in SEC proceedings and PCAOB disciplinary proceedings in fiscal year 2016 totaled approximately $1.28 billion. The inflationary adjustment required by the 2015 Act results in the increase of the maximum amount of the CMPs administered by the Commission of 1.636%. Assuming that the Commission is successful in obtaining civil monetary penalties in fiscal year 2017 in similar proportion to that obtained in fiscal year 2016, the inflationary adjustment pursuant to this final rule would result in an increase in the CMPs ordered of approximately $21 million. This potential increase, however, overstates the effect of the rule. First, this figure represents the amount of penalties that could be potentially ordered, whereas the amount of penalties collected in any given year— the amount of penalties that would affect the economy—can be lower than the ordered amount. Second, the adjusted penalty amounts will not apply to all penalties ordered, but rather only to those penalties whose associated violations occurred after November 2,
2015. Third, penalties imposed in
insider trading cases brought in district court are based on the profit gained or loss avoided as a result of the violation rather than by reference to a statutory dollar amount that is affected by this regulation.25 The average annual amount of penalties obtained in insider trading cases from FY 2010 through FY 2016 is $95.7 million. Third, in many cases where the Commission has obtained large civil monetary penalties, such penalties were calculated on the basis of the defendant’s gross pecuniary gain rather than the maximum penalty dollar amount set by statute that will be adjusted by the proposed rule.26 In addition, the intent of the new regulation is merely to keep pace with changes in the economy, not to impose new costs. Therefore, for the instances in which CMPs affected by this rulemaking are imposed, the Commission does not believe that adjusting civil monetary penalties pursuant to the 2015 Act will significantly affect the amount of penalties it obtains beyond that necessary to keep pace with inflation. The benefit provided by the inflationary adjustment to the maximum CMPs is that of maintaining the level of deterrence effectuated by the CMPs, and not allowing such deterrent effect to be diminished by inflation. The costs of implementing this rule should be negligible because the only change from the current, baseline situation is determining potential penalties using a new maximum dollar amount.
V. Statutory Basis
The Commission is adopting these revisions to 17 CFR part 201, subpart E pursuant to the directives and authority of the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990, Public Law 101–410, 104 Stat. 890–892 (1990), codified at 28 U.S.C. 2461 note, as amended. List of Subjects in 17 CFR Part 201 Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Confidential business information, Lawyers, Penalties, Securities. Text of Amendment For the reasons set forth in the preamble, part 201, title 17, chapter II of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 201—RULES OF PRACTICE
Subpart E—Adjustment of Civil Monetary Penalties
TABLE I TO 201.1001—CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY INFLATION ADJUSTMENTS FOR VIOLATIONS FROM DECEMBER 10, 1996,
THROUGH NOVEMBER 2, 2015—Continued U.S. Code citation Civil monetary penalty description Date of violation and corresponding penalty Dec. 10, 1996– Feb. 2, 2001 i Feb. 3, 2001– Feb. 14, 2005 ii Feb. 15, 2005– Mar. 3, 2009 iii Mar. 4, 2009– Mar. 5, 2013 iv Mar. 6, 2013– Nov. 2, 2015 v For natural person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others or gains to self. 110,000 120,000 130,000 150,000 160,000 For any other person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others or gain to self. 550,000 600,000 650,000 725,000 775,000 15 U.S.C. 78u–1(a)(3) (Exchange Act Sec. 21A(a)(3)). Insider Trading—controlling person. 1,100,000 1,200,000 1,275,000 1,425,000 1,525,000 15 U.S.C. 78u–2 (Exchange Act Sec. 21B).
For natural person .....................
For any other person ................
5,500
55,000
6,500
60,000
6,500
65,000
7,500
75,000
7,500
80,000
For natural person/fraud ........... 55,000 60,000 65,000 75,000 80,000 For any other person/fraud ....... 275,000 300,000 325,000 375,000 400,000 For natural person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others. 110,000 120,000 130,000 150,000 160,000 For any other person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others. 550,000 600,000 650,000 725,000 775,000 15 U.S.C. 78ff(b) (Exchange Act Sec. 32(b)). Exchange Act/failure to file information documents, reports. 110 210 15 U.S.C. 78ff(c)(1)(B) (Exchange Act Sec. 32(c)(1)(B)). Foreign Corrupt Practices—any issuer. 11,000 16,000 16,000 15 U.S.C. 78ff(c)(2)(B) (Exchange Act Sec. 32(c)(2)(B)). Foreign Corrupt Practices—any agent or stockholder acting on behalf of issuer. 11,000 16,000 16,000 15 U.S.C. 80a–9(d) (Investment Company Act Sec. 9(d)).
For natural person .....................
For any other person ................
5,500
55,000
6,500
60,000
6,500
65,000
7,500
75,000
7,500
80,000
For natural person/fraud ........... 55,000 60,000 65,000 75,000 80,000 For any other person/fraud ....... 275,000 300,000 325,000 375,000 400,000 For natural person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others or gains to self. 110,000 120,000 130,000 150,000 160,000 For any other person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others or gain to self. 550,000 600,000 650,000 725,000 775,000 15 U.S.C. 80a–41(e) (Investment Company Act Sec. 42(e)).
For natural person .....................
For any other person ................
5,500
55,000
6,500
60,000
6,500
65,000
7,500
75,000
7,500
80,000
For natural person/fraud ........... 55,000 60,000 65,000 75,000 80,000 For any other person/fraud ....... 275,000 300,000 325,000 375,000 400,000 For natural person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others. 110,000 120,000 130,000 150,000 160,000 For any other person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others. 550,000 600,000 650,000 725,000 775,000 15 U.S.C. 80b–3(i) (Investment Advisers Act Sec. 203(i)).
For natural person .....................
For any other person ................
5,500
55,000
6,500
60,000
6,500
65,000
7,500
75,000
7,500
80,000
For natural person/fraud ........... 55,000 60,000 65,000 75,000 80,000 For any other person/fraud ....... 275,000 300,000 325,000 375,000 400,000 For natural person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others or gains to self. 110,000 120,000 130,000 150,000 160,000 For any other person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others or gain to self. 550,000 600,000 650,000 725,000 775,000 15 U.S.C. 80b–9(e) (Investment Advisers Act Sec. 209(e)).
For natural person .....................
For any other person ................
5,500
55,000
6,500
60,000
6,500
65,000
7,500
75,000
7,500
80,000
For natural person/fraud ........... 55,000 60,000 65,000 75,000 80,000 For any other person/fraud ....... 275,000 300,000 325,000 375,000 400,000 For natural person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others. 110,000 120,000 130,000 150,000 160,000 For any other person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others. 550,000 600,000 650,000 725,000 775,000 15 U.S.C. 7215(c)(4)(D)(i) (Sarbanes-Oxley Act Sec. 105(c)(4)(D)(i)).
For natural person .....................
For any other person ................
N/A
N/A vii 100,000 vii 2,000,000 110,000 2,100,000 120,000 2,375,000 130,000 2,525,000
TABLE I TO 201.1001—CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY INFLATION ADJUSTMENTS FOR VIOLATIONS FROM DECEMBER 10, 1996,
THROUGH NOVEMBER 2, 2015—Continued U.S. Code citation Civil monetary penalty description Date of violation and corresponding penalty Dec. 10, 1996– Feb. 2, 2001 i Feb. 3, 2001– Feb. 14, 2005 ii Feb. 15, 2005– Mar. 3, 2009 iii Mar. 4, 2009– Mar. 5, 2013 iv Mar. 6, 2013– Nov. 2, 2015 v 15 U.S.C. 7215(c)(4)(D)(ii) (Sarbanes-Oxley Act Sec. 105(c)(4)(D)(ii)).
For natural person .....................
For any other person ................
N/A
N/A vii 750,000 vii 15,000,000 800,000 15,825,000 900,000 17,800,000 950,000 18,925,000 i Release Nos. 33–7361, 34–37912, IA–1596, IC–22310, dated November 1, 1996 (effective December 9, 1996), previously found at 17 CFR 201.1001 and Table I to Subpart E of Part 201. ii Release Nos. 33–7946, 34–43897, IA–1921, IC–24846, dated January 31, 2001 (effective February 2, 2001), previously found at 17 CFR 201.1002 and Table II to Subpart E of Part 201. iii Release Nos. 33–8530, 34–51136, IA–2348, IC–26748, dated February 9, 2005 (effective February 14, 2005), previously found at 17 CFR 201.1003 and Table III to Subpart E of Part 201. iv Release Nos. 33–9009, 34–59449, IA–2845, IC–28635, dated February 25, 2009 (effective March 3, 2009), previously found at 17 CFR 201.1004 and Table IV to Subpart E of Part 201. v Release Nos. 33–9387, 34–68994, IA–3557, IC–30408, dated February 27, 2013 (effective March 5, 2013), previously found at 17 CFR 201.1005 and Table V to Subpart E of Part 201. viEffective from July 21, 2010 (enactment of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Pub. L. 111–203), through March 5, 2013. viiEffective from July 30, 2002 (enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Pub. L. 107–204), through February 14, 2005. By the Commission. January 6, 2017. Brent J. Fields, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2017–00421 Filed 1–13–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
This document supersedes: Adjustments to Civil Monetary Penalty Amounts
More like this from SEC
SEC published 7 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.
Source: Securities and Exchange Commission — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added · updated